TSTP Solution File: SWV488+3 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWV488+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:38:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.46s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWV488+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 00:20:26 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.37  The process was started by sandbox on n007.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.37  Thu Jun 16 00:20:26 2022
% 0.19/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 10694.
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=9.
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 66 during input processing: 0 [copy,66,flip.1] {-} plus(A,B)=plus(B,A).
% 0.19/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 77 during input processing: 0 [copy,77,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.45  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.45  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.45  number of clauses in intial UL: 62
% 0.19/0.45  number of clauses initially in problem: 75
% 0.19/0.45  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 82
% 0.19/0.45  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 84
% 0.19/0.45  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.45  absolute distinct symbol count: 13
% 0.19/0.45     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.19/0.45     distinct function count: 3
% 0.19/0.45     distinct constant count: 7
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.08 sec ----> 191 [binary,189.1,12.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  Length of proof is 7.  Level of proof is 3.
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  2 [] {+} int_leq(A,B)| -int_less(A,B).
% 0.19/0.46  12 [] {+} real_zero!=real_one.
% 0.19/0.46  14 [] {-} -int_leq(int_one,A)| -int_leq(A,n)| -int_leq(int_one,B)| -int_leq(B,n)| -int_leq(int_one,C)| -int_leq(C,B)|a(C,C)=real_one.
% 0.19/0.46  15 [copy,14,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} -int_leq(int_one,A)| -int_leq(A,n)| -int_leq(int_one,B)| -int_leq(B,A)|a(B,B)=real_one.
% 0.19/0.46  29 [factor,15.1.3] {+} -int_leq(int_one,A)| -int_leq(A,n)| -int_leq(A,A)|a(A,A)=real_one.
% 0.19/0.46  64 [] {-} int_less(A,B)|int_leq(B,A).
% 0.19/0.46  69 [] {-} int_leq(int_one,$c1).
% 0.19/0.46  71 [] {-} int_leq($c2,n).
% 0.19/0.46  73,72 [] {-} $c2=$c1.
% 0.19/0.46  74 [] {-} a($c2,$c1)=real_zero.
% 0.19/0.46  76,75 [copy,74,demod,73] {-} a($c1,$c1)=real_zero.
% 0.19/0.46  78 [back_demod,71,demod,73] {-} int_leq($c1,n).
% 0.19/0.46  84 [hyper,64,2] {-} int_leq(A,B)|int_leq(B,A).
% 0.19/0.46  85 [factor,84.1.2] {-} int_leq(A,A).
% 0.19/0.46  189 [hyper,85,29,69,78,demod,76] {-} real_zero=real_one.
% 0.19/0.46  191 [binary,189.1,12.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.46  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  ============ end of search ============
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  Process 10694 finished Thu Jun 16 00:20:26 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------