TSTP Solution File: SWV560-1.004 by Bliksem---1.12
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem : SWV560-1.004 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : bliksem %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 0s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 16:26:40 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.08s 300.45s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV560-1.004 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : bliksem %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 16:20:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 85.33/85.76 *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 85.33/85.76 *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 85.33/85.76 *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 85.33/85.76 Bliksem 1.12
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Automatic Strategy Selection
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Clauses:
% 85.33/85.76 [
% 85.33/85.76 [ =( select( store( X, Y, Z ), Y ), Z ) ],
% 85.33/85.76 [ =( X, Y ), =( select( store( Z, X, T ), Y ), select( Z, Y ) ) ],
% 85.33/85.76 [ =( store( store( X, Y, select( X, Z ) ), Z, select( X, Y ) ), store(
% 85.33/85.76 store( X, Z, select( X, Y ) ), Y, select( X, Z ) ) ) ],
% 85.33/85.76 [ =( store( store( store( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2, select(
% 85.33/85.76 store( a2, i1, select( a1, i1 ) ), i2 ) ), i3, select( store( store( a2,
% 85.33/85.76 i1, select( a1, i1 ) ), i2, select( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2
% 85.33/85.76 ) ), i3 ) ), i1, select( store( store( store( a2, i1, select( a1, i1 ) )
% 85.33/85.76 , i2, select( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2 ) ), i3, select(
% 85.33/85.76 store( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2, select( store( a2, i1,
% 85.33/85.76 select( a1, i1 ) ), i2 ) ), i3 ) ), i4 ) ), store( store( store( store(
% 85.33/85.76 a2, i1, select( a1, i1 ) ), i2, select( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) )
% 85.33/85.76 , i2 ) ), i3, select( store( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2,
% 85.33/85.76 select( store( a2, i1, select( a1, i1 ) ), i2 ) ), i3 ) ), i4, select(
% 85.33/85.76 store( store( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2, select( store( a2,
% 85.33/85.76 i1, select( a1, i1 ) ), i2 ) ), i3, select( store( store( a2, i1, select(
% 85.33/85.76 a1, i1 ) ), i2, select( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2 ) ), i3 ) )
% 85.33/85.76 , i4 ) ) ) ],
% 85.33/85.76 [ ~( =( a1, a2 ) ) ]
% 85.33/85.76 ] .
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 percentage equality = 1.000000, percentage horn = 0.800000
% 85.33/85.76 This is a pure equality problem
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Options Used:
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 useres = 1
% 85.33/85.76 useparamod = 1
% 85.33/85.76 useeqrefl = 1
% 85.33/85.76 useeqfact = 1
% 85.33/85.76 usefactor = 1
% 85.33/85.76 usesimpsplitting = 0
% 85.33/85.76 usesimpdemod = 5
% 85.33/85.76 usesimpres = 3
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 resimpinuse = 1000
% 85.33/85.76 resimpclauses = 20000
% 85.33/85.76 substype = eqrewr
% 85.33/85.76 backwardsubs = 1
% 85.33/85.76 selectoldest = 5
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 litorderings [0] = split
% 85.33/85.76 litorderings [1] = extend the termordering, first sorting on arguments
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 termordering = kbo
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 litapriori = 0
% 85.33/85.76 termapriori = 1
% 85.33/85.76 litaposteriori = 0
% 85.33/85.76 termaposteriori = 0
% 85.33/85.76 demodaposteriori = 0
% 85.33/85.76 ordereqreflfact = 0
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 litselect = negord
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 maxweight = 15
% 85.33/85.76 maxdepth = 30000
% 85.33/85.76 maxlength = 115
% 85.33/85.76 maxnrvars = 195
% 85.33/85.76 excuselevel = 1
% 85.33/85.76 increasemaxweight = 1
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 maxselected = 10000000
% 85.33/85.76 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 showgenerated = 0
% 85.33/85.76 showkept = 0
% 85.33/85.76 showselected = 0
% 85.33/85.76 showdeleted = 0
% 85.33/85.76 showresimp = 1
% 85.33/85.76 showstatus = 2000
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 prologoutput = 1
% 85.33/85.76 nrgoals = 5000000
% 85.33/85.76 totalproof = 1
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 {} [0, 0] (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 85.33/85.76 . [1, 2] (w:1, o:24, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 85.33/85.76 ! [4, 1] (w:0, o:19, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 85.33/85.76 = [13, 2] (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0),
% 85.33/85.76 ==> [14, 2] (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0),
% 85.33/85.76 store [42, 3] (w:1, o:50, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 85.33/85.76 select [43, 2] (w:1, o:49, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 85.33/85.76 a1 [45, 0] (w:1, o:13, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 85.33/85.76 i1 [46, 0] (w:1, o:14, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 85.33/85.76 a2 [47, 0] (w:1, o:15, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 85.33/85.76 i2 [48, 0] (w:1, o:16, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 85.33/85.76 i3 [49, 0] (w:1, o:17, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 85.33/85.76 i4 [50, 0] (w:1, o:18, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Starting Search:
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Resimplifying inuse:
% 85.33/85.76 Done
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Failed to find proof!
% 85.33/85.76 maxweight = 15
% 85.33/85.76 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 85.33/85.76 Generated: 105306
% 85.33/85.76 Kept: 66
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 The strategy used was not complete!
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Increased maxweight to 16
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Starting Search:
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Resimplifying inuse:
% 85.33/85.76 Done
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Failed to find proof!
% 85.33/85.76 maxweight = 16
% 85.33/85.76 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 85.33/85.76 Generated: 105306
% 85.33/85.76 Kept: 66
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 The strategy used was not complete!
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Increased maxweight to 17
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Starting Search:
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Resimplifying inuse:
% 85.33/85.76 Done
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Failed to find proof!
% 85.33/85.76 maxweight = 17
% 85.33/85.76 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 85.33/85.76 Generated: 105306
% 85.33/85.76 Kept: 66
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 The strategy used was not complete!
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Increased maxweight to 18
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Starting Search:
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Resimplifying inuse:
% 85.33/85.76 Done
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Failed to find proof!
% 85.33/85.76 maxweight = 18
% 85.33/85.76 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 85.33/85.76 Generated: 105664
% 85.33/85.76 Kept: 67
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 The strategy used was not complete!
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Increased maxweight to 19
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Starting Search:
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Resimplifying inuse:
% 85.33/85.76 Done
% 85.33/85.76
% 85.33/85.76 Failed to find proof!
% 85.33/85.76 maxweight = 19
% 85.33/85.76 maxnrclauseCputime limit exceeded (core dumped)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------