TSTP Solution File: SWV496-1.040 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV496-1.040 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:47:22 EDT 2023
% Result : Satisfiable 0.15s 0.42s
% Output : Saturation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named a2)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| select(store(X3,X1,X4),X2) = select(X3,X2) ),
a2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(a1,n1,e1),n2,e2),n3,e3),n4,e4),n5,e5),n6,e6),n7,e7),n8,e8),n9,e9),n10,e10),n11,e11),n12,e12),n13,e13),n14,e14),n15,e15),n16,e16),n17,e17),n18,e18),n19,e19),n20,e20),n21,e21),n22,e22),n23,e23),n24,e24),n25,e25),n26,e26),n27,e27),n28,e28),n29,e29),n30,e30),n31,e31),n32,e32),n33,e33),n34,e34),n35,e35),n36,e36),n37,e37),n38,e38),n39,e39),n1,e1) != store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(store(a1,n16,e16),n14,e14),n24,e24),n11,e11),n25,e25),n17,e17),n7,e7),n32,e32),n6,e6),n18,e18),n37,e37),n31,e31),n13,e13),n12,e12),n36,e36),n20,e20),n35,e35),n23,e23),n26,e26),n21,e21),n27,e27),n10,e10),n22,e22),n8,e8),n33,e33),n2,e2),n40,e40),n38,e38),n39,e39),n1,e1),n9,e9),n3,e3),n5,e5),n4,e4),n30,e30),n15,e15),n34,e34),n28,e28),n29,e29),n19,e19),
goal,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
select(store(X1,X2,X3),X2) = X3,
a1,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10 % Problem : SWV496-1.040 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.09/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:05:56 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8k9a9fLz82/E---3.1_5083.p
% 0.15/0.42 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 5164 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FGUPF-FFMF32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_SP_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_SP_S2S with pid 5168 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_SP_S2S
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FGUPF-FFMF32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_SP_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # No proof found!
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.42 # Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # Processed clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 6
% 0.15/0.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 525
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1664 pages
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1740 pages
% 0.15/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------