TSTP Solution File: SWV580-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SWV580-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:35:21 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.73s 0.93s
% Output   : Refutation 0.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   20 (  16 unt;   0 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   26 (  16 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Collect__def_0,axiom,
    c_Collect(X,Y) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Collect__def_0) ).

cnf(cls_singleton__conv2_0,axiom,
    c_Collect(c_fequal(X,Y),Y) = c_Set_Oinsert(X,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(Y,tc_bool)),Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_singleton__conv2_0) ).

cnf(338,plain,
    c_fequal(X,Y) = c_Set_Oinsert(X,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(Y,tc_bool)),Y),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_singleton__conv2_0,cls_Collect__def_0,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(cls_less_0,axiom,
    c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_m,v_n,tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_less_0) ).

cnf(cls_atLeastSucLessThan__greaterThanLessThan_0,axiom,
    c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OatLeastLessThan(c_Suc(X),Y,tc_nat) = c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OgreaterThanLessThan(X,Y,tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_atLeastSucLessThan__greaterThanLessThan_0) ).

cnf(cls_ivl__disj__un_I3_J_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Orderings_Olinorder(X)
    | c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(c_Set_Oinsert(Y,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X,tc_bool)),X),c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OgreaterThanLessThan(Y,Z,X),tc_fun(X,tc_bool)) = c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OatLeastLessThan(Y,Z,X)
    | ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(Y,Z,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_ivl__disj__un_I3_J_0) ).

cnf(406,plain,
    ( ~ class_Orderings_Olinorder(X)
    | c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(c_fequal(Y,X),c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OgreaterThanLessThan(Y,Z,X),tc_fun(X,tc_bool)) = c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OatLeastLessThan(Y,Z,X)
    | ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(Y,Z,X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_ivl__disj__un_I3_J_0,338,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(cls_calculation_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Ocomm__monoid__add(t_a)
    | c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(hAPP(v_f,v_m),c_Finite__Set_Osetsum(v_f,c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OgreaterThanLessThan(v_m,v_n,tc_nat),tc_nat,t_a),t_a) = c_Finite__Set_Osetsum(v_f,c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(c_Set_Oinsert(v_m,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_bool)),tc_nat),c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OgreaterThanLessThan(v_m,v_n,tc_nat),tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_bool)),tc_nat,t_a) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_calculation_0) ).

cnf(408,plain,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Ocomm__monoid__add(t_a)
    | c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(hAPP(v_f,v_m),c_Finite__Set_Osetsum(v_f,c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OatLeastLessThan(c_Suc(v_m),v_n,tc_nat),tc_nat,t_a),t_a) = c_Finite__Set_Osetsum(v_f,c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(c_fequal(v_m,tc_nat),c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OatLeastLessThan(c_Suc(v_m),v_n,tc_nat),tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_bool)),tc_nat,t_a) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_calculation_0,338,cls_atLeastSucLessThan__greaterThanLessThan_0,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(cls_Un__empty__right_0,axiom,
    c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(X,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(Y,tc_bool)),tc_fun(Y,tc_bool)) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Un__empty__right_0) ).

cnf(cls_insert__is__Un_0,axiom,
    c_Set_Oinsert(X,Y,Z) = c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(c_Set_Oinsert(X,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(Z,tc_bool)),Z),Y,tc_fun(Z,tc_bool)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_insert__is__Un_0) ).

