TSTP Solution File: SWV488+2 by Bliksem---1.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem  : SWV488+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : bliksem %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 16:25:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.55s 0.98s
% Output   : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10  % Problem  : SWV488+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command  : bliksem %s
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 15:12:44 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.55/0.98  *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.55/0.98  *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.55/0.98  *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.55/0.98  Bliksem 1.12
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  Clauses:
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  { ! int_leq( X, Y ), int_less( X, Y ), X = Y }.
% 0.55/0.98  { ! int_less( X, Y ), int_leq( X, Y ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  { ! X = Y, int_leq( X, Y ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  { ! int_less( X, Z ), ! int_less( Z, Y ), int_less( X, Y ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  { ! int_less( X, Y ), ! X = Y }.
% 0.55/0.98  { int_less( X, Y ), int_leq( Y, X ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  { int_less( int_zero, int_one ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  { plus( X, Y ) = plus( Y, X ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  { plus( X, int_zero ) = X }.
% 0.55/0.98  { ! int_less( X, Y ), ! int_leq( Z, T ), int_leq( plus( X, Z ), plus( Y, T
% 0.55/0.98     ) ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  { ! int_less( X, Y ), int_less( int_zero, skol1( Z, T ) ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  { ! int_less( X, Y ), plus( X, skol1( X, Y ) ) = Y }.
% 0.55/0.98  { ! plus( X, Z ) = Y, ! int_less( int_zero, Z ), int_less( X, Y ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  { ! int_less( int_zero, X ), int_leq( int_one, X ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), int_less( int_zero, X ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  { ! real_zero = real_one }.
% 0.55/0.98  { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! int_leq( X, n ), ! int_leq( int_one, Y ), ! 
% 0.55/0.98    int_leq( Y, n ), ! int_less( int_zero, Z ), ! X = plus( Y, Z ), ! int_leq
% 0.55/0.98    ( int_one, T ), ! int_leq( T, Y ), a( plus( T, Z ), T ) = lu( plus( T, Z
% 0.55/0.98     ), T ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! int_leq( X, n ), ! int_leq( int_one, Y ), ! 
% 0.55/0.98    int_leq( Y, n ), ! int_leq( int_one, Z ), ! int_leq( Z, Y ), a( Z, Z ) = 
% 0.55/0.98    real_one }.
% 0.55/0.98  { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! int_leq( X, n ), ! int_leq( int_one, Y ), ! 
% 0.55/0.98    int_leq( Y, n ), ! int_less( int_zero, Z ), ! Y = plus( X, Z ), ! int_leq
% 0.55/0.98    ( int_one, T ), ! int_leq( T, X ), a( T, plus( T, Z ) ) = real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.98  { int_leq( int_one, skol2 ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  { int_leq( skol2, skol3 ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  { int_leq( skol3, n ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  { skol2 = skol3 }.
