TSTP Solution File: SWV632-1 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : SWV632-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 23:05:41 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 142.34s 18.66s
% Output   : Proof 142.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWV632-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 06:25:25 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 142.34/18.66  Command-line arguments: --kbo-weight0 --lhs-weight 5 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --goal-heuristic
% 142.34/18.66  
% 142.34/18.66  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 142.34/18.66  
% 142.34/18.66  % SZS output start Proof
% 142.34/18.66  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 142.34/18.66    fof(cls_conjecture_0, negated_conjecture, c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)), tc_nat), v_m, tc_nat)), c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_i, c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)), tc_nat), v_j, tc_nat), tc_nat), tc_Complex_Ocomplex)!=c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_m), c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_i, v_j, tc_nat), tc_Complex_Ocomplex)).
% 142.34/18.66    fof(cls_nat__mult__assoc_0, axiom, ![V_n, V_m, V_k]: c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(V_m, V_n, tc_nat), V_k, tc_nat)=c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(V_m, c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(V_n, V_k, tc_nat), tc_nat)).
% 142.34/18.66    fof(cls_nat__mult__commute_0, axiom, ![V_n2, V_m2]: c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(V_m2, V_n2, tc_nat)=c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(V_n2, V_m2, tc_nat)).
% 142.34/18.66    fof(cls_numeral__2__eq__2_0, axiom, c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)), tc_nat)=c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)))).
% 142.34/18.66    fof(cls_pos2_0, axiom, c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat), c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)), tc_nat), tc_nat)).
% 142.34/18.66    fof(cls_root__cancel_0, axiom, ![V_d, V_n2, V_k2]: (c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(V_d, V_n2, tc_nat)), c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(V_d, V_k2, tc_nat), tc_Complex_Ocomplex)=c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(V_n2), V_k2, tc_Complex_Ocomplex) | ~c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat), V_d, tc_nat))).
% 142.34/18.66  
% 142.34/18.66  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 142.34/18.66  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 142.34/18.66  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 142.34/18.66    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 142.34/18.66    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 142.34/18.66  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 142.34/18.66  variables of u and v.
% 142.34/18.66  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 142.34/18.66  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 142.34/18.66  
% 142.34/18.66  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 142.34/18.66  
% 142.34/18.66  Axiom 1 (cls_nat__mult__commute_0): c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X, Y, tc_nat) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(Y, X, tc_nat).
% 142.34/18.66  Axiom 2 (cls_numeral__2__eq__2_0): c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)), tc_nat) = c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))).
% 142.34/18.66  Axiom 3 (cls_nat__mult__assoc_0): c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X, Y, tc_nat), Z, tc_nat) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X, c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(Y, Z, tc_nat), tc_nat).
% 142.34/18.66  Axiom 4 (cls_root__cancel_0): fresh225(X, X, Y, Z, W) = c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(Z), W, tc_Complex_Ocomplex).
% 142.34/18.66  Axiom 5 (cls_pos2_0): c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat), c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)), tc_nat), tc_nat) = true2.
% 142.34/18.67  Axiom 6 (cls_root__cancel_0): fresh225(c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat), X, tc_nat), true2, X, Y, Z) = c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X, Y, tc_nat)), c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X, Z, tc_nat), tc_Complex_Ocomplex).
% 142.34/18.67  
% 142.34/18.67  Goal 1 (cls_conjecture_0): c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)), tc_nat), v_m, tc_nat)), c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_i, c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)), tc_nat), v_j, tc_nat), tc_nat), tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_m), c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_i, v_j, tc_nat), tc_Complex_Ocomplex).
% 142.34/18.67  Proof:
% 142.34/18.67    c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)), tc_nat), v_m, tc_nat)), c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_i, c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)), tc_nat), v_j, tc_nat), tc_nat), tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
% 142.34/18.67  = { by axiom 2 (cls_numeral__2__eq__2_0) }
% 142.34/18.67    c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))), v_m, tc_nat)), c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_i, c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)), tc_nat), v_j, tc_nat), tc_nat), tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
% 142.34/18.67  = { by axiom 2 (cls_numeral__2__eq__2_0) }
% 142.34/18.67    c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))), v_m, tc_nat)), c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_i, c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))), v_j, tc_nat), tc_nat), tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
% 142.34/18.67  = { by axiom 3 (cls_nat__mult__assoc_0) R->L }
% 142.34/18.67    c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))), v_m, tc_nat)), c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_i, c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))), tc_nat), v_j, tc_nat), tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
% 142.34/18.67  = { by axiom 1 (cls_nat__mult__commute_0) }
% 142.34/18.67    c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))), v_m, tc_nat)), c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_j, c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_i, c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))), tc_nat), tc_nat), tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
% 142.34/18.67  = { by axiom 3 (cls_nat__mult__assoc_0) R->L }
% 142.34/18.67    c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))), v_m, tc_nat)), c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_j, v_i, tc_nat), c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))), tc_nat), tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
% 142.34/18.67  = { by axiom 1 (cls_nat__mult__commute_0) R->L }
% 142.34/18.67    c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))), v_m, tc_nat)), c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_i, v_j, tc_nat), c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))), tc_nat), tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
% 142.34/18.67  = { by axiom 1 (cls_nat__mult__commute_0) }
% 142.34/18.67    c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))), v_m, tc_nat)), c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))), c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_i, v_j, tc_nat), tc_nat), tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
% 142.34/18.67  = { by axiom 6 (cls_root__cancel_0) R->L }
% 142.34/18.67    fresh225(c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat), c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))), tc_nat), true2, c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))), v_m, c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_i, v_j, tc_nat))
% 142.34/18.67  = { by axiom 2 (cls_numeral__2__eq__2_0) R->L }
% 142.34/18.67    fresh225(c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat), c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)), tc_nat), tc_nat), true2, c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))), v_m, c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_i, v_j, tc_nat))
% 142.34/18.67  = { by axiom 5 (cls_pos2_0) }
% 142.34/18.67    fresh225(true2, true2, c_Suc(c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))), v_m, c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_i, v_j, tc_nat))
% 142.34/18.67  = { by axiom 4 (cls_root__cancel_0) }
% 142.34/18.67    c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_m), c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_i, v_j, tc_nat), tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
% 142.34/18.67  % SZS output end Proof
% 142.34/18.67  
% 142.34/18.67  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------