cnf(453,plain,
    c_Set_Oinsert(X,Y,Z) = c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(c_fequal(X,Z),Y,tc_fun(Z,tc_bool)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_insert__is__Un_0,338,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(tfree_tcs,negated_conjecture,
    class_OrderedGroup_Ocomm__monoid__add(t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tfree_tcs) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_Finite__Set_Osetsum(v_f,c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(c_Set_Oinsert(v_m,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_bool)),tc_nat),c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OgreaterThanLessThan(v_m,v_n,tc_nat),tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_bool)),tc_nat,t_a) != c_Finite__Set_Osetsum(v_f,c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OatLeastLessThan(v_m,v_n,tc_nat),tc_nat,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(459,plain,
    c_Finite__Set_Osetsum(v_f,c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(c_fequal(v_m,tc_nat),c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OatLeastLessThan(c_Suc(v_m),v_n,tc_nat),tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_bool)),tc_nat,t_a) != c_Finite__Set_Osetsum(v_f,c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OatLeastLessThan(v_m,v_n,tc_nat),tc_nat,t_a),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0,cls_atLeastSucLessThan__greaterThanLessThan_0,cls_Un__empty__right_0,453,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(clsarity_nat__Orderings_Olinorder,axiom,
    class_Orderings_Olinorder(tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_nat__Orderings_Olinorder) ).

cnf(507,plain,
    c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(hAPP(v_f,v_m),c_Finite__Set_Osetsum(v_f,c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OatLeastLessThan(c_Suc(v_m),v_n,tc_nat),tc_nat,t_a),t_a) = c_Finite__Set_Osetsum(v_f,c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(c_fequal(v_m,tc_nat),c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OatLeastLessThan(c_Suc(v_m),v_n,tc_nat),tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_bool)),tc_nat,t_a),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[408,tfree_tcs]) ).