% 0.55/0.98  { a( skol2, skol3 ) = real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  percentage equality = 0.241935, percentage horn = 0.916667
% 0.55/0.98  This is a problem with some equality
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  Options Used:
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  useres =            1
% 0.55/0.98  useparamod =        1
% 0.55/0.98  useeqrefl =         1
% 0.55/0.98  useeqfact =         1
% 0.55/0.98  usefactor =         1
% 0.55/0.98  usesimpsplitting =  0
% 0.55/0.98  usesimpdemod =      5
% 0.55/0.98  usesimpres =        3
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  resimpinuse      =  1000
% 0.55/0.98  resimpclauses =     20000
% 0.55/0.98  substype =          eqrewr
% 0.55/0.98  backwardsubs =      1
% 0.55/0.98  selectoldest =      5
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  litorderings [0] =  split
% 0.55/0.98  litorderings [1] =  extend the termordering, first sorting on arguments
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  termordering =      kbo
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  litapriori =        0
% 0.55/0.98  termapriori =       1
% 0.55/0.98  litaposteriori =    0
% 0.55/0.98  termaposteriori =   0
% 0.55/0.98  demodaposteriori =  0
% 0.55/0.98  ordereqreflfact =   0
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  litselect =         negord
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  maxweight =         15
% 0.55/0.98  maxdepth =          30000
% 0.55/0.98  maxlength =         115
% 0.55/0.98  maxnrvars =         195
% 0.55/0.98  excuselevel =       1
% 0.55/0.98  increasemaxweight = 1
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  maxselected =       10000000
% 0.55/0.98  maxnrclauses =      10000000
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  showgenerated =    0
% 0.55/0.98  showkept =         0
% 0.55/0.98  showselected =     0
% 0.55/0.98  showdeleted =      0
% 0.55/0.98  showresimp =       1
% 0.55/0.98  showstatus =       2000
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  prologoutput =     0
% 0.55/0.98  nrgoals =          5000000
% 0.55/0.98  totalproof =       1
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  {}  [0, 0]      (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.55/0.98  .  [1, 2]      (w:1, o:26, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.55/0.98  !  [4, 1]      (w:0, o:21, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.55/0.98  =  [13, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.55/0.98  ==>  [14, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.55/0.98  int_leq  [37, 2]      (w:1, o:50, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.55/0.98  int_less  [38, 2]      (w:1, o:51, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.55/0.98  int_zero  [40, 0]      (w:1, o:13, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.55/0.98  int_one  [41, 0]      (w:1, o:14, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.55/0.98  plus  [42, 2]      (w:1, o:52, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.55/0.98  real_zero  [47, 0]      (w:1, o:15, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.55/0.98  real_one  [48, 0]      (w:1, o:16, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.55/0.98  n  [49, 0]      (w:1, o:17, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.55/0.98  a  [51, 2]      (w:1, o:53, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.55/0.98  lu  [52, 2]      (w:1, o:54, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.55/0.98  skol1  [53, 2]      (w:1, o:55, a:1, s:1, b:1), 
% 0.55/0.98  skol2  [54, 0]      (w:1, o:19, a:1, s:1, b:1), 
% 0.55/0.98  skol3  [55, 0]      (w:1, o:20, a:1, s:1, b:1).
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  Starting Search:
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  *** allocated 15000 integers for clauses
% 0.55/0.98  *** allocated 22500 integers for clauses
% 0.55/0.98  *** allocated 33750 integers for clauses
% 0.55/0.98  *** allocated 15000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.55/0.98  *** allocated 50625 integers for clauses
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  Bliksems!, er is een bewijs:
% 0.55/0.98  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.55/0.98  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  (2) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2} I { ! X = Y, int_leq( X, Y ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (15) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! real_one ==> real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.98  (17) {G0,W23,D3,L7,V3,M7} I { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! int_leq( X, n ), !
% 0.55/0.98     int_leq( int_one, Y ), ! int_leq( Y, n ), ! int_leq( int_one, Z ), ! 
% 0.55/0.98    int_leq( Z, Y ), a( Z, Z ) ==> real_one }.
% 0.55/0.98  (19) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { int_leq( int_one, skol2 ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (21) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { int_leq( skol3, n ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (22) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { skol3 ==> skol2 }.
% 0.55/0.98  (23) {G1,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1} I;d(22) { a( skol2, skol2 ) ==> real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.98  (24) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V1,M1} Q(2) { int_leq( X, X ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (30) {G1,W17,D3,L5,V2,M5} F(17);f { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! int_leq( X, 
% 0.55/0.98    n ), ! int_leq( int_one, Y ), ! int_leq( Y, X ), a( Y, Y ) ==> real_one
% 0.55/0.98     }.
% 0.55/0.98  (35) {G2,W11,D3,L3,V1,M3} F(30);r(24) { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! int_leq
% 0.55/0.98    ( X, n ), a( X, X ) ==> real_one }.
