TSTP Solution File: SWV454+1 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : SWV454+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:51:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 27.61s 8.22s
% Output   : Proof 127.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWV454+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 14:27:25 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.60/0.57          ____       _                          
% 0.60/0.57    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.60/0.57   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.60/0.57  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.60/0.57  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.60/0.57  
% 0.60/0.57  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.60/0.58  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.60/0.58  
% 0.60/0.58  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.60/0.58  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.60/0.58  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.60/0.58  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.60/0.58  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.60/0.58  
% 0.60/0.58  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.60/0.58  
% 0.60/0.58  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.60/0.62  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.89/1.00  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.29/1.43  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.69/1.46  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 17.88/5.92  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 18.25/6.00  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 19.32/6.21  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 21.88/6.78  Prover 1: gave up
% 21.88/6.78  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 21.88/6.82  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 22.72/6.98  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 22.72/6.99  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 27.61/8.22  Prover 2: proved (1435ms)
% 27.61/8.22  Prover 0: stopped
% 27.61/8.22  
% 27.61/8.22  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 27.61/8.22  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 27.61/8.22  
% 27.61/8.22  Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 125.39/83.59  found it (size 2174)
% 125.39/83.59  
% 125.39/83.59  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 125.39/83.59  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 125.39/83.59  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] :  ? [v17] :  ? [v18] :  ? [v19] :  ? [v20] : ( ~ (v16 = v12) &  ~ (v16 = v5) &  ~ (v12 = v5) &  ~ (v11 = 0) &  ~ (v9 = 0) &  ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (norm = wait) &  ~ (norm = elec_1) &  ~ (norm = elec_2) &  ~ (wait = elec_1) &  ~ (wait = elec_2) &  ~ (elec_1 = elec_2) & index(down, v5) = v10 & index(status, v5) = elec_1 & ordered(q_nil) = 0 & cons(v7, v2) = v6 & m_Down(v19) = v20 & m_Down(v14) = v17 & m_Down(v4) = v7 & leq(v5, v8) = v9 & leq(v0, nbr_proc) = 0 & leq(nbr_proc, v5) = v11 & s(v5) = v12 & s(zero) = v0 & host(v19) = v16 & host(v15) = v16 & host(v14) = v5 & host(v13) = v5 & host(v4) = v8 & host(v3) = v5 & queue(v16) = v18 & queue(v5) = v6 & elem(v20, v2) = 0 & elem(v17, v18) = 0 & setIn(v15, alive) = 0 & setIn(v13, alive) = 0 & setIn(v3, alive) = 0 & setIn(nil, alive) = v1 &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] :  ! [v26] :  ! [v27] :  ! [v28] :  ! [v29] :  ! [v30] : (v26 = v25 |  ~ (m_Down(v24) = v27) |  ~ (m_Down(v22) = v29) |  ~ (host(v23) = v25) |  ~ (host(v21) = v26) |  ~ (queue(v26) = v28) |  ~ (queue(v25) = v30) |  ~ (elem(v29, v30) = 0) |  ~ (elem(v27, v28) = 0) |  ? [v31] : (( ~ (v31 = v26) & host(v22) = v31) | ( ~ (v31 = v25) & host(v24) = v31) | ( ~ (v31 = 0) & setIn(v23, alive) = v31) | ( ~ (v31 = 0) & setIn(v21, alive) = v31))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] :  ! [v26] :  ! [v27] :  ! [v28] : (v26 = v25 |  ~ (m_Down(v24) = v27) |  ~ (host(v23) = v25) |  ~ (host(v22) = v26) |  ~ (host(v21) = v26) |  ~ (queue(v26) = v28) |  ~ (elem(v27, v28) = 0) |  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] :  ? [v31] : (( ~ (v31 = 0) & m_Down(v22) = v29 & queue(v25) = v30 & elem(v29, v30) = v31) | ( ~ (v29 = v25) & host(v24) = v29) | ( ~ (v29 = 0) & setIn(v23, alive) = v29) | ( ~ (v29 = 0) & setIn(v21, alive) = v29))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] :  ! [v26] :  ! [v27] :  ! [v28] : (v26 = v25 |  ~ (m_Down(v22) = v27) |  ~ (host(v24) = v25) |  ~ (host(v23) = v25) |  ~ (host(v21) = v26) |  ~ (queue(v25) = v28) |  ~ (elem(v27, v28) = 0) |  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] :  ? [v31] : (( ~ (v31 = 0) & m_Down(v24) = v29 & queue(v26) = v30 & elem(v29, v30) = v31) | ( ~ (v29 = v26) & host(v22) = v29) | ( ~ (v29 = 0) & setIn(v23, alive) = v29) | ( ~ (v29 = 0) & setIn(v21, alive) = v29))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] :  ! [v26] :  ! [v27] : ( ~ (m_Down(v24) = v26) |  ~ (host(v22) = v25) |  ~ (host(v21) = v25) |  ~ (queue(v25) = v27) |  ~ (elem(v26, v27) = 0) |  ~ (setIn(v23, alive) = 0) |  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] :  ? [v31] : ((v28 = v25 & host(v23) = v25) | ( ~ (v31 = 0) & m_Down(v22) = v29 & host(v23) = v28 & queue(v28) = v30 & elem(v29, v30) = v31) | ( ~ (v29 = v28) & host(v24) = v29 & host(v23) = v28) | ( ~ (v28 = 0) & setIn(v21, alive) = v28))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] :  ! [v26] :  ! [v27] : ( ~ (m_Down(v22) = v26) |  ~ (host(v24) = v25) |  ~ (host(v23) = v25) |  ~ (queue(v25) = v27) |  ~ (elem(v26, v27) = 0) |  ~ (setIn(v21, alive) = 0) |  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] :  ? [v31] : ((v28 = v25 & host(v21) = v25) | ( ~ (v31 = 0) & m_Down(v24) = v29 & host(v21) = v28 & queue(v28) = v30 & elem(v29, v30) = v31) | ( ~ (v29 = v28) & host(v22) = v29 & host(v21) = v28) | ( ~ (v28 = 0) & setIn(v23, alive) = v28))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] :  ! [v26] : (v26 = v25 |  ~ (host(v24) = v25) |  ~ (host(v23) = v25) |  ~ (host(v22) = v26) |  ~ (host(v21) = v26) |  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] : (( ~ (v29 = 0) & m_Down(v24) = v27 & queue(v26) = v28 & elem(v27, v28) = v29) | ( ~ (v29 = 0) & m_Down(v22) = v27 & queue(v25) = v28 & elem(v27, v28) = v29) | ( ~ (v27 = 0) & setIn(v23, alive) = v27) | ( ~ (v27 = 0) & setIn(v21, alive) = v27))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] :  ! [v26] : (v26 = 0 |  ~ (ordered(v25) = 0) |  ~ (cons(v24, v21) = v25) |  ~ (m_Halt(v22) = v24) |  ~ (leq(v22, v23) = v26) |  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] : (( ~ (v28 = v27) & host(v23) = v28 & host(v22) = v27) | ( ~ (v28 = 0) & m_Down(v23) = v27 & elem(v27, v21) = v28))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] :  ! [v26] : ( ~ (ordered(v25) = 0) |  ~ (cons(v24, v21) = v25) |  ~ (m_Down(v23) = v26) |  ~ (m_Halt(v22) = v24) |  ~ (elem(v26, v21) = 0) |  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] : ((v27 = 0 & leq(v22, v23) = 0) | ( ~ (v28 = v27) & host(v23) = v28 & host(v22) = v27))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] :  ! [v26] : ( ~ (ordered(v25) = 0) |  ~ (cons(v24, v21) = v25) |  ~ (m_Halt(v22) = v24) |  ~ (host(v23) = v26) |  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] : ((v27 = 0 & leq(v22, v23) = 0) | ( ~ (v28 = 0) & m_Down(v23) = v27 & elem(v27, v21) = v28) | ( ~ (v27 = v26) & host(v22) = v27))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] :  ! [v26] : ( ~ (m_Ack(v23, v21) = v24) |  ~ (host(v22) = v25) |  ~ (queue(v25) = v26) |  ~ (elem(v24, v26) = 0) |  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] : ( ~ (v29 = 0) & leq(v27, v28) = v29 & host(v23) = v28 & host(v21) = v27)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] :  ! [v26] : ( ~ (host(v24) = v26) |  ~ (host(v22) = v25) |  ~ (host(v21) = v25) |  ~ (setIn(v23, alive) = 0) |  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] : ((v27 = v25 & host(v23) = v25) | ( ~ (v30 = 0) & m_Down(v22) = v28 & host(v23) = v27 & queue(v27) = v29 & elem(v28, v29) = v30) | ( ~ (v29 = 0) & m_Down(v24) = v27 & queue(v25) = v28 & elem(v27, v28) = v29) | ( ~ (v27 = v26) & host(v23) = v27) | ( ~ (v27 = 0) & setIn(v21, alive) = v27))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] :  ! [v26] : ( ~ (host(v24) = v26) |  ~ (host(v22) = v25) |  ~ (setIn(v23, alive) = 0) |  ~ (setIn(v21, alive) = 0) |  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] : (( ~ (v30 = 0) & m_Down(v24) = v28 & host(v21) = v27 & queue(v27) = v29 & elem(v28, v29) = v30) | ( ~ (v30 = 0) & m_Down(v22) = v28 & host(v23) = v27 & queue(v27) = v29 & elem(v28, v29) = v30) | ( ~ (v27 = v26) & host(v23) = v27) | (host(v21) = v28 & ( ~ (v28 = v25) | (v27 = v25 & host(v23) = v25))))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] :  ! [v26] : ( ~ (host(v24) = v25) |  ~ (host(v23) = v25) |  ~ (host(v22) = v26) |  ~ (setIn(v21, alive) = 0) |  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] : ((v27 = v25 & host(v21) = v25) | ( ~ (v30 = 0) & m_Down(v24) = v28 & host(v21) = v27 & queue(v27) = v29 & elem(v28, v29) = v30) | ( ~ (v29 = 0) & m_Down(v22) = v27 & queue(v25) = v28 & elem(v27, v28) = v29) | ( ~ (v27 = v26) & host(v21) = v27) | ( ~ (v27 = 0) & setIn(v23, alive) = v27))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] : (v25 = 0 |  ~ (snoc(v23, v22) = v24) |  ~ (elem(v21, v24) = v25) |  ? [v26] : ( ~ (v26 = 0) & elem(v21, v23) = v26)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] : (v25 = 0 |  ~ (cons(v22, v23) = v24) |  ~ (elem(v21, v24) = v25) |  ? [v26] : ( ~ (v26 = 0) & elem(v21, v23) = v26)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] : (v25 = 0 |  ~ (m_Down(v23) = v24) |  ~ (leq(v22, v23) = v25) |  ~ (elem(v24, v21) = 0) |  ? [v26] :  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] : (( ~ (v28 = 0) & ordered(v27) = v28 & cons(v26, v21) = v27 & m_Halt(v22) = v26) | ( ~ (v27 = v26) & host(v23) = v27 & host(v22) = v26))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] : (v25 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v23, v24) = v25) |  ~ (s(v22) = v24) |  ~ (s(v21) = v23) |  ? [v26] : ( ~ (v26 = 0) & leq(v21, v22) = v26)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] : (v24 = v23 |  ~ (m_Ack(v22, v24) = v25) |  ~ (m_Ack(v21, v23) = v25)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (m_Ack(v22, v24) = v25) |  ~ (m_Ack(v21, v23) = v25)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] : ( ~ (snoc(v24, v22) = v25) |  ~ (cons(v21, v23) = v24) |  ? [v26] : (snoc(v23, v22) = v26 & cons(v21, v26) = v25)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] : ( ~ (snoc(v23, v22) = v24) |  ~ (cons(v21, v24) = v25) |  ? [v26] : (snoc(v26, v22) = v25 & cons(v21, v23) = v26)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] : ( ~ (snoc(v21, v24) = v25) |  ~ (m_Ack(v22, v23) = v24) |  ? [v26] : ((v26 = 0 & ordered(v25) = 0) | ( ~ (v26 = 0) & ordered(v21) = v26))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] : ( ~ (m_Down(v23) = v25) |  ~ (host(v22) = v24) |  ~ (elem(v25, v21) = 0) |  ? [v26] :  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] : ((v26 = 0 & leq(v22, v23) = 0) | ( ~ (v28 = 0) & ordered(v27) = v28 & cons(v26, v21) = v27 & m_Halt(v22) = v26) | ( ~ (v26 = v24) & host(v23) = v26))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] : ( ~ (m_Down(v22) = v23) |  ~ (host(v21) = v24) |  ~ (queue(v24) = v25) |  ~ (elem(v23, v25) = 0) |  ? [v26] : ( ~ (v26 = v24) & host(v22) = v26)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] : ( ~ (m_Down(v22) = v23) |  ~ (host(v21) = v24) |  ~ (queue(v24) = v25) |  ~ (elem(v23, v25) = 0) |  ? [v26] : ( ~ (v26 = 0) & setIn(v22, alive) = v26)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] : ( ~ (m_Halt(v22) = v23) |  ~ (host(v21) = v24) |  ~ (queue(v24) = v25) |  ~ (elem(v23, v25) = 0) |  ? [v26] :  ? [v27] : ( ~ (v27 = 0) & leq(v24, v26) = v27 & host(v22) = v26)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : (v24 = 0 |  ~ (snoc(v22, v21) = v23) |  ~ (elem(v21, v23) = v24)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : (v24 = 0 |  ~ (cons(v21, v22) = v23) |  ~ (elem(v21, v23) = v24)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : (v24 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v22, v23) = 0) |  ~ (leq(v21, v23) = v24) |  ? [v25] : ( ~ (v25 = 0) & leq(v21, v22) = v25)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : (v24 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v21, v23) = v24) |  ~ (leq(v21, v22) = 0) |  ? [v25] : ( ~ (v25 = 0) & leq(v22, v23) = v25)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : (v24 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v21, v23) = v24) |  ~ (s(v22) = v23) |  ? [v25] : ( ~ (v25 = 0) & leq(v21, v22) = v25)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (index(v24, v23) = v22) |  ~ (index(v24, v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (snoc(v24, v23) = v22) |  ~ (snoc(v24, v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (snoc(v23, v22) = v24) |  ~ (elem(v21, v24) = 0) | elem(v21, v23) = 0) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (cons(v24, v23) = v22) |  ~ (cons(v24, v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (cons(v22, v23) = v24) |  ~ (elem(v21, v24) = 0) | elem(v21, v23) = 0) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (leq(v24, v23) = v22) |  ~ (leq(v24, v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (m_Ack(v24, v23) = v22) |  ~ (m_Ack(v24, v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (elem(v24, v23) = v22) |  ~ (elem(v24, v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (setIn(v24, v23) = v22) |  ~ (setIn(v24, v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : ( ~ (snoc(v21, v23) = v24) |  ~ (m_Ldr(v22) = v23) |  ? [v25] : ((v25 = 0 & ordered(v24) = 0) | ( ~ (v25 = 0) & ordered(v21) = v25))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : ( ~ (m_NormQ(v23) = v24) |  ~ (m_Ack(v21, v22) = v24)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : ( ~ (m_Ldr(v23) = v24) |  ~ (m_Ack(v21, v22) = v24)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : ( ~ (m_NotNorm(v23) = v24) |  ~ (m_Ack(v21, v22) = v24)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : ( ~ (m_Down(v23) = v24) |  ~ (m_Ack(v21, v22) = v24)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : ( ~ (m_Halt(v23) = v24) |  ~ (m_Ack(v21, v22) = v24)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : ( ~ (leq(v23, v24) = 0) |  ~ (s(v22) = v24) |  ~ (s(v21) = v23) | leq(v21, v22) = 0) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : ( ~ (leq(v23, v24) = 0) |  ~ (host(v22) = v24) |  ~ (host(v21) = v23) |  ? [v25] :  ? [v26] :  ? [v27] : ( ~ (v27 = 0) & m_Halt(v22) = v25 & queue(v23) = v26 & elem(v25, v26) = v27)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v23 = v22 |  ~ (m_NormQ(v21) = v23) |  ~ (m_NormQ(v21) = v22)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v23 = v22 |  ~ (m_Ldr(v21) = v23) |  ~ (m_Ldr(v21) = v22)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v23 = v22 |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v21) = v23) |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v21) = v22)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v23 = v22 |  ~ (m_Down(v21) = v23) |  ~ (m_Down(v21) = v22)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v23 = v22 |  ~ (m_Halt(v21) = v23) |  ~ (m_Halt(v21) = v22)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v23 = v22 |  ~ (host(v21) = v23) |  ~ (host(v21) = v22)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v23 = v21 |  ~ (leq(v21, v23) = 0) |  ~ (s(v22) = v23) | leq(v21, v22) = 0) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v23 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v22, v21) = v23) | leq(v21, v22) = 0) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v23 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v21, v22) = v23) | leq(v22, v21) = 0) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v23 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v21, v22) = v23) |  ? [v24] :  ? [v25] :  ? [v26] : ( ~ (v26 = 0) & leq(v24, v25) = v26 & s(v22) = v25 & s(v21) = v24)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v23 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v21, v22) = v23) |  ? [v24] :  ? [v25] : (s(v22) = v24 & (v24 = v21 | ( ~ (v25 = 0) & leq(v21, v24) = v25)))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v23 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v21, v21) = v23) |  ~ (s(v22) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (ordered(v23) = v22) |  ~ (ordered(v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (pidMsg(v23) = v22) |  ~ (pidMsg(v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (pidElem(v23) = v22) |  ~ (pidElem(v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (init(v23) = v22) |  ~ (init(v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (last(v23) = v22) |  ~ (last(v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (tail(v23) = v22) |  ~ (tail(v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (head(v23) = v22) |  ~ (head(v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (m_NormQ(v23) = v22) |  ~ (m_NormQ(v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (m_NormQ(v22) = v23) |  ~ (m_NormQ(v21) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (m_Ldr(v23) = v22) |  ~ (m_Ldr(v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (m_Ldr(v22) = v23) |  ~ (m_Ldr(v21) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v23) = v22) |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v22) = v23) |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v21) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (m_Down(v23) = v22) |  ~ (m_Down(v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (m_Down(v22) = v23) |  ~ (m_Down(v21) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (m_Halt(v23) = v22) |  ~ (m_Halt(v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (m_Halt(v22) = v23) |  ~ (m_Halt(v21) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (s(v23) = v22) |  ~ (s(v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (host(v23) = v22) |  ~ (host(v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (host(v22) = v23) |  ~ (host(v21) = v23) |  ? [v24] : (( ~ (v24 = 0) & setIn(v22, alive) = v24) | ( ~ (v24 = 0) & setIn(v21, alive) = v24))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (host(v22) = v23) |  ~ (setIn(v21, alive) = 0) |  ? [v24] : (( ~ (v24 = v23) & host(v21) = v24) | ( ~ (v24 = 0) & setIn(v22, alive) = v24))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (host(v21) = v23) |  ~ (setIn(v22, alive) = 0) |  ? [v24] : (( ~ (v24 = v23) & host(v22) = v24) | ( ~ (v24 = 0) & setIn(v21, alive) = v24))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (queue(v23) = v22) |  ~ (queue(v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = 0 |  ~ (pidElem(v21) = v22) |  ~ (m_Down(v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v22 = 0 |  ~ (pidElem(v21) = v22) |  ~ (m_Halt(v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (snoc(v22, v21) = v23) | init(v23) = v22) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (snoc(v22, v21) = v23) | last(v23) = v21) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (snoc(v22, v21) = v23) |  ? [v24] :  ? [v25] :  ? [v26] :  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] :  ? [v31] :  ? [v32] : ((v31 = v26 & v29 = 0 & v28 = 0 & v24 = 0 &  ~ (v32 = 0) & pidMsg(v27) = v30 & pidMsg(v21) = v25 & pidElem(v27) = 0 & pidElem(v21) = 0 & leq(v30, v25) = v32 & host(v30) = v26 & host(v25) = v26 & elem(v27, v22) = 0) | (v24 = 0 & ordered(v23) = 0) | ( ~ (v24 = 0) & ordered(v22) = v24))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (snoc(v22, v21) = v23) |  ? [v24] :  ? [v25] :  ? [v26] :  ? [v27] : ((v24 = 0 & ordered(v22) = 0 & pidMsg(v21) = v26 & pidElem(v21) = v25 & host(v26) = v27 &  ! [v28] :  ! [v29] : ( ~ (v25 = 0) |  ~ (pidMsg(v28) = v29) |  ? [v30] : ((v30 = 0 & leq(v29, v26) = 0) | ( ~ (v30 = v27) & host(v29) = v30) | ( ~ (v30 = 0) & pidElem(v28) = v30) | ( ~ (v30 = 0) & elem(v28, v22) = v30))) &  ! [v28] : ( ~ (v25 = 0) |  ~ (pidElem(v28) = 0) |  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] : ((v30 = 0 & pidMsg(v28) = v29 & leq(v29, v26) = 0) | ( ~ (v30 = v27) & pidMsg(v28) = v29 & host(v29) = v30) | ( ~ (v29 = 0) & elem(v28, v22) = v29))) &  ! [v28] : ( ~ (v25 = 0) |  ~ (elem(v28, v22) = 0) |  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] : ((v30 = 0 & pidMsg(v28) = v29 & leq(v29, v26) = 0) | ( ~ (v30 = v27) & pidMsg(v28) = v29 & host(v29) = v30) | ( ~ (v29 = 0) & pidElem(v28) = v29)))) | ( ~ (v24 = 0) & ordered(v23) = v24))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (cons(v21, v22) = v23) | tail(v23) = v22) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (cons(v21, v22) = v23) | head(v23) = v21) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (cons(v21, v22) = v23) |  ? [v24] :  ? [v25] :  ? [v26] :  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] :  ? [v31] :  ? [v32] : ((v31 = v26 & v29 = 0 & v28 = 0 & v24 = 0 &  ~ (v32 = 0) & pidMsg(v27) = v30 & pidMsg(v21) = v25 & pidElem(v27) = 0 & pidElem(v21) = 0 & leq(v25, v30) = v32 & host(v30) = v26 & host(v25) = v26 & elem(v27, v22) = 0) | (v24 = 0 & ordered(v23) = 0) | ( ~ (v24 = 0) & ordered(v22) = v24))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (cons(v21, v22) = v23) |  ? [v24] :  ? [v25] :  ? [v26] :  ? [v27] : ((v24 = 0 & ordered(v22) = 0 & pidMsg(v21) = v26 & pidElem(v21) = v25 & host(v26) = v27 &  ! [v28] :  ! [v29] : ( ~ (v25 = 0) |  ~ (pidMsg(v28) = v29) |  ? [v30] : ((v30 = 0 & leq(v26, v29) = 0) | ( ~ (v30 = v27) & host(v29) = v30) | ( ~ (v30 = 0) & pidElem(v28) = v30) | ( ~ (v30 = 0) & elem(v28, v22) = v30))) &  ! [v28] : ( ~ (v25 = 0) |  ~ (pidElem(v28) = 0) |  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] : ((v30 = 0 & pidMsg(v28) = v29 & leq(v26, v29) = 0) | ( ~ (v30 = v27) & pidMsg(v28) = v29 & host(v29) = v30) | ( ~ (v29 = 0) & elem(v28, v22) = v29))) &  ! [v28] : ( ~ (v25 = 0) |  ~ (elem(v28, v22) = 0) |  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] : ((v30 = 0 & pidMsg(v28) = v29 & leq(v26, v29) = 0) | ( ~ (v30 = v27) & pidMsg(v28) = v29 & host(v29) = v30) | ( ~ (v29 = 0) & pidElem(v28) = v29)))) | ( ~ (v24 = 0) & ordered(v23) = v24))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (m_NormQ(v22) = v23) |  ~ (m_Ldr(v21) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (m_NormQ(v22) = v23) |  ~ (m_Down(v21) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (m_NormQ(v21) = v23) |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v22) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (m_NormQ(v21) = v23) |  ~ (m_Halt(v22) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (m_Ldr(v22) = v23) |  ~ (m_Down(v21) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (m_Ldr(v21) = v23) |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v22) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (m_Ldr(v21) = v23) |  ~ (m_Halt(v22) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (m_NotNorm(v22) = v23) |  ~ (m_Down(v21) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (m_NotNorm(v21) = v23) |  ~ (m_Halt(v22) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (m_Down(v21) = v23) |  ~ (m_Halt(v22) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (leq(v22, v23) = 0) |  ~ (leq(v21, v22) = 0) | leq(v21, v23) = 0) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (leq(v21, v22) = v23) |  ? [v24] :  ? [v25] : (s(v22) = v24 & ((v25 = 0 & leq(v21, v24) = 0) | ( ~ (v24 = v21) &  ~ (v23 = 0))))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (s(v23) = v23) |  ~ (host(v22) = v23) |  ~ (host(v21) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (m_Ack(v21, v22) = v23) |  ? [v24] :  ? [v25] :  ? [v26] : ((v25 = 0 & v24 = 0 & setIn(v22, pids) = 0 & setIn(v21, pids) = 0) | ( ~ (v26 = 0) & host(v21) = v24 & queue(v24) = v25 & elem(v23, v25) = v26))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (host(v22) = v23) |  ~ (host(v21) = v23) |  ? [v24] : ( ~ (v24 = v23) & s(v23) = v24)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (leq(v22, v21) = 0) |  ? [v23] : ( ~ (v23 = 0) & leq(v21, v22) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (leq(v21, v22) = 0) |  ? [v23] : ( ~ (v23 = 0) & leq(v22, v21) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : (v22 = v21 |  ~ (setIn(v22, alive) = 0) |  ~ (setIn(v21, alive) = 0) |  ? [v23] :  ? [v24] : ( ~ (v24 = v23) & host(v22) = v23 & host(v21) = v24)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : (v22 = 0 | v21 = v8 |  ~ (leq(v5, v21) = v22) |  ? [v23] : ((v23 = 0 & setIn(v21, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v23 = 0) & leq(v0, v21) = v23))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : (v22 = 0 | v21 = v8 |  ~ (setIn(v21, v10) = v22) |  ? [v23] : ((v23 = 0 & leq(v5, v21) = 0) | ( ~ (v23 = 0) & leq(v0, v21) = v23))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : (v22 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v21, v21) = v22)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : (v21 = q_nil |  ~ (init(v21) = v22) |  ? [v23] : (snoc(v22, v23) = v21 & last(v21) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : (v21 = q_nil |  ~ (last(v21) = v22) |  ? [v23] : (init(v21) = v23 & snoc(v23, v22) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : (v21 = q_nil |  ~ (tail(v21) = v22) |  ? [v23] : (cons(v23, v22) = v21 & head(v21) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : (v21 = q_nil |  ~ (head(v21) = v22) |  ? [v23] : (tail(v21) = v23 & cons(v22, v23) = v21)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ~ (snoc(v22, v21) = q_nil) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : ( ~ (snoc(q_nil, v21) = v22) | ordered(v22) = 0) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : ( ~ (snoc(q_nil, v21) = v22) | cons(v21, q_nil) = v22) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ~ (cons(v21, v22) = q_nil) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : ( ~ (cons(v21, q_nil) = v22) | ordered(v22) = 0) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : ( ~ (cons(v21, q_nil) = v22) | snoc(q_nil, v21) = v22) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : ( ~ (m_Down(v21) = v22) | pidMsg(v22) = v21) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : ( ~ (m_Halt(v21) = v22) | pidMsg(v22) = v21) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : ( ~ (leq(v22, v21) = 0) |  ? [v23] :  ? [v24] : ((v23 = 0 & setIn(v21, alive) = 0) | ( ~ (v24 = v23) & host(v22) = v23 & host(v21) = v24) | ( ~ (v23 = 0) & setIn(v22, alive) = v23))) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : ( ~ (leq(v21, v22) = 0) |  ? [v23] :  ? [v24] : (leq(v23, v24) = 0 & s(v22) = v24 & s(v21) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : ( ~ (s(v21) = v22) |  ? [v23] : ( ~ (v23 = 0) & leq(v22, v21) = v23)) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : ( ~ (host(v21) = v22) | leq(v22, nbr_proc) = 0) &  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : ( ~ (host(v21) = v22) | leq(v0, v22) = 0) &  ! [v21] : (v21 = v8 |  ~ (leq(v0, v21) = 0) |  ? [v22] : ((v22 = 0 & leq(v5, v21) = 0) | (v22 = 0 & setIn(v21, v10) = 0))) &  ! [v21] : ( ~ (pidElem(v21) = 0) |  ? [v22] :  ? [v23] : ((v23 = v21 & m_Down(v22) = v21) | (v23 = v21 & m_Halt(v22) = v21))) &  ! [v21] :  ~ (elem(v21, q_nil) = 0) &  ! [v21] :  ~ (setIn(v21, setEmpty) = 0) &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] :  ? [v23] : index(v22, v21) = v23 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] :  ? [v23] : snoc(v22, v21) = v23 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] :  ? [v23] : cons(v22, v21) = v23 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] :  ? [v23] : leq(v22, v21) = v23 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] :  ? [v23] : m_Ack(v22, v21) = v23 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] :  ? [v23] : elem(v22, v21) = v23 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] :  ? [v23] : setIn(v22, v21) = v23 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] : ordered(v21) = v22 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] : pidMsg(v21) = v22 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] : pidElem(v21) = v22 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] : init(v21) = v22 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] : last(v21) = v22 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] : tail(v21) = v22 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] : head(v21) = v22 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] : m_NormQ(v21) = v22 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] : m_Ldr(v21) = v22 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] : m_NotNorm(v21) = v22 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] : m_Down(v21) = v22 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] : m_Halt(v21) = v22 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] : s(v21) = v22 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] : host(v21) = v22 &  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] : queue(v21) = v22)
% 125.84/83.70  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_10_10, all_0_11_11, all_0_12_12, all_0_13_13, all_0_14_14, all_0_15_15, all_0_16_16, all_0_17_17, all_0_18_18, all_0_19_19, all_0_20_20 yields:
% 125.84/83.70  | (1)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_8_8) &  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15) &  ~ (all_0_8_8 = all_0_15_15) &  ~ (all_0_9_9 = 0) &  ~ (all_0_11_11 = 0) &  ~ (all_0_19_19 = 0) &  ~ (norm = wait) &  ~ (norm = elec_1) &  ~ (norm = elec_2) &  ~ (wait = elec_1) &  ~ (wait = elec_2) &  ~ (elec_1 = elec_2) & index(down, all_0_15_15) = all_0_10_10 & index(status, all_0_15_15) = elec_1 & ordered(q_nil) = 0 & cons(all_0_13_13, all_0_18_18) = all_0_14_14 & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0 & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & m_Down(all_0_16_16) = all_0_13_13 & leq(all_0_15_15, all_0_12_12) = all_0_11_11 & leq(all_0_20_20, nbr_proc) = 0 & leq(nbr_proc, all_0_15_15) = all_0_9_9 & s(all_0_15_15) = all_0_8_8 & s(zero) = all_0_20_20 & host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_16_16) = all_0_12_12 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14 & elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_18_18) = 0 & elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0 & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0 & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = 0 & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0 & setIn(nil, alive) = all_0_19_19 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v5 = v4 |  ~ (m_Down(v3) = v6) |  ~ (m_Down(v1) = v8) |  ~ (host(v2) = v4) |  ~ (host(v0) = v5) |  ~ (queue(v5) = v7) |  ~ (queue(v4) = v9) |  ~ (elem(v8, v9) = 0) |  ~ (elem(v6, v7) = 0) |  ? [v10] : (( ~ (v10 = v5) & host(v1) = v10) | ( ~ (v10 = v4) & host(v3) = v10) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & setIn(v2, alive) = v10) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & setIn(v0, alive) = v10))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : (v5 = v4 |  ~ (m_Down(v3) = v6) |  ~ (host(v2) = v4) |  ~ (host(v1) = v5) |  ~ (host(v0) = v5) |  ~ (queue(v5) = v7) |  ~ (elem(v6, v7) = 0) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : (( ~ (v10 = 0) & m_Down(v1) = v8 & queue(v4) = v9 & elem(v8, v9) = v10) | ( ~ (v8 = v4) & host(v3) = v8) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & setIn(v2, alive) = v8) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & setIn(v0, alive) = v8))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : (v5 = v4 |  ~ (m_Down(v1) = v6) |  ~ (host(v3) = v4) |  ~ (host(v2) = v4) |  ~ (host(v0) = v5) |  ~ (queue(v4) = v7) |  ~ (elem(v6, v7) = 0) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : (( ~ (v10 = 0) & m_Down(v3) = v8 & queue(v5) = v9 & elem(v8, v9) = v10) | ( ~ (v8 = v5) & host(v1) = v8) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & setIn(v2, alive) = v8) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & setIn(v0, alive) = v8))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (m_Down(v3) = v5) |  ~ (host(v1) = v4) |  ~ (host(v0) = v4) |  ~ (queue(v4) = v6) |  ~ (elem(v5, v6) = 0) |  ~ (setIn(v2, alive) = 0) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : ((v7 = v4 & host(v2) = v4) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & m_Down(v1) = v8 & host(v2) = v7 & queue(v7) = v9 & elem(v8, v9) = v10) | ( ~ (v8 = v7) & host(v3) = v8 & host(v2) = v7) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & setIn(v0, alive) = v7))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (m_Down(v1) = v5) |  ~ (host(v3) = v4) |  ~ (host(v2) = v4) |  ~ (queue(v4) = v6) |  ~ (elem(v5, v6) = 0) |  ~ (setIn(v0, alive) = 0) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : ((v7 = v4 & host(v0) = v4) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & m_Down(v3) = v8 & host(v0) = v7 & queue(v7) = v9 & elem(v8, v9) = v10) | ( ~ (v8 = v7) & host(v1) = v8 & host(v0) = v7) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & setIn(v2, alive) = v7))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = v4 |  ~ (host(v3) = v4) |  ~ (host(v2) = v4) |  ~ (host(v1) = v5) |  ~ (host(v0) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (( ~ (v8 = 0) & m_Down(v3) = v6 & queue(v5) = v7 & elem(v6, v7) = v8) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & m_Down(v1) = v6 & queue(v4) = v7 & elem(v6, v7) = v8) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & setIn(v2, alive) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & setIn(v0, alive) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (ordered(v4) = 0) |  ~ (cons(v3, v0) = v4) |  ~ (m_Halt(v1) = v3) |  ~ (leq(v1, v2) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (( ~ (v7 = v6) & host(v2) = v7 & host(v1) = v6) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & m_Down(v2) = v6 & elem(v6, v0) = v7))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (ordered(v4) = 0) |  ~ (cons(v3, v0) = v4) |  ~ (m_Down(v2) = v5) |  ~ (m_Halt(v1) = v3) |  ~ (elem(v5, v0) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v6 = 0 & leq(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = v6) & host(v2) = v7 & host(v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (ordered(v4) = 0) |  ~ (cons(v3, v0) = v4) |  ~ (m_Halt(v1) = v3) |  ~ (host(v2) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v6 = 0 & leq(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & m_Down(v2) = v6 & elem(v6, v0) = v7) | ( ~ (v6 = v5) & host(v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (m_Ack(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (host(v1) = v4) |  ~ (queue(v4) = v5) |  ~ (elem(v3, v5) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ( ~ (v8 = 0) & leq(v6, v7) = v8 & host(v2) = v7 & host(v0) = v6)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (host(v3) = v5) |  ~ (host(v1) = v4) |  ~ (host(v0) = v4) |  ~ (setIn(v2, alive) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v6 = v4 & host(v2) = v4) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & m_Down(v1) = v7 & host(v2) = v6 & queue(v6) = v8 & elem(v7, v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & m_Down(v3) = v6 & queue(v4) = v7 & elem(v6, v7) = v8) | ( ~ (v6 = v5) & host(v2) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & setIn(v0, alive) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (host(v3) = v5) |  ~ (host(v1) = v4) |  ~ (setIn(v2, alive) = 0) |  ~ (setIn(v0, alive) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (( ~ (v9 = 0) & m_Down(v3) = v7 & host(v0) = v6 & queue(v6) = v8 & elem(v7, v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & m_Down(v1) = v7 & host(v2) = v6 & queue(v6) = v8 & elem(v7, v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v6 = v5) & host(v2) = v6) | (host(v0) = v7 & ( ~ (v7 = v4) | (v6 = v4 & host(v2) = v4))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (host(v3) = v4) |  ~ (host(v2) = v4) |  ~ (host(v1) = v5) |  ~ (setIn(v0, alive) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v6 = v4 & host(v0) = v4) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & m_Down(v3) = v7 & host(v0) = v6 & queue(v6) = v8 & elem(v7, v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & m_Down(v1) = v6 & queue(v4) = v7 & elem(v6, v7) = v8) | ( ~ (v6 = v5) & host(v0) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & setIn(v2, alive) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (snoc(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (elem(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & elem(v0, v2) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (cons(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (elem(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & elem(v0, v2) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (m_Down(v2) = v3) |  ~ (leq(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (elem(v3, v0) = 0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (( ~ (v7 = 0) & ordered(v6) = v7 & cons(v5, v0) = v6 & m_Halt(v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v6 = v5) & host(v2) = v6 & host(v1) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v2, v3) = v4) |  ~ (s(v1) = v3) |  ~ (s(v0) = v2) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v3 = v2 |  ~ (m_Ack(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (m_Ack(v0, v2) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_Ack(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (m_Ack(v0, v2) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (snoc(v3, v1) = v4) |  ~ (cons(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : (snoc(v2, v1) = v5 & cons(v0, v5) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (snoc(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (cons(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : (snoc(v5, v1) = v4 & cons(v0, v2) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (snoc(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (m_Ack(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & ordered(v4) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & ordered(v0) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (m_Down(v2) = v4) |  ~ (host(v1) = v3) |  ~ (elem(v4, v0) = 0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v5 = 0 & leq(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & ordered(v6) = v7 & cons(v5, v0) = v6 & m_Halt(v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = v3) & host(v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (m_Down(v1) = v2) |  ~ (host(v0) = v3) |  ~ (queue(v3) = v4) |  ~ (elem(v2, v4) = 0) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = v3) & host(v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (m_Down(v1) = v2) |  ~ (host(v0) = v3) |  ~ (queue(v3) = v4) |  ~ (elem(v2, v4) = 0) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & setIn(v1, alive) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (m_Halt(v1) = v2) |  ~ (host(v0) = v3) |  ~ (queue(v3) = v4) |  ~ (elem(v2, v4) = 0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & leq(v3, v5) = v6 & host(v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (snoc(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (elem(v0, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (cons(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ (elem(v0, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (leq(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (leq(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v1, v2) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (s(v1) = v2) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (index(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (index(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (snoc(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (snoc(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (snoc(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (elem(v0, v3) = 0) | elem(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cons(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (cons(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cons(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (elem(v0, v3) = 0) | elem(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_Ack(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (m_Ack(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (elem(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (elem(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (setIn(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (setIn(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (snoc(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (m_Ldr(v1) = v2) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & ordered(v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & ordered(v0) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (m_NormQ(v2) = v3) |  ~ (m_Ack(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (m_Ldr(v2) = v3) |  ~ (m_Ack(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (m_NotNorm(v2) = v3) |  ~ (m_Ack(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (m_Down(v2) = v3) |  ~ (m_Ack(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (m_Halt(v2) = v3) |  ~ (m_Ack(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (leq(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (s(v1) = v3) |  ~ (s(v0) = v2) | leq(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (leq(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (host(v1) = v3) |  ~ (host(v0) = v2) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & m_Halt(v1) = v4 & queue(v2) = v5 & elem(v4, v5) = v6)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (m_NormQ(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_NormQ(v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (m_Ldr(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_Ldr(v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (m_Down(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_Down(v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (m_Halt(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_Halt(v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (host(v0) = v2) |  ~ (host(v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = v0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v2) = 0) |  ~ (s(v1) = v2) | leq(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v1, v0) = v2) | leq(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v1) = v2) | leq(v1, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & leq(v3, v4) = v5 & s(v1) = v4 & s(v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (s(v1) = v3 & (v3 = v0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v0, v3) = v4)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v0) = v2) |  ~ (s(v1) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (ordered(v2) = v1) |  ~ (ordered(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (pidMsg(v2) = v1) |  ~ (pidMsg(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (pidElem(v2) = v1) |  ~ (pidElem(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (init(v2) = v1) |  ~ (init(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (last(v2) = v1) |  ~ (last(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (tail(v2) = v1) |  ~ (tail(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (head(v2) = v1) |  ~ (head(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_NormQ(v2) = v1) |  ~ (m_NormQ(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_NormQ(v1) = v2) |  ~ (m_NormQ(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_Ldr(v2) = v1) |  ~ (m_Ldr(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_Ldr(v1) = v2) |  ~ (m_Ldr(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v2) = v1) |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v1) = v2) |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_Down(v2) = v1) |  ~ (m_Down(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_Down(v1) = v2) |  ~ (m_Down(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_Halt(v2) = v1) |  ~ (m_Halt(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_Halt(v1) = v2) |  ~ (m_Halt(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (s(v2) = v1) |  ~ (s(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (host(v2) = v1) |  ~ (host(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (host(v1) = v2) |  ~ (host(v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & setIn(v1, alive) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & setIn(v0, alive) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (host(v1) = v2) |  ~ (setIn(v0, alive) = 0) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = v2) & host(v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & setIn(v1, alive) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (host(v0) = v2) |  ~ (setIn(v1, alive) = 0) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = v2) & host(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & setIn(v0, alive) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (queue(v2) = v1) |  ~ (queue(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (pidElem(v0) = v1) |  ~ (m_Down(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (pidElem(v0) = v1) |  ~ (m_Halt(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (snoc(v1, v0) = v2) | init(v2) = v1) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (snoc(v1, v0) = v2) | last(v2) = v0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (snoc(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ((v10 = v5 & v8 = 0 & v7 = 0 & v3 = 0 &  ~ (v11 = 0) & pidMsg(v6) = v9 & pidMsg(v0) = v4 & pidElem(v6) = 0 & pidElem(v0) = 0 & leq(v9, v4) = v11 & host(v9) = v5 & host(v4) = v5 & elem(v6, v1) = 0) | (v3 = 0 & ordered(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & ordered(v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (snoc(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v3 = 0 & ordered(v1) = 0 & pidMsg(v0) = v5 & pidElem(v0) = v4 & host(v5) = v6 &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (pidMsg(v7) = v8) |  ? [v9] : ((v9 = 0 & leq(v8, v5) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = v6) & host(v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & pidElem(v7) = v9) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & elem(v7, v1) = v9))) &  ! [v7] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (pidElem(v7) = 0) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v9 = 0 & pidMsg(v7) = v8 & leq(v8, v5) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = v6) & pidMsg(v7) = v8 & host(v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & elem(v7, v1) = v8))) &  ! [v7] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (elem(v7, v1) = 0) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v9 = 0 & pidMsg(v7) = v8 & leq(v8, v5) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = v6) & pidMsg(v7) = v8 & host(v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & pidElem(v7) = v8)))) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & ordered(v2) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (cons(v0, v1) = v2) | tail(v2) = v1) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (cons(v0, v1) = v2) | head(v2) = v0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (cons(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ((v10 = v5 & v8 = 0 & v7 = 0 & v3 = 0 &  ~ (v11 = 0) & pidMsg(v6) = v9 & pidMsg(v0) = v4 & pidElem(v6) = 0 & pidElem(v0) = 0 & leq(v4, v9) = v11 & host(v9) = v5 & host(v4) = v5 & elem(v6, v1) = 0) | (v3 = 0 & ordered(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & ordered(v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (cons(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v3 = 0 & ordered(v1) = 0 & pidMsg(v0) = v5 & pidElem(v0) = v4 & host(v5) = v6 &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (pidMsg(v7) = v8) |  ? [v9] : ((v9 = 0 & leq(v5, v8) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = v6) & host(v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & pidElem(v7) = v9) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & elem(v7, v1) = v9))) &  ! [v7] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (pidElem(v7) = 0) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v9 = 0 & pidMsg(v7) = v8 & leq(v5, v8) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = v6) & pidMsg(v7) = v8 & host(v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & elem(v7, v1) = v8))) &  ! [v7] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (elem(v7, v1) = 0) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v9 = 0 & pidMsg(v7) = v8 & leq(v5, v8) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = v6) & pidMsg(v7) = v8 & host(v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & pidElem(v7) = v8)))) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & ordered(v2) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_NormQ(v1) = v2) |  ~ (m_Ldr(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_NormQ(v1) = v2) |  ~ (m_Down(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_NormQ(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_NormQ(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_Halt(v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_Ldr(v1) = v2) |  ~ (m_Down(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_Ldr(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_Ldr(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_Halt(v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_NotNorm(v1) = v2) |  ~ (m_Down(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_NotNorm(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_Halt(v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_Down(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_Halt(v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (leq(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (leq(v0, v1) = 0) | leq(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (leq(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (s(v1) = v3 & ((v4 = 0 & leq(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = v0) &  ~ (v2 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (s(v2) = v2) |  ~ (host(v1) = v2) |  ~ (host(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_Ack(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & setIn(v1, pids) = 0 & setIn(v0, pids) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & host(v0) = v3 & queue(v3) = v4 & elem(v2, v4) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (host(v1) = v2) |  ~ (host(v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = v2) & s(v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (leq(v1, v0) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & leq(v1, v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (setIn(v1, alive) = 0) |  ~ (setIn(v0, alive) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = v2) & host(v1) = v2 & host(v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 | v0 = all_0_12_12 |  ~ (leq(all_0_15_15, v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ((v2 = 0 & setIn(v0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & leq(all_0_20_20, v0) = v2))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 | v0 = all_0_12_12 |  ~ (setIn(v0, all_0_10_10) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ((v2 = 0 & leq(all_0_15_15, v0) = 0) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & leq(all_0_20_20, v0) = v2))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v0 = q_nil |  ~ (init(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : (snoc(v1, v2) = v0 & last(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v0 = q_nil |  ~ (last(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : (init(v0) = v2 & snoc(v2, v1) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v0 = q_nil |  ~ (tail(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : (cons(v2, v1) = v0 & head(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v0 = q_nil |  ~ (head(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : (tail(v0) = v2 & cons(v1, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ~ (snoc(v1, v0) = q_nil) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (snoc(q_nil, v0) = v1) | ordered(v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (snoc(q_nil, v0) = v1) | cons(v0, q_nil) = v1) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ~ (cons(v0, v1) = q_nil) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (cons(v0, q_nil) = v1) | ordered(v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (cons(v0, q_nil) = v1) | snoc(q_nil, v0) = v1) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (m_Down(v0) = v1) | pidMsg(v1) = v0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (m_Halt(v0) = v1) | pidMsg(v1) = v0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (leq(v1, v0) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & setIn(v0, alive) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = v2) & host(v1) = v2 & host(v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & setIn(v1, alive) = v2))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (leq(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (leq(v2, v3) = 0 & s(v1) = v3 & s(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (s(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & leq(v1, v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (host(v0) = v1) | leq(v1, nbr_proc) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (host(v0) = v1) | leq(all_0_20_20, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] : (v0 = all_0_12_12 |  ~ (leq(all_0_20_20, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & leq(all_0_15_15, v0) = 0) | (v1 = 0 & setIn(v0, all_0_10_10) = 0))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (pidElem(v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ((v2 = v0 & m_Down(v1) = v0) | (v2 = v0 & m_Halt(v1) = v0))) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (elem(v0, q_nil) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (setIn(v0, setEmpty) = 0) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : index(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : snoc(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : cons(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : leq(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : m_Ack(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : elem(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : setIn(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ordered(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : pidMsg(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : pidElem(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : init(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : last(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : tail(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : head(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : m_NormQ(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : m_Ldr(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : m_NotNorm(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : m_Down(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : m_Halt(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : s(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : host(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : queue(v0) = v1
% 125.84/83.74  |
% 125.84/83.74  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 125.84/83.74  | (2)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : cons(v1, v0) = v2
% 125.84/83.74  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ~ (cons(v0, v1) = q_nil)
% 125.84/83.74  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (cons(v0, v1) = v2) | tail(v2) = v1)
% 125.84/83.74  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (m_Halt(v1) = v2) |  ~ (host(v0) = v3) |  ~ (queue(v3) = v4) |  ~ (elem(v2, v4) = 0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & leq(v3, v5) = v6 & host(v1) = v5))
% 125.84/83.74  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (host(v3) = v4) |  ~ (host(v2) = v4) |  ~ (host(v1) = v5) |  ~ (setIn(v0, alive) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v6 = v4 & host(v0) = v4) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & m_Down(v3) = v7 & host(v0) = v6 & queue(v6) = v8 & elem(v7, v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & m_Down(v1) = v6 & queue(v4) = v7 & elem(v6, v7) = v8) | ( ~ (v6 = v5) & host(v0) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & setIn(v2, alive) = v6)))
% 125.84/83.74  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (snoc(v3, v1) = v4) |  ~ (cons(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : (snoc(v2, v1) = v5 & cons(v0, v5) = v4))
% 125.84/83.74  | (8)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : last(v0) = v1
% 125.84/83.74  | (9) m_Down(all_0_16_16) = all_0_13_13
% 125.84/83.74  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (host(v0) = v2) |  ~ (host(v0) = v1))
% 125.84/83.74  | (11)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : elem(v1, v0) = v2
% 125.84/83.74  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (last(v2) = v1) |  ~ (last(v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.74  | (13) setIn(nil, alive) = all_0_19_19
% 125.84/83.74  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (host(v1) = v2) |  ~ (host(v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = v2) & s(v2) = v3))
% 125.84/83.74  | (15) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0
% 125.84/83.74  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_NotNorm(v1) = v2) |  ~ (m_Down(v0) = v2))
% 125.84/83.74  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (cons(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ (elem(v0, v2) = v3))
% 125.84/83.74  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v1) = v2) |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v0) = v2))
% 125.84/83.74  | (19)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (snoc(v1, v0) = v2) | init(v2) = v1)
% 125.84/83.74  | (20)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (leq(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (leq(v0, v1) = 0) | leq(v0, v2) = 0)
% 125.84/83.74  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (leq(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (s(v1) = v3 & ((v4 = 0 & leq(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = v0) &  ~ (v2 = 0)))))
% 125.84/83.74  | (22)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v1) = v2) | leq(v1, v0) = 0)
% 125.84/83.74  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v1, v0) = v2) | leq(v0, v1) = 0)
% 125.84/83.74  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v0 = q_nil |  ~ (head(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : (tail(v0) = v2 & cons(v1, v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.74  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v0) = v1))
% 125.84/83.74  | (26)  ~ (all_0_19_19 = 0)
% 125.84/83.74  | (27)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : head(v0) = v1
% 125.84/83.74  | (28)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (snoc(v1, v0) = v2) | last(v2) = v0)
% 125.84/83.75  | (29)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : m_Ack(v1, v0) = v2
% 125.84/83.75  | (30)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (m_Halt(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_Halt(v0) = v1))
% 125.84/83.75  | (31)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : (v5 = v4 |  ~ (m_Down(v1) = v6) |  ~ (host(v3) = v4) |  ~ (host(v2) = v4) |  ~ (host(v0) = v5) |  ~ (queue(v4) = v7) |  ~ (elem(v6, v7) = 0) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : (( ~ (v10 = 0) & m_Down(v3) = v8 & queue(v5) = v9 & elem(v8, v9) = v10) | ( ~ (v8 = v5) & host(v1) = v8) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & setIn(v2, alive) = v8) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & setIn(v0, alive) = v8)))
% 125.84/83.75  | (32)  ! [v0] :  ~ (elem(v0, q_nil) = 0)
% 125.84/83.75  | (33)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (host(v0) = v1) | leq(all_0_20_20, v1) = 0)
% 125.84/83.75  | (34)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_NormQ(v1) = v2) |  ~ (m_Ldr(v0) = v2))
% 125.84/83.75  | (35)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : host(v0) = v1
% 125.84/83.75  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_NormQ(v2) = v1) |  ~ (m_NormQ(v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.75  | (37)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_Halt(v1) = v2) |  ~ (m_Halt(v0) = v2))
% 125.84/83.75  | (38)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v5 = v4 |  ~ (m_Down(v3) = v6) |  ~ (m_Down(v1) = v8) |  ~ (host(v2) = v4) |  ~ (host(v0) = v5) |  ~ (queue(v5) = v7) |  ~ (queue(v4) = v9) |  ~ (elem(v8, v9) = 0) |  ~ (elem(v6, v7) = 0) |  ? [v10] : (( ~ (v10 = v5) & host(v1) = v10) | ( ~ (v10 = v4) & host(v3) = v10) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & setIn(v2, alive) = v10) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & setIn(v0, alive) = v10)))
% 125.84/83.75  | (39)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_Ldr(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_Halt(v1) = v2))
% 125.84/83.75  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (leq(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (leq(v2, v3) = 0 & s(v1) = v3 & s(v0) = v2))
% 125.84/83.75  | (41)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (s(v1) = v2) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v4))
% 125.84/83.75  | (42) setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0
% 125.84/83.75  | (43)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (index(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (index(v3, v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.75  | (44)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : leq(v1, v0) = v2
% 125.84/83.75  | (45)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : m_Ldr(v0) = v1
% 125.84/83.75  | (46)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (snoc(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (elem(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & elem(v0, v2) = v5))
% 125.84/83.75  | (47)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (m_Down(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_Down(v0) = v1))
% 125.84/83.75  | (48)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_Ack(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (m_Ack(v3, v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.75  | (49)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v2, v3) = v4) |  ~ (s(v1) = v3) |  ~ (s(v0) = v2) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v5))
% 125.84/83.75  | (50)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (m_Ldr(v2) = v3) |  ~ (m_Ack(v0, v1) = v3))
% 125.84/83.75  | (51)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (init(v2) = v1) |  ~ (init(v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.75  | (52)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (m_Down(v2) = v4) |  ~ (host(v1) = v3) |  ~ (elem(v4, v0) = 0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v5 = 0 & leq(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & ordered(v6) = v7 & cons(v5, v0) = v6 & m_Halt(v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = v3) & host(v2) = v5)))
% 125.84/83.75  | (53)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (snoc(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v3 = 0 & ordered(v1) = 0 & pidMsg(v0) = v5 & pidElem(v0) = v4 & host(v5) = v6 &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (pidMsg(v7) = v8) |  ? [v9] : ((v9 = 0 & leq(v8, v5) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = v6) & host(v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & pidElem(v7) = v9) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & elem(v7, v1) = v9))) &  ! [v7] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (pidElem(v7) = 0) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v9 = 0 & pidMsg(v7) = v8 & leq(v8, v5) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = v6) & pidMsg(v7) = v8 & host(v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & elem(v7, v1) = v8))) &  ! [v7] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (elem(v7, v1) = 0) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v9 = 0 & pidMsg(v7) = v8 & leq(v8, v5) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = v6) & pidMsg(v7) = v8 & host(v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & pidElem(v7) = v8)))) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & ordered(v2) = v3)))
% 125.84/83.75  | (54) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3
% 125.84/83.75  | (55)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (m_Down(v1) = v2) |  ~ (host(v0) = v3) |  ~ (queue(v3) = v4) |  ~ (elem(v2, v4) = 0) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & setIn(v1, alive) = v5))
% 125.84/83.75  | (56)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v0) = v2) |  ~ (s(v1) = v0))
% 125.84/83.75  | (57) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2
% 125.84/83.75  | (58)  ~ (wait = elec_2)
% 125.84/83.75  | (59)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_NotNorm(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_Halt(v1) = v2))
% 125.84/83.75  | (60)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cons(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (elem(v0, v3) = 0) | elem(v0, v2) = 0)
% 125.84/83.75  | (61)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_Ack(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (m_Ack(v0, v2) = v4))
% 125.84/83.75  | (62)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (cons(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (elem(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & elem(v0, v2) = v5))
% 125.84/83.75  | (63)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_Down(v1) = v2) |  ~ (m_Down(v0) = v2))
% 125.84/83.75  | (64) setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0
% 125.84/83.75  | (65)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (ordered(v4) = 0) |  ~ (cons(v3, v0) = v4) |  ~ (m_Down(v2) = v5) |  ~ (m_Halt(v1) = v3) |  ~ (elem(v5, v0) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v6 = 0 & leq(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = v6) & host(v2) = v7 & host(v1) = v6)))
% 125.84/83.75  | (66)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (m_Ack(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (host(v1) = v4) |  ~ (queue(v4) = v5) |  ~ (elem(v3, v5) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ( ~ (v8 = 0) & leq(v6, v7) = v8 & host(v2) = v7 & host(v0) = v6))
% 125.84/83.75  | (67)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (ordered(v2) = v1) |  ~ (ordered(v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.75  | (68)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : setIn(v1, v0) = v2
% 125.84/83.75  | (69)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (leq(v1, v0) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v2))
% 125.84/83.75  | (70)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ordered(v0) = v1
% 125.84/83.75  | (71) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15
% 125.84/83.75  | (72)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_NormQ(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_Halt(v1) = v2))
% 125.84/83.75  | (73) ordered(q_nil) = 0
% 125.84/83.75  | (74)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (snoc(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (m_Ack(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & ordered(v4) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & ordered(v0) = v5)))
% 125.84/83.75  | (75)  ! [v0] : (v0 = all_0_12_12 |  ~ (leq(all_0_20_20, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & leq(all_0_15_15, v0) = 0) | (v1 = 0 & setIn(v0, all_0_10_10) = 0)))
% 125.84/83.75  | (76)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (pidElem(v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ((v2 = v0 & m_Down(v1) = v0) | (v2 = v0 & m_Halt(v1) = v0)))
% 125.84/83.75  | (77)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_Ldr(v2) = v1) |  ~ (m_Ldr(v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.75  | (78) setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = 0
% 125.84/83.75  | (79)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : init(v0) = v1
% 125.84/83.75  | (80)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_Down(v2) = v1) |  ~ (m_Down(v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.75  | (81)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.76  | (82) host(all_0_16_16) = all_0_12_12
% 125.84/83.76  | (83)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (leq(v1, v0) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & setIn(v0, alive) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = v2) & host(v1) = v2 & host(v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & setIn(v1, alive) = v2)))
% 125.84/83.76  | (84) host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4
% 125.84/83.76  | (85)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_Halt(v2) = v1) |  ~ (m_Halt(v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.76  | (86)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & leq(v3, v4) = v5 & s(v1) = v4 & s(v0) = v3))
% 125.84/83.76  | (87)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : snoc(v1, v0) = v2
% 125.84/83.76  | (88)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (m_Down(v0) = v1) | pidMsg(v1) = v0)
% 125.84/83.76  | (89)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : m_NotNorm(v0) = v1
% 125.84/83.76  | (90)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (setIn(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (setIn(v3, v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.76  | (91)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (s(v1) = v3 & (v3 = v0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v0, v3) = v4))))
% 125.84/83.76  | (92)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (snoc(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (elem(v0, v2) = v3))
% 125.84/83.76  | (93)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (m_Down(v2) = v3) |  ~ (leq(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (elem(v3, v0) = 0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (( ~ (v7 = 0) & ordered(v6) = v7 & cons(v5, v0) = v6 & m_Halt(v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v6 = v5) & host(v2) = v6 & host(v1) = v5)))
% 125.84/83.76  | (94)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (host(v3) = v5) |  ~ (host(v1) = v4) |  ~ (host(v0) = v4) |  ~ (setIn(v2, alive) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v6 = v4 & host(v2) = v4) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & m_Down(v1) = v7 & host(v2) = v6 & queue(v6) = v8 & elem(v7, v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & m_Down(v3) = v6 & queue(v4) = v7 & elem(v6, v7) = v8) | ( ~ (v6 = v5) & host(v2) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & setIn(v0, alive) = v6)))
% 125.84/83.76  | (95) cons(all_0_13_13, all_0_18_18) = all_0_14_14
% 125.84/83.76  | (96)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v0) = v1))
% 125.84/83.76  | (97)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = v0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v2) = 0) |  ~ (s(v1) = v2) | leq(v0, v1) = 0)
% 125.84/83.76  | (98)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : m_NormQ(v0) = v1
% 125.84/83.76  | (99)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (s(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & leq(v1, v0) = v2))
% 125.84/83.76  | (100)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (ordered(v4) = 0) |  ~ (cons(v3, v0) = v4) |  ~ (m_Halt(v1) = v3) |  ~ (host(v2) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v6 = 0 & leq(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & m_Down(v2) = v6 & elem(v6, v0) = v7) | ( ~ (v6 = v5) & host(v1) = v6)))
% 125.84/83.76  | (101)  ~ (all_0_8_8 = all_0_15_15)
% 125.84/83.76  | (102)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_NormQ(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v1) = v2))
% 125.84/83.76  | (103)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : tail(v0) = v1
% 125.84/83.76  | (104)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 | v0 = all_0_12_12 |  ~ (leq(all_0_15_15, v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ((v2 = 0 & setIn(v0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & leq(all_0_20_20, v0) = v2)))
% 125.84/83.76  | (105)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : m_Halt(v0) = v1
% 125.84/83.76  | (106)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = v4 |  ~ (host(v3) = v4) |  ~ (host(v2) = v4) |  ~ (host(v1) = v5) |  ~ (host(v0) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (( ~ (v8 = 0) & m_Down(v3) = v6 & queue(v5) = v7 & elem(v6, v7) = v8) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & m_Down(v1) = v6 & queue(v4) = v7 & elem(v6, v7) = v8) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & setIn(v2, alive) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & setIn(v0, alive) = v6)))
% 125.84/83.76  | (107)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v0 = q_nil |  ~ (init(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : (snoc(v1, v2) = v0 & last(v0) = v2))
% 125.84/83.76  | (108)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : s(v0) = v1
% 125.84/83.76  | (109)  ~ (all_0_11_11 = 0)
% 125.84/83.76  | (110)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (host(v0) = v2) |  ~ (setIn(v1, alive) = 0) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = v2) & host(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & setIn(v0, alive) = v3)))
% 125.84/83.76  | (111)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (snoc(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (cons(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : (snoc(v5, v1) = v4 & cons(v0, v2) = v5))
% 125.84/83.76  | (112)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (host(v2) = v1) |  ~ (host(v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.76  | (113)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (pidElem(v0) = v1) |  ~ (m_Down(v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.76  | (114) s(all_0_15_15) = all_0_8_8
% 125.84/83.76  | (115)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_Ldr(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v1) = v2))
% 125.84/83.76  | (116) leq(all_0_20_20, nbr_proc) = 0
% 125.84/83.76  | (117)  ~ (wait = elec_1)
% 125.84/83.76  | (118)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v0 = q_nil |  ~ (tail(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : (cons(v2, v1) = v0 & head(v0) = v2))
% 125.84/83.76  | (119)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (host(v3) = v5) |  ~ (host(v1) = v4) |  ~ (setIn(v2, alive) = 0) |  ~ (setIn(v0, alive) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (( ~ (v9 = 0) & m_Down(v3) = v7 & host(v0) = v6 & queue(v6) = v8 & elem(v7, v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & m_Down(v1) = v7 & host(v2) = v6 & queue(v6) = v8 & elem(v7, v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v6 = v5) & host(v2) = v6) | (host(v0) = v7 & ( ~ (v7 = v4) | (v6 = v4 & host(v2) = v4)))))
% 125.84/83.76  | (120)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (ordered(v4) = 0) |  ~ (cons(v3, v0) = v4) |  ~ (m_Halt(v1) = v3) |  ~ (leq(v1, v2) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (( ~ (v7 = v6) & host(v2) = v7 & host(v1) = v6) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & m_Down(v2) = v6 & elem(v6, v0) = v7)))
% 125.84/83.76  | (121)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (pidElem(v2) = v1) |  ~ (pidElem(v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.76  | (122)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v2) = v1) |  ~ (m_NotNorm(v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.76  | (123)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (host(v1) = v2) |  ~ (host(v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & setIn(v1, alive) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & setIn(v0, alive) = v3)))
% 125.84/83.76  | (124)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ~ (snoc(v1, v0) = q_nil)
% 125.84/83.76  | (125) host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15
% 125.84/83.76  | (126)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (host(v1) = v2) |  ~ (setIn(v0, alive) = 0) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = v2) & host(v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & setIn(v1, alive) = v3)))
% 125.84/83.76  | (127)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (snoc(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (snoc(v3, v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.76  | (128)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cons(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (cons(v3, v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.76  | (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 125.84/83.76  | (130)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (snoc(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ((v10 = v5 & v8 = 0 & v7 = 0 & v3 = 0 &  ~ (v11 = 0) & pidMsg(v6) = v9 & pidMsg(v0) = v4 & pidElem(v6) = 0 & pidElem(v0) = 0 & leq(v9, v4) = v11 & host(v9) = v5 & host(v4) = v5 & elem(v6, v1) = 0) | (v3 = 0 & ordered(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & ordered(v1) = v3)))
% 125.84/83.76  | (131)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & leq(v1, v0) = v2))
% 125.84/83.76  | (132)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (m_NormQ(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_NormQ(v0) = v1))
% 125.84/83.76  | (133) leq(all_0_15_15, all_0_12_12) = all_0_11_11
% 125.84/83.76  | (134)  ~ (norm = wait)
% 125.84/83.76  | (135)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_Down(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_Halt(v1) = v2))
% 125.84/83.76  | (136)  ~ (norm = elec_2)
% 125.84/83.76  | (137) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 125.84/83.76  | (138)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (head(v2) = v1) |  ~ (head(v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.76  | (139)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_8_8)
% 125.84/83.76  | (140)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_NormQ(v1) = v2) |  ~ (m_NormQ(v0) = v2))
% 125.84/83.76  | (141)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (m_Down(v1) = v5) |  ~ (host(v3) = v4) |  ~ (host(v2) = v4) |  ~ (queue(v4) = v6) |  ~ (elem(v5, v6) = 0) |  ~ (setIn(v0, alive) = 0) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : ((v7 = v4 & host(v0) = v4) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & m_Down(v3) = v8 & host(v0) = v7 & queue(v7) = v9 & elem(v8, v9) = v10) | ( ~ (v8 = v7) & host(v1) = v8 & host(v0) = v7) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & setIn(v2, alive) = v7)))
% 125.84/83.77  | (142)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v0 = q_nil |  ~ (last(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : (init(v0) = v2 & snoc(v2, v1) = v0))
% 125.84/83.77  | (143)  ~ (norm = elec_1)
% 125.84/83.77  | (144)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (snoc(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (elem(v0, v3) = 0) | elem(v0, v2) = 0)
% 125.84/83.77  | (145)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : (v5 = v4 |  ~ (m_Down(v3) = v6) |  ~ (host(v2) = v4) |  ~ (host(v1) = v5) |  ~ (host(v0) = v5) |  ~ (queue(v5) = v7) |  ~ (elem(v6, v7) = 0) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : (( ~ (v10 = 0) & m_Down(v1) = v8 & queue(v4) = v9 & elem(v8, v9) = v10) | ( ~ (v8 = v4) & host(v3) = v8) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & setIn(v2, alive) = v8) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & setIn(v0, alive) = v8)))
% 125.84/83.77  | (146)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (m_Ldr(v0) = v2) |  ~ (m_Ldr(v0) = v1))
% 125.84/83.77  | (147)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (cons(v0, v1) = v2) | head(v2) = v0)
% 125.84/83.77  | (148)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : index(v1, v0) = v2
% 125.84/83.77  | (149)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (s(v2) = v2) |  ~ (host(v1) = v2) |  ~ (host(v0) = v2))
% 125.84/83.77  | (150)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (m_Down(v3) = v5) |  ~ (host(v1) = v4) |  ~ (host(v0) = v4) |  ~ (queue(v4) = v6) |  ~ (elem(v5, v6) = 0) |  ~ (setIn(v2, alive) = 0) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : ((v7 = v4 & host(v2) = v4) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & m_Down(v1) = v8 & host(v2) = v7 & queue(v7) = v9 & elem(v8, v9) = v10) | ( ~ (v8 = v7) & host(v3) = v8 & host(v2) = v7) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & setIn(v0, alive) = v7)))
% 125.84/83.77  | (151)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (host(v0) = v1) | leq(v1, nbr_proc) = 0)
% 125.84/83.77  | (152)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (setIn(v1, alive) = 0) |  ~ (setIn(v0, alive) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = v2) & host(v1) = v2 & host(v0) = v3))
% 125.84/83.77  | (153)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (tail(v2) = v1) |  ~ (tail(v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.77  | (154)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (m_Down(v2) = v3) |  ~ (m_Ack(v0, v1) = v3))
% 125.84/83.77  | (155) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14
% 125.84/83.77  | (156)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (s(v2) = v1) |  ~ (s(v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.77  | (157)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (m_Down(v1) = v2) |  ~ (host(v0) = v3) |  ~ (queue(v3) = v4) |  ~ (elem(v2, v4) = 0) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = v3) & host(v1) = v5))
% 125.84/83.77  | (158)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (cons(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v3 = 0 & ordered(v1) = 0 & pidMsg(v0) = v5 & pidElem(v0) = v4 & host(v5) = v6 &  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (pidMsg(v7) = v8) |  ? [v9] : ((v9 = 0 & leq(v5, v8) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = v6) & host(v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & pidElem(v7) = v9) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & elem(v7, v1) = v9))) &  ! [v7] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (pidElem(v7) = 0) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v9 = 0 & pidMsg(v7) = v8 & leq(v5, v8) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = v6) & pidMsg(v7) = v8 & host(v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & elem(v7, v1) = v8))) &  ! [v7] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (elem(v7, v1) = 0) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v9 = 0 & pidMsg(v7) = v8 & leq(v5, v8) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = v6) & pidMsg(v7) = v8 & host(v8) = v9) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & pidElem(v7) = v8)))) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & ordered(v2) = v3)))
% 125.84/83.77  | (159)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (m_NormQ(v2) = v3) |  ~ (m_Ack(v0, v1) = v3))
% 125.84/83.77  | (160)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 | v0 = all_0_12_12 |  ~ (setIn(v0, all_0_10_10) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ((v2 = 0 & leq(all_0_15_15, v0) = 0) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & leq(all_0_20_20, v0) = v2)))
% 125.84/83.77  | (161)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (cons(v0, q_nil) = v1) | ordered(v1) = 0)
% 125.84/83.77  | (162)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (leq(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v1, v2) = v4))
% 125.84/83.77  | (163)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (leq(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v4))
% 125.84/83.77  | (164)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (m_Halt(v0) = v1) | pidMsg(v1) = v0)
% 125.84/83.77  | (165)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (snoc(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (m_Ldr(v1) = v2) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & ordered(v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & ordered(v0) = v4)))
% 125.84/83.77  | (166)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : m_Down(v0) = v1
% 125.84/83.77  | (167)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (m_Halt(v2) = v3) |  ~ (m_Ack(v0, v1) = v3))
% 125.84/83.77  | (168)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (leq(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (s(v1) = v3) |  ~ (s(v0) = v2) | leq(v0, v1) = 0)
% 125.84/83.77  | (169)  ! [v0] :  ~ (setIn(v0, setEmpty) = 0)
% 125.84/83.77  | (170)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v3 = v2 |  ~ (m_Ack(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (m_Ack(v0, v2) = v4))
% 125.84/83.77  | (171)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_NormQ(v1) = v2) |  ~ (m_Down(v0) = v2))
% 125.84/83.77  | (172)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (queue(v2) = v1) |  ~ (queue(v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.77  | (173) index(status, all_0_15_15) = elec_1
% 125.84/83.77  | (174) host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4
% 125.84/83.77  | (175) host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15
% 125.84/83.77  | (176)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : pidMsg(v0) = v1
% 125.84/83.77  | (177)  ~ (elec_1 = elec_2)
% 125.84/83.77  | (178)  ~ (all_0_9_9 = 0)
% 125.84/83.77  | (179)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (m_NotNorm(v2) = v3) |  ~ (m_Ack(v0, v1) = v3))
% 125.84/83.77  | (180) index(down, all_0_15_15) = all_0_10_10
% 125.84/83.77  | (181)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_Ldr(v1) = v2) |  ~ (m_Down(v0) = v2))
% 125.84/83.77  | (182)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (pidMsg(v2) = v1) |  ~ (pidMsg(v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.77  | (183)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (m_Ack(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & setIn(v1, pids) = 0 & setIn(v0, pids) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & host(v0) = v3 & queue(v3) = v4 & elem(v2, v4) = v5)))
% 125.84/83.77  | (184)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (cons(v0, q_nil) = v1) | snoc(q_nil, v0) = v1)
% 125.84/83.77  | (185)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (snoc(q_nil, v0) = v1) | cons(v0, q_nil) = v1)
% 125.84/83.77  | (186) s(zero) = all_0_20_20
% 125.84/83.77  | (187) leq(nbr_proc, all_0_15_15) = all_0_9_9
% 125.84/83.77  | (188) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_18_18) = 0
% 125.84/83.77  | (189)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (elem(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (elem(v3, v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.77  | (190)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (snoc(q_nil, v0) = v1) | ordered(v1) = 0)
% 125.84/83.77  | (191)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : queue(v0) = v1
% 125.84/83.77  | (192)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : pidElem(v0) = v1
% 125.84/83.77  | (193)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (pidElem(v0) = v1) |  ~ (m_Halt(v2) = v0))
% 125.84/83.77  | (194)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (cons(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ((v10 = v5 & v8 = 0 & v7 = 0 & v3 = 0 &  ~ (v11 = 0) & pidMsg(v6) = v9 & pidMsg(v0) = v4 & pidElem(v6) = 0 & pidElem(v0) = 0 & leq(v4, v9) = v11 & host(v9) = v5 & host(v4) = v5 & elem(v6, v1) = 0) | (v3 = 0 & ordered(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & ordered(v1) = v3)))
% 125.84/83.77  | (195)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (m_Ldr(v1) = v2) |  ~ (m_Ldr(v0) = v2))
% 125.84/83.77  | (196)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (leq(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (host(v1) = v3) |  ~ (host(v0) = v2) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & m_Halt(v1) = v4 & queue(v2) = v5 & elem(v4, v5) = v6))
% 125.84/83.77  |
% 125.84/83.77  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.77  | (197) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.77  |
% 125.84/83.77  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.77  | (198) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (199) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (200) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (201) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (202) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (203) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (204) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (205) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (206) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (207) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (208) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (209) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (210) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (211) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (212) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_17_17, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (213) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (214) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_17_17, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (215) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_7_7, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (216) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_17_17, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (217) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_17_17, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (218) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (219) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_17_17, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (220) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (221) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.78  |
% 125.84/83.78  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_17_17, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.78  | (222) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.79  |
% 125.84/83.79  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1, all_0_17_17, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.79  | (223) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.79  |
