TSTP Solution File: SWV629-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWV629-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:07:33 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 11 ( 6 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_root__unity_0,axiom,
c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(X1),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BDCx8xMNkE/E---3.1_13013.p',cls_root__unity_0) ).
cnf(cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I33_J_0,axiom,
( c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),X1) = X2
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BDCx8xMNkE/E---3.1_13013.p',cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I33_J_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BDCx8xMNkE/E---3.1_13013.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat)) != c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BDCx8xMNkE/E---3.1_13013.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(X1),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
cls_root__unity_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
( c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),X1) = X2
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I33_J_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat)) != c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWV629-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:12:57 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.50 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BDCx8xMNkE/E---3.1_13013.p
% 0.20/0.53 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.53 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53 # sh5l with pid 13127 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.53 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.53 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.53 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.53 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.53 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53 # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 13135 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.53 # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.20/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.53 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.53 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.53 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.53 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.53 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.53 # Parsed axioms : 389
% 0.20/0.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 38
% 0.20/0.53 # Initial clauses : 351
% 0.20/0.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 351
% 0.20/0.53 # Processed clauses : 144
% 0.20/0.53 # ...of these trivial : 9
% 0.20/0.53 # ...subsumed : 23
% 0.20/0.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 112
% 0.20/0.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.53 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.53 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.20/0.53 # Generated clauses : 173
% 0.20/0.53 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 88
% 0.20/0.53 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.53 # Paramodulations : 170
% 0.20/0.53 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.53 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.53 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.20/0.53 # Total rewrite steps : 79
% 0.20/0.53 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.53 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.53 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.53 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.53 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.53 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.53 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53 # Current number of processed clauses : 108
% 0.20/0.53 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 49
% 0.20/0.53 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.20/0.53 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.20/0.53 # Non-unit-clauses : 54
% 0.20/0.53 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 295
% 0.20/0.53 # ...number of literals in the above : 709
% 0.20/0.53 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.53 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.20/0.53 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 580
% 0.20/0.53 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 383
% 0.20/0.53 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 22
% 0.20/0.53 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.20/0.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 35
% 0.20/0.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 22
% 0.20/0.53 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.53 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8520
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53 # User time : 0.017 s
% 0.20/0.53 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.53 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.20/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 2356 pages
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53 # User time : 0.026 s
% 0.20/0.53 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.53 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 0.20/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1916 pages
% 0.20/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------