TSTP Solution File: SWV466+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV466+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:43:11 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 65.45s 65.67s
% Output   : Refutation 65.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWV466+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 20:20:11 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 65.45/65.67  
% 65.45/65.67  SPASS V 3.9 
% 65.45/65.67  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 65.45/65.67  % SZS status Theorem
% 65.45/65.67  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 65.45/65.67  SPASS derived 38268 clauses, backtracked 6 clauses, performed 11 splits and kept 15378 clauses.
% 65.45/65.67  SPASS allocated 126849 KBytes.
% 65.45/65.67  SPASS spent	0:01:04.34 on the problem.
% 65.45/65.67  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 65.45/65.67  		0:00:00.06 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 65.45/65.67  		0:00:00.58 for inferences.
% 65.45/65.67  		0:00:00.64 for the backtracking.
% 65.45/65.67  		0:01:02.60 for the reduction.
% 65.45/65.67  
% 65.45/65.67  
% 65.45/65.67  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 75 :
% 65.45/65.67  % SZS output start Refutation
% 65.45/65.67  2[0:Inp] ||  -> setIn(skc8,alive)*.
% 65.45/65.67  3[0:Inp] ||  -> setIn(skc13,alive)*.
% 65.45/65.67  7[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(host(u),nbr_proc)*l.
% 65.45/65.67  23[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(host(skc13),host(skc11))**.
% 65.45/65.67  29[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(index(status__dfg,host(skc8)),elec_2)**.
% 65.45/65.67  30[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(nbr_proc,index(pendack,host(skc8)))*r.
% 65.45/65.67  31[0:Inp] || equal(host(skc13),host(skc8))** -> .
% 65.45/65.67  32[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(index(status__dfg,host(skc13)),elec_2)**.
% 65.45/65.67  52[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(index(pendack,host(skc8)),host(skc9))**.
% 65.45/65.67  53[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(nbr_proc,s(index(pendack,host(skc13))))*r.
% 65.45/65.67  54[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(index(pendack,host(skc13)),host(skc15))**.
% 65.45/65.67  58[0:Inp] || equal(m_Ack(u,v),m_Ldr(w))* -> .
% 65.45/65.67  67[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(s(index(pendack,host(skc13))),host(skc14))**.
% 65.45/65.67  68[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(cons(m_Down(skc9),skc10),queue(host(skc8)))**.
% 65.45/65.67  82[0:Inp] || equal(u,v) -> elem(u,cons(v,w))*.
% 65.45/65.67  92[0:Inp] ||  -> elem(m_Ack(skc13,skc15),snoc(queue(host(skc13)),m_Ldr(skc8)))*.
% 65.45/65.67  100[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)*+ leq(v,u)* -> equal(v,u).
% 65.45/65.67  101[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)* leq(v,w)* -> leq(u,w)*.
% 65.45/65.67  103[0:Inp] || elem(u,snoc(v,w))* -> elem(u,v) equal(u,w).
% 65.45/65.67  106[0:Inp] || leq(u,s(v))* -> leq(u,v) equal(u,s(v)).
% 65.45/65.67  108[0:Inp] || equal(host(u),host(v)) elem(m_Down(u),queue(host(v)))* -> .
% 65.45/65.67  112[0:Inp] || leq(host(u),host(v)) elem(m_Ack(v,u),queue(host(w)))* -> .
% 65.45/65.67  125[0:Inp] || setIn(u,alive) setIn(v,alive) equal(index(status__dfg,host(u)),elec_2)**+ equal(index(status__dfg,host(v)),elec_2)** -> leq(host(v),host(u))* leq(index(pendack,host(u)),host(v))*.
% 65.45/65.67  127[0:Inp] || setIn(u,alive) setIn(v,alive) equal(host(u),host(w))* elem(m_Ack(v,w),queue(host(v)))*+ equal(index(status__dfg,host(u)),elec_2)** equal(index(status__dfg,host(v)),elec_2) -> .
% 65.45/65.67  134[0:Rew:23.0,32.0] ||  -> equal(index(status__dfg,host(skc11)),elec_2)**.
% 65.45/65.67  135[0:Rew:23.0,31.0] || equal(host(skc11),host(skc8))** -> .
% 65.45/65.67  137[0:Rew:23.0,54.0] ||  -> equal(index(pendack,host(skc11)),host(skc15))**.
% 65.45/65.67  138[0:Rew:137.0,67.0,23.0,67.0] ||  -> equal(s(host(skc15)),host(skc14))**.
