TSTP Solution File: SWV547-1.004 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SWV547-1.004 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:22:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV547-1.004 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 16:48:56 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C02____F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.12/0.36 #
% 0.12/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36 # Number of axioms: 32 Number of unprocessed: 32
% 0.12/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.37 # 32 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.37 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.37 # Found 31 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.37 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.37 # 1 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.37 # 31 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.12/0.37 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.12/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.12/0.37 # Returning from population with 41 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.37 # We now have 41 tableaux to operate on
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_61, hypothesis, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_62, hypothesis, (select(a_489,i_490)=e_492)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_50, hypothesis, (select(a1,i1)=e_465)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_51, hypothesis, (select(a_467,i3)=e_468)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_52, hypothesis, (select(a_467,i0)=e_470)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_53, hypothesis, (select(a_471,i2)=e_472)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_54, hypothesis, (select(a_471,i3)=e_474)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_55, hypothesis, (select(a_475,i0)=e_476)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_56, hypothesis, (select(a_475,i2)=e_478)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_57, hypothesis, (select(a_481,i2)=e_482)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_58, hypothesis, (select(a_481,i3)=e_484)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_59, hypothesis, (select(a_485,i2)=e_486)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_60, hypothesis, (select(a_485,i0)=e_488)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_63, hypothesis, (sk(a_479,a_489)=i_490)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_36, hypothesis, (store(a1,i1,e_465)=a_466)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_37, hypothesis, (store(a_466,i1,e_465)=a_467)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_38, hypothesis, (store(a_467,i0,e_468)=a_469)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_39, hypothesis, (store(a_469,i3,e_470)=a_471)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_40, hypothesis, (store(a_471,i3,e_472)=a_473)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_41, hypothesis, (store(a_473,i2,e_474)=a_475)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_42, hypothesis, (store(a_475,i2,e_476)=a_477)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_43, hypothesis, (store(a_477,i0,e_478)=a_479)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_44, hypothesis, (store(a_467,i3,e_470)=a_480)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_45, hypothesis, (store(a_480,i0,e_468)=a_481)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_46, hypothesis, (store(a_481,i3,e_482)=a_483)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_47, hypothesis, (store(a_483,i2,e_484)=a_485)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_48, hypothesis, (store(a_485,i0,e_486)=a_487)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_49, hypothesis, (store(a_487,i2,e_488)=a_489)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X2)=X3)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (store(store(X1,X2,select(X1,X3)),X3,select(X1,X2))=store(store(X1,X3,select(X1,X2)),X2,select(X1,X3)))).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_64, negated_conjecture, (e_492!=e_491)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X4)=select(X1,X4)|X2=X4)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (X5=X5)).
% 0.19/0.40 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.40 # Found 7 steps
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_61, hypothesis, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_76])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_128, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)!=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_127, plain, (sk(select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490))=sk(e_491,e_491)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_74])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_209, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)!=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_210, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)!=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_207, plain, (store(sk(select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490)),select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490))=store(sk(e_491,e_491),e_491,e_491)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_207, ...])).
% 0.19/0.40 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.40 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_61, hypothesis, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_62, hypothesis, (select(a_489,i_490)=e_492)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_50, hypothesis, (select(a1,i1)=e_465)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_51, hypothesis, (select(a_467,i3)=e_468)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_52, hypothesis, (select(a_467,i0)=e_470)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_53, hypothesis, (select(a_471,i2)=e_472)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_54, hypothesis, (select(a_471,i3)=e_474)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_55, hypothesis, (select(a_475,i0)=e_476)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_56, hypothesis, (select(a_475,i2)=e_478)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_57, hypothesis, (select(a_481,i2)=e_482)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_58, hypothesis, (select(a_481,i3)=e_484)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_59, hypothesis, (select(a_485,i2)=e_486)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_60, hypothesis, (select(a_485,i0)=e_488)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_63, hypothesis, (sk(a_479,a_489)=i_490)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_36, hypothesis, (store(a1,i1,e_465)=a_466)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_37, hypothesis, (store(a_466,i1,e_465)=a_467)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_38, hypothesis, (store(a_467,i0,e_468)=a_469)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_39, hypothesis, (store(a_469,i3,e_470)=a_471)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_40, hypothesis, (store(a_471,i3,e_472)=a_473)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_41, hypothesis, (store(a_473,i2,e_474)=a_475)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_42, hypothesis, (store(a_475,i2,e_476)=a_477)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_43, hypothesis, (store(a_477,i0,e_478)=a_479)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_44, hypothesis, (store(a_467,i3,e_470)=a_480)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_45, hypothesis, (store(a_480,i0,e_468)=a_481)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_46, hypothesis, (store(a_481,i3,e_482)=a_483)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_47, hypothesis, (store(a_483,i2,e_484)=a_485)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_48, hypothesis, (store(a_485,i0,e_486)=a_487)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_49, hypothesis, (store(a_487,i2,e_488)=a_489)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X2)=X3)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (store(store(X1,X2,select(X1,X3)),X3,select(X1,X2))=store(store(X1,X3,select(X1,X2)),X2,select(X1,X3)))).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_64, negated_conjecture, (e_492!=e_491)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X4)=select(X1,X4)|X2=X4)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (X5=X5)).