% 0.55/0.98  (39) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} S(21);d(22) { int_leq( skol2, n ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (892) {G3,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} R(35,19);d(23);r(39) { real_one ==> real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.98  (893) {G4,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} S(892);r(15) {  }.
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.55/0.98  found a proof!
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  Unprocessed initial clauses:
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  (895) {G0,W9,D2,L3,V2,M3}  { ! int_leq( X, Y ), int_less( X, Y ), X = Y }.
% 0.55/0.98  (896) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! int_less( X, Y ), int_leq( X, Y ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (897) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! X = Y, int_leq( X, Y ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (898) {G0,W9,D2,L3,V3,M3}  { ! int_less( X, Z ), ! int_less( Z, Y ), 
% 0.55/0.98    int_less( X, Y ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (899) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! int_less( X, Y ), ! X = Y }.
% 0.55/0.98  (900) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { int_less( X, Y ), int_leq( Y, X ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (901) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { int_less( int_zero, int_one ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (902) {G0,W7,D3,L1,V2,M1}  { plus( X, Y ) = plus( Y, X ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (903) {G0,W5,D3,L1,V1,M1}  { plus( X, int_zero ) = X }.
% 0.55/0.98  (904) {G0,W13,D3,L3,V4,M3}  { ! int_less( X, Y ), ! int_leq( Z, T ), 
% 0.55/0.98    int_leq( plus( X, Z ), plus( Y, T ) ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (905) {G0,W8,D3,L2,V4,M2}  { ! int_less( X, Y ), int_less( int_zero, skol1
% 0.55/0.98    ( Z, T ) ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (906) {G0,W10,D4,L2,V2,M2}  { ! int_less( X, Y ), plus( X, skol1( X, Y ) ) 
% 0.55/0.98    = Y }.
% 0.55/0.98  (907) {G0,W11,D3,L3,V3,M3}  { ! plus( X, Z ) = Y, ! int_less( int_zero, Z )
% 0.55/0.98    , int_less( X, Y ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (908) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V1,M2}  { ! int_less( int_zero, X ), int_leq( int_one, X
% 0.55/0.98     ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (909) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V1,M2}  { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), int_less( int_zero, X
% 0.55/0.98     ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (910) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! real_zero = real_one }.
% 0.55/0.98  (911) {G0,W37,D4,L9,V4,M9}  { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! int_leq( X, n ), !
% 0.55/0.98     int_leq( int_one, Y ), ! int_leq( Y, n ), ! int_less( int_zero, Z ), ! X
% 0.55/0.98     = plus( Y, Z ), ! int_leq( int_one, T ), ! int_leq( T, Y ), a( plus( T, 
% 0.55/0.98    Z ), T ) = lu( plus( T, Z ), T ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (912) {G0,W23,D3,L7,V3,M7}  { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! int_leq( X, n ), !
% 0.55/0.98     int_leq( int_one, Y ), ! int_leq( Y, n ), ! int_leq( int_one, Z ), ! 
% 0.55/0.98    int_leq( Z, Y ), a( Z, Z ) = real_one }.
% 0.55/0.98  (913) {G0,W33,D4,L9,V4,M9}  { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! int_leq( X, n ), !
% 0.55/0.98     int_leq( int_one, Y ), ! int_leq( Y, n ), ! int_less( int_zero, Z ), ! Y
% 0.55/0.98     = plus( X, Z ), ! int_leq( int_one, T ), ! int_leq( T, X ), a( T, plus( 
% 0.55/0.98    T, Z ) ) = real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.98  (914) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { int_leq( int_one, skol2 ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (915) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { int_leq( skol2, skol3 ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (916) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { int_leq( skol3, n ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  (917) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { skol2 = skol3 }.
% 0.55/0.98  (918) {G0,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1}  { a( skol2, skol3 ) = real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  Total Proof:
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  subsumption: (2) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2} I { ! X = Y, int_leq( X, Y ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  parent0: (897) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! X = Y, int_leq( X, Y ) }.
