TSTP Solution File: SWV675-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV675-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:06 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.58s 0.84s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_not__less__eq__eq_1,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_nat)
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Suc(X2),X1,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1BK1KxAFhO/E---3.1_26291.p',cls_not__less__eq__eq_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(c_Suc(v_y),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1BK1KxAFhO/E---3.1_26291.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_le0_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X1,tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1BK1KxAFhO/E---3.1_26291.p',cls_le0_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_nat)
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Suc(X2),X1,tc_nat) ),
cls_not__less__eq__eq_1 ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(c_Suc(v_y),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_nat),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_lessequals(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X1,tc_nat),
cls_le0_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.26 % Problem : SWV675-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.27 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.27/0.48 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.27/0.48 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.27/0.48 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.27/0.48 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.27/0.48 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.27/0.48 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.27/0.48 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.27/0.48 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:12:07 EDT 2023
% 0.27/0.48 % CPUTime :
% 0.58/0.73 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.58/0.73 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1BK1KxAFhO/E---3.1_26291.p
% 0.58/0.84 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.58/0.84 # Preprocessing class: FMLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.58/0.84 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.58/0.84 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 900s (3) cores
% 0.58/0.84 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.58/0.84 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.58/0.84 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.84 # new_bool_3 with pid 26371 completed with status 0
% 0.58/0.84 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.58/0.84 # Preprocessing class: FMLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.58/0.84 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.58/0.84 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 900s (3) cores
% 0.58/0.84 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.58/0.84 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.58/0.84 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.58/0.84 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.58/0.84 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 50s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.84 # Starting new_bool_3 with 61s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.84 # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 26374 completed with status 0
% 0.58/0.84 # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.58/0.84 # Preprocessing class: FMLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.58/0.84 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.58/0.84 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 900s (3) cores
% 0.58/0.84 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.58/0.84 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.58/0.84 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.58/0.84 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.58/0.84 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 50s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.84 # Preprocessing time : 0.029 s
% 0.58/0.84
% 0.58/0.84 # Proof found!
% 0.58/0.84 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.58/0.84 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.58/0.84 # Parsed axioms : 1389
% 0.58/0.84 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 634
% 0.58/0.84 # Initial clauses : 755
% 0.58/0.84 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.58/0.84 # Initial clauses in saturation : 755
% 0.58/0.84 # Processed clauses : 49
% 0.58/0.84 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.58/0.84 # ...subsumed : 7
% 0.58/0.84 # ...remaining for further processing : 39
% 0.58/0.84 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.58/0.84 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.58/0.84 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.58/0.84 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.58/0.84 # Generated clauses : 7
% 0.58/0.84 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.58/0.84 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.58/0.84 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.58/0.84 # Paramodulations : 6
% 0.58/0.84 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.58/0.84 # NegExts : 0
% 0.58/0.84 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.58/0.84 # Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.58/0.84 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.58/0.84 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.58/0.84 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.58/0.84 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.58/0.84 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.58/0.84 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.58/0.84 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.58/0.84 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.58/0.84 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.58/0.84 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.58/0.84 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.58/0.84 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.58/0.84 # Current number of processed clauses : 37
% 0.58/0.84 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 18
% 0.58/0.84 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.58/0.84 # Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.58/0.84 # Non-unit-clauses : 12
% 0.58/0.84 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 707
% 0.58/0.84 # ...number of literals in the above : 2474
% 0.58/0.84 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.58/0.84 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.58/0.84 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 25
% 0.58/0.84 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23
% 0.58/0.84 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.58/0.84 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.58/0.84 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.58/0.84 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.58/0.84 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.58/0.84 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.58/0.84 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.58/0.84 # Termbank termtop insertions : 27217
% 0.58/0.84
% 0.58/0.84 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.84 # User time : 0.041 s
% 0.58/0.84 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.58/0.84 # Total time : 0.051 s
% 0.58/0.84 # Maximum resident set size: 3580 pages
% 0.58/0.84
% 0.58/0.84 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.84 # User time : 0.111 s
% 0.58/0.84 # System time : 0.014 s
% 0.58/0.84 # Total time : 0.125 s
% 0.58/0.84 # Maximum resident set size: 2656 pages
% 0.58/0.84 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.58/0.84 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------