TSTP Solution File: SWV455+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWV455+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:47:30 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.40s 2.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (  21 unt;   0 nHn;  28 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   56 (  21 equ;  30 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    8 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (  17 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_115,plain,
    ( queue(host(X1)) = cons(m_Down(X2),X3)
    | ~ epred1_3(X3,X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l0z_i_5t/lgb.p',i_0_115) ).

cnf(i_0_114,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_3(esk5_0,esk7_0,esk6_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l0z_i_5t/lgb.p',i_0_114) ).

cnf(i_0_116,plain,
    ( host(X1) = host(X2)
    | host(X2) != host(X3)
    | host(X1) != host(X4)
    | ~ setIn(X2,alive)
    | ~ setIn(X1,alive)
    | ~ epred1_3(X5,X6,X7)
    | ~ elem(m_Down(X4),queue(host(X2)))
    | ~ elem(m_Down(X3),queue(host(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l0z_i_5t/lgb.p',i_0_116) ).

cnf(i_0_97,negated_conjecture,
    elem(m_Down(esk12_0),queue(host(esk9_0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l0z_i_5t/lgb.p',i_0_97) ).

cnf(i_0_99,negated_conjecture,
    host(esk12_0) = host(esk11_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l0z_i_5t/lgb.p',i_0_99) ).

cnf(i_0_104,negated_conjecture,
    host(esk6_0) = host(esk11_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l0z_i_5t/lgb.p',i_0_104) ).

cnf(i_0_102,negated_conjecture,
    setIn(esk9_0,alive),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l0z_i_5t/lgb.p',i_0_102) ).

cnf(i_0_51,plain,
    ( elem(X1,cons(X2,X3))
    | ~ elem(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l0z_i_5t/lgb.p',i_0_51) ).

cnf(i_0_113,negated_conjecture,
    setIn(esk6_0,alive),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l0z_i_5t/lgb.p',i_0_113) ).

cnf(i_0_105,negated_conjecture,
    host(esk6_0) != host(esk9_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l0z_i_5t/lgb.p',i_0_105) ).

cnf(i_0_98,negated_conjecture,
    elem(m_Down(esk10_0),esk5_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l0z_i_5t/lgb.p',i_0_98) ).

cnf(i_0_100,negated_conjecture,
    host(esk9_0) = host(esk10_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l0z_i_5t/lgb.p',i_0_100) ).

cnf(c_0_129,plain,
    ( queue(host(X1)) = cons(m_Down(X2),X3)
    | ~ epred1_3(X3,X2,X1) ),
    i_0_115 ).

cnf(c_0_130,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_3(esk5_0,esk7_0,esk6_0),
    i_0_114 ).

cnf(c_0_131,plain,
    ( host(X1) = host(X2)
    | host(X2) != host(X3)
    | host(X1) != host(X4)
    | ~ setIn(X2,alive)
    | ~ setIn(X1,alive)
    | ~ epred1_3(X5,X6,X7)
    | ~ elem(m_Down(X4),queue(host(X2)))
    | ~ elem(m_Down(X3),queue(host(X1))) ),
    i_0_116 ).

cnf(c_0_132,negated_conjecture,
    elem(m_Down(esk12_0),queue(host(esk9_0))),
    i_0_97 ).

cnf(c_0_133,negated_conjecture,
    host(esk12_0) = host(esk11_0),
    i_0_99 ).

cnf(c_0_134,negated_conjecture,
    host(esk6_0) = host(esk11_0),
    i_0_104 ).

cnf(c_0_135,negated_conjecture,
    setIn(esk9_0,alive),
    i_0_102 ).

cnf(c_0_136,plain,
    ( elem(X1,cons(X2,X3))
    | ~ elem(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_51 ).

cnf(c_0_137,negated_conjecture,
    cons(m_Down(esk7_0),esk5_0) = queue(host(esk6_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_129,c_0_130]) ).

cnf(c_0_138,negated_conjecture,
    ( host(X1) = host(esk9_0)
    | host(esk9_0) != host(X2)
    | host(X1) != host(esk6_0)
    | ~ setIn(X1,alive)
    | ~ elem(m_Down(X2),queue(host(X1)))
    | ~ epred1_3(X3,X4,X5) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_131,c_0_132]),c_0_133]),c_0_134]),c_0_135])]) ).

cnf(c_0_139,plain,
    ( elem(X1,queue(host(esk6_0)))
    | ~ elem(X1,esk5_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_136,c_0_137]) ).

cnf(c_0_140,negated_conjecture,
    setIn(esk6_0,alive),
    i_0_113 ).

cnf(c_0_141,negated_conjecture,
    host(esk6_0) != host(esk9_0),
    i_0_105 ).

cnf(c_0_142,plain,
    ( host(esk9_0) != host(X1)
    | ~ elem(m_Down(X1),esk5_0)
    | ~ epred1_3(X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_138,c_0_139]),c_0_140])]),c_0_141]) ).

cnf(c_0_143,negated_conjecture,
    elem(m_Down(esk10_0),esk5_0),
    i_0_98 ).

cnf(c_0_144,negated_conjecture,
    host(esk9_0) = host(esk10_0),
    i_0_100 ).

cnf(c_0_145,negated_conjecture,
    ~ epred1_3(X1,X2,X3),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_142,c_0_143]),c_0_144])]) ).

cnf(c_0_146,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_130,c_0_145]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SWV455+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 19:54:43 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.40/2.38  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.40/2.38  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.40/2.38  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.40/2.38  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.40/2.38  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.40/2.38  #
% 7.40/2.38  # Preprocessing time       : 0.025 s
% 7.40/2.38  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.40/2.38  
% 7.40/2.38  # Proof found!
% 7.40/2.38  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.40/2.38  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.40/2.38  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.40/2.38  
% 7.40/2.38  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.40/2.38  # User time                : 0.031 s
% 7.40/2.38  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 7.40/2.38  # Total time               : 0.035 s
% 7.40/2.38  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.40/2.38  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------