% 125.84/83.79  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.79  | (224) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.79  |
% 125.84/83.79  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1, all_0_17_17, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.79  | (225) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.79  |
% 125.84/83.79  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1, all_0_7_7, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.79  | (226) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.79  |
% 125.84/83.79  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1, all_0_17_17, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.79  | (227) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.79  |
% 125.84/83.79  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_17_17, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.79  | (228) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.79  |
% 125.84/83.79  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.79  | (229) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.79  |
% 125.84/83.79  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_17_17, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.79  | (230) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.79  |
% 125.84/83.79  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.79  | (231) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.79  |
% 125.84/83.79  | Instantiating formula (106) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_17_17, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 125.84/83.79  | (232) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.79  |
% 125.84/83.79  | Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 125.84/83.79  | (233) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.79  |
% 125.84/83.79  | Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 125.84/83.79  | (234) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.79  |
% 125.84/83.79  | Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 125.84/83.79  | (235) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 125.84/83.79  |
% 125.84/83.79  | Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 125.84/83.79  | (236) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.79  |
% 126.29/83.79  | Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.79  | (237) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.79  |
% 126.29/83.79  | Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.79  | (238) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.79  |
% 126.29/83.79  | Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.79  | (239) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.79  |
% 126.29/83.79  | Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.79  | (240) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.79  |
% 126.29/83.79  | Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.79  | (241) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.79  |
% 126.29/83.79  | Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.79  | (242) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.79  |
% 126.29/83.79  | Instantiating formula (94) with all_0_4_4, all_0_15_15, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.79  | (243)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v0 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.79  |
% 126.29/83.79  | Instantiating formula (94) with all_0_4_4, all_0_15_15, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.79  | (244)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v0 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.79  |
% 126.29/83.79  | Instantiating formula (94) with all_0_4_4, all_0_15_15, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.79  | (245)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v0 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.79  |
% 126.29/83.79  | Instantiating formula (94) with all_0_4_4, all_0_15_15, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.79  | (246)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v0 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.79  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (150) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (247)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v1 = v0) & host(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (150) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (248)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v1 = v0) & host(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (6) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (249)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (119) with all_0_4_4, all_0_15_15, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (250)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = v0) | (host(all_0_7_7) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = all_0_15_15) | (v0 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15))))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (6) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (251)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (119) with all_0_4_4, all_0_15_15, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (252)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = v0) | (host(all_0_7_7) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = all_0_15_15) | (v0 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15))))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (119) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (253)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = v0) | (host(all_0_5_5) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) | (v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (119) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_0_1_1, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (254)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = v0) | (host(all_0_7_7) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) | (v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (119) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (255)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = v0) | (host(all_0_5_5) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) | (v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (119) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7, all_0_1_1, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (256)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = v0) | (host(all_0_7_7) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) | (v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (119) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (257)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = v0) | (host(all_0_7_7) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) | (v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (150) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (258)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v1 = v0) & host(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (150) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (259)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v1 = v0) & host(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (6) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (260)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (119) with all_0_4_4, all_0_15_15, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (261)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = v0) | (host(all_0_17_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = all_0_15_15) | (v0 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15))))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (6) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (262)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (119) with all_0_4_4, all_0_15_15, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (263)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = v0) | (host(all_0_17_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = all_0_15_15) | (v0 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15))))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (119) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (264)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = v0) | (host(all_0_5_5) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) | (v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4))))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (119) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17, all_0_1_1, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (265)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = v0) | (host(all_0_17_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) | (v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4))))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (119) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (266)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = v0) | (host(all_0_5_5) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) | (v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4))))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (119) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = 0, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (267)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = v0) | (host(all_0_17_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) | (v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (119) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6, all_0_17_17, all_0_5_5, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (268)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = v0) | (host(all_0_17_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) | (v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4))))
% 126.29/83.80  |
% 126.29/83.80  | Instantiating formula (119) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7, all_0_1_1, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_1_1) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = 0, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.80  | (269)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = v0) | (host(all_0_17_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) | (v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating formula (119) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7, all_0_17_17, all_0_5_5, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (270)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = v0) | (host(all_0_17_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) | (v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4))))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating formula (126) with all_0_15_15, all_0_7_7, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (271) all_0_7_7 = all_0_17_17 |  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating formula (119) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_17_17, all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = 0, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (272)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v1 & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = v0) | (host(all_0_17_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) | (v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating formula (119) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_17_17, all_0_17_17, all_0_5_5, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (273)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v1 & host(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(v0) = v2 & elem(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = v0) | (host(all_0_17_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) | (v0 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4))))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating formula (152) with all_0_7_7, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = 0, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (274) all_0_7_7 = all_0_17_17 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & host(all_0_17_17) = v1)
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (247) with all_65_0_100, all_65_1_101, all_65_2_102, all_65_3_103 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (275) (all_65_3_103 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_65_0_100 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_65_2_102 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_65_3_103 & queue(all_65_3_103) = all_65_1_101 & elem(all_65_2_102, all_65_1_101) = all_65_0_100) | ( ~ (all_65_2_102 = all_65_3_103) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_65_2_102 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_65_3_103) | ( ~ (all_65_3_103 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_65_3_103)
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (248) with all_98_0_232, all_98_1_233, all_98_2_234, all_98_3_235 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (276) (all_98_3_235 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_98_0_232 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_98_2_234 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_98_3_235 & queue(all_98_3_235) = all_98_1_233 & elem(all_98_2_234, all_98_1_233) = all_98_0_232) | ( ~ (all_98_2_234 = all_98_3_235) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_98_2_234 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_98_3_235) | ( ~ (all_98_3_235 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_98_3_235)
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (269) with all_148_0_418, all_148_1_419, all_148_2_420, all_148_3_421 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (277) ( ~ (all_148_0_418 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_148_2_420 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_148_3_421 & queue(all_148_3_421) = all_148_1_419 & elem(all_148_2_420, all_148_1_419) = all_148_0_418) | ( ~ (all_148_0_418 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_148_2_420 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_148_3_421 & queue(all_148_3_421) = all_148_1_419 & elem(all_148_2_420, all_148_1_419) = all_148_0_418) | ( ~ (all_148_3_421 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_148_3_421) | (host(all_0_17_17) = all_148_2_420 & ( ~ (all_148_2_420 = all_0_4_4) | (all_148_3_421 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (273) with all_157_0_453, all_157_1_454, all_157_2_455, all_157_3_456 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (278) ( ~ (all_157_0_453 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_157_2_455 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456 & queue(all_157_3_456) = all_157_1_454 & elem(all_157_2_455, all_157_1_454) = all_157_0_453) | ( ~ (all_157_0_453 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = all_157_2_455 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456 & queue(all_157_3_456) = all_157_1_454 & elem(all_157_2_455, all_157_1_454) = all_157_0_453) | ( ~ (all_157_3_456 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456) | (host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_2_455 & ( ~ (all_157_2_455 = all_0_4_4) | (all_157_3_456 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4)))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (272) with all_188_0_566, all_188_1_567, all_188_2_568, all_188_3_569 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (279) ( ~ (all_188_0_566 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_188_2_568 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_188_3_569 & queue(all_188_3_569) = all_188_1_567 & elem(all_188_2_568, all_188_1_567) = all_188_0_566) | ( ~ (all_188_0_566 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = all_188_2_568 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_188_3_569 & queue(all_188_3_569) = all_188_1_567 & elem(all_188_2_568, all_188_1_567) = all_188_0_566) | ( ~ (all_188_3_569 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_188_3_569) | (host(all_0_17_17) = all_188_2_568 & ( ~ (all_188_2_568 = all_0_4_4) | (all_188_3_569 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (260) with all_212_0_655, all_212_1_656, all_212_2_657, all_212_3_658 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (280) (all_212_3_658 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_212_0_655 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_212_2_657 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_212_3_658 & queue(all_212_3_658) = all_212_1_656 & elem(all_212_2_657, all_212_1_656) = all_212_0_655) | ( ~ (all_212_1_656 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_212_3_658 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_212_2_657 & elem(all_212_3_658, all_212_2_657) = all_212_1_656) | ( ~ (all_212_3_658 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_212_3_658) | ( ~ (all_212_3_658 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_212_3_658)
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (268) with all_248_0_799, all_248_1_800, all_248_2_801, all_248_3_802 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (281) ( ~ (all_248_0_799 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_248_2_801 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802 & queue(all_248_3_802) = all_248_1_800 & elem(all_248_2_801, all_248_1_800) = all_248_0_799) | ( ~ (all_248_0_799 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_248_2_801 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802 & queue(all_248_3_802) = all_248_1_800 & elem(all_248_2_801, all_248_1_800) = all_248_0_799) | ( ~ (all_248_3_802 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802) | (host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_2_801 & ( ~ (all_248_2_801 = all_0_4_4) | (all_248_3_802 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4)))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (267) with all_249_0_803, all_249_1_804, all_249_2_805, all_249_3_806 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (282) ( ~ (all_249_0_803 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_249_2_805 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_249_3_806 & queue(all_249_3_806) = all_249_1_804 & elem(all_249_2_805, all_249_1_804) = all_249_0_803) | ( ~ (all_249_0_803 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_249_2_805 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_249_3_806 & queue(all_249_3_806) = all_249_1_804 & elem(all_249_2_805, all_249_1_804) = all_249_0_803) | ( ~ (all_249_3_806 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_249_3_806) | (host(all_0_17_17) = all_249_2_805 & ( ~ (all_249_2_805 = all_0_4_4) | (all_249_3_806 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (249) with all_270_0_874, all_270_1_875, all_270_2_876, all_270_3_877 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (283) (all_270_3_877 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_270_0_874 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_270_2_876 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_270_3_877 & queue(all_270_3_877) = all_270_1_875 & elem(all_270_2_876, all_270_1_875) = all_270_0_874) | ( ~ (all_270_1_875 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_270_3_877 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_270_2_876 & elem(all_270_3_877, all_270_2_876) = all_270_1_875) | ( ~ (all_270_3_877 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_270_3_877) | ( ~ (all_270_3_877 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_270_3_877)
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (250) with all_314_0_1050, all_314_1_1051, all_314_2_1052, all_314_3_1053 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (284) ( ~ (all_314_0_1050 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_314_2_1052 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_314_3_1053 & queue(all_314_3_1053) = all_314_1_1051 & elem(all_314_2_1052, all_314_1_1051) = all_314_0_1050) | ( ~ (all_314_0_1050 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_314_2_1052 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_314_3_1053 & queue(all_314_3_1053) = all_314_1_1051 & elem(all_314_2_1052, all_314_1_1051) = all_314_0_1050) | ( ~ (all_314_3_1053 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_314_3_1053) | (host(all_0_7_7) = all_314_2_1052 & ( ~ (all_314_2_1052 = all_0_15_15) | (all_314_3_1053 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15)))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (252) with all_377_0_1290, all_377_1_1291, all_377_2_1292, all_377_3_1293 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (285) ( ~ (all_377_0_1290 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_377_2_1292 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_377_3_1293 & queue(all_377_3_1293) = all_377_1_1291 & elem(all_377_2_1292, all_377_1_1291) = all_377_0_1290) | ( ~ (all_377_0_1290 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_377_2_1292 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_377_3_1293 & queue(all_377_3_1293) = all_377_1_1291 & elem(all_377_2_1292, all_377_1_1291) = all_377_0_1290) | ( ~ (all_377_3_1293 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_377_3_1293) | (host(all_0_7_7) = all_377_2_1292 & ( ~ (all_377_2_1292 = all_0_15_15) | (all_377_3_1293 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15)))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (257) with all_382_0_1310, all_382_1_1311, all_382_2_1312, all_382_3_1313 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (286) ( ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310) | ( ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310) | ( ~ (all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313) | (host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312 & ( ~ (all_382_2_1312 = all_0_4_4) | (all_382_3_1313 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (243) with all_398_0_1374, all_398_1_1375, all_398_2_1376, all_398_3_1377 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (287) (all_398_3_1377 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (all_398_0_1374 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_398_2_1376 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_398_3_1377 & queue(all_398_3_1377) = all_398_1_1375 & elem(all_398_2_1376, all_398_1_1375) = all_398_0_1374) | ( ~ (all_398_1_1375 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_398_3_1377 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_398_2_1376 & elem(all_398_3_1377, all_398_2_1376) = all_398_1_1375) | ( ~ (all_398_3_1377 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_398_3_1377) | ( ~ (all_398_3_1377 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = all_398_3_1377)
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (244) with all_400_0_1382, all_400_1_1383, all_400_2_1384, all_400_3_1385 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (288) (all_400_3_1385 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (all_400_0_1382 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_400_2_1384 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_400_3_1385 & queue(all_400_3_1385) = all_400_1_1383 & elem(all_400_2_1384, all_400_1_1383) = all_400_0_1382) | ( ~ (all_400_1_1383 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_400_3_1385 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_400_2_1384 & elem(all_400_3_1385, all_400_2_1384) = all_400_1_1383) | ( ~ (all_400_3_1385 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_400_3_1385) | ( ~ (all_400_3_1385 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_400_3_1385)
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (246) with all_402_0_1390, all_402_1_1391, all_402_2_1392, all_402_3_1393 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (289) (all_402_3_1393 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (all_402_0_1390 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_402_2_1392 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_402_3_1393 & queue(all_402_3_1393) = all_402_1_1391 & elem(all_402_2_1392, all_402_1_1391) = all_402_0_1390) | ( ~ (all_402_1_1391 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_402_3_1393 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_402_2_1392 & elem(all_402_3_1393, all_402_2_1392) = all_402_1_1391) | ( ~ (all_402_3_1393 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_402_3_1393) | ( ~ (all_402_3_1393 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_402_3_1393)
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (245) with all_411_0_1426, all_411_1_1427, all_411_2_1428, all_411_3_1429 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (290) (all_411_3_1429 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (all_411_0_1426 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_411_2_1428 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_411_3_1429 & queue(all_411_3_1429) = all_411_1_1427 & elem(all_411_2_1428, all_411_1_1427) = all_411_0_1426) | ( ~ (all_411_1_1427 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_411_3_1429 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_411_2_1428 & elem(all_411_3_1429, all_411_2_1428) = all_411_1_1427) | ( ~ (all_411_3_1429 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_411_3_1429) | ( ~ (all_411_3_1429 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = all_411_3_1429)
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (256) with all_448_0_1571, all_448_1_1572, all_448_2_1573, all_448_3_1574 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (291) ( ~ (all_448_0_1571 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_448_2_1573 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_448_3_1574 & queue(all_448_3_1574) = all_448_1_1572 & elem(all_448_2_1573, all_448_1_1572) = all_448_0_1571) | ( ~ (all_448_0_1571 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_448_2_1573 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_448_3_1574 & queue(all_448_3_1574) = all_448_1_1572 & elem(all_448_2_1573, all_448_1_1572) = all_448_0_1571) | ( ~ (all_448_3_1574 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_448_3_1574) | (host(all_0_7_7) = all_448_2_1573 & ( ~ (all_448_2_1573 = all_0_4_4) | (all_448_3_1574 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (264) with all_466_0_1639, all_466_1_1640, all_466_2_1641, all_466_3_1642 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (292) ( ~ (all_466_0_1639 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_466_2_1641 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_466_3_1642 & queue(all_466_3_1642) = all_466_1_1640 & elem(all_466_2_1641, all_466_1_1640) = all_466_0_1639) | ( ~ (all_466_0_1639 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_466_2_1641 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_466_3_1642 & queue(all_466_3_1642) = all_466_1_1640 & elem(all_466_2_1641, all_466_1_1640) = all_466_0_1639) | ( ~ (all_466_3_1642 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_466_3_1642) | (host(all_0_5_5) = all_466_2_1641 & ( ~ (all_466_2_1641 = all_0_4_4) | (all_466_3_1642 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4)))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (262) with all_471_0_1659, all_471_1_1660, all_471_2_1661, all_471_3_1662 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (293) (all_471_3_1662 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_471_0_1659 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_471_2_1661 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_471_3_1662 & queue(all_471_3_1662) = all_471_1_1660 & elem(all_471_2_1661, all_471_1_1660) = all_471_0_1659) | ( ~ (all_471_1_1660 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_471_3_1662 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_471_2_1661 & elem(all_471_3_1662, all_471_2_1661) = all_471_1_1660) | ( ~ (all_471_3_1662 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_471_3_1662) | ( ~ (all_471_3_1662 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_471_3_1662)
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (263) with all_483_0_1707, all_483_1_1708, all_483_2_1709, all_483_3_1710 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (294) ( ~ (all_483_0_1707 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_483_2_1709 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_483_3_1710 & queue(all_483_3_1710) = all_483_1_1708 & elem(all_483_2_1709, all_483_1_1708) = all_483_0_1707) | ( ~ (all_483_0_1707 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_483_2_1709 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_483_3_1710 & queue(all_483_3_1710) = all_483_1_1708 & elem(all_483_2_1709, all_483_1_1708) = all_483_0_1707) | ( ~ (all_483_3_1710 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_483_3_1710) | (host(all_0_17_17) = all_483_2_1709 & ( ~ (all_483_2_1709 = all_0_15_15) | (all_483_3_1710 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15)))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (261) with all_488_0_1727, all_488_1_1728, all_488_2_1729, all_488_3_1730 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (295) ( ~ (all_488_0_1727 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_488_2_1729 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_488_3_1730 & queue(all_488_3_1730) = all_488_1_1728 & elem(all_488_2_1729, all_488_1_1728) = all_488_0_1727) | ( ~ (all_488_0_1727 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_488_2_1729 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_488_3_1730 & queue(all_488_3_1730) = all_488_1_1728 & elem(all_488_2_1729, all_488_1_1728) = all_488_0_1727) | ( ~ (all_488_3_1730 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_488_3_1730) | (host(all_0_17_17) = all_488_2_1729 & ( ~ (all_488_2_1729 = all_0_15_15) | (all_488_3_1730 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15)))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (259) with all_502_0_1783, all_502_1_1784, all_502_2_1785, all_502_3_1786 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (296) (all_502_3_1786 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_502_0_1783 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_502_2_1785 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_502_3_1786 & queue(all_502_3_1786) = all_502_1_1784 & elem(all_502_2_1785, all_502_1_1784) = all_502_0_1783) | ( ~ (all_502_2_1785 = all_502_3_1786) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_502_2_1785 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_502_3_1786) | ( ~ (all_502_3_1786 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_502_3_1786)
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (258) with all_505_0_1795, all_505_1_1796, all_505_2_1797, all_505_3_1798 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (297) (all_505_3_1798 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_505_0_1795 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_505_2_1797 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_505_3_1798 & queue(all_505_3_1798) = all_505_1_1796 & elem(all_505_2_1797, all_505_1_1796) = all_505_0_1795) | ( ~ (all_505_2_1797 = all_505_3_1798) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_505_2_1797 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_505_3_1798) | ( ~ (all_505_3_1798 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_505_3_1798)
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (266) with all_518_0_1847, all_518_1_1848, all_518_2_1849, all_518_3_1850 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (298) ( ~ (all_518_0_1847 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_518_2_1849 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_518_3_1850 & queue(all_518_3_1850) = all_518_1_1848 & elem(all_518_2_1849, all_518_1_1848) = all_518_0_1847) | ( ~ (all_518_0_1847 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_518_2_1849 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_518_3_1850 & queue(all_518_3_1850) = all_518_1_1848 & elem(all_518_2_1849, all_518_1_1848) = all_518_0_1847) | ( ~ (all_518_3_1850 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_518_3_1850) | (host(all_0_5_5) = all_518_2_1849 & ( ~ (all_518_2_1849 = all_0_4_4) | (all_518_3_1850 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4)))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (265) with all_519_0_1851, all_519_1_1852, all_519_2_1853, all_519_3_1854 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (299) ( ~ (all_519_0_1851 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_519_2_1853 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854 & queue(all_519_3_1854) = all_519_1_1852 & elem(all_519_2_1853, all_519_1_1852) = all_519_0_1851) | ( ~ (all_519_0_1851 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_519_2_1853 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854 & queue(all_519_3_1854) = all_519_1_1852 & elem(all_519_2_1853, all_519_1_1852) = all_519_0_1851) | ( ~ (all_519_3_1854 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854) | (host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_2_1853 & ( ~ (all_519_2_1853 = all_0_4_4) | (all_519_3_1854 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4)))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (255) with all_543_0_1944, all_543_1_1945, all_543_2_1946, all_543_3_1947 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (300) ( ~ (all_543_0_1944 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_543_2_1946 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_543_3_1947 & queue(all_543_3_1947) = all_543_1_1945 & elem(all_543_2_1946, all_543_1_1945) = all_543_0_1944) | ( ~ (all_543_0_1944 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_543_2_1946 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_543_3_1947 & queue(all_543_3_1947) = all_543_1_1945 & elem(all_543_2_1946, all_543_1_1945) = all_543_0_1944) | ( ~ (all_543_3_1947 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_543_3_1947) | (host(all_0_5_5) = all_543_2_1946 & ( ~ (all_543_2_1946 = all_0_4_4) | (all_543_3_1947 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)))
% 126.29/83.81  |
% 126.29/83.81  | Instantiating (254) with all_544_0_1948, all_544_1_1949, all_544_2_1950, all_544_3_1951 yields:
% 126.29/83.81  | (301) ( ~ (all_544_0_1948 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_544_2_1950 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_544_3_1951 & queue(all_544_3_1951) = all_544_1_1949 & elem(all_544_2_1950, all_544_1_1949) = all_544_0_1948) | ( ~ (all_544_0_1948 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_544_2_1950 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_544_3_1951 & queue(all_544_3_1951) = all_544_1_1949 & elem(all_544_2_1950, all_544_1_1949) = all_544_0_1948) | ( ~ (all_544_3_1951 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_544_3_1951) | (host(all_0_7_7) = all_544_2_1950 & ( ~ (all_544_2_1950 = all_0_4_4) | (all_544_3_1951 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)))
% 126.29/83.82  |
% 126.29/83.82  | Instantiating (253) with all_556_0_1996, all_556_1_1997, all_556_2_1998, all_556_3_1999 yields:
% 126.29/83.82  | (302) ( ~ (all_556_0_1996 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_556_2_1998 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_556_3_1999 & queue(all_556_3_1999) = all_556_1_1997 & elem(all_556_2_1998, all_556_1_1997) = all_556_0_1996) | ( ~ (all_556_0_1996 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_556_2_1998 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_556_3_1999 & queue(all_556_3_1999) = all_556_1_1997 & elem(all_556_2_1998, all_556_1_1997) = all_556_0_1996) | ( ~ (all_556_3_1999 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_556_3_1999) | (host(all_0_5_5) = all_556_2_1998 & ( ~ (all_556_2_1998 = all_0_4_4) | (all_556_3_1999 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)))
% 126.29/83.82  |
% 126.29/83.82  | Instantiating (251) with all_579_0_2087, all_579_1_2088, all_579_2_2089, all_579_3_2090 yields:
% 126.29/83.82  | (303) (all_579_3_2090 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_579_0_2087 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_579_2_2089 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_579_3_2090 & queue(all_579_3_2090) = all_579_1_2088 & elem(all_579_2_2089, all_579_1_2088) = all_579_0_2087) | ( ~ (all_579_1_2088 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_579_3_2090 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_579_2_2089 & elem(all_579_3_2090, all_579_2_2089) = all_579_1_2088) | ( ~ (all_579_3_2090 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_579_3_2090) | ( ~ (all_579_3_2090 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_579_3_2090)
% 126.29/83.82  |
% 126.29/83.82  | Instantiating (270) with all_590_0_2129, all_590_1_2130, all_590_2_2131, all_590_3_2132 yields:
% 126.29/83.82  | (304) ( ~ (all_590_0_2129 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_590_2_2131 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132 & queue(all_590_3_2132) = all_590_1_2130 & elem(all_590_2_2131, all_590_1_2130) = all_590_0_2129) | ( ~ (all_590_0_2129 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_590_2_2131 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132 & queue(all_590_3_2132) = all_590_1_2130 & elem(all_590_2_2131, all_590_1_2130) = all_590_0_2129) | ( ~ (all_590_3_2132 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132) | (host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_2_2131 & ( ~ (all_590_2_2131 = all_0_4_4) | (all_590_3_2132 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4)))
% 126.29/83.82  |
% 126.29/83.82  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (271), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  |-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  | (305) all_0_7_7 = all_0_17_17
% 126.29/83.82  |
% 126.29/83.82  	| From (305) and (125) follows:
% 126.29/83.82  	| (71) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.82  	|
% 126.29/83.82  	| From (305) and (78) follows:
% 126.29/83.82  	| (42) setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0
% 126.29/83.82  	|
% 126.29/83.82  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (241), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  	|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.82  	|
% 126.29/83.82  		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.82  		| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.82  		|
% 126.29/83.82  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.82  	|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.82  	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.82  	| (311)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.82  	|
% 126.29/83.82  		| Instantiating (311) with all_612_0_2189, all_612_1_2190, all_612_2_2191 yields:
% 126.29/83.82  		| (312) ( ~ (all_612_0_2189 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_612_2_2191 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_612_1_2190 & elem(all_612_2_2191, all_612_1_2190) = all_612_0_2189) | ( ~ (all_612_2_2191 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_612_2_2191) | ( ~ (all_612_2_2191 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_612_2_2191) | ( ~ (all_612_2_2191 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = all_612_2_2191)
% 126.29/83.82  		|
% 126.29/83.82  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (289), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  		|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  		| (313) (all_402_3_1393 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (all_402_0_1390 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_402_2_1392 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_402_3_1393 & queue(all_402_3_1393) = all_402_1_1391 & elem(all_402_2_1392, all_402_1_1391) = all_402_0_1390) | ( ~ (all_402_1_1391 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_402_3_1393 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_402_2_1392 & elem(all_402_3_1393, all_402_2_1392) = all_402_1_1391) | ( ~ (all_402_3_1393 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_402_3_1393)
% 126.29/83.82  		|
% 126.29/83.82  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (313), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  			|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  			| (314) (all_402_3_1393 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (all_402_0_1390 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_402_2_1392 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_402_3_1393 & queue(all_402_3_1393) = all_402_1_1391 & elem(all_402_2_1392, all_402_1_1391) = all_402_0_1390) | ( ~ (all_402_1_1391 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_402_3_1393 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_402_2_1392 & elem(all_402_3_1393, all_402_2_1392) = all_402_1_1391)
% 126.29/83.82  			|
% 126.29/83.82  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (314), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  				|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  				| (315) (all_402_3_1393 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (all_402_0_1390 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_402_2_1392 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_402_3_1393 & queue(all_402_3_1393) = all_402_1_1391 & elem(all_402_2_1392, all_402_1_1391) = all_402_0_1390)
% 126.29/83.82  				|
% 126.29/83.82  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (315), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  					|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  					| (316) all_402_3_1393 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.82  					|
% 126.29/83.82  						| Applying alpha-rule on (316) yields:
% 126.29/83.82  						| (317) all_402_3_1393 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.82  						| (318) host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.82  						|
% 126.29/83.82  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (237), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  						|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.82  						|
% 126.29/83.82  							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.82  							| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.82  							|
% 126.29/83.82  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.82  						|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.82  						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.82  						| (322)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.82  						|
% 126.29/83.82  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (239), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  							|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.82  							|
% 126.29/83.82  								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.82  								| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.82  								|
% 126.29/83.82  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.82  							|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.82  							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.82  							| (326)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.82  							|
% 126.29/83.82  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (238), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  								|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.82  								|
% 126.29/83.82  									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.82  									| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.82  									|
% 126.29/83.82  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.82  								|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.82  								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.82  								| (330)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.82  								|
% 126.29/83.82  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (240), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  									|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.82  									|
% 126.29/83.82  										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.82  										| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.82  										|
% 126.29/83.82  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.82  									|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.82  									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.82  									| (334)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.82  									|
% 126.29/83.82  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (215), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  										|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.82  										|
% 126.29/83.82  											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.82  											| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.82  											|
% 126.29/83.82  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.82  										|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.82  										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.82  										| (338)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.82  										|
% 126.29/83.82  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (213), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  											|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.82  											|
