TSTP Solution File: SWV549-1.004 by Bliksem---1.12
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem : SWV549-1.004 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : bliksem %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 0s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 16:26:34 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.09s 300.48s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.12 % Problem : SWV549-1.004 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.05/0.13 % Command : bliksem %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 08:47:54 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 77.16/77.61 *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 77.16/77.61 *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 77.16/77.61 *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 77.16/77.61 Bliksem 1.12
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Automatic Strategy Selection
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Clauses:
% 77.16/77.61 [
% 77.16/77.61 [ =( select( store( X, Y, Z ), Y ), Z ) ],
% 77.16/77.61 [ =( X, Y ), =( select( store( Z, X, T ), Y ), select( Z, Y ) ) ],
% 77.16/77.61 [ =( store( store( store( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2, select(
% 77.16/77.61 store( a2, i1, select( a1, i1 ) ), i2 ) ), i3, select( store( store( a2,
% 77.16/77.61 i1, select( a1, i1 ) ), i2, select( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2
% 77.16/77.61 ) ), i3 ) ), i4, select( store( store( store( a2, i1, select( a1, i1 ) )
% 77.16/77.61 , i2, select( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2 ) ), i3, select(
% 77.16/77.61 store( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2, select( store( a2, i1,
% 77.16/77.61 select( a1, i1 ) ), i2 ) ), i3 ) ), i4 ) ), store( store( store( store(
% 77.16/77.61 a2, i1, select( a1, i1 ) ), i2, select( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) )
% 77.16/77.61 , i2 ) ), i3, select( store( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2,
% 77.16/77.61 select( store( a2, i1, select( a1, i1 ) ), i2 ) ), i3 ) ), i4, select(
% 77.16/77.61 store( store( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2, select( store( a2,
% 77.16/77.61 i1, select( a1, i1 ) ), i2 ) ), i3, select( store( store( a2, i1, select(
% 77.16/77.61 a1, i1 ) ), i2, select( store( a1, i1, select( a2, i1 ) ), i2 ) ), i3 ) )
% 77.16/77.61 , i4 ) ) ) ],
% 77.16/77.61 [ ~( =( a1, a2 ) ) ]
% 77.16/77.61 ] .
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 percentage equality = 1.000000, percentage horn = 0.750000
% 77.16/77.61 This is a pure equality problem
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Options Used:
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 useres = 1
% 77.16/77.61 useparamod = 1
% 77.16/77.61 useeqrefl = 1
% 77.16/77.61 useeqfact = 1
% 77.16/77.61 usefactor = 1
% 77.16/77.61 usesimpsplitting = 0
% 77.16/77.61 usesimpdemod = 5
% 77.16/77.61 usesimpres = 3
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 resimpinuse = 1000
% 77.16/77.61 resimpclauses = 20000
% 77.16/77.61 substype = eqrewr
% 77.16/77.61 backwardsubs = 1
% 77.16/77.61 selectoldest = 5
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 litorderings [0] = split
% 77.16/77.61 litorderings [1] = extend the termordering, first sorting on arguments
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 termordering = kbo
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 litapriori = 0
% 77.16/77.61 termapriori = 1
% 77.16/77.61 litaposteriori = 0
% 77.16/77.61 termaposteriori = 0
% 77.16/77.61 demodaposteriori = 0
% 77.16/77.61 ordereqreflfact = 0
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 litselect = negord
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 maxweight = 15
% 77.16/77.61 maxdepth = 30000
% 77.16/77.61 maxlength = 115
% 77.16/77.61 maxnrvars = 195
% 77.16/77.61 excuselevel = 1
% 77.16/77.61 increasemaxweight = 1
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 maxselected = 10000000
% 77.16/77.61 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 showgenerated = 0
% 77.16/77.61 showkept = 0
% 77.16/77.61 showselected = 0
% 77.16/77.61 showdeleted = 0
% 77.16/77.61 showresimp = 1
% 77.16/77.61 showstatus = 2000
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 prologoutput = 1
% 77.16/77.61 nrgoals = 5000000
% 77.16/77.61 totalproof = 1
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 {} [0, 0] (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 77.16/77.61 . [1, 2] (w:1, o:24, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 77.16/77.61 ! [4, 1] (w:0, o:19, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 77.16/77.61 = [13, 2] (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0),
% 77.16/77.61 ==> [14, 2] (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0),
% 77.16/77.61 store [42, 3] (w:1, o:50, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 77.16/77.61 select [43, 2] (w:1, o:49, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 77.16/77.61 a1 [45, 0] (w:1, o:13, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 77.16/77.61 i1 [46, 0] (w:1, o:14, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 77.16/77.61 a2 [47, 0] (w:1, o:15, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 77.16/77.61 i2 [48, 0] (w:1, o:16, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 77.16/77.61 i3 [49, 0] (w:1, o:17, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 77.16/77.61 i4 [50, 0] (w:1, o:18, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Starting Search:
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Resimplifying inuse:
% 77.16/77.61 Done
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Failed to find proof!
% 77.16/77.61 maxweight = 15
% 77.16/77.61 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 77.16/77.61 Generated: 49059
% 77.16/77.61 Kept: 55
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 The strategy used was not complete!
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Increased maxweight to 16
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Starting Search:
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Resimplifying inuse:
% 77.16/77.61 Done
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Failed to find proof!
% 77.16/77.61 maxweight = 16
% 77.16/77.61 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 77.16/77.61 Generated: 49059
% 77.16/77.61 Kept: 55
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 The strategy used was not complete!
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Increased maxweight to 17
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Starting Search:
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Resimplifying inuse:
% 77.16/77.61 Done
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Failed to find proof!
% 77.16/77.61 maxweight = 17
% 77.16/77.61 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 77.16/77.61 Generated: 49059
% 77.16/77.61 Kept: 55
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 The strategy used was not complete!
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Increased maxweight to 18
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Starting Search:
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Resimplifying inuse:
% 77.16/77.61 Done
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Failed to find proof!
% 77.16/77.61 maxweight = 18
% 77.16/77.61 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 77.16/77.61 Generated: 49291
% 77.16/77.61 Kept: 56
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 The strategy used was not complete!
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Increased maxweight to 19
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Starting Search:
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Resimplifying inuse:
% 77.16/77.61 Done
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Failed to find proof!
% 77.16/77.61 maxweight = 19
% 77.16/77.61 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 77.16/77.61 Generated: 49374
% 77.16/77.61 Kept: 57
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 The strategy used was not complete!
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Increased maxweight to 20
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Starting Search:
% 77.16/77.61
% 77.16/77.61 Resimplifying Cputime limit exceeded (core dumped)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------