TSTP Solution File: SWV488+2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SWV488+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:04:20 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 4.76s 2.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  13 unt;  13 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   57 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   17 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   56 (  20   ~;  15   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (   6   >;   6   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (;  19   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ int_less > int_leq > plus > lu > a > #nlpp > real_zero > real_one > n > int_zero > int_one > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(int_one,type,
    int_one: $i ).

tff(plus,type,
    plus: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff(int_zero,type,
    int_zero: $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff(a,type,
    a: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(real_one,type,
    real_one: $i ).

tff(n,type,
    n: $i ).

tff(int_leq,type,
    int_leq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(int_less,type,
    int_less: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(lu,type,
    lu: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(real_zero,type,
    real_zero: $i ).

tff(f_69,axiom,
    real_zero != real_one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',real_constants) ).

tff(f_120,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [I,J] :
        ( ( int_leq(int_one,I)
          & int_leq(I,J)
          & int_leq(J,n) )
       => ( ( I = J )
         => ( a(I,J) != real_zero ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lti) ).

tff(f_30,axiom,
    ! [I,J] :
      ( int_leq(I,J)
    <=> ( int_less(I,J)
        | ( I = J ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',int_leq) ).

tff(f_108,hypothesis,
    ! [I,J] :
      ( ( int_leq(int_one,I)
        & int_leq(I,n)
        & int_leq(int_one,J)
        & int_leq(J,n) )
     => ( ! [C] :
            ( ( int_less(int_zero,C)
              & ( I = plus(J,C) ) )
           => ! [K] :
                ( ( int_leq(int_one,K)
                  & int_leq(K,J) )
               => ( a(plus(K,C),K) = lu(plus(K,C),K) ) ) )
        & ! [K] :
            ( ( int_leq(int_one,K)
              & int_leq(K,J) )
           => ( a(K,K) = real_one ) )
        & ! [C] :
            ( ( int_less(int_zero,C)
              & ( J = plus(I,C) ) )
           => ! [K] :
                ( ( int_leq(int_one,K)
                  & int_leq(K,I) )
               => ( a(K,plus(K,C)) = real_zero ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',qil) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    real_zero != real_one,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    '#skF_2' = '#skF_3',
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_120]) ).

tff(c_48,plain,
    int_leq(int_one,'#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_120]) ).

tff(c_49,plain,
    int_leq(int_one,'#skF_3'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_42,c_48]) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    a('#skF_2','#skF_3') = real_zero,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_120]) ).

tff(c_51,plain,
    a('#skF_3','#skF_3') = real_zero,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_42,c_40]) ).

tff(c_44,plain,
    int_leq('#skF_3',n),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_120]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [J_2] : int_leq(J_2,J_2),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_30]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    ! [K_35,J_24,I_23] :
      ( ( a(K_35,K_35) = real_one )
      | ~ int_leq(K_35,J_24)
      | ~ int_leq(int_one,K_35)
      | ~ int_leq(J_24,n)
      | ~ int_leq(int_one,J_24)
      | ~ int_leq(I_23,n)
      | ~ int_leq(int_one,I_23) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_108]) ).

tff(c_633,plain,
    ! [I_84] :
      ( ~ int_leq(I_84,n)
      | ~ int_leq(int_one,I_84) ),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_36]) ).

tff(c_649,plain,
    ~ int_leq(int_one,'#skF_3'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_633]) ).

tff(c_657,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_49,c_649]) ).

tff(c_844,plain,
    ! [K_94,J_95] :
      ( ( a(K_94,K_94) = real_one )
      | ~ int_leq(K_94,J_95)
      | ~ int_leq(int_one,K_94)
      | ~ int_leq(J_95,n)
      | ~ int_leq(int_one,J_95) ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_36]) ).

tff(c_1610,plain,
    ! [J_121] :
      ( ( a(J_121,J_121) = real_one )
      | ~ int_leq(J_121,n)
      | ~ int_leq(int_one,J_121) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_844]) ).

tff(c_1632,plain,
    ( ( a('#skF_3','#skF_3') = real_one )
    | ~ int_leq(int_one,'#skF_3') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_1610]) ).

tff(c_1640,plain,
    real_zero = real_one,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_49,c_51,c_1632]) ).

tff(c_1642,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_1640]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWV488+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 22:56:33 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.76/2.26  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.76/2.26  
% 4.76/2.26  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.76/2.29  
% 4.76/2.29  Inference rules
% 4.76/2.29  ----------------------
% 4.76/2.29  #Ref     : 0
% 4.76/2.29  #Sup     : 346
% 4.76/2.29  #Fact    : 2
% 4.76/2.29  #Define  : 0
% 4.76/2.29  #Split   : 1
% 4.76/2.29  #Chain   : 0
% 4.76/2.29  #Close   : 0
% 4.76/2.29  
% 4.76/2.29  Ordering : KBO
% 4.76/2.29  
% 4.76/2.29  Simplification rules
% 4.76/2.29  ----------------------
% 4.76/2.29  #Subsume      : 114
% 4.76/2.29  #Demod        : 189
% 4.76/2.29  #Tautology    : 92
% 4.76/2.29  #SimpNegUnit  : 10
% 4.76/2.29  #BackRed      : 0
% 4.76/2.29  
% 4.76/2.29  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.76/2.29  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.76/2.29  
% 4.76/2.29  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.76/2.29  ----------------------
% 4.92/2.29  Preprocessing        : 0.51
% 4.92/2.29  Parsing              : 0.26
% 4.92/2.29  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 4.92/2.29  Main loop            : 0.59
% 4.92/2.29  Inferencing          : 0.21
% 4.92/2.29  Reduction            : 0.18
% 4.92/2.29  Demodulation         : 0.13
% 4.92/2.29  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 4.92/2.29  Subsumption          : 0.14
% 4.92/2.29  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 4.92/2.29  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.92/2.29  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.92/2.29  Total                : 1.14
% 4.92/2.29  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.92/2.29  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.92/2.29  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.92/2.29  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------