% 126.29/83.82  												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.82  												| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.82  												|
% 126.29/83.82  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.82  											|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.82  											| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.82  											| (342)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.82  											|
% 126.29/83.82  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (214), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  												|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.82  												|
% 126.29/83.82  													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.82  													| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.82  													|
% 126.29/83.82  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.82  												|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.82  												| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.82  												| (346)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.82  												|
% 126.29/83.82  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (216), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  													|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.82  													|
% 126.29/83.82  														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.82  														| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.82  														|
% 126.29/83.82  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.82  													|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.82  													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.82  													| (350)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.82  													|
% 126.29/83.82  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (219), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  														|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.82  														|
% 126.29/83.82  															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.82  															| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.82  															|
% 126.29/83.82  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.82  														|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.82  														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.82  														| (354)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.82  														|
% 126.29/83.82  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (220), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  															|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.82  															|
% 126.29/83.82  																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.82  																| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.82  																|
% 126.29/83.82  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.82  															|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.82  															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.82  															| (358)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.82  															|
% 126.29/83.82  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (218), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  																|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.82  																|
% 126.29/83.82  																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.82  																	| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.82  																	|
% 126.29/83.82  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.82  																|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.82  																| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.82  																| (362)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.82  																|
% 126.29/83.82  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (234), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  																	|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.82  																	|
% 126.29/83.82  																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.82  																		| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.82  																		|
% 126.29/83.82  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.82  																	|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.82  																	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.82  																	| (366)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.82  																	|
% 126.29/83.82  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (233), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.82  																		|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.82  																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.82  																		|
% 126.29/83.82  																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.82  																			| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.82  																			|
% 126.29/83.82  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.82  																		|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.82  																		| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.82  																		| (370)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																		|
% 126.29/83.83  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (235), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																			|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																			|
% 126.29/83.83  																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																				| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																				|
% 126.29/83.83  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																			|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																			| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																			| (374)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																			|
% 126.29/83.83  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																				|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																				|
% 126.29/83.83  																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																					| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																					|
% 126.29/83.83  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																				|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																				| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																				| (378)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																				|
% 126.29/83.83  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																					|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																					|
% 126.29/83.83  																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																						| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																						|
% 126.29/83.83  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																					|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																					| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																					| (382)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																					|
% 126.29/83.83  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (223), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																						|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																						|
% 126.29/83.83  																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																							| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																							|
% 126.29/83.83  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																						|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																						| (386)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																						|
% 126.29/83.83  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (224), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																							|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																							|
% 126.29/83.83  																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																								| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																								|
% 126.29/83.83  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																							|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																							| (390)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																							|
% 126.29/83.83  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (227), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																								|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																								|
% 126.29/83.83  																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																									| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																									|
% 126.29/83.83  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																								|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																								| (394)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																								|
% 126.29/83.83  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (225), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																									|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																									|
% 126.29/83.83  																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																										| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																										|
% 126.29/83.83  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																									|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																									| (398)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																									|
% 126.29/83.83  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (226), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																										|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																										|
% 126.29/83.83  																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																											| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																											|
% 126.29/83.83  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																										|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																										| (402)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																										|
% 126.29/83.83  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																											|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																											|
% 126.29/83.83  																												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																												| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																												|
% 126.29/83.83  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																											|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																											| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																											| (406)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																											|
% 126.29/83.83  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																												|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																												|
% 126.29/83.83  																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																													| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																													|
% 126.29/83.83  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																												|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																												| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																												| (410)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																												|
% 126.29/83.83  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																													|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																													|
% 126.29/83.83  																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																														| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																														|
% 126.29/83.83  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																													|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																													| (414)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																													|
% 126.29/83.83  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (231), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																														|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																														|
% 126.29/83.83  																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																															| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																															|
% 126.29/83.83  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																														|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																														| (418)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																														|
% 126.29/83.83  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (232), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																															|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																															|
% 126.29/83.83  																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																																| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																																|
% 126.29/83.83  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																															|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																															| (422)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																															|
% 126.29/83.83  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (236), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																																|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																																|
% 126.29/83.83  																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																																	| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																																	|
% 126.29/83.83  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																																|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																																| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																																| (426)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																																|
% 126.29/83.83  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (242), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																																	|
% 126.29/83.83  																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																																		| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																																		|
% 126.29/83.83  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																																	|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																																	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																																	| (430)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																																	|
% 126.29/83.83  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (199), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																																		|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																																		|
% 126.29/83.83  																																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																																			| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																																			|
% 126.29/83.83  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																																		|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																																		| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																																		| (434)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																																		|
% 126.29/83.83  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (200), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																																			|
% 126.29/83.83  																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																																				| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																																				|
% 126.29/83.83  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																																			|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																																			| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																																			| (438)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																																			|
% 126.29/83.83  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (217), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																																				|
% 126.29/83.83  																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																																					| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																																					|
% 126.29/83.83  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																																				|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																																				| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																																				| (442)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																																				|
% 126.29/83.83  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																																					|
% 126.29/83.83  																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																																						| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																																						|
% 126.29/83.83  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																																					|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																																					| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																																					| (446)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																																					|
% 126.29/83.83  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (202), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																																						|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																																						|
% 126.29/83.83  																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																																							| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																																							|
% 126.29/83.83  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																																						|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																																						| (450)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																																						|
% 126.29/83.83  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (203), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																																							|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																																							|
% 126.29/83.83  																																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																																								| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																																								|
% 126.29/83.83  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																																							|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																																							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																																							| (454)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																																							|
% 126.29/83.83  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (204), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																																								|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																																								|
% 126.29/83.83  																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																																									| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																																									|
% 126.29/83.83  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																																								|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																																								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																																								| (458)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																																								|
% 126.29/83.83  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																																									|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.83  																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.83  																																									|
% 126.29/83.83  																																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.83  																																										| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.83  																																										|
% 126.29/83.83  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.83  																																									|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.83  																																									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.83  																																									| (462)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.83  																																									|
% 126.29/83.83  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.83  																																										|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.84  																																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.84  																																										|
% 126.29/83.84  																																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.84  																																											| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.84  																																											|
% 126.29/83.84  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.84  																																										|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.84  																																										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.84  																																										| (466)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.84  																																										|
% 126.29/83.84  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (206), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.84  																																											|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.84  																																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.84  																																											|
% 126.29/83.84  																																												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.84  																																												| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.84  																																												|
% 126.29/83.84  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.84  																																											|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.84  																																											| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.84  																																											| (470)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.84  																																											|
% 126.29/83.84  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.84  																																												|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.84  																																												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.84  																																												|
% 126.29/83.84  																																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.84  																																													| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.84  																																													|
% 126.29/83.84  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.84  																																												|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.84  																																												| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.84  																																												| (474)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.84  																																												|
% 126.29/83.84  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (197), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.84  																																													|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.84  																																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.84  																																													|
% 126.29/83.84  																																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.84  																																														| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.84  																																														|
% 126.29/83.84  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.84  																																													|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.84  																																													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.84  																																													| (478)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.84  																																													|
% 126.29/83.84  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (198), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.84  																																														|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.84  																																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.84  																																														|
% 126.29/83.84  																																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.84  																																															| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.84  																																															|
% 126.29/83.84  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.84  																																														|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.84  																																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.84  																																														| (482)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.84  																																														|
% 126.29/83.84  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.84  																																															|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.84  																																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.84  																																															|
% 126.29/83.84  																																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.84  																																																| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.84  																																																|
% 126.29/83.84  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.84  																																															|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.84  																																															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.84  																																															| (486)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.84  																																															|
% 126.29/83.84  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (210), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.84  																																																|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.84  																																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.84  																																																|
% 126.29/83.84  																																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.84  																																																	| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.84  																																																	|
% 126.29/83.84  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.84  																																																|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.84  																																																| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.84  																																																| (490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.84  																																																|
% 126.29/83.84  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (212), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.84  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.84  																																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.84  																																																	|
% 126.29/83.84  																																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.84  																																																		| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.84  																																																		|
% 126.29/83.84  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.84  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.84  																																																	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.84  																																																	| (494)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.84  																																																	|
% 126.29/83.84  																																																		| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.29/83.84  																																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.84  																																																		|
% 126.29/83.84  																																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.84  																																																		| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.84  																																																		|
% 126.29/83.84  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.84  					|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.84  					| (497)  ~ (all_402_0_1390 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_402_2_1392 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_402_3_1393 & queue(all_402_3_1393) = all_402_1_1391 & elem(all_402_2_1392, all_402_1_1391) = all_402_0_1390
% 126.29/83.84  					|
% 126.29/83.84  						| Applying alpha-rule on (497) yields:
% 126.29/83.84  						| (498) queue(all_402_3_1393) = all_402_1_1391
% 126.29/83.84  						| (499)  ~ (all_402_0_1390 = 0)
% 126.29/83.84  						| (500) elem(all_402_2_1392, all_402_1_1391) = all_402_0_1390
% 126.29/83.84  						| (501) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_402_2_1392
% 126.29/83.84  						| (502) host(all_0_5_5) = all_402_3_1393
% 126.29/83.84  						|
% 126.29/83.84  						| Instantiating formula (47) with all_402_2_1392, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_402_2_1392, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 126.29/83.84  						| (503) all_402_2_1392 = all_0_3_3
% 126.29/83.84  						|
% 126.29/83.84  						| Instantiating formula (10) with all_402_3_1393, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_402_3_1393, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 126.29/83.84  						| (504) all_402_3_1393 = all_0_4_4
% 126.29/83.84  						|
% 126.29/83.84  						| From (504) and (498) follows:
% 126.29/83.84  						| (505) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_402_1_1391
% 126.29/83.84  						|
% 126.29/83.84  						| From (503) and (500) follows:
% 126.29/83.84  						| (506) elem(all_0_3_3, all_402_1_1391) = all_402_0_1390
% 126.29/83.84  						|
% 126.29/83.84  						| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_402_1_1391, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_402_1_1391, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 126.29/83.84  						| (507) all_402_1_1391 = all_0_2_2
% 126.29/83.84  						|
% 126.29/83.84  						| From (507) and (506) follows:
% 126.29/83.84  						| (508) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_402_0_1390
% 126.29/83.84  						|
% 126.29/83.84  						| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_402_0_1390, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_402_0_1390, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 126.29/83.84  						| (509) all_402_0_1390 = 0
% 126.29/83.84  						|
% 126.29/83.84  						| Equations (509) can reduce 499 to:
% 126.29/83.84  						| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.84  						|
% 126.29/83.84  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.84  				|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.84  				| (511)  ~ (all_402_1_1391 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_402_3_1393 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_402_2_1392 & elem(all_402_3_1393, all_402_2_1392) = all_402_1_1391
% 126.29/83.84  				|
% 126.29/83.84  					| Applying alpha-rule on (511) yields:
% 126.29/83.84  					| (512)  ~ (all_402_1_1391 = 0)
% 126.29/83.84  					| (513) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_402_3_1393
% 126.29/83.84  					| (514) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_402_2_1392
% 126.29/83.84  					| (515) elem(all_402_3_1393, all_402_2_1392) = all_402_1_1391
% 126.29/83.84  					|
% 126.29/83.84  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (237), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.84  					|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.84  					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.84  					|
% 126.29/83.84  						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.84  						| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.84  						|
% 126.29/83.84  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.84  					|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.84  					| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.84  					| (322)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.84  					|
% 126.29/83.84  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (239), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.84  						|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.84  						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.84  						|
% 126.29/83.84  							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.84  							| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.84  							|
% 126.29/83.84  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.84  						|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.84  						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.84  						| (326)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.84  						|
% 126.29/83.84  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (238), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.84  							|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.84  							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.84  							|
% 126.29/83.84  								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.84  								| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.84  								|
% 126.29/83.84  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.84  							|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.84  							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.84  							| (330)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.84  							|
% 126.29/83.84  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (240), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.84  								|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.84  								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.84  								|
% 126.29/83.84  									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.84  									| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.84  									|
% 126.29/83.84  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.84  								|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.84  								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.84  								| (334)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.84  								|
% 126.29/83.84  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (215), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.84  									|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.84  									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.84  									|
% 126.29/83.84  										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.84  										| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.84  										|
% 126.29/83.84  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.84  									|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.84  									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.84  									| (338)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.84  									|
% 126.29/83.84  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (213), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.84  										|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.84  										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.84  										|
% 126.29/83.84  											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.84  											| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.84  											|
% 126.29/83.84  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.84  										|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.84  										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.84  										| (342)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.84  										|
% 126.29/83.85  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (214), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  											|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.85  											|
% 126.29/83.85  												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.85  												| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.85  												|
% 126.29/83.85  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.85  											|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.85  											| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.85  											| (346)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.85  											|
% 126.29/83.85  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (216), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  												|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.85  												|
% 126.29/83.85  													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.85  													| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.85  													|
% 126.29/83.85  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.85  												|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.85  												| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.85  												| (350)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.85  												|
% 126.29/83.85  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (219), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  													|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.85  													|
% 126.29/83.85  														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.85  														| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.85  														|
% 126.29/83.85  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.85  													|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.85  													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.85  													| (354)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.85  													|
% 126.29/83.85  														| Instantiating (354) with all_652_0_3369, all_652_1_3370, all_652_2_3371 yields:
% 126.29/83.85  														| (552) ( ~ (all_652_0_3369 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_652_2_3371 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_652_1_3370 & elem(all_652_2_3371, all_652_1_3370) = all_652_0_3369) | ( ~ (all_652_0_3369 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_652_2_3371 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_652_1_3370 & elem(all_652_2_3371, all_652_1_3370) = all_652_0_3369) | ( ~ (all_652_2_3371 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_652_2_3371) | ( ~ (all_652_2_3371 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_652_2_3371)
% 126.29/83.85  														|
% 126.29/83.85  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (220), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  														|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.85  														|
% 126.29/83.85  															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.85  															| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.85  															|
% 126.29/83.85  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.85  														|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.85  														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.85  														| (358)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.85  														|
% 126.29/83.85  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (552), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  															|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  															| (557) ( ~ (all_652_0_3369 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_652_2_3371 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_652_1_3370 & elem(all_652_2_3371, all_652_1_3370) = all_652_0_3369) | ( ~ (all_652_0_3369 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_652_2_3371 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_652_1_3370 & elem(all_652_2_3371, all_652_1_3370) = all_652_0_3369) | ( ~ (all_652_2_3371 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_652_2_3371)
% 126.29/83.85  															|
% 126.29/83.85  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (557), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																| (558) ( ~ (all_652_0_3369 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_652_2_3371 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_652_1_3370 & elem(all_652_2_3371, all_652_1_3370) = all_652_0_3369) | ( ~ (all_652_0_3369 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_652_2_3371 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_652_1_3370 & elem(all_652_2_3371, all_652_1_3370) = all_652_0_3369)
% 126.29/83.85  																|
% 126.29/83.85  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (558), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																	|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																	| (559)  ~ (all_652_0_3369 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_652_2_3371 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_652_1_3370 & elem(all_652_2_3371, all_652_1_3370) = all_652_0_3369
% 126.29/83.85  																	|
% 126.29/83.85  																		| Applying alpha-rule on (559) yields:
% 126.29/83.85  																		| (560)  ~ (all_652_0_3369 = 0)
% 126.29/83.85  																		| (561) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_652_2_3371
% 126.29/83.85  																		| (562) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_652_1_3370
% 126.29/83.85  																		| (563) elem(all_652_2_3371, all_652_1_3370) = all_652_0_3369
% 126.29/83.85  																		|
% 126.29/83.85  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (283), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																		|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																		| (564) (all_270_3_877 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_270_0_874 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_270_2_876 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_270_3_877 & queue(all_270_3_877) = all_270_1_875 & elem(all_270_2_876, all_270_1_875) = all_270_0_874) | ( ~ (all_270_1_875 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_270_3_877 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_270_2_876 & elem(all_270_3_877, all_270_2_876) = all_270_1_875) | ( ~ (all_270_3_877 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_270_3_877)
