TSTP Solution File: SWV473+1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SWV473+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:21:18 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 94.97s 12.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 94.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV473+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 22:48:25 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.19/0.38 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.19/0.38 #
% 0.19/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.38 # Number of axioms: 117 Number of unprocessed: 119
% 0.19/0.38 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.19/0.38 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.19/0.38 # Hello from C++
% 0.19/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.19/0.38 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.19/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.19/0.38 # 119 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.19/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 11 conjectures.
% 0.19/0.38 # There are 11 start rule candidates:
% 0.19/0.38 # Found 53 unit axioms.
% 0.19/0.38 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.19/0.38 # 11 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.19/0.38 # 66 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.19/0.38 # 53 unit axiom clauses
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 9.20/1.61 # Creating equality axioms
% 9.20/1.61 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 94.97/12.39 # There were 16 total branch saturation attempts.
% 94.97/12.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 94.97/12.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 94.97/12.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 94.97/12.39 # There were 6 total successful branch saturations.
% 94.97/12.39 # There were 2 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 94.97/12.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 94.97/12.39 # There were 4 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 94.97/12.39 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 94.97/12.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 94.97/12.39 # Begin clausification derivation
% 94.97/12.39
% 94.97/12.39 # End clausification derivation
% 94.97/12.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_100, negated_conjecture, (host(esk12_0)=nbr_proc)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_107, negated_conjecture, (setIn(esk7_0,alive))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_98, negated_conjecture, (setIn(esk9_0,alive))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_102, negated_conjecture, (elem(m_Down(esk11_0),esk5_0))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_64, plain, (ordered(q_nil))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_104, negated_conjecture, (host(esk7_0)=nbr_proc)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_101, negated_conjecture, (host(esk10_0)=nbr_proc)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (leq(s(zero),nbr_proc))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_85, plain, (leq(X1,X1))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (leq(host(X1),nbr_proc))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (pidMsg(m_Halt(X1))=X1)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_99, negated_conjecture, (index(status,nbr_proc)=elec_1)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_108, negated_conjecture, (epred1_4(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0,esk8_0))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (leq(s(zero),host(X1)))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_97, negated_conjecture, (elem(m_Down(esk10_0),queue(host(esk9_0))))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_63, plain, (pidMsg(m_Down(X1))=X1)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_66, plain, (ordered(cons(X1,q_nil)))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (snoc(q_nil,X1)=cons(X1,q_nil))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (head(cons(X1,X2))=X1)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (tail(cons(X1,X2))=X2)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (last(snoc(X1,X2))=X2)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (init(snoc(X1,X2))=X1)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (snoc(cons(X1,X2),X3)=cons(X1,snoc(X2,X3)))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_54, plain, (elem(X1,cons(X1,X2)))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_57, plain, (elem(X1,snoc(X2,X1)))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (elec_2!=elec_1)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (elec_1!=wait)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (elec_2!=wait)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (elec_1!=norm)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (elec_2!=norm)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_105, negated_conjecture, (host(esk9_0)!=nbr_proc)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (wait!=norm)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (~setIn(nil,alive))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_84, plain, (~leq(s(X1),X1))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_52, plain, (~elem(X1,q_nil))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_96, plain, (~setIn(X1,setEmpty))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (m_Down(X1)!=m_Halt(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (m_NotNorm(X1)!=m_Down(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (m_Ldr(X1)!=m_Down(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (m_NormQ(X1)!=m_Down(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (cons(X1,X2)!=q_nil)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (snoc(X1,X2)!=q_nil)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (m_Ack(X1,X2)!=m_Down(X3))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (m_NotNorm(X1)!