TSTP Solution File: SWV500-1.050 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWV500-1.050 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:38:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 0.53s 0.74s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SWV500-1.050 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 11:42:28 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.34  The process was started by sandbox on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.34  Wed Jun 15 11:42:28 2022
% 0.12/0.34  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 30386.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.34  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.34  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.34  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.34  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.34  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.34    Following clause subsumed by 306 during input processing: 0 [copy,306,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.17/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.17/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.17/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 1
% 0.17/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 205
% 0.17/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 0
% 0.17/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 0
% 0.17/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.17/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 353
% 0.17/0.38     distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.17/0.38     distinct function count: 2
% 0.17/0.38     distinct constant count: 349
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.17/0.38  
% 0.17/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.53/0.73  
% 0.53/0.73  Input error on line 368: clause (0) {  -> p_eq(v0,v1); p_eq(v2,f_select(v3,v1)); p_eq(f_select(f_store(v4,f_store(v3,v0,v5),v6),v7),f_select(v4,v7)); p_eq(f_select(v8,v2),f_select(v9,v2)); p_eq(f_select(f_store(v10,f_store(v9,f_select(v7,v1),v11),v12),v8),f_select(v10,v8)). } end.
% 0.53/0.73  
% 0.53/0.73  FN_MAX exceeded: too many functors! 
% 0.53/0.73  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------