% 126.29/83.85  																		|
% 126.29/83.85  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (564), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																			|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																			| (565) (all_270_3_877 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_270_0_874 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_270_2_876 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_270_3_877 & queue(all_270_3_877) = all_270_1_875 & elem(all_270_2_876, all_270_1_875) = all_270_0_874) | ( ~ (all_270_1_875 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_270_3_877 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_270_2_876 & elem(all_270_3_877, all_270_2_876) = all_270_1_875)
% 126.29/83.85  																			|
% 126.29/83.85  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (565), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																				|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																				| (566) (all_270_3_877 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_270_0_874 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_270_2_876 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_270_3_877 & queue(all_270_3_877) = all_270_1_875 & elem(all_270_2_876, all_270_1_875) = all_270_0_874)
% 126.29/83.85  																				|
% 126.29/83.85  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (566), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																					|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																					| (567) all_270_3_877 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4
% 126.29/83.85  																					|
% 126.29/83.85  																						| Applying alpha-rule on (567) yields:
% 126.29/83.85  																						| (568) all_270_3_877 = all_0_4_4
% 126.29/83.85  																						| (569) host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4
% 126.29/83.85  																						|
% 126.29/83.85  																						| From (305) and (569) follows:
% 126.29/83.85  																						| (570) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4
% 126.29/83.85  																						|
% 126.29/83.85  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (218), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																						|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.85  																						|
% 126.29/83.85  																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.85  																							| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.85  																							|
% 126.29/83.85  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.85  																						|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.85  																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.85  																						| (362)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.85  																						|
% 126.29/83.85  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (301), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																							|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																							| (575) ( ~ (all_544_0_1948 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_544_2_1950 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_544_3_1951 & queue(all_544_3_1951) = all_544_1_1949 & elem(all_544_2_1950, all_544_1_1949) = all_544_0_1948) | ( ~ (all_544_0_1948 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_544_2_1950 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_544_3_1951 & queue(all_544_3_1951) = all_544_1_1949 & elem(all_544_2_1950, all_544_1_1949) = all_544_0_1948) | ( ~ (all_544_3_1951 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_544_3_1951)
% 126.29/83.85  																							|
% 126.29/83.85  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (575), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																								|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																								| (576) ( ~ (all_544_0_1948 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_544_2_1950 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_544_3_1951 & queue(all_544_3_1951) = all_544_1_1949 & elem(all_544_2_1950, all_544_1_1949) = all_544_0_1948) | ( ~ (all_544_0_1948 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_544_2_1950 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_544_3_1951 & queue(all_544_3_1951) = all_544_1_1949 & elem(all_544_2_1950, all_544_1_1949) = all_544_0_1948)
% 126.29/83.85  																								|
% 126.29/83.85  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (576), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																									|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																									| (577)  ~ (all_544_0_1948 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_544_2_1950 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_544_3_1951 & queue(all_544_3_1951) = all_544_1_1949 & elem(all_544_2_1950, all_544_1_1949) = all_544_0_1948
% 126.29/83.85  																									|
% 126.29/83.85  																										| Applying alpha-rule on (577) yields:
% 126.29/83.85  																										| (578) queue(all_544_3_1951) = all_544_1_1949
% 126.29/83.85  																										| (579)  ~ (all_544_0_1948 = 0)
% 126.29/83.85  																										| (580) host(all_0_7_7) = all_544_3_1951
% 126.29/83.85  																										| (581) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_544_2_1950
% 126.29/83.85  																										| (582) elem(all_544_2_1950, all_544_1_1949) = all_544_0_1948
% 126.29/83.85  																										|
% 126.29/83.85  																										| From (305) and (580) follows:
% 126.29/83.85  																										| (583) host(all_0_17_17) = all_544_3_1951
% 126.29/83.85  																										|
% 126.29/83.85  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (217), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																										|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.85  																										|
% 126.29/83.85  																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.85  																											| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.85  																											|
% 126.29/83.85  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.85  																										|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.85  																										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.85  																										| (442)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.85  																										|
% 126.29/83.85  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (234), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																											|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.85  																											|
% 126.29/83.85  																												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.85  																												| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.85  																												|
% 126.29/83.85  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.85  																											|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.85  																											| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.85  																											| (366)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.85  																											|
% 126.29/83.85  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (233), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																												|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.85  																												|
% 126.29/83.85  																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.85  																													| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.85  																													|
% 126.29/83.85  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.85  																												|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.85  																												| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.85  																												| (370)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.85  																												|
% 126.29/83.85  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (235), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																													|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.85  																													|
% 126.29/83.85  																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.85  																														| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.85  																														|
% 126.29/83.85  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.85  																													|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.85  																													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.85  																													| (374)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.85  																													|
% 126.29/83.85  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																														|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.85  																														|
% 126.29/83.85  																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.85  																															| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.85  																															|
% 126.29/83.85  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.85  																														|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.85  																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.85  																														| (378)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.85  																														|
% 126.29/83.85  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																															|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.85  																															|
% 126.29/83.85  																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.85  																																| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.85  																																|
% 126.29/83.85  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.85  																															|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.85  																															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.85  																															| (382)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.85  																															|
% 126.29/83.85  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (223), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																																|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.85  																																|
% 126.29/83.85  																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.85  																																	| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.85  																																	|
% 126.29/83.85  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.85  																																|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.85  																																| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.85  																																| (386)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.85  																																|
% 126.29/83.85  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (224), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.85  																																	|
% 126.29/83.85  																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.85  																																		| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.85  																																		|
% 126.29/83.85  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.85  																																	|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.85  																																	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.85  																																	| (390)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.85  																																	|
% 126.29/83.85  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (227), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																																		|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.85  																																		|
% 126.29/83.85  																																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.85  																																			| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.85  																																			|
% 126.29/83.85  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.85  																																		|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.85  																																		| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.85  																																		| (394)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.85  																																		|
% 126.29/83.85  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (225), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.85  																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.85  																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.85  																																			|
% 126.29/83.85  																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.85  																																				| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.85  																																				|
% 126.29/83.85  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.85  																																			|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.85  																																			| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.85  																																			| (398)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																			|
% 126.29/83.86  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (226), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																				|
% 126.29/83.86  																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																					| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																					|
% 126.29/83.86  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																				|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																				| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																				| (402)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																				|
% 126.29/83.86  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																					|
% 126.29/83.86  																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																						| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																						|
% 126.29/83.86  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																					|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																					| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																					| (406)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																					|
% 126.29/83.86  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																						|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																						|
% 126.29/83.86  																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																							| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																							|
% 126.29/83.86  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																						|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																						| (410)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																						|
% 126.29/83.86  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																							|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																							|
% 126.29/83.86  																																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																								| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																								|
% 126.29/83.86  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																							|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																							| (414)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																							|
% 126.29/83.86  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (231), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																								|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																								|
% 126.29/83.86  																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																									| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																									|
% 126.29/83.86  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																								|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																								| (418)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																								|
% 126.29/83.86  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (232), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																									|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																									|
% 126.29/83.86  																																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																										| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																										|
% 126.29/83.86  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																									|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																									| (422)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																									|
% 126.29/83.86  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (236), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																										|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																										|
% 126.29/83.86  																																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																											| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																											|
% 126.29/83.86  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																										|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																										| (426)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																										|
% 126.29/83.86  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (242), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																											|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																											|
% 126.29/83.86  																																												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																												| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																												|
% 126.29/83.86  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																											|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																											| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																											| (430)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																											|
% 126.29/83.86  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (199), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																												|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																												|
% 126.29/83.86  																																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																													| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																													|
% 126.29/83.86  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																												|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																												| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																												| (434)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																												|
% 126.29/83.86  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (200), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																													|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																													|
% 126.29/83.86  																																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																														| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																														|
% 126.29/83.86  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																													|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																													| (438)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																													|
% 126.29/83.86  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																														|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																														|
% 126.29/83.86  																																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																															| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																															|
% 126.29/83.86  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																														|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																														| (446)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																														|
% 126.29/83.86  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (202), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																															|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																															|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																																|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																															|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																															| (450)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																															|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (203), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																																|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																																|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																	| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																																	|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																																|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																																| (454)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																																|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (204), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																																	|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																		| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																																		|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																																	| (458)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																																	|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																																		|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																			| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																																			|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																		| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																																		| (462)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																																		|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																																			|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																				| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																																				|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																			| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																																			| (466)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																																			|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (206), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																																				|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																					| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																																					|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																				| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																																				| (470)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																																				|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																																					|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																						| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																																						|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																					| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																																					| (474)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																																					|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (197), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																																						|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																							| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																																							|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																																						| (478)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																																						|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (198), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																																							|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																								| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																																								|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																																							| (482)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																																							|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																																								|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																									| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																																									|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																																								| (486)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																																								|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (210), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																																									|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																										| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																																										|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																																									| (490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.86  																																																									|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (212), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.86  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.86  																																																										|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																											| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.86  																																																											|
% 126.29/83.86  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.86  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.86  																																																										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.86  																																																										| (494)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.87  																																																										|
% 126.29/83.87  																																																											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_544_3_1951, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_544_3_1951, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.29/83.87  																																																											| (716) all_544_3_1951 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.87  																																																											|
% 126.29/83.87  																																																											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_544_3_1951, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_544_3_1951, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 126.29/83.87  																																																											| (717) all_544_3_1951 = all_0_4_4
% 126.29/83.87  																																																											|
% 126.29/83.87  																																																											| Combining equations (717,716) yields a new equation:
% 126.29/83.87  																																																											| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.87  																																																											|
% 126.29/83.87  																																																											| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 126.29/83.87  																																																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.87  																																																											|
% 126.29/83.87  																																																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.87  																																																											| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.87  																																																											|
% 126.29/83.87  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.87  																									|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.87  																									| (721)  ~ (all_544_0_1948 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_544_2_1950 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_544_3_1951 & queue(all_544_3_1951) = all_544_1_1949 & elem(all_544_2_1950, all_544_1_1949) = all_544_0_1948
% 126.29/83.87  																									|
% 126.29/83.87  																										| Applying alpha-rule on (721) yields:
% 126.29/83.87  																										| (578) queue(all_544_3_1951) = all_544_1_1949
% 126.29/83.87  																										| (579)  ~ (all_544_0_1948 = 0)
% 126.29/83.87  																										| (724) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_544_2_1950
% 126.29/83.87  																										| (580) host(all_0_7_7) = all_544_3_1951
% 126.29/83.87  																										| (582) elem(all_544_2_1950, all_544_1_1949) = all_544_0_1948
% 126.29/83.87  																										|
% 126.29/83.87  																										| From (305) and (580) follows:
% 126.29/83.87  																										| (583) host(all_0_17_17) = all_544_3_1951
% 126.29/83.87  																										|
% 126.29/83.87  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (217), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.87  																										|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.87  																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.87  																										|
% 126.29/83.87  																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.87  																											| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.87  																											|
% 126.29/83.87  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.87  																										|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.87  																										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.87  																										| (442)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.87  																										|
% 126.29/83.87  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (234), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.87  																											|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.87  																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.87  																											|
% 126.29/83.87  																												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.87  																												| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.87  																												|
% 126.29/83.87  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.87  																											|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.87  																											| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.87  																											| (366)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.87  																											|
% 126.29/83.87  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (233), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.87  																												|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.87  																												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.87  																												|
% 126.29/83.87  																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.87  																													| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.87  																													|
% 126.29/83.87  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.87  																												|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.87  																												| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.87  																												| (370)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.87  																												|
% 126.29/83.87  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (235), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.87  																													|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.87  																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.87  																													|
% 126.29/83.87  																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.87  																														| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.87  																														|
% 126.29/83.87  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.87  																													|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.87  																													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.87  																													| (374)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.87  																													|
% 126.29/83.87  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.87  																														|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.87  																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.87  																														|
% 126.29/83.87  																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.87  																															| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.87  																															|
% 126.29/83.87  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.87  																														|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.87  																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.87  																														| (378)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.87  																														|
% 126.29/83.87  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.87  																															|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.87  																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.87  																															|
% 126.29/83.87  																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.87  																																| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.87  																																|
% 126.29/83.87  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.87  																															|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.87  																															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.87  																															| (382)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.87  																															|
% 126.29/83.87  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (223), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.87  																																|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.87  																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.87  																																|
% 126.29/83.87  																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.87  																																	| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.87  																																	|
% 126.29/83.87  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.87  																																|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.87  																																| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.87  																																| (386)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.87  																																|
% 126.29/83.87  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (224), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.87  																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.87  																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.87  																																	|
% 126.29/83.87  																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.87  																																		| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.87  																																		|
% 126.29/83.87  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.87  																																	|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.87  																																	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.87  																																	| (390)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.87  																																	|
% 126.29/83.87  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (227), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.87  																																		|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.87  																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.87  																																		|
% 126.29/83.87  																																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.87  																																			| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.87  																																			|
% 126.29/83.87  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.87  																																		|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.87  																																		| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.87  																																		| (394)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.87  																																		|
% 126.29/83.87  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (225), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.87  																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.87  																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.87  																																			|
% 126.29/83.87  																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.87  																																				| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.87  																																				|
% 126.29/83.87  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.87  																																			|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.87  																																			| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.87  																																			| (398)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.87  																																			|
% 126.29/83.87  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (226), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.87  																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.87  																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.87  																																				|
% 126.29/83.87  																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.87  																																					| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.87  																																					|
% 126.29/83.87  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.87  																																				|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.87  																																				| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.87  																																				| (402)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.87  																																				|
% 126.29/83.87  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.87  																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.87  																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.87  																																					|
% 126.29/83.87  																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.87  																																						| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.87  																																						|
% 126.29/83.87  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.87  																																					|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.87  																																					| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.87  																																					| (406)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.87  																																					|
% 126.29/83.87  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.87  																																						|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.87  																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.87  																																						|
% 126.29/83.87  																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.87  																																							| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.87  																																							|
% 126.29/83.87  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.87  																																						|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.87  																																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.87  																																						| (410)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																						|
% 126.29/83.88  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																							|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																							|
% 126.29/83.88  																																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																								| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																								|
% 126.29/83.88  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																							|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																							| (414)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																							|
% 126.29/83.88  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (231), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																								|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																								|
% 126.29/83.88  																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																									| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																									|
% 126.29/83.88  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																								|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																								| (418)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																								|
% 126.29/83.88  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (232), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																									|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																									|
% 126.29/83.88  																																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																										| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																										|