% 0.55/0.98  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.98     X := X
% 0.55/0.98     Y := Y
% 0.55/0.98  end
% 0.55/0.98  permutation0:
% 0.55/0.98     0 ==> 0
% 0.55/0.98     1 ==> 1
% 0.55/0.98  end
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  eqswap: (928) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! real_one = real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.98  parent0[0]: (910) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! real_zero = real_one }.
% 0.55/0.98  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.98  end
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  subsumption: (15) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! real_one ==> real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.98  parent0: (928) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! real_one = real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.98  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.98  end
% 0.55/0.98  permutation0:
% 0.55/0.98     0 ==> 0
% 0.55/0.98  end
% 0.55/0.98  
% 0.55/0.98  *** allocated 22500 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.55/0.98  subsumption: (17) {G0,W23,D3,L7,V3,M7} I { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! 
% 0.55/0.98    int_leq( X, n ), ! int_leq( int_one, Y ), ! int_leq( Y, n ), ! int_leq( 
% 0.55/0.98    int_one, Z ), ! int_leq( Z, Y ), a( Z, Z ) ==> real_one }.
% 0.55/0.98  parent0: (912) {G0,W23,D3,L7,V3,M7}  { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! int_leq( 
% 0.55/0.99    X, n ), ! int_leq( int_one, Y ), ! int_leq( Y, n ), ! int_leq( int_one, Z
% 0.55/0.99     ), ! int_leq( Z, Y ), a( Z, Z ) = real_one }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99     X := X
% 0.55/0.99     Y := Y
% 0.55/0.99     Z := Z
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  permutation0:
% 0.55/0.99     0 ==> 0
% 0.55/0.99     1 ==> 1
% 0.55/0.99     2 ==> 2
% 0.55/0.99     3 ==> 3
% 0.55/0.99     4 ==> 4
% 0.55/0.99     5 ==> 5
% 0.55/0.99     6 ==> 6
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  *** allocated 75937 integers for clauses
% 0.55/0.99  *** allocated 33750 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.55/0.99  subsumption: (19) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { int_leq( int_one, skol2 ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0: (914) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { int_leq( int_one, skol2 ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  permutation0:
% 0.55/0.99     0 ==> 0
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  *** allocated 50625 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.55/0.99  subsumption: (21) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { int_leq( skol3, n ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0: (916) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { int_leq( skol3, n ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  permutation0:
% 0.55/0.99     0 ==> 0
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  eqswap: (1882) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { skol3 = skol2 }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0[0]: (917) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { skol2 = skol3 }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  subsumption: (22) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { skol3 ==> skol2 }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0: (1882) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { skol3 = skol2 }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  permutation0:
% 0.55/0.99     0 ==> 0
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  *** allocated 75937 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.55/0.99  *** allocated 113905 integers for clauses
% 0.55/0.99  paramod: (2182) {G1,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1}  { a( skol2, skol2 ) = real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0[0]: (22) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { skol3 ==> skol2 }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent1[0; 3]: (918) {G0,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1}  { a( skol2, skol3 ) = real_zero
% 0.55/0.99     }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  substitution1:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  subsumption: (23) {G1,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1} I;d(22) { a( skol2, skol2 ) ==> 
% 0.55/0.99    real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0: (2182) {G1,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1}  { a( skol2, skol2 ) = real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  permutation0:
% 0.55/0.99     0 ==> 0
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  eqswap: (2184) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! Y = X, int_leq( X, Y ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0[0]: (2) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2} I { ! X = Y, int_leq( X, Y ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99     X := X
% 0.55/0.99     Y := Y
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  eqrefl: (2185) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V1,M1}  { int_leq( X, X ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0[0]: (2184) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! Y = X, int_leq( X, Y ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99     X := X
% 0.55/0.99     Y := X
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  subsumption: (24) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V1,M1} Q(2) { int_leq( X, X ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0: (2185) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V1,M1}  { int_leq( X, X ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99     X := X
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  permutation0:
% 0.55/0.99     0 ==> 0
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  factor: (2196) {G0,W20,D3,L6,V2,M6}  { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! int_leq( 
% 0.55/0.99    X, n ), ! int_leq( X, n ), ! int_leq( int_one, Y ), ! int_leq( Y, X ), a
% 0.55/0.99    ( Y, Y ) ==> real_one }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0[0, 2]: (17) {G0,W23,D3,L7,V3,M7} I { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! 