=m_Halt(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (m_Ldr(X1)!=m_Halt(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (m_Ldr(X1)!=m_NotNorm(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (m_NormQ(X1)!=m_Ldr(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (m_NormQ(X1)!=m_Halt(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (m_NormQ(X1)!=m_NotNorm(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (m_Ack(X1,X2)!=m_Halt(X3))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (m_Ack(X1,X2)!=m_NotNorm(X3))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (m_Ack(X1,X2)!=m_Ldr(X3))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (m_Ack(X1,X2)!=m_NormQ(X3))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_93, plain, (leq(X1,s(X2))|~leq(X1,X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_86, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|leq(X2,X1))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_94, plain, (leq(X1,s(X2))|X1!=s(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_60, plain, (pidElem(X1)|X1!=m_Halt(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (X1=X2|m_Down(X1)!=m_Down(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_92, plain, (leq(s(X1),s(X2))|~leq(X1,X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_91, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~leq(s(X1),s(X2)))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_89, plain, (X1=X2|~leq(X2,X1)|~leq(X1,X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_59, plain, (pidElem(X1)|X1!=m_Down(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_95, plain, (X1=s(X2)|leq(X1,X2)|~leq(X1,s(X2)))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_90, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~leq(X3,X2)|~leq(X1,X3))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (s(host(X1))!=host(X2)|host(X1)!=host(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (elem(X1,cons(X2,X3))|~elem(X1,X3))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_56, plain, (elem(X1,snoc(X2,X3))|~elem(X1,X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (X1=X2|m_Halt(X1)!=m_Halt(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (X1=X2|m_NotNorm(X1)!=m_NotNorm(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (X1=X2|m_Ldr(X1)!=m_Ldr(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (X1=X2|m_NormQ(X1)!=m_NormQ(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_73, plain, (ordered(X1)|~ordered(cons(X2,X1)))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_80, plain, (ordered(X1)|~ordered(snoc(X1,X2)))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_103, negated_conjecture, (X1=host(esk11_0)|leq(nbr_proc,X1)|setIn(X1,index(down,nbr_proc))|~leq(s(zero),X1))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (setIn(X1,pids)|~elem(m_Ack(X2,X1),queue(host(X2))))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (setIn(X1,pids)|~elem(m_Ack(X1,X2),queue(host(X1))))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_82, plain, (ordered(snoc(X1,m_Ldr(X2)))|~ordered(X1))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (cons(head(X1),tail(X1))=X1|X1=q_nil)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (X1=X2|m_Ack(X3,X1)!=m_Ack(X4,X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (X1=X2|m_Ack(X1,X3)!=m_Ack(X2,X4))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_58, plain, (X1=X2|elem(X1,X3)|~elem(X1,snoc(X3,X2)))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_55, plain, (X1=X2|elem(X1,X3)|~elem(X1,cons(X2,X3)))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_61, plain, (m_Down(esk2_1(X1))=X1|m_Halt(esk1_1(X1))=X1|~pidElem(X1))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (snoc(init(X1),last(X1))=X1|X1=q_nil)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (ordered(cons(X1,X2))|pidElem(X1)|~ordered(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (ordered(snoc(X1,X2))|pidElem(X2)|~ordered(X1))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_69, plain, (ordered(cons(X1,X2))|pidElem(esk3_2(X1,X2))|~ordered(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_109, plain, (queue(host(X1))=cons(m_Ack(X2,X3),X4)|~epred1_4(X4,X2,X1,X3))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_81, plain, (ordered(snoc(X1,m_Ack(X2,X3)))|~ordered(X1))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_71, plain, (ordered(cons(X1,X2))|elem(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)|~ordered(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_119, plain, (index(elid,host(X1))=X1|index(status,host(X1))!=elec_1|~epred1_4(X2,X3,X4,X5)|~setIn(X1,alive))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_118, plain, (index(elid,host(X1))=X1|index(status,host(X1))!=elec_2|~epred1_4(X2,X3,X4,X5)|~setIn(X1,alive))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_78, plain, (ordered(snoc(X1,X2))|elem(esk4_2(X2,X1),X1)|~ordered(X1))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_76, plain, (ordered(snoc(X1,X2))|pidElem(esk4_2(X2,X1))|~ordered(X1))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_68, plain, (host(pidMsg(esk3_2(X1,X2)))=host(pidMsg(X1))|ordered(cons(X1,X2))|~ordered(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_75, plain, (host(pidMsg(esk4_2(X1,X2)))=host(pidMsg(X1))|ordered(snoc(X2,X1))|~ordered(X2))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_120, plain, (X1=X2|host(X1)!=host(X2)|~epred1_4(X3,X4,X5,X6)|~setIn(X2,alive)|~setIn(X1,alive))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_83, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|host(X1)!=host(X2)|~ordered(cons(m_Halt(X1),X3))|~elem(m_Down(X2),X3))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_67, plain, (ordered(cons(X1,X2))|~ordered(X2)|~leq(pidMsg(X1),pidMsg(esk3_2(X1,X2))))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_74, plain, (ordered(snoc(X1,X2))|~ordered(X1)|~leq(pidMsg(esk4_2(X2,X1)),pidMsg(X2)))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_72, plain, (leq(pidMsg(X1),pidMsg(X2))|host(pidMsg(X2))!