TSTP Solution File: SWV496-1.040 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SWV496-1.040 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:21:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.12s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SWV496-1.040 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 16:35:35 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic H_____011_C18_F1_PI_SE_SP_S2S
% 0.12/0.36  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 0.12/0.36  #
% 0.12/0.36  # Number of axioms: 3 Number of unprocessed: 3
% 0.12/0.36  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36  # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.36  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.36  # 3 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.36  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.36  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.36  # Found 2 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.36  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.36  # 1 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.36  # 2 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.36  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.12/0.36  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.12/0.36  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.12/0.36  # Returning from population with 9 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.36  # We now have 9 tableaux to operate on
% 0.12/0.37  # 18496 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.37  # 18497 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.37  # 18498 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.37  # 18499 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.37  # 18500 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.37  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X2)=X3)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (X1=X2|select(store(X3,X1,X4),X2)=select(X3,X2))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(a1,n16,e16),n14,e14),n24,e24),n11,e11),n25,e25),n17,e17),n7,e7),n32,e32),n6,e6),n18,e18),n37,e37),n31,e31),n13,e13),n12,e12),n36,e36),n20,e20),n35,e35),n23,e23),n26,e26),n21,e21),n27,e27),n10,e10),n22,e22),n8,e8),n33,e33),n2,e2),n40,e40),n38,e38),n39,e39),n1,e1),n9,e9),n3,e3),n5,e5),n4,e4),n30,e30),n15,e15),n34,e34),n28,e28),n29,e29),n19,e19)!=store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(a1,n1,e1),n2,e2),n3,e3),n4,e4),n5,e5),n6,e6),n7,e7),n8,e8),n9,e9),n10,e10),n11,e11),n12,e12),n13,e13),n14,e14),n15,e15),n16,e16),n17,e17),n18,e18),n19,e19),n20,e20),n21,e21),n22,e22),n23,e23),n24,e24),n25,e25),n26,e26),n27,e27),n28,e28),n29,e29),n30,e30),n31,e31),n32,e32),n33,e33),n34,e34),n35,e35),n36,e36),n37,e37),n38,e38),n39,e39),n1,e1))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X5=X5)).
% 0.12/0.37  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # Found 5 steps
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (select(store(X15,X16,X11),X16)=X11), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (select(store(X15,X16,X11),X16)=X11), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_17])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (select(store(X1,X11,store(X1,X11,X8)),X11)!=store(X1,X11,X8)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (select(select(store(X1,X11,store(X1,X11,X8)),X11),select(store(X15,X16,X11),X16))=select(store(X1,X11,X8),X11)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (select(store(X1,X11,X8),X11)!=X8), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.12/0.37  # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X2)=X3)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (X1=X2|select(store(X3,X1,X4),X2)=select(X3,X2))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(a1,n16,e16),n14,e14),n24,e24),n11,e11),n25,e25),n17,e17),n7,e7),n32,e32),n6,e6),n18,e18),n37,e37),n31,e31),n13,e13),n12,e12),n36,e36),n20,e20),n35,e35),n23,e23),n26,e26),n21,e21),n27,e27),n10,e10),n22,e22),n8,e8),n33,e33),n2,e2),n40,e40),n38,e38),n39,e39),n1,e1),n9,e9),n3,e3),n5,e5),n4,e4),n30,e30),n15,e15),n34,e34),n28,e28),n29,e29),n19,e19)!=store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(a1,n1,e1),n2,e2),n3,e3),n4,e4),n5,e5),n6,e6),n7,e7),n8,e8),n9,e9),n10,e10),n11,e11),n12,e12),n13,e13),n14,e14),n15,e15),n16,e16),n17,e17),n18,e18),n19,e19),n20,e20),n21,e21),n22,e22),n23,e23),n24,e24),n25,e25),n26,e26),n27,e27),n28,e28),n29,e29),n30,e30),n31,e31),n32,e32),n33,e33),n34,e34),n35,e35),n36,e36),n37,e37),n38,e38),n39,e39),n1,e1))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X5=X5)).
% 0.12/0.37  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # Found 5 steps
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (select(store(X12,X13,store(X1,X11,X8)),X13)=store(X1,X11,X8)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (select(store(X12,X13,store(X1,X11,X8)),X13)=store(X1,X11,X8)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_17])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (select(store(X1,X11,X11),X11)!=X11), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (select(select(store(X12,X13,store(X1,X11,X8)),X13),select(store(X1,X11,X11),X11))=select(store(X1,X11,X8),X11)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (select(store(X1,X11,X8),X11)!=X8), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.12/0.37  # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X2)=X3)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (X1=X2|select(store(X3,X1,X4),X2)=select(X3,X2))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(a1,n16,e16),n14,e14),n24,e24),n11,e11),n25,e25),n17,e17),n7,e7),n32,e32),n6,e6),n18,e18),n37,e37),n31,e31),n13,e13),n12,e12),n36,e36),n20,e20),n35,e35),n23,e23),n26,e26),n21,e21),n27,e27),n10,e10),n22,e22),n8,e8),n33,e33),n2,e2),n40,e40),n38,e38),n39,e39),n1,e1),n9,e9),n3,e3),n5,e5),n4,e4),n30,e30),n15,e15),n34,e34),n28,e28),n29,e29),n19,e19)!=store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(a1,n1,e1),n2,e2),n3,e3),n4,e4),n5,e5),n6,e6),n7,e7),n8,e8),n9,e9),n10,e10),n11,e11),n12,e12),n13,e13),n14,e14),n15,e15),n16,e16),n17,e17),n18,e18),n19,e19),n20,e20),n21,e21),n22,e22),n23,e23),n24,e24),n25,e25),n26,e26),n27,e27),n28,e28),n29,e29),n30,e30),n31,e31),n32,e32),n33,e33),n34,e34),n35,e35),n36,e36),n37,e37),n38,e38),n39,e39),n1,e1))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X5=X5)).