% 0.55/0.99    int_leq( X, n ), ! int_leq( int_one, Y ), ! int_leq( Y, n ), ! int_leq( 
% 0.55/0.99    int_one, Z ), ! int_leq( Z, Y ), a( Z, Z ) ==> real_one }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99     X := X
% 0.55/0.99     Y := X
% 0.55/0.99     Z := Y
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  factor: (2199) {G0,W17,D3,L5,V2,M5}  { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! int_leq( 
% 0.55/0.99    X, n ), ! int_leq( int_one, Y ), ! int_leq( Y, X ), a( Y, Y ) ==> 
% 0.55/0.99    real_one }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0[1, 2]: (2196) {G0,W20,D3,L6,V2,M6}  { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! 
% 0.55/0.99    int_leq( X, n ), ! int_leq( X, n ), ! int_leq( int_one, Y ), ! int_leq( Y
% 0.55/0.99    , X ), a( Y, Y ) ==> real_one }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99     X := X
% 0.55/0.99     Y := Y
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  subsumption: (30) {G1,W17,D3,L5,V2,M5} F(17);f { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), !
% 0.55/0.99     int_leq( X, n ), ! int_leq( int_one, Y ), ! int_leq( Y, X ), a( Y, Y ) 
% 0.55/0.99    ==> real_one }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0: (2199) {G0,W17,D3,L5,V2,M5}  { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! int_leq
% 0.55/0.99    ( X, n ), ! int_leq( int_one, Y ), ! int_leq( Y, X ), a( Y, Y ) ==> 
% 0.55/0.99    real_one }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99     X := X
% 0.55/0.99     Y := Y
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  permutation0:
% 0.55/0.99     0 ==> 0
% 0.55/0.99     1 ==> 1
% 0.55/0.99     2 ==> 2
% 0.55/0.99     3 ==> 3
% 0.55/0.99     4 ==> 4
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  factor: (2211) {G1,W14,D3,L4,V1,M4}  { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! int_leq( 
% 0.55/0.99    X, n ), ! int_leq( X, X ), a( X, X ) ==> real_one }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0[0, 2]: (30) {G1,W17,D3,L5,V2,M5} F(17);f { ! int_leq( int_one, X )
% 0.55/0.99    , ! int_leq( X, n ), ! int_leq( int_one, Y ), ! int_leq( Y, X ), a( Y, Y
% 0.55/0.99     ) ==> real_one }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99     X := X
% 0.55/0.99     Y := X
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  resolution: (2218) {G2,W11,D3,L3,V1,M3}  { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! 
% 0.55/0.99    int_leq( X, n ), a( X, X ) ==> real_one }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0[2]: (2211) {G1,W14,D3,L4,V1,M4}  { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! 
