TSTP Solution File: SWV629-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SWV629-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:02 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   11 (   6 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_root__unity_0,axiom,
    c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(X1),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nfGjwIGvbu/E---3.1_23934.p',cls_root__unity_0) ).

cnf(cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I33_J_0,axiom,
    ( c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),X1) = X2
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nfGjwIGvbu/E---3.1_23934.p',cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I33_J_0) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nfGjwIGvbu/E---3.1_23934.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat)) != c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nfGjwIGvbu/E---3.1_23934.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(X1),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    cls_root__unity_0 ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    ( c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X2,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),X1) = X2
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
    cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I33_J_0 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat)) != c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.14  % Problem    : SWV629-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.16  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 04:12:16 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.53  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.53  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nfGjwIGvbu/E---3.1_23934.p
% 0.22/0.56  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.56  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.56  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.56  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.56  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.56  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.56  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.56  # new_bool_3 with pid 24043 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.56  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.22/0.56  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.56  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.56  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.56  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.56  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.56  # Search class: FGUSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.56  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.56  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.56  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 24047 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.56  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.22/0.56  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.56  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.56  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.56  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.56  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.56  # Search class: FGUSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.56  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.56  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.56  # Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.56  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.56  
% 0.22/0.56  # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.56  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.56  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.56  # Parsed axioms                        : 389
% 0.22/0.56  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 157
% 0.22/0.56  # Initial clauses                      : 232
% 0.22/0.56  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.22/0.56  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 232
% 0.22/0.56  # Processed clauses                    : 293
% 0.22/0.56  # ...of these trivial                  : 22
% 0.22/0.56  # ...subsumed                          : 76
% 0.22/0.56  # ...remaining for further processing  : 195
% 0.22/0.56  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 6
% 0.22/0.56  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.56  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/0.56  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.22/0.56  # Generated clauses                    : 89
% 0.22/0.56  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 18
% 0.22/0.56  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.56  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/0.56  # Paramodulations                      : 83
% 0.22/0.56  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.56  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.56  # Equation resolutions                 : 6
% 0.22/0.56  # Total rewrite steps                  : 71
% 0.22/0.56  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.56  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.56  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.56  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.56  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.56  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.56  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.56  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.56  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.56  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.56  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.56  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.56  # Current number of processed clauses  : 55
% 0.22/0.56  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 27
% 0.22/0.56  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.56  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.22/0.56  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 25
% 0.22/0.56  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 96
% 0.22/0.56  # ...number of literals in the above   : 225
% 0.22/0.56  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.56  # Current number of archived clauses   : 140
% 0.22/0.56  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 989
% 0.22/0.56  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 848
% 0.22/0.56  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 74
% 0.22/0.56  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.22/0.56  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.56  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 91
% 0.22/0.56  # BW rewrite match successes           : 69
% 0.22/0.56  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.56  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.56  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 7740
% 0.22/0.56  
% 0.22/0.56  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.56  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.22/0.56  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.56  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.22/0.56  # Maximum resident set size: 2208 pages
% 0.22/0.56  
% 0.22/0.56  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.56  # User time                : 0.025 s
% 0.22/0.56  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.56  # Total time               : 0.028 s
% 0.22/0.56  # Maximum resident set size: 1916 pages
% 0.22/0.56  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.57  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------