% 0.19/0.40 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.40 # Found 7 steps
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_61, hypothesis, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_75])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_125, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)!=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_124, plain, (select(select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490))=select(e_491,e_491)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_74])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_206, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)!=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_207, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)!=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_204, plain, (store(select(select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490)),select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490))=store(select(e_491,e_491),e_491,e_491)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_204, ...])).
% 0.19/0.40 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.40 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_61, hypothesis, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_62, hypothesis, (select(a_489,i_490)=e_492)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_50, hypothesis, (select(a1,i1)=e_465)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_51, hypothesis, (select(a_467,i3)=e_468)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_52, hypothesis, (select(a_467,i0)=e_470)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_53, hypothesis, (select(a_471,i2)=e_472)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_54, hypothesis, (select(a_471,i3)=e_474)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_55, hypothesis, (select(a_475,i0)=e_476)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_56, hypothesis, (select(a_475,i2)=e_478)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_57, hypothesis, (select(a_481,i2)=e_482)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_58, hypothesis, (select(a_481,i3)=e_484)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_59, hypothesis, (select(a_485,i2)=e_486)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_60, hypothesis, (select(a_485,i0)=e_488)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_63, hypothesis, (sk(a_479,a_489)=i_490)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_36, hypothesis, (store(a1,i1,e_465)=a_466)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_37, hypothesis, (store(a_466,i1,e_465)=a_467)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_38, hypothesis, (store(a_467,i0,e_468)=a_469)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_39, hypothesis, (store(a_469,i3,e_470)=a_471)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_40, hypothesis, (store(a_471,i3,e_472)=a_473)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_41, hypothesis, (store(a_473,i2,e_474)=a_475)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_42, hypothesis, (store(a_475,i2,e_476)=a_477)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_43, hypothesis, (store(a_477,i0,e_478)=a_479)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_44, hypothesis, (store(a_467,i3,e_470)=a_480)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_45, hypothesis, (store(a_480,i0,e_468)=a_481)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_46, hypothesis, (store(a_481,i3,e_482)=a_483)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_47, hypothesis, (store(a_483,i2,e_484)=a_485)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_48, hypothesis, (store(a_485,i0,e_486)=a_487)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_49, hypothesis, (store(a_487,i2,e_488)=a_489)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X2)=X3)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (store(store(X1,X2,select(X1,X3)),X3,select(X1,X2))=store(store(X1,X3,select(X1,X2)),X2,select(X1,X3)))).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_64, negated_conjecture, (e_492!=e_491)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X4)=select(X1,X4)|X2=X4)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (X5=X5)).
% 0.19/0.40 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.40 # Found 7 steps
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_61, hypothesis, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_76])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_129, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)!=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_127, plain, (sk(select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490))=sk(e_491,e_491)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_74])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_209, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)!=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_210, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)!=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_207, plain, (store(sk(select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490)),select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490))=store(sk(e_491,e_491),e_491,e_491)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_207, ...])).
% 0.19/0.40 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.40 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_61, hypothesis, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_62, hypothesis, (select(a_489,i_490)=e_492)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_50, hypothesis, (select(a1,i1)=e_465)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_51, hypothesis, (select(a_467,i3)=e_468)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_52, hypothesis, (select(a_467,i0)=e_470)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_53, hypothesis, (select(a_471,i2)=e_472)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_54, hypothesis, (select(a_471,i3)=e_474)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_55, hypothesis, (select(a_475,i0)=e_476)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_56, hypothesis, (select(a_475,i2)=e_478)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_57, hypothesis, (select(a_481,i2)=e_482)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_58, hypothesis, (select(a_481,i3)=e_484)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_59, hypothesis, (select(a_485,i2)=e_486)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_60, hypothesis, (select(a_485,i0)=e_488)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_63, hypothesis, (sk(a_479,a_489)=i_490)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_36, hypothesis, (store(a1,i1,e_465)=a_466)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_37, hypothesis, (store(a_466,i1,e_465)=a_467)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_38, hypothesis, (store(a_467,i0,e_468)=a_469)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_39, hypothesis, (store(a_469,i3,e_470)=a_471)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_40, hypothesis, (store(a_471,i3,e_472)=a_473)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_41, hypothesis, (store(a_473,i2,e_474)=a_475)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_42, hypothesis, (store(a_475,i2,e_476)=a_477)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_43, hypothesis, (store(a_477,i0,e_478)=a_479)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_44, hypothesis, (store(a_467,i3,e_470)=a_480)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_45, hypothesis, (store(a_480,i0,e_468)=a_481)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_46, hypothesis, (store(a_481,i3,e_482)=a_483)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_47, hypothesis, (store(a_483,i2,e_484)=a_485)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_48, hypothesis, (store(a_485,i0,e_486)=a_487)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_49, hypothesis, (store(a_487,i2,e_488)=a_489)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X2)=X3)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (store(store(X1,X2,select(X1,X3)),X3,select(X1,X2))=store(store(X1,X3,select(X1,X2)),X2,select(X1,X3)))).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_64, negated_conjecture, (e_492!=e_491)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X4)=select(X1,X4)|X2=X4)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (X5=X5)).