cnf(508,plain,
    c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(hAPP(v_f,v_m),c_Finite__Set_Osetsum(v_f,c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OatLeastLessThan(c_Suc(v_m),v_n,tc_nat),tc_nat,t_a),t_a) != c_Finite__Set_Osetsum(v_f,c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OatLeastLessThan(v_m,v_n,tc_nat),tc_nat,t_a),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[459,507,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1052,plain,
    c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(c_fequal(v_m,tc_nat),c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OatLeastLessThan(c_Suc(v_m),v_n,tc_nat),tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_bool)) = c_SetInterval_Oord__class_OatLeastLessThan(v_m,v_n,tc_nat),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[406,clsarity_nat__Orderings_Olinorder,cls_less_0]),cls_atLeastSucLessThan__greaterThanLessThan_0,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1053,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[507,508,1052,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWV580-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 12:48:56 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T12:48:56
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n003.cluster.edu at 2022-06-15T12:48:56
% 0.43/0.61  
% 0.43/0.61  ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless| ?X (|c_Suc| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__add__join| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__add__meet| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |c_Complete__Lattice_Ocomplete__lattice| is a 9-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_Int_Onumber__ring| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.73/0.93  ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless| ?X (|c_Suc| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 0.73/0.93  
% 0.73/0.93  #||
% 0.73/0.93  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.73/0.93  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.73/0.93  ||#
% 0.73/0.93  
% 0.73/0.93  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.73/0.93  ;      2836 formulas have been input or derived (from 350 formulas).
% 0.73/0.93  ;      1053 (37%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.73/0.93  ;          148 (14%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.73/0.93  ;          905 (86%) are still being kept.
% 0.73/0.93  ; 
% 0.73/0.93  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.73/0.93  ;     0.122  27%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.73/0.93  ;     0.012   3%   Assert                       (601 calls)
% 0.73/0.93  ;     0.072  16%   Process new row              (2,440 calls)
% 0.73/0.93  ;     0.046  10%   Resolution                   (698 calls)
% 0.73/0.93  ;     0.013   3%   Paramodulation               (349 calls)
% 0.73/0.93  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (3 calls)
% 0.73/0.93  ;     0.023   5%   Condensing                   (877 calls)
% 0.73/0.93  ;     0.025   5%   Forward subsumption          (877 calls)
% 0.73/0.93  ;     0.009   2%   Backward subsumption         (516 calls)
% 0.73/0.93  ;     0.024   5%   Clause clause subsumption    (1,214 calls)
% 0.73/0.93  ;     0.035   8%   Forward simplification       (2,374 calls)
% 0.73/0.93  ;     0.020   4%   Backward simplification      (1,006 calls)
% 0.73/0.93  ;     0.023   5%   Ordering                     (3,052 calls)
% 0.73/0.93  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.73/0.93  ;     0.002   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.73/0.93  ;     0.029   6%   Other
% 0.73/0.93  ;     0.455        Total
% 0.73/0.93  ;     0.457        Real time
% 0.73/0.93  ; 
% 0.77/0.93  ; Term-hash-array has 2,124 terms in all.
% 0.77/0.93  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 469 entries (469 at peak, 516 added, 47 deleted).
% 0.77/0.93  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,075 nodes (2,075 at peak, 2,482 added, 407 deleted).
% 0.77/0.93  ;  Retrieved 1,597 possibly forward subsuming rows in 877 calls.
% 0.77/0.93  ;  Retrieved 299 possibly backward subsumed rows in 516 calls.
% 0.77/0.93  ; Path-index has 1,876 entries (1,878 at peak, 2,203 added, 327 deleted).
% 0.77/0.93  ; Path-index has 5,983 nodes (5,997 at peak, 6,875 added, 892 deleted).
% 0.77/0.93  ; Trie-index has 1,876 entries (1,878 at peak, 2,203 added, 327 deleted).
% 0.77/0.93  ; Trie-index has 8,120 nodes (8,148 at peak, 10,731 added, 2,611 deleted).
% 0.77/0.93  ; Retrieved 5,904 generalization terms in 6,627 calls.
% 0.77/0.93  ; Retrieved 1,263 instance terms in 574 calls.
% 0.77/0.93  ; Retrieved 50,432 unifiable terms in 2,874 calls.
% 0.77/0.93  ; 
% 0.77/0.93  ; The agenda of rows to process has 6 entries:
% 0.77/0.93  ;     1 with value 23              1 with value 28               1 with value 30
% 0.77/0.93  ;     1 with value 26              2 with value 29
% 0.77/0.93  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 74 entries:
% 0.77/0.93  ;     6 with value 27             12 with value 32               1 with value 39
% 0.77/0.93  ;     9 with value 28             11 with value 33               2 with value 40
% 0.77/0.93  ;     3 with value 29              5 with value 35               2 with value 45
% 0.77/0.93  ;     3 with value 30              1 with value 36               1 with value 48
% 0.77/0.93  ;     9 with value 31              8 with value 38               1 with value 84
% 0.77/0.93  ; The agenda of rows to give has 485 entries:
% 0.77/0.93  ;     2 with value (4 4)          15 with value (4 17)          11 with value (4 29)
% 0.77/0.93  ;     7 with value (4 6)          33 with value (4 18)           2 with value (4 30)
% 0.77/0.93  ;    20 with value (4 7)          23 with value (4 19)           4 with value (4 31)
% 0.77/0.93  ;     9 with value (4 8)          24 with value (4 20)           9 with value (4 32)
% 0.77/0.93  ;     6 with value (4 9)          42 with value (4 21)           7 with value (4 33)
% 0.77/0.93  ;    19 with value (4 10)         34 with value (4 22)           2 with value (4 34)
% 0.77/0.93  ;    23 with value (4 11)         20 with value (4 23)           7 with value (4 35)
% 0.77/0.93  ;    20 with value (4 12)          8 with value (4 24)           1 with value (4 36)
% 0.77/0.93  ;    22 with value (4 13)         14 with value (4 25)           1 with value (4 37)
% 0.77/0.93  ;    16 with value (4 14)         21 with value (4 26)           2 with value (4 38)
% 0.77/0.93  ;    14 with value (4 15)          5 with value (4 27)          11 with value (4 39)
% 0.77/0.93  ;    19 with value (4 16)         11 with value (4 28)           1 with value (4 43)
% 0.77/0.93  Evaluation took:
% 0.77/0.93    0.458 seconds of real time
% 0.77/0.93    0.425392 seconds of user run time
% 0.77/0.93    0.032877 seconds of system run time
% 0.77/0.93    [Run times include 0.022 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.77/0.93    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.77/0.93    0 page faults and
% 0.77/0.93    30,947,056 bytes consed.
% 0.77/0.93  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.77/0.93  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T12:48:56
% 0.77/0.93  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.77/0.93  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------