TSTP Solution File: SWV488+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWV488+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:17:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 132 ( 39 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 17 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 150 ( 45 ~; 42 |; 39 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 22 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 56 ( 3 sgn 42 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(qii,hypothesis,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( int_leq(int_one,X1)
& int_leq(X1,n)
& int_leq(int_one,X2)
& int_leq(X2,n) )
=> ( ! [X8] :
( ( int_less(int_zero,X8)
& X1 = plus(X2,X8) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( int_leq(int_one,X3)
& int_leq(X3,X2) )
=> a(plus(X3,X8),X3) = real_zero ) )
& ! [X3] :
( ( int_leq(int_one,X3)
& int_leq(X3,X2) )
=> a(X3,X3) = real_one )
& ! [X8] :
( ( int_less(int_zero,X8)
& X2 = plus(X1,X8) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( int_leq(int_one,X3)
& int_leq(X3,X1) )
=> a(X3,plus(X3,X8)) = real_zero ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',qii) ).
fof(uti,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( int_leq(int_one,X2)
& int_leq(X2,X1)
& int_leq(X1,n) )
=> ( X1 = X2
=> a(X1,X2) != real_zero ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',uti) ).
fof(int_leq,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( int_leq(X1,X2)
<=> ( int_less(X1,X2)
| X1 = X2 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',int_leq) ).
fof(real_constants,axiom,
real_zero != real_one,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',real_constants) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X2,X1] :
( epred1_2(X1,X2)
<=> ( ! [X8] :
( ( int_less(int_zero,X8)
& X1 = plus(X2,X8) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( int_leq(int_one,X3)
& int_leq(X3,X2) )
=> a(plus(X3,X8),X3) = real_zero ) )
& ! [X3] :
( ( int_leq(int_one,X3)
& int_leq(X3,X2) )
=> a(X3,X3) = real_one )
& ! [X8] :
( ( int_less(int_zero,X8)
& X2 = plus(X1,X8) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( int_leq(int_one,X3)
& int_leq(X3,X1) )
=> a(X3,plus(X3,X8)) = real_zero ) ) ) ),
introduced(definition) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X2,X1] :
( epred1_2(X1,X2)
=> ( ! [X8] :
( ( int_less(int_zero,X8)
& X1 = plus(X2,X8) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( int_leq(int_one,X3)
& int_leq(X3,X2) )
=> a(plus(X3,X8),X3) = real_zero ) )
& ! [X3] :
( ( int_leq(int_one,X3)
& int_leq(X3,X2) )
=> a(X3,X3) = real_one )
& ! [X8] :
( ( int_less(int_zero,X8)
& X2 = plus(X1,X8) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( int_leq(int_one,X3)
& int_leq(X3,X1) )
=> a(X3,plus(X3,X8)) = real_zero ) ) ) ),
inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_6,hypothesis,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( int_leq(int_one,X1)
& int_leq(X1,n)
& int_leq(int_one,X2)
& int_leq(X2,n) )
=> epred1_2(X1,X2) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[qii,c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( ( int_leq(int_one,X2)
& int_leq(X2,X1)
& int_leq(X1,n) )
=> ( X1 = X2
=> a(X1,X2) != real_zero ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[uti]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X9,X10,X11,X12,X13,X14,X15] :
( ( ~ int_less(int_zero,X11)
| X10 != plus(X9,X11)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X12)
| ~ int_leq(X12,X9)
| a(plus(X12,X11),X12) = real_zero
| ~ epred1_2(X10,X9) )
& ( ~ int_leq(int_one,X13)
| ~ int_leq(X13,X9)
| a(X13,X13) = real_one
| ~ epred1_2(X10,X9) )
& ( ~ int_less(int_zero,X14)
| X9 != plus(X10,X14)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X15)
| ~ int_leq(X15,X10)
| a(X15,plus(X15,X14)) = real_zero
| ~ epred1_2(X10,X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,hypothesis,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ int_leq(int_one,X3)
| ~ int_leq(X3,n)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X4)
| ~ int_leq(X4,n)
| epred1_2(X3,X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( int_leq(int_one,esk2_0)
& int_leq(esk2_0,esk1_0)
& int_leq(esk1_0,n)
& esk1_0 = esk2_0
& a(esk1_0,esk2_0) = real_zero ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( a(X3,X3) = real_one
| ~ epred1_2(X1,X2)
| ~ int_leq(X3,X2)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
( epred1_2(X1,X2)
| ~ int_leq(X2,n)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X2)
| ~ int_leq(X1,n)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
int_leq(int_one,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = esk2_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
( a(X1,X1) = real_one
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X1)
| ~ int_leq(X2,n)
| ~ int_leq(X3,n)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X2)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X3)
| ~ int_leq(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
int_leq(esk1_0,n),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
int_leq(int_one,esk1_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
( ( ~ int_leq(X3,X4)
| int_less(X3,X4)
| X3 = X4 )
& ( ~ int_less(X3,X4)
| int_leq(X3,X4) )
& ( X3 != X4
| int_leq(X3,X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[int_leq])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
a(esk1_0,esk2_0) = real_zero,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( a(X1,X1) = real_one
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X1)
| ~ int_leq(X2,n)
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X2)
| ~ int_leq(X1,esk1_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( int_leq(X1,X2)
| X1 != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
a(esk1_0,esk1_0) = real_zero,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( a(X1,X1) = real_one
| ~ int_leq(int_one,X1)
| ~ int_leq(X1,esk1_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
int_leq(X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
real_zero != real_one,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[real_constants]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_17]),c_0_24])]),c_0_25]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14 % Problem : SWV488+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.14/0.15 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 00:37:02 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.26/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.26/1.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.26/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.26/1.45
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof found!
% 0.26/1.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/1.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object total steps : 27
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object clause steps : 15
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object formula steps : 12
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object conjectures : 12
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 9
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 11
% 0.26/1.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.26/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 13
% 0.26/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Initial clauses : 25
% 0.26/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 25
% 0.26/1.45 # Processed clauses : 415
% 0.26/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.26/1.45 # ...subsumed : 234
% 0.26/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 180
% 0.26/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 20
% 0.26/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 6
% 0.26/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.26/1.45 # Generated clauses : 2117
% 0.26/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1801
% 0.26/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 116
% 0.26/1.45 # Paramodulations : 2065
% 0.26/1.45 # Factorizations : 26
% 0.26/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 26
% 0.26/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 170
% 0.26/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.26/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.26/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.26/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 155
% 0.26/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1367
% 0.26/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 5962
% 0.26/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.26/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3694
% 0.26/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2327
% 0.26/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 334
% 0.26/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20
% 0.26/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 19
% 0.26/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.26/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 24769
% 0.26/1.45
% 0.26/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/1.45 # User time : 0.065 s
% 0.26/1.45 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.26/1.45 # Total time : 0.068 s
% 0.26/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 4104 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------