TSTP Solution File: SWV495-1.050 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWV495-1.050 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:38:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 239.28s 239.45s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWV495-1.050 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 10:26:21 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox2 on n014.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Wed Jun 15 10:26:21 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 10623.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.35  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.35  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [copy,6,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 1
% 0.20/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 5
% 0.20/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 20
% 0.20/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 99
% 0.20/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 104
% 0.20/0.39     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.20/0.39     distinct function count: 2
% 0.20/0.39     distinct constant count: 101
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 14.41/14.57  
% 14.41/14.57  
% 14.41/14.57  Changing weight limit from 60 to 54.
% 14.41/14.57  
% 14.41/14.57  Resetting weight limit to 54 after 20 givens.
% 14.41/14.57  
% 54.51/54.72  
% 54.51/54.72  
% 54.51/54.72  Changing weight limit from 54 to 43.
% 54.51/54.72  
% 54.51/54.72  Resetting weight limit to 43 after 25 givens.
% 54.51/54.72  
% 59.08/59.29  
% 59.08/59.29  
% 59.08/59.29  Changing weight limit from 43 to 42.
% 59.08/59.29  
% 59.08/59.29  Resetting weight limit to 42 after 30 givens.
% 59.08/59.29  
% 67.24/67.43  
% 67.24/67.43  
% 67.24/67.43  Changing weight limit from 42 to 41.
% 67.24/67.43  
% 67.24/67.43  Resetting weight limit to 41 after 35 givens.
% 67.24/67.43  
% 73.20/73.43  
% 73.20/73.43  
% 73.20/73.43  Changing weight limit from 41 to 40.
% 73.20/73.43  
% 73.20/73.43  Resetting weight limit to 40 after 40 givens.
% 73.20/73.43  
% 75.80/75.97  
% 75.80/75.97  
% 75.80/75.97  Changing weight limit from 40 to 39.
% 75.80/75.97  
% 75.80/75.97  Resetting weight limit to 39 after 45 givens.
% 75.80/75.97  
% 79.48/79.65  
% 79.48/79.65  
% 79.48/79.65  Changing weight limit from 39 to 38.
% 79.48/79.65  
% 79.48/79.65  Resetting weight limit to 38 after 50 givens.
% 79.48/79.65  
% 87.78/87.98  
% 87.78/87.98  
% 87.78/87.98  Changing weight limit from 38 to 37.
% 87.78/87.98  
% 87.78/87.98  Resetting weight limit to 37 after 60 givens.
% 87.78/87.98  
% 103.72/103.92  
% 103.72/103.92  
% 103.72/103.92  Changing weight limit from 37 to 35.
% 103.72/103.92  
% 103.72/103.92  Resetting weight limit to 35 after 80 givens.
% 103.72/103.92  
% 108.48/108.66  
% 108.48/108.66  
% 108.48/108.66  Changing weight limit from 35 to 34.
% 108.48/108.66  
% 108.48/108.66  Resetting weight limit to 34 after 90 givens.
% 108.48/108.66  
% 233.70/233.91  
% 233.70/233.91  
% 233.70/233.91  Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 233.70/233.91  
% 233.70/233.91  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 233.70/233.91  
% 233.70/233.91  Model 3 [ 12 1 29066 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 233.70/233.91  
% 233.70/233.91  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 233.70/233.91  
% 233.70/233.91  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 233.70/233.91  
% 233.70/233.91  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 233.70/233.91  
% 233.70/233.91  Model 5 [ 17 10 197139 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 233.70/233.91  
% 233.70/233.91  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 233.70/233.91  
% 233.70/233.91  Model 6 [ 15 3 51468 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 233.70/233.91  
% 233.70/233.91  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 233.70/233.91  
% 233.70/233.91  Model 7 [ 35 14 189671 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 233.70/233.91  
% 233.70/233.91  Resetting weight limit to 33 after 225 givens.
% 233.70/233.91  
% 239.28/239.45  
% 239.28/239.45  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 239.28/239.45  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 239.28/239.45  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 239.28/239.45  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 239.28/239.45  
% 239.28/239.45  
% 239.28/239.45  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 239.28/239.45  
% 239.28/239.45  Model 8 [ 25 1 9873 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 239.28/239.45  
% 239.28/239.45  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 239.28/239.45  
% 239.28/239.45  true clauses given           3      (1.3%)
% 239.28/239.45  false clauses given        225
% 239.28/239.45  
% 239.28/239.45        FALSE     TRUE
% 239.28/239.45    11  1         0
% 239.28/239.45    14  2         1
% 239.28/239.45    15  0         1
% 239.28/239.45    16  2         0
% 239.28/239.45    17  21        4
% 239.28/239.45    18  3         2
% 239.28/239.45    19  11        2
% 239.28/239.45    20  14        8
% 239.28/239.45    21  16        6
% 239.28/239.45    22  40        13
% 239.28/239.45    23  43        12
% 239.28/239.45    24  152       30
% 239.28/239.45    25  339       35
% 239.28/239.45    26  184       57
% 239.28/239.45    27  615       68
% 239.28/239.45    28  865       68
% 239.28/239.45    29  27        0
% 239.28/239.45    30  105       0
% 239.28/239.45    31  50        1
% 239.28/239.45    32  32        2
% 239.28/239.45    33  241       5
% 239.28/239.45  tot:  2763      315      (10.2% true)
% 239.28/239.45  
% 239.28/239.45  
% 239.28/239.45  Model 8 [ 25 1 9873 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 239.28/239.45  
% 239.28/239.45  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 239.28/239.45  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 239.28/239.45  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 239.28/239.45  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 239.28/239.45  
% 239.28/239.45  
% 239.28/239.45  The job finished Wed Jun 15 10:30:20 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------