% 0.19/0.40 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.40 # Found 7 steps
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_61, hypothesis, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_75])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_126, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)!=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_124, plain, (select(select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490))=select(e_491,e_491)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_74])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_206, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)!=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_207, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)!=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_204, plain, (store(select(select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490)),select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490))=store(select(e_491,e_491),e_491,e_491)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_204, ...])).
% 0.19/0.40 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.40 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_61, hypothesis, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_62, hypothesis, (select(a_489,i_490)=e_492)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_50, hypothesis, (select(a1,i1)=e_465)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_51, hypothesis, (select(a_467,i3)=e_468)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_52, hypothesis, (select(a_467,i0)=e_470)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_53, hypothesis, (select(a_471,i2)=e_472)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_54, hypothesis, (select(a_471,i3)=e_474)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_55, hypothesis, (select(a_475,i0)=e_476)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_56, hypothesis, (select(a_475,i2)=e_478)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_57, hypothesis, (select(a_481,i2)=e_482)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_58, hypothesis, (select(a_481,i3)=e_484)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_59, hypothesis, (select(a_485,i2)=e_486)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_60, hypothesis, (select(a_485,i0)=e_488)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_63, hypothesis, (sk(a_479,a_489)=i_490)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_36, hypothesis, (store(a1,i1,e_465)=a_466)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_37, hypothesis, (store(a_466,i1,e_465)=a_467)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_38, hypothesis, (store(a_467,i0,e_468)=a_469)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_39, hypothesis, (store(a_469,i3,e_470)=a_471)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_40, hypothesis, (store(a_471,i3,e_472)=a_473)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_41, hypothesis, (store(a_473,i2,e_474)=a_475)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_42, hypothesis, (store(a_475,i2,e_476)=a_477)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_43, hypothesis, (store(a_477,i0,e_478)=a_479)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_44, hypothesis, (store(a_467,i3,e_470)=a_480)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_45, hypothesis, (store(a_480,i0,e_468)=a_481)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_46, hypothesis, (store(a_481,i3,e_482)=a_483)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_47, hypothesis, (store(a_483,i2,e_484)=a_485)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_48, hypothesis, (store(a_485,i0,e_486)=a_487)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_49, hypothesis, (store(a_487,i2,e_488)=a_489)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X2)=X3)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (store(store(X1,X2,select(X1,X3)),X3,select(X1,X2))=store(store(X1,X3,select(X1,X2)),X2,select(X1,X3)))).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_64, negated_conjecture, (e_492!=e_491)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X4)=select(X1,X4)|X2=X4)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (X5=X5)).
% 0.19/0.40 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.40 # Found 7 steps
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_61, hypothesis, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_74])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_121, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)!=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_122, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)!=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_120, plain, (store(select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490))=store(e_491,e_491,e_491)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_75])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_202, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)!=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_200, plain, (select(store(select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490)),select(a_479,i_490))=select(store(e_491,e_491,e_491),e_491)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_200, ...])).
