TSTP Solution File: SWV529-1.050 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWV529-1.050 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:39:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 0.62s 0.83s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.14  % Problem  : SWV529-1.050 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 23:09:19 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.39  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.39  The process was started by sandbox2 on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.39  Tue Jun 14 23:09:19 2022
% 0.21/0.39  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 6185.
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.39  set(auto).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.39  clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  list(usable).
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.21/0.39  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.21/0.39  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.21/0.39  clauses in usable.
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [copy,6,flip.1] {-} store(store(A,B,select(A,C)),C,select(A,B))=store(store(A,C,select(A,B)),B,select(A,C)).
% 0.21/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 316 during input processing: 0 [copy,316,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.44  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.44  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.44  number of clauses in intial UL: 1
% 0.21/0.44  number of clauses initially in problem: 212
% 0.21/0.44  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 0
% 0.21/0.44  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 0
% 0.21/0.44  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.44  absolute distinct symbol count: 375
% 0.21/0.44     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.21/0.44     distinct function count: 4
% 0.21/0.44     distinct constant count: 368
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.62/0.82  
% 0.62/0.82  Input error on line 390: clause (0) {  -> p_eq(v0,v1); p_eq(f_select(v2,v1),f_select(v3,v1)); p_eq(f_select(f_store(v4,f_store(v3,v0,v5),v6),f_store(v2,f_store(v7,v8,v9),v10)),f_select(v4,f_store(v2,f_store(v7,v8,v9),v10))); p_eq(v8,v11); p_eq(f_select(v1,v11),f_select(v7,v11)). } end.
% 0.62/0.82  
% 0.62/0.82  FN_MAX exceeded: too many functors! 
% 0.62/0.82  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------