% 0.12/0.37  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # Found 6 steps
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (select(store(X22,X23,X7),X23)=X7), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (select(store(X22,X23,X7),X23)=X7), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X13),X2)!=X13), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X15),X2)!=X15), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (store(select(store(X1,X2,X13),X2),select(store(X1,X2,X15),X2),select(store(X22,X23,X7),X23))=store(X13,X15,X7)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (store(X13,X15,X7)!=select(store(X1,X2,store(X13,X15,X7)),X2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.12/0.37  # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X2)=X3)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (X1=X2|select(store(X3,X1,X4),X2)=select(X3,X2))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(a1,n16,e16),n14,e14),n24,e24),n11,e11),n25,e25),n17,e17),n7,e7),n32,e32),n6,e6),n18,e18),n37,e37),n31,e31),n13,e13),n12,e12),n36,e36),n20,e20),n35,e35),n23,e23),n26,e26),n21,e21),n27,e27),n10,e10),n22,e22),n8,e8),n33,e33),n2,e2),n40,e40),n38,e38),n39,e39),n1,e1),n9,e9),n3,e3),n5,e5),n4,e4),n30,e30),n15,e15),n34,e34),n28,e28),n29,e29),n19,e19)!=store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(a1,n1,e1),n2,e2),n3,e3),n4,e4),n5,e5),n6,e6),n7,e7),n8,e8),n9,e9),n10,e10),n11,e11),n12,e12),n13,e13),n14,e14),n15,e15),n16,e16),n17,e17),n18,e18),n19,e19),n20,e20),n21,e21),n22,e22),n23,e23),n24,e24),n25,e25),n26,e26),n27,e27),n28,e28),n29,e29),n30,e30),n31,e31),n32,e32),n33,e33),n34,e34),n35,e35),n36,e36),n37,e37),n38,e38),n39,e39),n1,e1))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X5=X5)).
% 0.12/0.37  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # Found 6 steps
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (select(store(X19,X20,X15),X20)=X15), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (select(store(X19,X20,X15),X20)=X15), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X13),X2)!=X13), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X7),X2)!=X7), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (store(select(store(X1,X2,X13),X2),select(store(X19,X20,X15),X20),select(store(X1,X2,X7),X2))=store(X13,X15,X7)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (store(X13,X15,X7)!=select(store(X1,X2,store(X13,X15,X7)),X2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.12/0.37  # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X3),X2)=X3)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (X1=X2|select(store(X3,X1,X4),X2)=select(X3,X2))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(a1,n16,e16),n14,e14),n24,e24),n11,e11),n25,e25),n17,e17),n7,e7),n32,e32),n6,e6),n18,e18),n37,e37),n31,e31),n13,e13),n12,e12),n36,e36),n20,e20),n35,e35),n23,e23),n26,e26),n21,e21),n27,e27),n10,e10),n22,e22),n8,e8),n33,e33),n2,e2),n40,e40),n38,e38),n39,e39),n1,e1),n9,e9),n3,e3),n5,e5),n4,e4),n30,e30),n15,e15),n34,e34),n28,e28),n29,e29),n19,e19)!=store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(a1,n1,e1),n2,e2),n3,e3),n4,e4),n5,e5),n6,e6),n7,e7),n8,e8),n9,e9),n10,e10),n11,e11),n12,e12),n13,e13),n14,e14),n15,e15),n16,e16),n17,e17),n18,e18),n19,e19),n20,e20),n21,e21),n22,e22),n23,e23),n24,e24),n25,e25),n26,e26),n27,e27),n28,e28),n29,e29),n30,e30),n31,e31),n32,e32),n33,e33),n34,e34),n35,e35),n36,e36),n37,e37),n38,e38),n39,e39),n1,e1))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X5=X5)).
% 0.12/0.37  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # Found 6 steps
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (select(store(X16,X17,X13),X17)=X13), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (select(store(X16,X17,X13),X17)=X13), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X15),X2)!=X15), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (select(store(X1,X2,X7),X2)!=X7), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (store(select(store(X16,X17,X13),X17),select(store(X1,X2,X15),X2),select(store(X1,X2,X7),X2))=store(X13,X15,X7)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (store(X13,X15,X7)!=select(store(X1,X2,store(X13,X15,X7)),X2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.12/0.37  # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37  # Child (18497) has found a proof.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # Proof search is over...
% 0.12/0.37  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------