TSTP Solution File: SWV626-1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : SWV626-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 17:05:23 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 34.99s 5.42s
% Output   : Refutation 34.99s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    9 (   7   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f105810,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f105809]) ).

fof(f105809,plain,
    c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_n,v_k,tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_n,v_k,tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f105808,f419]) ).

fof(f419,axiom,
    ! [X14,X13] : c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X13,X14,tc_nat) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X14,X13,tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_nat__mult__commute_0) ).

fof(f105808,plain,
    c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_n,v_k,tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_k,v_n,tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f105805,f105796]) ).

fof(f105796,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X0,X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X2,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X0,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1,X2,tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(resolution,[],[f848,f1027]) ).

fof(f1027,axiom,
    class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult) ).

fof(f848,axiom,
    ! [X0,X14,X4,X13] :
      ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(X0)
      | c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X4,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X13,X14,tc_nat),X0) = c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X4,X13,X0),X14,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_power__mult_0) ).

fof(f105805,plain,
    c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_n,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_n,v_k,tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f2029,f105796]) ).

fof(f2029,plain,
    c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_n,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_n,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f907,f2028]) ).

fof(f2028,plain,
    ! [X0] : c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X0,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X0,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(resolution,[],[f890,f1035]) ).

fof(f1035,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ofield) ).

fof(f890,axiom,
    ! [X0,X4] :
      ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X0)
      | c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X4,X0) = c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X0),X4,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_inverse__eq__divide_0) ).

fof(f907,axiom,
    c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_n,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_n,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_FFT__Mirabelle_Oroot(v_n),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_k,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SWV626-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 05:08:25 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.35  % (1290)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.19/0.40  % (1293)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.19/0.41  % (1293)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.41  % (1294)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.41  % (1292)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.41  % (1297)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.41  % (1296)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.41  % (1295)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.41  % (1291)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.49  TRYING [1]
% 0.19/0.51  TRYING [2]
% 2.79/0.78  TRYING [1]
% 2.79/0.80  TRYING [2]
% 3.22/0.92  TRYING [1]
% 3.22/0.92  TRYING [3]
% 4.31/1.02  TRYING [2]
% 5.43/1.16  TRYING [3]
% 21.17/3.44  TRYING [3]
% 22.71/3.65  TRYING [4]
% 25.85/4.08  TRYING [4]
% 34.99/5.40  % (1296)First to succeed.
% 34.99/5.42  % (1296)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 34.99/5.42  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 34.99/5.42  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 34.99/5.42  % (1296)------------------------------
% 34.99/5.42  % (1296)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 34.99/5.42  % (1296)Termination reason: Refutation
% 34.99/5.42  
% 34.99/5.42  % (1296)Memory used [KB]: 33244
% 34.99/5.42  % (1296)Time elapsed: 4.998 s
% 34.99/5.42  % (1296)Instructions burned: 9263 (million)
% 34.99/5.42  % (1296)------------------------------
% 34.99/5.42  % (1296)------------------------------
% 34.99/5.42  % (1290)Success in time 5.059 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------