% 126.29/83.88  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																									|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																									| (422)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																									|
% 126.29/83.88  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (236), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																										|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																										|
% 126.29/83.88  																																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																											| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																											|
% 126.29/83.88  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																										|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																										| (426)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																										|
% 126.29/83.88  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (242), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																											|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																											|
% 126.29/83.88  																																												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																												| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																												|
% 126.29/83.88  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																											|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																											| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																											| (430)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																											|
% 126.29/83.88  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (199), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																												|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																												|
% 126.29/83.88  																																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																													| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																													|
% 126.29/83.88  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																												|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																												| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																												| (434)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																												|
% 126.29/83.88  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (200), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																													|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																													|
% 126.29/83.88  																																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																														| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																														|
% 126.29/83.88  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																													|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																													| (438)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																													|
% 126.29/83.88  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (211), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																														|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																														|
% 126.29/83.88  																																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																															| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																															|
% 126.29/83.88  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																														|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																														| (811)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																														|
% 126.29/83.88  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																															|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																															|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																																|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																															|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																															| (486)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																															|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (210), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																																|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																																|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																	| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																																	|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																																|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																																| (490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																																|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (212), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																																	|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																		| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																																		|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																																	| (494)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																																	|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (197), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																																		|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																			| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																																			|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																		| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																																		| (478)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																																		|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (198), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																																			|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																				| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																																				|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																			| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																																			| (482)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																																			|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																																				|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																					| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																																					|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																				| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																																				| (446)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																																				|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (202), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																																					|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																						| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																																						|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																					| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																																					| (450)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																																					|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (203), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																																						|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																							| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																																							|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																																						| (454)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																																						|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (204), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																																							|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																								| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																																								|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																																							| (458)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																																							|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																																								|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																									| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																																									|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																																								| (462)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																																								|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																																									|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																										| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																																										|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																																									| (466)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																																									|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (206), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																																										|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																											| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																																											|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																																										| (470)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																																										|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.88  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																																											|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																												| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																																												|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																											| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.88  																																																											| (474)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.88  																																																											|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																												| Instantiating formula (10) with all_544_3_1951, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_544_3_1951, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																												| (716) all_544_3_1951 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																																												|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																												| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_544_3_1951, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_544_3_1951, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																												| (717) all_544_3_1951 = all_0_4_4
% 126.29/83.88  																																																												|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																												| Combining equations (716,717) yields a new equation:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.88  																																																												|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.88  																																																												| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.88  																																																												|
% 126.29/83.88  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.88  																								|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.88  																								| (868)  ~ (all_544_3_1951 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_544_3_1951
% 126.29/83.88  																								|
% 126.29/83.88  																									| Applying alpha-rule on (868) yields:
% 126.29/83.88  																									| (869)  ~ (all_544_3_1951 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.89  																									| (580) host(all_0_7_7) = all_544_3_1951
% 126.29/83.89  																									|
% 126.29/83.89  																									| From (305) and (580) follows:
% 126.29/83.89  																									| (583) host(all_0_17_17) = all_544_3_1951
% 126.29/83.89  																									|
% 126.29/83.89  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (217), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.89  																									|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.89  																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.89  																									|
% 126.29/83.89  																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.89  																										| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.89  																										|
% 126.29/83.89  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.89  																									|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.89  																									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.89  																									| (442)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.89  																									|
% 126.29/83.89  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (234), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.89  																										|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.89  																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.89  																										|
% 126.29/83.89  																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.89  																											| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.89  																											|
% 126.29/83.89  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.89  																										|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.89  																										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.89  																										| (366)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.89  																										|
% 126.29/83.89  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (233), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.89  																											|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.89  																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.89  																											|
% 126.29/83.89  																												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.89  																												| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.89  																												|
% 126.29/83.89  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.89  																											|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.89  																											| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.89  																											| (370)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.89  																											|
% 126.29/83.89  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (235), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.89  																												|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.89  																												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.89  																												|
% 126.29/83.89  																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.89  																													| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.89  																													|
% 126.29/83.89  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.89  																												|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.89  																												| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.89  																												| (374)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.89  																												|
% 126.29/83.89  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.89  																													|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.89  																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.89  																													|
% 126.29/83.89  																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.89  																														| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.89  																														|
% 126.29/83.89  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.89  																													|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.89  																													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.89  																													| (378)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.89  																													|
% 126.29/83.89  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.89  																														|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.89  																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.89  																														|
% 126.29/83.89  																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.89  																															| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.89  																															|
% 126.29/83.89  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.89  																														|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.89  																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.89  																														| (382)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.89  																														|
% 126.29/83.89  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (223), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.89  																															|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.89  																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.89  																															|
% 126.29/83.89  																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.89  																																| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.89  																																|
% 126.29/83.89  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.89  																															|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.89  																															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.89  																															| (386)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.89  																															|
% 126.29/83.89  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (224), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.89  																																|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.89  																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.89  																																|
% 126.29/83.89  																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.89  																																	| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.89  																																	|
% 126.29/83.89  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.89  																																|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.89  																																| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.89  																																| (390)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.89  																																|
% 126.29/83.89  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (227), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.89  																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.89  																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.89  																																	|
% 126.29/83.89  																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.89  																																		| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.89  																																		|
% 126.29/83.89  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.89  																																	|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.89  																																	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.89  																																	| (394)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.89  																																	|
% 126.29/83.89  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (225), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.89  																																		|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.89  																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.89  																																		|
% 126.29/83.89  																																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.89  																																			| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.89  																																			|
% 126.29/83.89  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.89  																																		|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.89  																																		| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.89  																																		| (398)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.29/83.89  																																		|
% 126.29/83.89  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (226), into two cases.
% 126.29/83.89  																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.29/83.89  																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.29/83.89  																																			|
% 126.29/83.89  																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.29/83.89  																																				| (309) $false
% 126.29/83.89  																																				|
% 126.29/83.89  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.29/83.89  																																			|-Branch two:
% 126.29/83.89  																																			| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.29/83.89  																																			| (402)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.72/83.89  																																			|
% 126.72/83.89  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 126.72/83.89  																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.72/83.89  																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.72/83.89  																																				|
% 126.72/83.89  																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.72/83.89  																																					| (309) $false
% 126.72/83.89  																																					|
% 126.72/83.89  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.72/83.89  																																				|-Branch two:
% 126.72/83.89  																																				| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.72/83.89  																																				| (406)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.72/83.89  																																				|
% 126.72/83.89  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 126.72/83.89  																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.72/83.89  																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.72/83.89  																																					|
% 126.72/83.89  																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.72/83.89  																																						| (309) $false
% 126.72/83.89  																																						|
% 126.72/83.89  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.72/83.89  																																					|-Branch two:
% 126.72/83.89  																																					| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.72/83.89  																																					| (410)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.72/83.89  																																					|
% 126.72/83.89  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 126.72/83.89  																																						|-Branch one:
% 126.72/83.89  																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.72/83.89  																																						|
% 126.72/83.89  																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.72/83.89  																																							| (309) $false
% 126.72/83.89  																																							|
% 126.72/83.89  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.72/83.89  																																						|-Branch two:
% 126.72/83.89  																																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.72/83.89  																																						| (414)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.72/83.89  																																						|
% 126.72/83.89  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (231), into two cases.
% 126.72/83.89  																																							|-Branch one:
% 126.72/83.89  																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.72/83.89  																																							|
% 126.72/83.89  																																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.72/83.89  																																								| (309) $false
% 126.72/83.89  																																								|
% 126.72/83.89  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.72/83.89  																																							|-Branch two:
% 126.72/83.89  																																							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.72/83.89  																																							| (418)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.72/83.89  																																							|
% 126.72/83.89  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (232), into two cases.
% 126.72/83.89  																																								|-Branch one:
% 126.72/83.89  																																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.72/83.89  																																								|
% 126.72/83.89  																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.72/83.89  																																									| (309) $false
% 126.72/83.89  																																									|
% 126.72/83.89  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.72/83.89  																																								|-Branch two:
% 126.72/83.89  																																								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.72/83.89  																																								| (422)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.72/83.89  																																								|
% 126.72/83.89  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (236), into two cases.
% 126.72/83.89  																																									|-Branch one:
% 126.72/83.89  																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.72/83.89  																																									|
% 126.72/83.89  																																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.72/83.89  																																										| (309) $false
% 126.72/83.89  																																										|
% 126.72/83.89  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.72/83.89  																																									|-Branch two:
% 126.72/83.89  																																									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.72/83.89  																																									| (426)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.72/83.89  																																									|
% 126.72/83.89  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (242), into two cases.
% 126.72/83.89  																																										|-Branch one:
% 126.72/83.89  																																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.72/83.89  																																										|
% 126.72/83.89  																																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.72/83.89  																																											| (309) $false
% 126.72/83.89  																																											|
% 126.72/83.89  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.72/83.89  																																										|-Branch two:
% 126.72/83.89  																																										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.72/83.89  																																										| (430)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.72/83.89  																																										|
% 126.72/83.89  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (199), into two cases.
% 126.72/83.89  																																											|-Branch one:
% 126.72/83.89  																																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.72/83.89  																																											|
% 126.72/83.89  																																												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.72/83.89  																																												| (309) $false
% 126.72/83.89  																																												|
% 126.72/83.89  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.72/83.89  																																											|-Branch two:
% 126.72/83.89  																																											| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.72/83.89  																																											| (434)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.72/83.89  																																											|
% 126.72/83.89  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (200), into two cases.
% 126.72/83.89  																																												|-Branch one:
% 126.72/83.89  																																												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.72/83.89  																																												|
% 126.72/83.89  																																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.72/83.89  																																													| (309) $false
% 126.72/83.89  																																													|
% 126.72/83.89  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.72/83.89  																																												|-Branch two:
% 126.72/83.89  																																												| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.72/83.89  																																												| (438)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.72/83.89  																																												|
% 126.72/83.89  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 126.72/83.89  																																													|-Branch one:
% 126.72/83.89  																																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.72/83.89  																																													|
% 126.72/83.89  																																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.72/83.89  																																														| (309) $false
% 126.72/83.89  																																														|
% 126.72/83.89  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.72/83.89  																																													|-Branch two:
% 126.72/83.89  																																													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.72/83.89  																																													| (446)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.72/83.89  																																													|
% 126.72/83.89  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (202), into two cases.
% 126.72/83.89  																																														|-Branch one:
% 126.72/83.89  																																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.72/83.89  																																														|
% 126.72/83.89  																																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.72/83.89  																																															| (309) $false
% 126.72/83.89  																																															|
% 126.72/83.89  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.72/83.89  																																														|-Branch two:
% 126.72/83.90  																																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.72/83.90  																																														| (450)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.72/83.90  																																														|
% 126.72/83.90  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (203), into two cases.
% 126.72/83.90  																																															|-Branch one:
% 126.72/83.90  																																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.72/83.90  																																															|
% 126.72/83.90  																																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.72/83.90  																																																| (309) $false
% 126.72/83.90  																																																|
% 126.72/83.90  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.72/83.90  																																															|-Branch two:
% 126.72/83.90  																																															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.72/83.90  																																															| (454)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.72/83.90  																																															|
% 126.72/83.90  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (204), into two cases.
% 126.72/83.90  																																																|-Branch one:
% 126.72/83.90  																																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.72/83.90  																																																|
% 126.72/83.90  																																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.72/83.90  																																																	| (309) $false
% 126.72/83.90  																																																	|
% 126.72/83.90  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.72/83.90  																																																|-Branch two:
% 126.72/83.90  																																																| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.72/83.90  																																																| (458)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.75/83.90  																																																|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 126.75/83.90  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.75/83.90  																																																	|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																		| (309) $false
% 126.75/83.90  																																																		|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.75/83.90  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.75/83.90  																																																	| (462)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.75/83.90  																																																	|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 126.75/83.90  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.75/83.90  																																																		|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																			| (309) $false
% 126.75/83.90  																																																			|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.75/83.90  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																		| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.75/83.90  																																																		| (466)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.75/83.90  																																																		|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (206), into two cases.
% 126.75/83.90  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.75/83.90  																																																			|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																				| (309) $false
% 126.75/83.90  																																																				|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.75/83.90  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																			| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.75/83.90  																																																			| (470)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.75/83.90  																																																			|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 126.75/83.90  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.75/83.90  																																																				|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																					| (309) $false
% 126.75/83.90  																																																					|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.75/83.90  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																				| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.75/83.90  																																																				| (474)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.75/83.90  																																																				|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (197), into two cases.
% 126.75/83.90  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.75/83.90  																																																					|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																						| (309) $false
% 126.75/83.90  																																																						|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.75/83.90  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																					| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.75/83.90  																																																					| (478)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.75/83.90  																																																					|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (198), into two cases.
% 126.75/83.90  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.75/83.90  																																																						|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																							| (309) $false
% 126.75/83.90  																																																							|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.75/83.90  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.75/83.90  																																																						| (482)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.75/83.90  																																																						|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 126.75/83.90  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.75/83.90  																																																							|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																								| (309) $false
% 126.75/83.90  																																																								|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.75/83.90  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.75/83.90  																																																							| (486)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.75/83.90  																																																							|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (210), into two cases.
% 126.75/83.90  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.75/83.90  																																																								|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																									| (309) $false
% 126.75/83.90  																																																									|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.75/83.90  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.75/83.90  																																																								| (490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.75/83.90  																																																								|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (212), into two cases.
% 126.75/83.90  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.75/83.90  																																																									|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										| (309) $false
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.75/83.90  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.75/83.90  																																																									| (494)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.75/83.90  																																																									|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										| Instantiating formula (10) with all_544_3_1951, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_544_3_1951, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										| (716) all_544_3_1951 = all_0_15_15
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_544_3_1951, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_544_3_1951, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										| (717) all_544_3_1951 = all_0_4_4
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										| Combining equations (717,716) yields a new equation:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										| (309) $false
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										|
% 126.75/83.90  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.75/83.90  																							|-Branch two:
% 126.75/83.90  																							| (1009) host(all_0_7_7) = all_544_2_1950 & ( ~ (all_544_2_1950 = all_0_4_4) | (all_544_3_1951 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))
% 126.75/83.90  																							|
% 126.75/83.90  																								| Applying alpha-rule on (1009) yields:
% 126.75/83.90  																								| (1010) host(all_0_7_7) = all_544_2_1950
% 126.75/83.90  																								| (1011)  ~ (all_544_2_1950 = all_0_4_4) | (all_544_3_1951 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)
% 126.75/83.90  																								|
% 126.75/83.90  																								| From (305) and (1010) follows:
% 126.75/83.90  																								| (1012) host(all_0_17_17) = all_544_2_1950
% 126.75/83.90  																								|
% 126.75/83.90  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (217), into two cases.
% 126.75/83.90  																								|-Branch one:
% 126.75/83.90  																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.75/83.90  																								|
% 126.75/83.90  																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.75/83.90  																									| (309) $false
% 126.75/83.90  																									|
% 126.75/83.90  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.75/83.90  																								|-Branch two:
% 126.75/83.90  																								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.75/83.90  																								| (442)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.75/83.90  																								|
% 126.75/83.90  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (234), into two cases.
% 126.75/83.90  																									|-Branch one:
% 126.75/83.90  																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.75/83.90  																									|
% 126.75/83.90  																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.75/83.90  																										| (309) $false
% 126.75/83.90  																										|
% 126.75/83.90  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.75/83.90  																									|-Branch two:
% 126.75/83.90  																									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.75/83.90  																									| (366)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.75/83.90  																									|
% 126.75/83.90  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (233), into two cases.
% 126.75/83.90  																										|-Branch one:
% 126.75/83.90  																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.75/83.90  																										|
% 126.75/83.90  																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.75/83.90  																											| (309) $false
% 126.75/83.90  																											|
% 126.75/83.90  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.75/83.90  																										|-Branch two:
% 126.75/83.90  																										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.75/83.90  																										| (370)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.75/83.90  																										|
% 126.75/83.90  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (235), into two cases.