% 0.55/0.99    int_leq( X, n ), ! int_leq( X, X ), a( X, X ) ==> real_one }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent1[0]: (24) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V1,M1} Q(2) { int_leq( X, X ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99     X := X
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  substitution1:
% 0.55/0.99     X := X
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  subsumption: (35) {G2,W11,D3,L3,V1,M3} F(30);r(24) { ! int_leq( int_one, X
% 0.55/0.99     ), ! int_leq( X, n ), a( X, X ) ==> real_one }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0: (2218) {G2,W11,D3,L3,V1,M3}  { ! int_leq( int_one, X ), ! int_leq
% 0.55/0.99    ( X, n ), a( X, X ) ==> real_one }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99     X := X
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  permutation0:
% 0.55/0.99     0 ==> 0
% 0.55/0.99     1 ==> 1
% 0.55/0.99     2 ==> 2
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  paramod: (2221) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { int_leq( skol2, n ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0[0]: (22) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { skol3 ==> skol2 }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent1[0; 1]: (21) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { int_leq( skol3, n ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  substitution1:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  subsumption: (39) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} S(21);d(22) { int_leq( skol2, n ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0: (2221) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { int_leq( skol2, n ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  permutation0:
% 0.55/0.99     0 ==> 0
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  eqswap: (2222) {G2,W11,D3,L3,V1,M3}  { real_one ==> a( X, X ), ! int_leq( 
% 0.55/0.99    int_one, X ), ! int_leq( X, n ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0[2]: (35) {G2,W11,D3,L3,V1,M3} F(30);r(24) { ! int_leq( int_one, X )
% 0.55/0.99    , ! int_leq( X, n ), a( X, X ) ==> real_one }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99     X := X
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  resolution: (2224) {G1,W8,D3,L2,V0,M2}  { real_one ==> a( skol2, skol2 ), !
% 0.55/0.99     int_leq( skol2, n ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0[1]: (2222) {G2,W11,D3,L3,V1,M3}  { real_one ==> a( X, X ), ! 
% 0.55/0.99    int_leq( int_one, X ), ! int_leq( X, n ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent1[0]: (19) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { int_leq( int_one, skol2 ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99     X := skol2
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  substitution1:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  paramod: (2225) {G2,W6,D2,L2,V0,M2}  { real_one ==> real_zero, ! int_leq( 
% 0.55/0.99    skol2, n ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0[0]: (23) {G1,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1} I;d(22) { a( skol2, skol2 ) ==> 
% 0.55/0.99    real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent1[0; 2]: (2224) {G1,W8,D3,L2,V0,M2}  { real_one ==> a( skol2, skol2 )
% 0.55/0.99    , ! int_leq( skol2, n ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  substitution1:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  resolution: (2226) {G2,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { real_one ==> real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0[1]: (2225) {G2,W6,D2,L2,V0,M2}  { real_one ==> real_zero, ! int_leq
% 0.55/0.99    ( skol2, n ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent1[0]: (39) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} S(21);d(22) { int_leq( skol2, n ) }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  substitution1:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  subsumption: (892) {G3,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} R(35,19);d(23);r(39) { real_one ==> 
% 0.55/0.99    real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0: (2226) {G2,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { real_one ==> real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  permutation0:
% 0.55/0.99     0 ==> 0
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  resolution: (2230) {G1,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0}  {  }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0[0]: (15) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! real_one ==> real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent1[0]: (892) {G3,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} R(35,19);d(23);r(39) { real_one ==> 
% 0.55/0.99    real_zero }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  substitution1:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  subsumption: (893) {G4,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} S(892);r(15) {  }.
% 0.55/0.99  parent0: (2230) {G1,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0}  {  }.
% 0.55/0.99  substitution0:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  permutation0:
% 0.55/0.99  end
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  Proof check complete!
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  Memory use:
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  space for terms:        13918
% 0.55/0.99  space for clauses:      44608
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  clauses generated:      3484
% 0.55/0.99  clauses kept:           894
% 0.55/0.99  clauses selected:       109
% 0.55/0.99  clauses deleted:        8
% 0.55/0.99  clauses inuse deleted:  0
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  subsentry:          32877
% 0.55/0.99  literals s-matched: 9956
% 0.55/0.99  literals matched:   8545
% 0.55/0.99  full subsumption:   4123
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  checksum:           541675512
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  
% 0.55/0.99  Bliksem ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------