% 0.19/0.40 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.40 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_61, hypothesis, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_62, hypothesis, (select(a_489,i_490)=e_492)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_50, hypothesis, (select(a1,i1)=e_465)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_51, hypothesis, (select(a_467,i3)=e_468)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_52, hypothesis, (select(a_467,i0)=e_470)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_53, hypothesis, (select(a_471,i2)=e_472)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_54, hypothesis, (select(a_471,i3)=e_474)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_55, hypothesis, (select(a_475,i0)=e_476)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_56, hypothesis, (select(a_475,i2)=e_478)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_57, hypothesis, (select(a_481,i2)=e_482)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_58, hypothesis, (select(a_481,i3)=e_484)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_59, hypothesis, (select(a_485,i2)=e_486)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_60, hypothesis, (select(a_485,i0)=e_488)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_63, hypothesis, (sk(a_479,a_489)=i_490)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_36, hypothesis, (store(a1,i1,e_465)=a_466)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_37, hypothesis, (store(a_466,i1,e_465)=a_467)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_38, hypothesis, (store(a_467,i0,e_468)=a_469)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_39, hypothesis, (store(a_469,i3,e_470)=a_471)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_40, hypothesis, (store(a_471,i3,e_472)=a_473)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_41, hypothesis, (store(a_473,i2,e_474)=a_475)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_42, hypothesis, (store(a_475,i2,e_476)=a_477)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_43, hypothesis, (store(a_477,i0,e_478)=a_479)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_44, hypothesis, (store(a_467,i3,e_470)=a_480)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_45, hypothesis, (store(a_480,i0,e_468)=a_481)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_46, hypothesis, (store(a_481,i3,e_482)=a_483)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_47, hypothesis, (store(a_483,i2,e_484)=a_485)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_48, hypothesis, (store(a_485,i0,e_486)=a_487)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_49, hypothesis, (store(a_487,i2,e_488)=a_489)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X2)=X3)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (store(store(X1,X2,select(X1,X3)),X3,select(X1,X2))=store(store(X1,X3,select(X1,X2)),X2,select(X1,X3)))).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_64, negated_conjecture, (e_492!=e_491)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X4)=select(X1,X4)|X2=X4)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (X5=X5)).
% 0.19/0.40 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.40 # Found 7 steps
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_61, hypothesis, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_74])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_121, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)!=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_123, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)!=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_120, plain, (store(select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490))=store(e_491,e_491,e_491)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_75])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_202, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)!=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_200, plain, (select(store(select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490),select(a_479,i_490)),select(a_479,i_490))=select(store(e_491,e_491,e_491),e_491)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_200, ...])).
% 0.19/0.40 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.40 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_61, hypothesis, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_62, hypothesis, (select(a_489,i_490)=e_492)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_50, hypothesis, (select(a1,i1)=e_465)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_51, hypothesis, (select(a_467,i3)=e_468)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_52, hypothesis, (select(a_467,i0)=e_470)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_53, hypothesis, (select(a_471,i2)=e_472)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_54, hypothesis, (select(a_471,i3)=e_474)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_55, hypothesis, (select(a_475,i0)=e_476)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_56, hypothesis, (select(a_475,i2)=e_478)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_57, hypothesis, (select(a_481,i2)=e_482)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_58, hypothesis, (select(a_481,i3)=e_484)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_59, hypothesis, (select(a_485,i2)=e_486)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_60, hypothesis, (select(a_485,i0)=e_488)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_63, hypothesis, (sk(a_479,a_489)=i_490)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_36, hypothesis, (store(a1,i1,e_465)=a_466)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_37, hypothesis, (store(a_466,i1,e_465)=a_467)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_38, hypothesis, (store(a_467,i0,e_468)=a_469)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_39, hypothesis, (store(a_469,i3,e_470)=a_471)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_40, hypothesis, (store(a_471,i3,e_472)=a_473)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_41, hypothesis, (store(a_473,i2,e_474)=a_475)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_42, hypothesis, (store(a_475,i2,e_476)=a_477)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_43, hypothesis, (store(a_477,i0,e_478)=a_479)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_44, hypothesis, (store(a_467,i3,e_470)=a_480)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_45, hypothesis, (store(a_480,i0,e_468)=a_481)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_46, hypothesis, (store(a_481,i3,e_482)=a_483)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_47, hypothesis, (store(a_483,i2,e_484)=a_485)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_48, hypothesis, (store(a_485,i0,e_486)=a_487)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_49, hypothesis, (store(a_487,i2,e_488)=a_489)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X2)=X3)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (store(store(X1,X2,select(X1,X3)),X3,select(X1,X2))=store(store(X1,X3,select(X1,X2)),X2,select(X1,X3)))).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_64, negated_conjecture, (e_492!=e_491)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X4)=select(X1,X4)|X2=X4)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (X5=X5)).
% 0.19/0.40 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.40 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.40 # Found 5 steps
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_61, hypothesis, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (select(a_479,i_490)=e_491), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_73])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_117, plain, (e_492=e_491), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_64])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_118, plain, (e_492!=select(a_479,i_490)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_34])).
% 0.19/0.40 cnf(i_0_130, plain, (select(store(X5,e_492,X7),select(a_479,i_490))=select(X5,select(a_479,i_490))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_130, ...])).
% 0.19/0.40 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.40 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.40 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.40 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.40 # Child (3279) has found a proof.
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.40 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------