% 126.75/83.90  																											|-Branch one:
% 126.75/83.90  																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.75/83.90  																											|
% 126.75/83.90  																												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.75/83.90  																												| (309) $false
% 126.75/83.90  																												|
% 126.75/83.90  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.75/83.90  																											|-Branch two:
% 126.75/83.90  																											| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.75/83.90  																											| (374)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.90  																											|
% 126.77/83.90  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.90  																												|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.90  																												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.90  																												|
% 126.77/83.90  																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.90  																													| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.90  																													|
% 126.77/83.90  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.90  																												|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.90  																												| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.90  																												| (378)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.90  																												|
% 126.77/83.90  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.90  																													|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.90  																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.90  																													|
% 126.77/83.90  																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.90  																														| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.90  																														|
% 126.77/83.90  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.90  																													|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.90  																													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.90  																													| (382)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.90  																													|
% 126.77/83.90  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (223), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.90  																														|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.90  																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.90  																														|
% 126.77/83.90  																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.90  																															| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.90  																															|
% 126.77/83.90  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.90  																														|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.90  																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.90  																														| (386)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.90  																														|
% 126.77/83.90  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (224), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.90  																															|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.90  																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.90  																															|
% 126.77/83.90  																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.90  																																| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.90  																																|
% 126.77/83.90  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.90  																															|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.90  																															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.90  																															| (390)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																															|
% 126.77/83.91  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (227), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																|
% 126.77/83.91  																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																	| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																	|
% 126.77/83.91  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																| (394)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																|
% 126.77/83.91  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (225), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																	|
% 126.77/83.91  																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																		| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																		|
% 126.77/83.91  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																	|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																	| (398)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																	|
% 126.77/83.91  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (226), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																		|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																		|
% 126.77/83.91  																																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																			| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																			|
% 126.77/83.91  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																		|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																		| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																		| (402)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																		|
% 126.77/83.91  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																			|
% 126.77/83.91  																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																				| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																				|
% 126.77/83.91  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																			|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																			| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																			| (406)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																			|
% 126.77/83.91  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																				|
% 126.77/83.91  																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																					| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																					|
% 126.77/83.91  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																				|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																				| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																				| (410)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																				|
% 126.77/83.91  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																					|
% 126.77/83.91  																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																						| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																						|
% 126.77/83.91  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																					|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																					| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																					| (414)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																					|
% 126.77/83.91  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (231), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																						|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																						|
% 126.77/83.91  																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																							| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																							|
% 126.77/83.91  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																						|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																						| (418)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																						|
% 126.77/83.91  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (232), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																							|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																							|
% 126.77/83.91  																																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																								| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																								|
% 126.77/83.91  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																							|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																							| (422)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																							|
% 126.77/83.91  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (236), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																								|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																								|
% 126.77/83.91  																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																									| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																									|
% 126.77/83.91  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																								|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																								| (426)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																								|
% 126.77/83.91  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (242), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																									|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																									|
% 126.77/83.91  																																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																										| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																										|
% 126.77/83.91  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																									|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																									| (430)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																									|
% 126.77/83.91  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (199), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																										|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																										|
% 126.77/83.91  																																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																											| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																											|
% 126.77/83.91  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																										|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																										| (434)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																										|
% 126.77/83.91  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (200), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																											|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																											|
% 126.77/83.91  																																												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																												| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																												|
% 126.77/83.91  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																											|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																											| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																											| (438)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																											|
% 126.77/83.91  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																												|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																												|
% 126.77/83.91  																																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																													| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																													|
% 126.77/83.91  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																												|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																												| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																												| (446)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																												|
% 126.77/83.91  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (202), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																													|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																													|
% 126.77/83.91  																																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																														| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																														|
% 126.77/83.91  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																													|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																													| (450)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																													|
% 126.77/83.91  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (203), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																														|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																														|
% 126.77/83.91  																																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																															| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																															|
% 126.77/83.91  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																														|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																														| (454)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																														|
% 126.77/83.91  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (204), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																															|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																															|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																																|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																															|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																															| (458)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																															|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																																|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																																|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																	| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																																	|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																																|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																																| (462)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																																|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																																	|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																		| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																																		|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																																	| (466)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																																	|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (206), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																																		|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																			| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																																			|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																		| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																																		| (470)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																																		|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																																			|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																				| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																																				|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																			| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																																			| (474)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																																			|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (197), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																																				|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																					| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																																					|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																				| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																																				| (478)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.91  																																																				|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (198), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.91  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.91  																																																					|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																						| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.91  																																																						|
% 126.77/83.91  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.91  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.91  																																																					| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.91  																																																					| (482)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.92  																																																					|
% 126.77/83.92  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																																																						|
% 126.77/83.92  																																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																																																							| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																																																							|
% 126.77/83.92  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																																																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.92  																																																						| (486)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.92  																																																						|
% 126.77/83.92  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (210), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																																																							|
% 126.77/83.92  																																																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																																																								| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																																																								|
% 126.77/83.92  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																																																							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.92  																																																							| (490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.92  																																																							|
% 126.77/83.92  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (212), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																																																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																																																								|
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									|
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																																																								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.92  																																																								| (494)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.92  																																																								|
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									| Instantiating formula (10) with all_544_2_1950, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_544_2_1950, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									| (1145) all_544_2_1950 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									|
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_544_2_1950, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_544_2_1950, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									| (1146) all_544_2_1950 = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									|
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									| Combining equations (1146,1145) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									|
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									|
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									|
% 126.77/83.92  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																					|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																					| (1150)  ~ (all_270_0_874 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_270_2_876 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_270_3_877 & queue(all_270_3_877) = all_270_1_875 & elem(all_270_2_876, all_270_1_875) = all_270_0_874
% 126.77/83.92  																					|
% 126.77/83.92  																						| Applying alpha-rule on (1150) yields:
% 126.77/83.92  																						| (1151) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_270_2_876
% 126.77/83.92  																						| (1152) host(all_0_7_7) = all_270_3_877
% 126.77/83.92  																						| (1153)  ~ (all_270_0_874 = 0)
% 126.77/83.92  																						| (1154) elem(all_270_2_876, all_270_1_875) = all_270_0_874
% 126.77/83.92  																						| (1155) queue(all_270_3_877) = all_270_1_875
% 126.77/83.92  																						|
% 126.77/83.92  																						| From (305) and (1152) follows:
% 126.77/83.92  																						| (1156) host(all_0_17_17) = all_270_3_877
% 126.77/83.92  																						|
% 126.77/83.92  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (218), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																						|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																						|
% 126.77/83.92  																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																							| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																							|
% 126.77/83.92  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																						|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.92  																						| (362)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.92  																						|
% 126.77/83.92  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (312), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																							|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																							| (1161) ( ~ (all_612_0_2189 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_612_2_2191 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_612_1_2190 & elem(all_612_2_2191, all_612_1_2190) = all_612_0_2189) | ( ~ (all_612_2_2191 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_612_2_2191) | ( ~ (all_612_2_2191 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_612_2_2191)
% 126.77/83.92  																							|
% 126.77/83.92  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1161), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																								|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																								| (1162) ( ~ (all_612_0_2189 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_612_2_2191 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_612_1_2190 & elem(all_612_2_2191, all_612_1_2190) = all_612_0_2189) | ( ~ (all_612_2_2191 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_612_2_2191)
% 126.77/83.92  																								|
% 126.77/83.92  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1162), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																									|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																									| (1163)  ~ (all_612_0_2189 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_612_2_2191 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_612_1_2190 & elem(all_612_2_2191, all_612_1_2190) = all_612_0_2189
% 126.77/83.92  																									|
% 126.77/83.92  																										| Applying alpha-rule on (1163) yields:
% 126.77/83.92  																										| (1164)  ~ (all_612_0_2189 = 0)
% 126.77/83.92  																										| (1165) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_612_2_2191
% 126.77/83.92  																										| (1166) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_612_1_2190
% 126.77/83.92  																										| (1167) elem(all_612_2_2191, all_612_1_2190) = all_612_0_2189
% 126.77/83.92  																										|
% 126.77/83.92  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (290), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																										|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																										| (1168) (all_411_3_1429 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (all_411_0_1426 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_411_2_1428 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_411_3_1429 & queue(all_411_3_1429) = all_411_1_1427 & elem(all_411_2_1428, all_411_1_1427) = all_411_0_1426) | ( ~ (all_411_1_1427 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_411_3_1429 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_411_2_1428 & elem(all_411_3_1429, all_411_2_1428) = all_411_1_1427) | ( ~ (all_411_3_1429 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_411_3_1429)
% 126.77/83.92  																										|
% 126.77/83.92  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1168), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																											|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																											| (1169) (all_411_3_1429 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (all_411_0_1426 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_411_2_1428 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_411_3_1429 & queue(all_411_3_1429) = all_411_1_1427 & elem(all_411_2_1428, all_411_1_1427) = all_411_0_1426) | ( ~ (all_411_1_1427 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_411_3_1429 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_411_2_1428 & elem(all_411_3_1429, all_411_2_1428) = all_411_1_1427)
% 126.77/83.92  																											|
% 126.77/83.92  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1169), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																												|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																												| (1170) (all_411_3_1429 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (all_411_0_1426 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_411_2_1428 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_411_3_1429 & queue(all_411_3_1429) = all_411_1_1427 & elem(all_411_2_1428, all_411_1_1427) = all_411_0_1426)
% 126.77/83.92  																												|
% 126.77/83.92  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1170), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																													|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																													| (1171) all_411_3_1429 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																													|
% 126.77/83.92  																														| Applying alpha-rule on (1171) yields:
% 126.77/83.92  																														| (1172) all_411_3_1429 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																														| (318) host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																														|
% 126.77/83.92  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (199), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																														|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																														|
% 126.77/83.92  																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																															| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																															|
% 126.77/83.92  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																														|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.92  																														| (434)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.92  																														|
% 126.77/83.92  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (200), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																															|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																															|
% 126.77/83.92  																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																																| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																																|
% 126.77/83.92  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																															|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.92  																															| (438)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.92  																															|
% 126.77/83.92  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (217), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																																|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																																|
% 126.77/83.92  																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																																	| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																																	|
% 126.77/83.92  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																																|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																																| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.92  																																| (442)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.92  																																|
% 126.77/83.92  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (234), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																																	|
% 126.77/83.92  																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																																		| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																																		|
% 126.77/83.92  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																																	|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																																	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.92  																																	| (366)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.92  																																	|
% 126.77/83.92  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (233), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																																		|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																																		|
% 126.77/83.92  																																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																																			| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																																			|
% 126.77/83.92  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																																		|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																																		| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.92  																																		| (370)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.92  																																		|
% 126.77/83.92  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (235), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																																			|
% 126.77/83.92  																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																																				| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																																				|
% 126.77/83.92  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																																			|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																																			| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.92  																																			| (374)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.92  																																			|
% 126.77/83.92  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																																				|
% 126.77/83.92  																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																																					| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																																					|
% 126.77/83.92  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																																				|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																																				| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.92  																																				| (378)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.92  																																				|
% 126.77/83.92  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																																					|
% 126.77/83.92  																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																																						| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																																						|
% 126.77/83.92  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																																					|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																																					| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.92  																																					| (382)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.92  																																					|
% 126.77/83.92  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (223), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																																						|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																																						|
% 126.77/83.92  																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																																							| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																																							|
% 126.77/83.92  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																																						|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.92  																																						| (386)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.92  																																						|
% 126.77/83.92  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (224), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																																							|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																																							|
% 126.77/83.92  																																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																																								| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																																								|
% 126.77/83.92  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																																							|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																																							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.92  																																							| (390)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.92  																																							|
% 126.77/83.92  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (227), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																																								|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																																								|
% 126.77/83.92  																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																																									| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																																									|
% 126.77/83.92  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																																								|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																																								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.92  																																								| (394)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.92  																																								|
% 126.77/83.92  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (225), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																																									|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																																									|
% 126.77/83.92  																																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																																										| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																																										|
% 126.77/83.92  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																																									|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																																									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.92  																																									| (398)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.92  																																									|
% 126.77/83.92  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (226), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																																										|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																																										|
% 126.77/83.92  																																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																																											| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																																											|
% 126.77/83.92  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																																										|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																																										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.92  																																										| (402)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.92  																																										|
% 126.77/83.92  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.92  																																											|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.92  																																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.92  																																											|
% 126.77/83.92  																																												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.92  																																												| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.92  																																												|
% 126.77/83.92  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.92  																																											|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.92  																																											| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.92  																																											| (406)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																											|
% 126.77/83.93  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																												|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																												|
% 126.77/83.93  																																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																													| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																													|
% 126.77/83.93  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																												|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																												| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																												| (410)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																												|
% 126.77/83.93  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																													|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																													|
% 126.77/83.93  																																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																														| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																														|
% 126.77/83.93  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																													|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																													| (414)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																													|
% 126.77/83.93  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (231), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																														|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																														|
% 126.77/83.93  																																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																															| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																															|
% 126.77/83.93  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																														|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																														| (418)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																														|
% 126.77/83.93  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (232), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																															|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																															|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																																|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																															|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																															| (422)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																															|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (236), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																																|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																																|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																	| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																																	|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																																|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																																| (426)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																																|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (242), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																																	|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																		| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																																		|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																																	| (430)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																																	|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																																		|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																			| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																																			|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																		| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																																		| (446)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																																		|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (202), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																																			|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																				| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																																				|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																			| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																																			| (450)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																																			|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (203), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																																				|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																					| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																																					|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																				| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																																				| (454)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																																				|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (204), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																																					|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																						| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																																						|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																					| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																																					| (458)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																																					|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																																						|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																							| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																																							|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																																						| (462)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																																						|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																																							|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																								| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																																								|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																																							| (466)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																																							|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (206), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																																								|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																									| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																																									|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																																								| (470)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																																								|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																																									|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																										| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																																										|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																																									| (474)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																																									|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (197), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																																										|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																											| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																																											|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																																										| (478)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																																										|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (198), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																																											|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																												| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																																												|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																											| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																																											| (482)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																																											|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																																												|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																													| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																																													|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																												| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																																												| (486)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																																												|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (210), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																																													|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																														| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																																													| (490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																																													|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (212), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																															| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																																															|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																																																														| (494)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																															| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																																																															|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																																																															| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																																																															|
% 126.77/83.93  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																													|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																													| (1308)  ~ (all_411_0_1426 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_411_2_1428 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_411_3_1429 & queue(all_411_3_1429) = all_411_1_1427 & elem(all_411_2_1428, all_411_1_1427) = all_411_0_1426
% 126.77/83.93  																													|
% 126.77/83.93  																														| Applying alpha-rule on (1308) yields:
% 126.77/83.93  																														| (1309) host(all_0_5_5) = all_411_3_1429
% 126.77/83.93  																														| (1310)  ~ (all_411_0_1426 = 0)
% 126.77/83.93  																														| (1311) queue(all_411_3_1429) = all_411_1_1427
% 126.77/83.93  																														| (1312) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_411_2_1428
% 126.77/83.93  																														| (1313) elem(all_411_2_1428, all_411_1_1427) = all_411_0_1426
% 126.77/83.93  																														|
% 126.77/83.93  																														| Instantiating formula (47) with all_411_2_1428, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_411_2_1428, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 126.77/83.93  																														| (1314) all_411_2_1428 = all_0_3_3
% 126.77/83.93  																														|
% 126.77/83.93  																														| Instantiating formula (10) with all_411_3_1429, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_411_3_1429, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 126.77/83.93  																														| (1315) all_411_3_1429 = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/83.93  																														|
% 126.77/83.93  																														| From (1315) and (1311) follows:
% 126.77/83.93  																														| (1316) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_411_1_1427
% 126.77/83.93  																														|
% 126.77/83.93  																														| From (1314) and (1313) follows:
% 126.77/83.93  																														| (1317) elem(all_0_3_3, all_411_1_1427) = all_411_0_1426
% 126.77/83.93  																														|
% 126.77/83.93  																														| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_411_1_1427, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_411_1_1427, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 126.77/83.93  																														| (1318) all_411_1_1427 = all_0_2_2
% 126.77/83.93  																														|
% 126.77/83.93  																														| From (1318) and (1317) follows:
% 126.77/83.93  																														| (1319) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_411_0_1426
% 126.77/83.93  																														|
% 126.77/83.93  																														| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_411_0_1426, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_411_0_1426, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 126.77/83.93  																														| (1320) all_411_0_1426 = 0
% 126.77/83.93  																														|
% 126.77/83.93  																														| Equations (1320) can reduce 1310 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																														| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																														|
% 126.77/83.93  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																												|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																												| (1322)  ~ (all_411_1_1427 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_411_3_1429 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_411_2_1428 & elem(all_411_3_1429, all_411_2_1428) = all_411_1_1427
% 126.77/83.93  																												|
% 126.77/83.93  																													| Applying alpha-rule on (1322) yields:
% 126.77/83.93  																													| (1323)  ~ (all_411_1_1427 = 0)
% 126.77/83.93  																													| (1324) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_411_3_1429
% 126.77/83.93  																													| (1325) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_411_2_1428
% 126.77/83.93  																													| (1326) elem(all_411_3_1429, all_411_2_1428) = all_411_1_1427
% 126.77/83.93  																													|
% 126.77/83.93  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (199), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																													|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																													|
% 126.77/83.93  																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																														| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																														|
% 126.77/83.93  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																													|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.93  																													| (434)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.93  																													|
% 126.77/83.93  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (200), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.93  																														|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.93  																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.93  																														|
% 126.77/83.93  																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.93  																															| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.93  																															|
% 126.77/83.93  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.93  																														|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.93  																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																														| (438)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																														|
% 126.77/83.94  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (217), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																															|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																															|
% 126.77/83.94  																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																|
% 126.77/83.94  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																															|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																															| (442)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																															|
% 126.77/83.94  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (288), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																| (1339) (all_400_3_1385 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (all_400_0_1382 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_400_2_1384 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_400_3_1385 & queue(all_400_3_1385) = all_400_1_1383 & elem(all_400_2_1384, all_400_1_1383) = all_400_0_1382) | ( ~ (all_400_1_1383 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_400_3_1385 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_400_2_1384 & elem(all_400_3_1385, all_400_2_1384) = all_400_1_1383) | ( ~ (all_400_3_1385 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_400_3_1385)
% 126.77/83.94  																																|
% 126.77/83.94  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1339), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																	| (1340) (all_400_3_1385 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (all_400_0_1382 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_400_2_1384 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_400_3_1385 & queue(all_400_3_1385) = all_400_1_1383 & elem(all_400_2_1384, all_400_1_1383) = all_400_0_1382) | ( ~ (all_400_1_1383 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_400_3_1385 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_400_2_1384 & elem(all_400_3_1385, all_400_2_1384) = all_400_1_1383)
% 126.77/83.94  																																	|
% 126.77/83.94  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1340), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																		|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																		| (1341) (all_400_3_1385 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (all_400_0_1382 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_400_2_1384 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_400_3_1385 & queue(all_400_3_1385) = all_400_1_1383 & elem(all_400_2_1384, all_400_1_1383) = all_400_0_1382)
% 126.77/83.94  																																		|
% 126.77/83.94  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1341), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																			| (1342) all_400_3_1385 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																			|
% 126.77/83.94  																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (1342) yields:
% 126.77/83.94  																																				| (1343) all_400_3_1385 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																				| (318) host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																				|
% 126.77/83.94  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (234), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																				|
% 126.77/83.94  																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																					| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																					|
% 126.77/83.94  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																				|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																				| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																				| (366)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																				|
% 126.77/83.94  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (233), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																					|
% 126.77/83.94  																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																						| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																						|
% 126.77/83.94  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																					|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																					| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																					| (370)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																					|
% 126.77/83.94  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (235), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																						|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																						|
% 126.77/83.94  																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																							| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																							|
% 126.77/83.94  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																						|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																						| (374)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																						|
% 126.77/83.94  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																							|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																							|
% 126.77/83.94  																																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																								| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																								|
% 126.77/83.94  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																							|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																							| (378)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																							|
% 126.77/83.94  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																								|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																								|
% 126.77/83.94  																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																									| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																									|
% 126.77/83.94  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																								|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																								| (382)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																								|
% 126.77/83.94  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (223), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																									|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																									|
% 126.77/83.94  																																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																										| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																										|
% 126.77/83.94  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																									|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																									| (386)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																									|
% 126.77/83.94  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (224), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																										|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																										|
% 126.77/83.94  																																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																											| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																											|
% 126.77/83.94  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																										|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																										| (390)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																										|
% 126.77/83.94  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (227), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																											|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																											|
% 126.77/83.94  																																												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																												| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																												|
% 126.77/83.94  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																											|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																											| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																											| (394)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																											|
% 126.77/83.94  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (225), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																												|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																												|
% 126.77/83.94  																																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																													| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																													|
% 126.77/83.94  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																												|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																												| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																												| (398)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																												|
% 126.77/83.94  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (226), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																													|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																													|
% 126.77/83.94  																																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																														| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																														|
% 126.77/83.94  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																													|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																													| (402)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																													|
% 126.77/83.94  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																														|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																														|
% 126.77/83.94  																																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																															| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																															|
% 126.77/83.94  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																														|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																														| (406)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																														|
% 126.77/83.94  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																															|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																															|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																																|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																															|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																															| (410)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																															|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																																|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																																|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																	| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																																	|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																																|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																																| (414)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																																|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (231), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																																	|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																		| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																																		|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																																	| (418)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																																	|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (232), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																																		|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																			| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																																			|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																		| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																																		| (422)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																																		|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (236), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																																			|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																				| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																																				|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																			| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																																			| (426)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																																			|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (242), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																																				|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																					| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																																					|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																				| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																																				| (430)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																																				|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																																					|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																						| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																																						|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																					| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																																					| (486)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																																					|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (210), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																																						|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																							| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																																							|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																																						| (490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																																						|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (212), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																																							|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																								| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																																								|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																																							| (494)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																																							|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (197), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																																								|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																									| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																																									|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																																								| (478)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																																								|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (198), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																																									|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																										| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																																										|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																																									| (482)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																																									|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																																										|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																											| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.94  																																																											|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.94  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.94  																																																										| (446)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.94  																																																										|