% 65.45/65.67  140[0:Rew:23.0,92.0] ||  -> elem(m_Ack(skc13,skc15),snoc(queue(host(skc11)),m_Ldr(skc8)))*.
% 65.45/65.67  141[0:Rew:52.0,30.0] ||  -> leq(nbr_proc,host(skc9))*r.
% 65.45/65.67  142[0:Rew:138.0,53.0,137.0,53.0,23.0,53.0] ||  -> leq(nbr_proc,host(skc14))*r.
% 65.45/65.67  166[0:Res:3.0,125.3] || setIn(u,alive) equal(index(status__dfg,host(u)),elec_2)** equal(index(status__dfg,host(skc13)),elec_2)** -> leq(host(u),host(skc13)) leq(index(pendack,host(skc13)),host(u)).
% 65.45/65.67  310[0:Res:100.2,135.0] || leq(host(skc11),host(skc8))*l leq(host(skc8),host(skc11)) -> .
% 65.45/65.67  326[0:Res:29.0,127.5] || setIn(u,alive) equal(index(status__dfg,host(u)),elec_2) elem(m_Ack(u,v),queue(host(u)))* equal(host(skc8),host(v)) setIn(skc8,alive) -> .
% 65.45/65.67  329[0:Res:29.0,125.2] || setIn(u,alive) equal(index(status__dfg,host(u)),elec_2)** setIn(skc8,alive) -> leq(host(u),host(skc8)) leq(index(pendack,host(skc8)),host(u)).
% 65.45/65.67  388[0:MRR:326.4,2.0] || setIn(u,alive) equal(host(skc8),host(v)) elem(m_Ack(u,v),queue(host(u)))* equal(index(status__dfg,host(u)),elec_2) -> .
% 65.45/65.67  415[0:Rew:52.0,329.4] || setIn(u,alive) equal(index(status__dfg,host(u)),elec_2)** setIn(skc8,alive) -> leq(host(u),host(skc8)) leq(host(skc9),host(u)).
% 65.45/65.67  416[0:MRR:415.2,2.0] || setIn(u,alive) equal(index(status__dfg,host(u)),elec_2)** -> leq(host(u),host(skc8)) leq(host(skc9),host(u)).
% 65.45/65.67  439[0:Rew:137.0,166.4,23.0,166.4,23.0,166.3,134.0,166.2,23.0,166.2] || setIn(u,alive) equal(index(status__dfg,host(u)),elec_2)** equal(elec_2,elec_2) -> leq(host(u),host(skc11)) leq(host(skc15),host(u)).
% 65.45/65.67  440[0:Obv:439.2] || setIn(u,alive) equal(index(status__dfg,host(u)),elec_2)** -> leq(host(u),host(skc11)) leq(host(skc15),host(u)).
% 65.45/65.67  724[0:SpR:68.0,82.1] || equal(u,m_Down(skc9)) -> elem(u,queue(host(skc8)))*.
% 65.45/65.67  924[0:Res:140.0,103.0] ||  -> elem(m_Ack(skc13,skc15),queue(host(skc11)))* equal(m_Ack(skc13,skc15),m_Ldr(skc8)).
% 65.45/65.67  934[0:MRR:924.1,58.0] ||  -> elem(m_Ack(skc13,skc15),queue(host(skc11)))*.
% 65.45/65.67  1005[0:Res:724.1,108.1] || equal(m_Down(u),m_Down(skc9)) equal(host(u),host(skc8))* -> .
% 65.45/65.67  1743[0:Res:934.0,112.1] || leq(host(skc15),host(skc13))*l -> .
% 65.45/65.67  1744[0:Rew:23.0,1743.0] || leq(host(skc15),host(skc11))*l -> .
% 65.45/65.67  1749[0:NCh:101.2,101.0,1744.0,7.0] || leq(nbr_proc,host(skc11))*r -> .
% 65.45/65.67  1843[0:Res:141.0,100.0] || leq(host(skc9),nbr_proc)*l -> equal(host(skc9),nbr_proc).
% 65.45/65.67  1844[0:Res:142.0,100.0] || leq(host(skc14),nbr_proc)*l -> equal(host(skc14),nbr_proc).
% 65.45/65.67  1949[0:MRR:1843.0,7.0] ||  -> equal(host(skc9),nbr_proc)**.
% 65.45/65.67  1957[0:Rew:1949.0,416.3] || setIn(u,alive) equal(index(status__dfg,host(u)),elec_2)** -> leq(host(u),host(skc8)) leq(nbr_proc,host(u)).