=host(pidMsg(X1))|~ordered(cons(X1,X3))|~pidElem(X1)|~pidElem(X2)|~elem(X2,X3))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_79, plain, (leq(pidMsg(X1),pidMsg(X2))|host(pidMsg(X1))!=host(pidMsg(X2))|~ordered(snoc(X3,X2))|~pidElem(X2)|~pidElem(X1)|~elem(X1,X3))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_116, plain, (host(X1)=host(X2)|host(index(elid,host(X1)))!=host(X2)|index(status,host(X1))!=wait|host(X1)!=host(X3)|~epred1_4(X4,X5,X6,X7)|~setIn(X1,alive)|~elem(m_Down(X3),queue(host(X2))))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_117, plain, (host(X1)=host(X2)|index(ldr,host(X1))!=host(X2)|index(status,host(X1))!=norm|host(X1)!=host(X3)|~epred1_4(X4,X5,X6,X7)|~setIn(X1,alive)|~elem(m_Down(X3),queue(host(X2))))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_110, plain, (esk13_8(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8)!=host(X7)|index(status,host(X8))!=elec_1|host(X6)!=host(X8)|host(X8)!=nbr_proc|~epred1_4(X4,X3,X2,X1)|~setIn(X5,alive)|~elem(m_Down(X7),queue(host(X8)))|~elem(m_Down(X6),queue(host(X5))))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_115, plain, (host(X1)=host(X2)|host(X2)!=host(X3)|host(X1)!=host(X4)|~epred1_4(X5,X6,X7,X8)|~setIn(X2,alive)|~setIn(X1,alive)|~elem(m_Down(X4),queue(host(X2)))|~elem(m_Down(X3),queue(host(X1))))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_114, plain, (host(X1)=host(X2)|host(X2)!=host(X3)|host(X1)!=host(X4)|~epred1_4(X5,X6,X7,X8)|~setIn(host(X3),index(down,host(X1)))|~setIn(X2,alive)|~setIn(X1,alive)|~elem(m_Down(X4),queue(host(X2))))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_112, plain, (leq(s(zero),esk13_8(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8))|index(status,host(X8))!=elec_1|host(X6)!=host(X8)|host(X8)!=nbr_proc|~epred1_4(X4,X3,X2,X1)|~setIn(X5,alive)|~elem(m_Down(X7),queue(host(X8)))|~elem(m_Down(X6),queue(host(X5))))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_113, plain, (index(status,host(X1))!=elec_1|host(X1)!=host(X2)|host(X1)!=nbr_proc|~epred1_4(X3,X4,X5,X6)|~leq(host(X1),esk13_8(X6,X5,X4,X3,X7,X2,X8,X1))|~setIn(X7,alive)|~elem(m_Down(X8),queue(host(X1)))|~elem(m_Down(X2),queue(host(X7))))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_111, plain, (index(status,host(X1))!=elec_1|host(X2)!=host(X1)|host(X1)!=nbr_proc|~epred1_4(X3,X4,X5,X6)|~setIn(esk13_8(X6,X5,X4,X3,X7,X2,X8,X1),index(down,host(X1)))|~setIn(X7,alive)|~elem(m_Down(X8),queue(host(X1)))|~elem(m_Down(X2),queue(host(X7))))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_122, plain, (~epred3_0|~epred2_0)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_121, plain, (~epred5_0|~epred4_0)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_123, plain, (~epred7_0|~epred6_0)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_133, plain, (epred3_0|~epred1_4(X1,X2,X3,X4))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_139, plain, (epred5_0|~epred1_4(X1,X2,X3,X4))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_142, plain, (epred6_0|~epred1_4(X1,X2,X3,X4))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_130, plain, (epred2_0|host(X1)!=host(X2)|~elem(m_Down(X1),queue(host(X2))))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_136, plain, (epred4_0|host(X1)!=nbr_proc|~elem(m_NotNorm(X2),queue(host(X1))))).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_145, plain, (epred7_0|~leq(host(X1),host(X2))|~elem(m_Ldr(X2),queue(host(X1))))).
% 94.97/12.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 94.97/12.39 # Begin printing tableau
% 94.97/12.39 # Found 12 steps
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_100, negated_conjecture, (host(esk12_0)=nbr_proc), inference(start_rule)).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_159, plain, (host(esk12_0)=nbr_proc), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_110])).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_1188211, plain, (~epred1_4(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0,esk8_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_108])).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_1188212, plain, (~setIn(esk9_0,alive)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_98])).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_1188214, plain, (~elem(m_Down(esk10_0),queue(host(esk9_0)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_97])).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_1188207, plain, (esk13_8(esk8_0,esk7_0,esk6_0,esk5_0,esk9_0,esk10_0,esk11_0,esk12_0)!=host(esk11_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_103])).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_1188208, plain, (index(status,host(esk12_0))!=elec_1), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_1188208, ...])).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_1188209, plain, (host(esk10_0)!=host(esk12_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_1188209, ...])).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_1188213, plain, (~elem(m_Down(esk11_0),queue(host(esk12_0)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_1188213, ...])).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_1188313, plain, (leq(nbr_proc,esk13_8(esk8_0,esk7_0,esk6_0,esk5_0,esk9_0,esk10_0,esk11_0,esk12_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_1188313, ...])).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_1188314, plain, (setIn(esk13_8(esk8_0,esk7_0,esk6_0,esk5_0,esk9_0,esk10_0,esk11_0,esk12_0),index(down,nbr_proc))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_1188314, ...])).
% 94.97/12.39 cnf(i_0_1188315, plain, (~leq(s(zero),esk13_8(esk8_0,esk7_0,esk6_0,esk5_0,esk9_0,esk10_0,esk11_0,esk12_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_1188315, ...])).
% 94.97/12.39 # End printing tableau
% 94.97/12.39 # SZS output end
% 94.97/12.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 94.97/12.39 # Child (23569) has found a proof.
% 94.97/12.39
% 94.97/12.39 # Proof search is over...
% 94.97/12.39 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------