% 65.45/65.67  1990[0:MRR:1844.0,7.0] ||  -> equal(host(skc14),nbr_proc)**.
% 65.45/65.67  1991[0:Rew:1990.0,138.0] ||  -> equal(s(host(skc15)),nbr_proc)**.
% 65.45/65.67  2109[0:SpL:1949.0,1005.1] || equal(m_Down(skc9),m_Down(skc9)) equal(host(skc8),nbr_proc)** -> .
% 65.45/65.67  2113[0:Obv:2109.0] || equal(host(skc8),nbr_proc)** -> .
% 65.45/65.67  2182[0:SpL:1991.0,106.0] || leq(u,nbr_proc)* -> leq(u,host(skc15))* equal(u,s(host(skc15)))*.
% 65.45/65.67  2245[0:Rew:1991.0,2182.2] || leq(u,nbr_proc)*+ -> leq(u,host(skc15))* equal(u,nbr_proc).
% 65.45/65.67  10879[0:Res:7.0,2245.0] ||  -> leq(host(u),host(skc15))* equal(host(u),nbr_proc)**.
% 65.45/65.67  18699[0:SpL:23.0,388.2] || setIn(skc13,alive) equal(host(skc8),host(u)) elem(m_Ack(skc13,u),queue(host(skc11)))* equal(index(status__dfg,host(skc13)),elec_2) -> .
% 65.45/65.67  18709[0:Rew:134.0,18699.3,23.0,18699.3] || setIn(skc13,alive) equal(host(skc8),host(u)) elem(m_Ack(skc13,u),queue(host(skc11)))* equal(elec_2,elec_2) -> .
% 65.45/65.67  18710[0:Obv:18709.3] || setIn(skc13,alive) equal(host(skc8),host(u)) elem(m_Ack(skc13,u),queue(host(skc11)))* -> .
% 65.45/65.67  18711[0:MRR:18710.0,3.0] || equal(host(skc8),host(u)) elem(m_Ack(skc13,u),queue(host(skc11)))* -> .
% 65.45/65.67  30285[0:SpL:23.0,1957.1] || setIn(skc13,alive) equal(index(status__dfg,host(skc11)),elec_2)** -> leq(host(skc13),host(skc8)) leq(nbr_proc,host(skc13)).
% 65.45/65.67  30297[0:Rew:23.0,30285.3,23.0,30285.2,134.0,30285.1] || setIn(skc13,alive)* equal(elec_2,elec_2) -> leq(host(skc11),host(skc8)) leq(nbr_proc,host(skc11)).
% 65.45/65.67  30298[0:Obv:30297.1] || setIn(skc13,alive)* -> leq(host(skc11),host(skc8)) leq(nbr_proc,host(skc11)).
% 65.45/65.67  30299[0:MRR:30298.0,30298.2,3.0,1749.0] ||  -> leq(host(skc11),host(skc8))*l.
% 65.45/65.67  30300[0:MRR:310.0,30299.0] || leq(host(skc8),host(skc11))*r -> .
% 65.45/65.67  30735[0:SpL:29.0,440.1] || setIn(skc8,alive)* equal(elec_2,elec_2) -> leq(host(skc8),host(skc11)) leq(host(skc15),host(skc8)).
% 65.45/65.67  30736[0:Obv:30735.1] || setIn(skc8,alive)* -> leq(host(skc8),host(skc11)) leq(host(skc15),host(skc8)).
% 65.45/65.67  30737[0:MRR:30736.0,30736.1,2.0,30300.0] ||  -> leq(host(skc15),host(skc8))*l.
% 65.45/65.67  30764[0:Res:30737.0,100.0] || leq(host(skc8),host(skc15))*r -> equal(host(skc15),host(skc8)).
% 65.45/65.67  46857[0:Res:934.0,18711.1] || equal(host(skc15),host(skc8))** -> .
% 65.45/65.67  46858[0:MRR:30764.1,46857.0] || leq(host(skc8),host(skc15))*r -> .
% 65.45/65.67  46863[0:Res:10879.0,46858.0] ||  -> equal(host(skc8),nbr_proc)**.
% 65.45/65.67  46893[0:MRR:46863.0,2113.0] ||  -> .
% 65.45/65.67  % SZS output end Refutation
% 65.45/65.67  Formulae used in the proof : conj axiom_02 axiom_62 axiom_63 axiom_58 axiom_04 axiom_14 axiom_46 axiom_61 axiom_47 axiom_64
% 65.45/65.67  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------