% 126.77/83.94  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (202), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.94  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.94  																																																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.94  																																																											|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																												| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																																												|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																											| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																																											| (450)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.95  																																																											|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (203), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.95  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																																												|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																													| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																																													|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																												| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																																												| (454)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.95  																																																												|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (204), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.95  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																																													|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																														| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																																													| (458)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.95  																																																													|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.95  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																															| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																																															|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																																														| (462)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.95  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.95  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																																															|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																																															| (466)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.95  																																																															|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (206), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																	| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																	|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																| (470)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																	|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																		| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																	| (474)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																	|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																		| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																		| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.95  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																			|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																			| (1467)  ~ (all_400_0_1382 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_400_2_1384 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_400_3_1385 & queue(all_400_3_1385) = all_400_1_1383 & elem(all_400_2_1384, all_400_1_1383) = all_400_0_1382
% 126.77/83.95  																																			|
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (1467) yields:
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| (1468) elem(all_400_2_1384, all_400_1_1383) = all_400_0_1382
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| (1469) queue(all_400_3_1385) = all_400_1_1383
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| (1470) host(all_0_5_5) = all_400_3_1385
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| (1471) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_400_2_1384
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| (1472)  ~ (all_400_0_1382 = 0)
% 126.77/83.95  																																				|
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| Instantiating formula (47) with all_400_2_1384, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_400_2_1384, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| (1473) all_400_2_1384 = all_0_3_3
% 126.77/83.95  																																				|
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_400_3_1385, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_400_3_1385, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| (1474) all_400_3_1385 = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/83.95  																																				|
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| From (1474) and (1469) follows:
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| (1475) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_400_1_1383
% 126.77/83.95  																																				|
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| From (1473) and (1468) follows:
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| (1476) elem(all_0_3_3, all_400_1_1383) = all_400_0_1382
% 126.77/83.95  																																				|
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_400_1_1383, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_400_1_1383, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| (1477) all_400_1_1383 = all_0_2_2
% 126.77/83.95  																																				|
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| From (1477) and (1476) follows:
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| (1478) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_400_0_1382
% 126.77/83.95  																																				|
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_400_0_1382, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_400_0_1382, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| (1479) all_400_0_1382 = 0
% 126.77/83.95  																																				|
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| Equations (1479) can reduce 1472 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																				|
% 126.77/83.95  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																		|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																		| (1481)  ~ (all_400_1_1383 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_400_3_1385 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_400_2_1384 & elem(all_400_3_1385, all_400_2_1384) = all_400_1_1383
% 126.77/83.95  																																		|
% 126.77/83.95  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (1481) yields:
% 126.77/83.95  																																			| (1482)  ~ (all_400_1_1383 = 0)
% 126.77/83.95  																																			| (1483) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_400_3_1385
% 126.77/83.95  																																			| (1484) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_400_2_1384
% 126.77/83.95  																																			| (1485) elem(all_400_3_1385, all_400_2_1384) = all_400_1_1383
% 126.77/83.95  																																			|
% 126.77/83.95  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (234), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.95  																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.95  																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																			|
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																				|
% 126.77/83.95  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																			|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																			| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																			| (366)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.95  																																			|
% 126.77/83.95  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (233), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.95  																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																				|
% 126.77/83.95  																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																					| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																					|
% 126.77/83.95  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																				|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																				| (370)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.95  																																				|
% 126.77/83.95  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (235), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.95  																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.95  																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																					|
% 126.77/83.95  																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																						| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																						|
% 126.77/83.95  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																					|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																					| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																					| (374)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.95  																																					|
% 126.77/83.95  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.95  																																						|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.95  																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																						|
% 126.77/83.95  																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																							| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																							|
% 126.77/83.95  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																						|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																						| (378)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.95  																																						|
% 126.77/83.95  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.95  																																							|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.95  																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																							|
% 126.77/83.95  																																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																								| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																								|
% 126.77/83.95  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																							|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																							| (382)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.95  																																							|
% 126.77/83.95  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (223), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.95  																																								|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.95  																																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																								|
% 126.77/83.95  																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																									| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																									|
% 126.77/83.95  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																								|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																								| (386)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.95  																																								|
% 126.77/83.95  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (224), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.95  																																									|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.95  																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																									|
% 126.77/83.95  																																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																										| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																										|
% 126.77/83.95  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																									|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																									| (390)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.95  																																									|
% 126.77/83.95  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (227), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.95  																																										|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.95  																																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																										|
% 126.77/83.95  																																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																											| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																											|
% 126.77/83.95  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																										|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																										| (394)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.95  																																										|
% 126.77/83.95  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (225), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.95  																																											|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.95  																																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																											|
% 126.77/83.95  																																												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																												| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																												|
% 126.77/83.95  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																											|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																											| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																											| (398)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.95  																																											|
% 126.77/83.95  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (226), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.95  																																												|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.95  																																												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																												|
% 126.77/83.95  																																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																													| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																													|
% 126.77/83.95  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																												|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																												| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																												| (402)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.95  																																												|
% 126.77/83.95  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.95  																																													|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.95  																																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																													|
% 126.77/83.95  																																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																														| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																														|
% 126.77/83.95  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																													|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																													| (406)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.95  																																													|
% 126.77/83.95  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.95  																																														|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.95  																																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.95  																																														|
% 126.77/83.95  																																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.95  																																															| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.95  																																															|
% 126.77/83.95  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.95  																																														|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.95  																																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.95  																																														| (410)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.96  																																														|
% 126.77/83.96  																																															| Instantiating (410) with all_754_0_4287, all_754_1_4288, all_754_2_4289 yields:
% 126.77/83.96  																																															| (1534) ( ~ (all_754_0_4287 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_754_2_4289 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_754_1_4288 & elem(all_754_2_4289, all_754_1_4288) = all_754_0_4287) | ( ~ (all_754_0_4287 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_754_2_4289 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_754_1_4288 & elem(all_754_2_4289, all_754_1_4288) = all_754_0_4287) | ( ~ (all_754_2_4289 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_754_2_4289) | ( ~ (all_754_2_4289 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_754_2_4289)
% 126.77/83.96  																																															|
% 126.77/83.96  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																															|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.96  																																															|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.96  																																																|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.96  																																															|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.96  																																															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.96  																																															| (414)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.96  																																															|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (231), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.96  																																																|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																	| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.96  																																																	|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.96  																																																|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																| (418)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.96  																																																|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (232), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.96  																																																	|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																		| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.96  																																																		|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.96  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																	| (422)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.96  																																																	|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (236), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.96  																																																		|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																			| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.96  																																																			|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.96  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																		| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																		| (426)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.96  																																																		|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (242), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.96  																																																			|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																				| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.96  																																																				|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.96  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																			| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																			| (430)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.96  																																																			|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																				| Instantiating (430) with all_774_0_4302, all_774_1_4303, all_774_2_4304 yields:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																				| (1555) ( ~ (all_774_0_4302 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_774_2_4304 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_774_1_4303 & elem(all_774_2_4304, all_774_1_4303) = all_774_0_4302) | ( ~ (all_774_2_4304 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_774_2_4304) | ( ~ (all_774_2_4304 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_774_2_4304) | ( ~ (all_774_2_4304 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_774_2_4304)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																				|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1555), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																				| (1556) ( ~ (all_774_0_4302 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_774_2_4304 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_774_1_4303 & elem(all_774_2_4304, all_774_1_4303) = all_774_0_4302) | ( ~ (all_774_2_4304 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_774_2_4304) | ( ~ (all_774_2_4304 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_774_2_4304)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																				|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1556), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																					| (1557) ( ~ (all_774_0_4302 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_774_2_4304 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_774_1_4303 & elem(all_774_2_4304, all_774_1_4303) = all_774_0_4302) | ( ~ (all_774_2_4304 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_774_2_4304)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																					|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1557), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																						| (1558)  ~ (all_774_0_4302 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_774_2_4304 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_774_1_4303 & elem(all_774_2_4304, all_774_1_4303) = all_774_0_4302
% 126.77/83.96  																																																						|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (1558) yields:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																							| (1559)  ~ (all_774_0_4302 = 0)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																							| (1560) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_774_2_4304
% 126.77/83.96  																																																							| (1561) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_774_1_4303
% 126.77/83.96  																																																							| (1562) elem(all_774_2_4304, all_774_1_4303) = all_774_0_4302
% 126.77/83.96  																																																							|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1534), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																							| (1563) ( ~ (all_754_0_4287 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_754_2_4289 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_754_1_4288 & elem(all_754_2_4289, all_754_1_4288) = all_754_0_4287) | ( ~ (all_754_0_4287 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_754_2_4289 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_754_1_4288 & elem(all_754_2_4289, all_754_1_4288) = all_754_0_4287) | ( ~ (all_754_2_4289 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_754_2_4289)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																							|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1563), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																								| (1564) ( ~ (all_754_0_4287 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_754_2_4289 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_754_1_4288 & elem(all_754_2_4289, all_754_1_4288) = all_754_0_4287) | ( ~ (all_754_0_4287 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_754_2_4289 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_754_1_4288 & elem(all_754_2_4289, all_754_1_4288) = all_754_0_4287)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																								|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1564), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																									| (1565)  ~ (all_754_0_4287 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_754_2_4289 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_754_1_4288 & elem(all_754_2_4289, all_754_1_4288) = all_754_0_4287
% 126.77/83.96  																																																									|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (1565) yields:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																										| (1566)  ~ (all_754_0_4287 = 0)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																										| (1567) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_754_2_4289
% 126.77/83.96  																																																										| (1568) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_754_1_4288
% 126.77/83.96  																																																										| (1569) elem(all_754_2_4289, all_754_1_4288) = all_754_0_4287
% 126.77/83.96  																																																										|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (287), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																										| (1570) (all_398_3_1377 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (all_398_0_1374 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_398_2_1376 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_398_3_1377 & queue(all_398_3_1377) = all_398_1_1375 & elem(all_398_2_1376, all_398_1_1375) = all_398_0_1374) | ( ~ (all_398_1_1375 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_398_3_1377 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_398_2_1376 & elem(all_398_3_1377, all_398_2_1376) = all_398_1_1375) | ( ~ (all_398_3_1377 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_398_3_1377)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																										|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1570), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																											| (1571) (all_398_3_1377 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (all_398_0_1374 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_398_2_1376 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_398_3_1377 & queue(all_398_3_1377) = all_398_1_1375 & elem(all_398_2_1376, all_398_1_1375) = all_398_0_1374) | ( ~ (all_398_1_1375 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_398_3_1377 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_398_2_1376 & elem(all_398_3_1377, all_398_2_1376) = all_398_1_1375)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																											|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1571), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																												| (1572) (all_398_3_1377 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15) | ( ~ (all_398_0_1374 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_398_2_1376 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_398_3_1377 & queue(all_398_3_1377) = all_398_1_1375 & elem(all_398_2_1376, all_398_1_1375) = all_398_0_1374)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																												|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1572), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																													| (1573) all_398_3_1377 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.96  																																																													|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (1573) yields:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																														| (1574) all_398_3_1377 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.96  																																																														| (318) host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.96  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.96  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																															| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.96  																																																															|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.96  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																														| (486)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.96  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (210), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.96  																																																															|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.96  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																															| (490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.96  																																																															|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (212), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																	| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																	|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																| (494)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (197), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																	|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																		| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																	| (478)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																	|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (198), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																			| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																		| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																		| (482)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																				| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																				|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																			| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																			| (446)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (202), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																				|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																					| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																					|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																				| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																				| (450)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																				|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (203), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																					|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																						| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																						|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																					| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																					| (454)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																					|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (204), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																						|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																							| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																							|
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.96  																																																																						| (458)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																						|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							| (462)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																									| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																									|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								| (466)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (206), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																									|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																										| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																										|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																									| (470)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																									|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																										|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																											| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																											|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																										| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																										| (474)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																										|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																											|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																											| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																											|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.97  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																													| (1630)  ~ (all_398_0_1374 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_398_2_1376 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_398_3_1377 & queue(all_398_3_1377) = all_398_1_1375 & elem(all_398_2_1376, all_398_1_1375) = all_398_0_1374
% 126.77/83.97  																																																													|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (1630) yields:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| (1631) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_398_2_1376
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| (1632)  ~ (all_398_0_1374 = 0)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| (1633) elem(all_398_2_1376, all_398_1_1375) = all_398_0_1374
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| (1634) queue(all_398_3_1377) = all_398_1_1375
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| (1635) host(all_0_5_5) = all_398_3_1377
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| Instantiating formula (47) with all_398_2_1376, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_398_2_1376, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| (1636) all_398_2_1376 = all_0_3_3
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| Instantiating formula (10) with all_398_3_1377, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_398_3_1377, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| (1637) all_398_3_1377 = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| From (1637) and (1634) follows:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| (1638) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_398_1_1375
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| From (1636) and (1633) follows:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| (1639) elem(all_0_3_3, all_398_1_1375) = all_398_0_1374
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_398_1_1375, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_398_1_1375, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| (1640) all_398_1_1375 = all_0_2_2
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| From (1640) and (1639) follows:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| (1641) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_398_0_1374
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_398_0_1374, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_398_0_1374, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| (1642) all_398_0_1374 = 0
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| Equations (1642) can reduce 1632 to:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.97  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																												| (1644)  ~ (all_398_1_1375 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_398_3_1377 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_398_2_1376 & elem(all_398_3_1377, all_398_2_1376) = all_398_1_1375
% 126.77/83.97  																																																												|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (1644) yields:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																													| (1645)  ~ (all_398_1_1375 = 0)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																													| (1646) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_398_3_1377
% 126.77/83.97  																																																													| (1647) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_398_2_1376
% 126.77/83.97  																																																													| (1648) elem(all_398_3_1377, all_398_2_1376) = all_398_1_1375
% 126.77/83.97  																																																													|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.97  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.97  																																																													|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.97  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																													| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																													| (486)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.97  																																																													|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (210), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																															| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.97  																																																															|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														| (490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.97  																																																														|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (212), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.97  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.97  																																																															|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.97  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																															| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																															| (494)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.97  																																																															|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (197), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																	| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																	|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																| (478)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (198), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																	|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																		| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																	| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																	| (482)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																	|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																			| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																		| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																		| (446)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (202), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																				| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																				|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																			| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																			| (450)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (203), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																				|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																					| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																					|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																				| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																				| (454)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																				|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (204), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																					|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																						| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																						|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																					| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																					| (458)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																					|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																						|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																						| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																						| (462)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_6_6, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																						|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							| (466)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																							|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								| Instantiating (466) with all_830_0_4423, all_830_1_4424, all_830_2_4425 yields:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								| (1693) ( ~ (all_830_0_4423 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_830_2_4425 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_830_1_4424 & elem(all_830_2_4425, all_830_1_4424) = all_830_0_4423) | ( ~ (all_830_0_4423 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_830_2_4425 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_830_1_4424 & elem(all_830_2_4425, all_830_1_4424) = all_830_0_4423) | ( ~ (all_830_2_4425 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_830_2_4425) | ( ~ (all_830_2_4425 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = all_830_2_4425)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (206), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																									| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																									|
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.97  																																																																								| (470)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																								|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																									|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																										| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																										|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																									| (129)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																									| (474)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = v0 & queue(all_0_15_15) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = v0 & queue(all_0_4_4) = v1 & elem(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_1_1, alive) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																									|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1693), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																										| (1702) ( ~ (all_830_0_4423 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_830_2_4425 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_830_1_4424 & elem(all_830_2_4425, all_830_1_4424) = all_830_0_4423) | ( ~ (all_830_0_4423 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_830_2_4425 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_830_1_4424 & elem(all_830_2_4425, all_830_1_4424) = all_830_0_4423) | ( ~ (all_830_2_4425 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_830_2_4425)
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																										|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1702), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																											| (1703) ( ~ (all_830_0_4423 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_830_2_4425 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_830_1_4424 & elem(all_830_2_4425, all_830_1_4424) = all_830_0_4423) | ( ~ (all_830_0_4423 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_830_2_4425 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_830_1_4424 & elem(all_830_2_4425, all_830_1_4424) = all_830_0_4423)
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																											|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1703), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																												| (1704)  ~ (all_830_0_4423 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_830_2_4425 & queue(all_0_15_15) = all_830_1_4424 & elem(all_830_2_4425, all_830_1_4424) = all_830_0_4423
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																												|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (1704) yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1705)  ~ (all_830_0_4423 = 0)
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1706) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_830_2_4425
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1707) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_830_1_4424
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1708) elem(all_830_2_4425, all_830_1_4424) = all_830_0_4423
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (47) with all_652_2_3371, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_652_2_3371, m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1709) all_652_2_3371 = all_0_0_0
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (47) with all_652_2_3371, all_830_2_4425, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_830_2_4425, m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_652_2_3371, yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1710) all_830_2_4425 = all_652_2_3371
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (47) with all_400_3_1385, all_652_2_3371, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_652_2_3371, m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_400_3_1385, yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1711) all_652_2_3371 = all_400_3_1385
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (47) with all_398_3_1377, all_830_2_4425, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_830_2_4425, m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_398_3_1377, yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1712) all_830_2_4425 = all_398_3_1377
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (47) with all_270_2_876, all_652_2_3371, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_652_2_3371, m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_270_2_876, yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1713) all_652_2_3371 = all_270_2_876
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (10) with all_270_3_877, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_270_3_877, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1714) all_270_3_877 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_830_1_4424, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_830_1_4424, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1715) all_830_1_4424 = all_0_14_14
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_774_1_4303, all_830_1_4424 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_830_1_4424, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_774_1_4303, yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1716) all_830_1_4424 = all_774_1_4303
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_612_1_2190, all_774_1_4303 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_774_1_4303, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_612_1_2190, yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1717) all_774_1_4303 = all_612_1_2190
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_612_1_2190, all_652_1_3370 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_652_1_3370, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_612_1_2190, yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1718) all_652_1_3370 = all_612_1_2190
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_411_2_1428, all_754_1_4288 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_754_1_4288, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_411_2_1428, yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1719) all_754_1_4288 = all_411_2_1428
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_411_2_1428, all_652_1_3370 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_652_1_3370, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_411_2_1428, yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1720) all_652_1_3370 = all_411_2_1428
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_402_2_1392, all_652_1_3370 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_652_1_3370, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_402_2_1392, yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1721) all_652_1_3370 = all_402_2_1392
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_400_2_1384, all_411_2_1428 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_411_2_1428, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_400_2_1384, yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1722) all_411_2_1428 = all_400_2_1384
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_398_2_1376, all_754_1_4288 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_754_1_4288, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_398_2_1376, yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1723) all_754_1_4288 = all_398_2_1376
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1716,1715) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1724) all_774_1_4303 = all_0_14_14
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Simplifying 1724 yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1725) all_774_1_4303 = all_0_14_14
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1710,1712) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1726) all_652_2_3371 = all_398_3_1377
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Simplifying 1726 yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1727) all_652_2_3371 = all_398_3_1377
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1717,1725) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1728) all_612_1_2190 = all_0_14_14
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Simplifying 1728 yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1729) all_612_1_2190 = all_0_14_14
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1719,1723) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1730) all_411_2_1428 = all_398_2_1376
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Simplifying 1730 yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1731) all_411_2_1428 = all_398_2_1376
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1718,1721) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1732) all_612_1_2190 = all_402_2_1392
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Simplifying 1732 yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1733) all_612_1_2190 = all_402_2_1392
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1720,1721) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1734) all_411_2_1428 = all_402_2_1392
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Simplifying 1734 yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1735) all_411_2_1428 = all_402_2_1392
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1709,1711) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1736) all_400_3_1385 = all_0_0_0
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1727,1711) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1737) all_400_3_1385 = all_398_3_1377
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1713,1711) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1738) all_400_3_1385 = all_270_2_876
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1733,1729) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1739) all_402_2_1392 = all_0_14_14
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Simplifying 1739 yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1740) all_402_2_1392 = all_0_14_14
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1735,1722) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1741) all_402_2_1392 = all_400_2_1384
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Simplifying 1741 yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1742) all_402_2_1392 = all_400_2_1384
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1731,1722) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1743) all_400_2_1384 = all_398_2_1376
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1742,1740) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1744) all_400_2_1384 = all_0_14_14
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Simplifying 1744 yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1745) all_400_2_1384 = all_0_14_14
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1743,1745) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1746) all_398_2_1376 = all_0_14_14
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Simplifying 1746 yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1747) all_398_2_1376 = all_0_14_14
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1738,1737) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1748) all_398_3_1377 = all_270_2_876
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1736,1737) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1749) all_398_3_1377 = all_0_0_0
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1749,1748) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1750) all_270_2_876 = all_0_0_0
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1750,1748) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1749) all_398_3_1377 = all_0_0_0
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1749,1737) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1736) all_400_3_1385 = all_0_0_0
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1736,1711) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1709) all_652_2_3371 = all_0_0_0
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1740,1721) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1754) all_652_1_3370 = all_0_14_14
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| Combining equations (1749,1712) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1755) all_830_2_4425 = all_0_0_0
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| From (1750) and (1151) follows:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (15) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| From (1714) and (1156) follows:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (71) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| From (1714) and (1155) follows:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1758) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_270_1_875
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| From (1747) and (1647) follows:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (155) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| From (1755)(1715) and (1708) follows:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1760) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_830_0_4423
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| From (1709)(1754) and (563) follows:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1761) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_652_0_3369
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| From (1736)(1745) and (1485) follows:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1762) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_400_1_1383
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| From (1749)(1747) and (1648) follows:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1763) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_398_1_1375
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| From (1750) and (1154) follows:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1764) elem(all_0_0_0, all_270_1_875) = all_270_0_874
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (296), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													| (1765) (all_502_3_1786 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_502_0_1783 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_502_2_1785 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_502_3_1786 & queue(all_502_3_1786) = all_502_1_1784 & elem(all_502_2_1785, all_502_1_1784) = all_502_0_1783) | ( ~ (all_502_2_1785 = all_502_3_1786) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_502_2_1785 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_502_3_1786)
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																													|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1765), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																														| (1766) (all_502_3_1786 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_502_0_1783 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_502_2_1785 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_502_3_1786 & queue(all_502_3_1786) = all_502_1_1784 & elem(all_502_2_1785, all_502_1_1784) = all_502_0_1783)
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																														|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1766), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																															| (1767) all_502_3_1786 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																															|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (1767) yields:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																																| (1768) all_502_3_1786 = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																																| (570) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																																|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (277), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																																| (1770) ( ~ (all_148_0_418 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_148_2_420 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_148_3_421 & queue(all_148_3_421) = all_148_1_419 & elem(all_148_2_420, all_148_1_419) = all_148_0_418) | ( ~ (all_148_0_418 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_148_2_420 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_148_3_421 & queue(all_148_3_421) = all_148_1_419 & elem(all_148_2_420, all_148_1_419) = all_148_0_418) | ( ~ (all_148_3_421 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_148_3_421)
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																																|
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1770), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.98  																																																																																	| (1771) ( ~ (all_148_0_418 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_148_2_420 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_148_3_421 & queue(all_148_3_421) = all_148_1_419 & elem(all_148_2_420, all_148_1_419) = all_148_0_418) | ( ~ (all_148_0_418 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_148_2_420 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_148_3_421 & queue(all_148_3_421) = all_148_1_419 & elem(all_148_2_420, all_148_1_419) = all_148_0_418)
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1771), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		| (1772)  ~ (all_148_0_418 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_148_2_420 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_148_3_421 & queue(all_148_3_421) = all_148_1_419 & elem(all_148_2_420, all_148_1_419) = all_148_0_418
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (1772) yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (1773) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_148_2_420
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (1774) host(all_0_7_7) = all_148_3_421
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (1775) elem(all_148_2_420, all_148_1_419) = all_148_0_418
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (1776) queue(all_148_3_421) = all_148_1_419
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (1777)  ~ (all_148_0_418 = 0)
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| From (305) and (1774) follows:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (1778) host(all_0_17_17) = all_148_3_421
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (10) with all_148_3_421, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_148_3_421, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (1779) all_148_3_421 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_148_3_421, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_148_3_421, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (1780) all_148_3_421 = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| Combining equations (1780,1779) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		| (1784)  ~ (all_148_0_418 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_148_2_420 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_148_3_421 & queue(all_148_3_421) = all_148_1_419 & elem(all_148_2_420, all_148_1_419) = all_148_0_418
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (1784) yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (1785) m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_148_2_420
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (1775) elem(all_148_2_420, all_148_1_419) = all_148_0_418
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (1776) queue(all_148_3_421) = all_148_1_419
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (1777)  ~ (all_148_0_418 = 0)
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (1778) host(all_0_17_17) = all_148_3_421
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (10) with all_148_3_421, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_148_3_421, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (1779) all_148_3_421 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_148_3_421, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_148_3_421, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (1780) all_148_3_421 = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| Combining equations (1780,1779) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	| (1795)  ~ (all_148_3_421 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_148_3_421
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (1795) yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		| (1796)  ~ (all_148_3_421 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		| (1774) host(all_0_7_7) = all_148_3_421
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		| From (305) and (1774) follows:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		| (1778) host(all_0_17_17) = all_148_3_421
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		| Instantiating formula (10) with all_148_3_421, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_148_3_421, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		| (1779) all_148_3_421 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_148_3_421, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_148_3_421, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		| (1780) all_148_3_421 = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		| Combining equations (1780,1779) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (1804) host(all_0_17_17) = all_148_2_420 & ( ~ (all_148_2_420 = all_0_4_4) | (all_148_3_421 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (1804) yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	| (1805) host(all_0_17_17) = all_148_2_420
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	| (1806)  ~ (all_148_2_420 = all_0_4_4) | (all_148_3_421 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_148_2_420, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_148_2_420, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	| (1807) all_148_2_420 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_148_2_420, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_148_2_420, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	| (1808) all_148_2_420 = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	| Combining equations (1808,1807) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																															| (1812)  ~ (all_502_0_1783 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_502_2_1785 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_502_3_1786 & queue(all_502_3_1786) = all_502_1_1784 & elem(all_502_2_1785, all_502_1_1784) = all_502_0_1783
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																															|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (1812) yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (1813) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_502_2_1785
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (1814) elem(all_502_2_1785, all_502_1_1784) = all_502_0_1783
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (1815) host(all_0_17_17) = all_502_3_1786
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (1816)  ~ (all_502_0_1783 = 0)
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (1817) queue(all_502_3_1786) = all_502_1_1784
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| Instantiating formula (10) with all_502_3_1786, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_502_3_1786, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (1818) all_502_3_1786 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_270_1_875, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_270_1_875, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (1819) all_270_1_875 = all_0_14_14
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14, all_652_0_3369, all_830_0_4423 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_830_0_4423, elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_652_0_3369, yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (1820) all_830_0_4423 = all_652_0_3369
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14, all_400_1_1383, all_652_0_3369 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_652_0_3369, elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_400_1_1383, yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (1821) all_652_0_3369 = all_400_1_1383
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14, all_398_1_1375, all_830_0_4423 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_830_0_4423, elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_398_1_1375, yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (1822) all_830_0_4423 = all_398_1_1375
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| Combining equations (1820,1822) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (1823) all_652_0_3369 = all_398_1_1375
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| Simplifying 1823 yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (1824) all_652_0_3369 = all_398_1_1375
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| Combining equations (1824,1821) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (1825) all_400_1_1383 = all_398_1_1375
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| From (1818) and (1815) follows:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (71) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| From (1818) and (1817) follows:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (1827) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_502_1_1784
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| From (1819) and (1758) follows:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (155) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| From (1819) and (1764) follows:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (1829) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_270_0_874
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| From (1825) and (1762) follows:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (1763) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_398_1_1375
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (276), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																| (1831) (all_98_3_235 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_98_0_232 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_98_2_234 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_98_3_235 & queue(all_98_3_235) = all_98_1_233 & elem(all_98_2_234, all_98_1_233) = all_98_0_232) | ( ~ (all_98_2_234 = all_98_3_235) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_98_2_234 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_98_3_235)
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1831), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	| (1832) (all_98_3_235 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_98_0_232 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_98_2_234 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_98_3_235 & queue(all_98_3_235) = all_98_1_233 & elem(all_98_2_234, all_98_1_233) = all_98_0_232)
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																	|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1832), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		| (1833) all_98_3_235 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																		|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (1833) yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (1834) all_98_3_235 = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (569) host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| From (305) and (569) follows:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (570) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (291), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			| (1837) ( ~ (all_448_0_1571 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_448_2_1573 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_448_3_1574 & queue(all_448_3_1574) = all_448_1_1572 & elem(all_448_2_1573, all_448_1_1572) = all_448_0_1571) | ( ~ (all_448_0_1571 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_448_2_1573 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_448_3_1574 & queue(all_448_3_1574) = all_448_1_1572 & elem(all_448_2_1573, all_448_1_1572) = all_448_0_1571) | ( ~ (all_448_3_1574 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_448_3_1574)
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1837), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																				| (1838) ( ~ (all_448_0_1571 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_448_2_1573 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_448_3_1574 & queue(all_448_3_1574) = all_448_1_1572 & elem(all_448_2_1573, all_448_1_1572) = all_448_0_1571) | ( ~ (all_448_0_1571 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_448_2_1573 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_448_3_1574 & queue(all_448_3_1574) = all_448_1_1572 & elem(all_448_2_1573, all_448_1_1572) = all_448_0_1571)
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																				|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1838), into two cases.
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																					| (1839)  ~ (all_448_0_1571 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_448_2_1573 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_448_3_1574 & queue(all_448_3_1574) = all_448_1_1572 & elem(all_448_2_1573, all_448_1_1572) = all_448_0_1571
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																					|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (1839) yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| (1840) queue(all_448_3_1574) = all_448_1_1572
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| (1841) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_448_2_1573
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| (1842) host(all_0_7_7) = all_448_3_1574
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| (1843)  ~ (all_448_0_1571 = 0)
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| (1844) elem(all_448_2_1573, all_448_1_1572) = all_448_0_1571
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| From (305) and (1842) follows:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| (1845) host(all_0_17_17) = all_448_3_1574
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (10) with all_448_3_1574, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_448_3_1574, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| (1846) all_448_3_1574 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_448_3_1574, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_448_3_1574, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| (1847) all_448_3_1574 = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| Combining equations (1847,1846) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| (309) $false
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																					| (1851)  ~ (all_448_0_1571 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_448_2_1573 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_448_3_1574 & queue(all_448_3_1574) = all_448_1_1572 & elem(all_448_2_1573, all_448_1_1572) = all_448_0_1571
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																					|
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (1851) yields:
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| (1840) queue(all_448_3_1574) = all_448_1_1572
% 126.77/83.99  																																																																																						| (1853) m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_448_2_1573
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						| (1842) host(all_0_7_7) = all_448_3_1574
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						| (1843)  ~ (all_448_0_1571 = 0)
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						| (1844) elem(all_448_2_1573, all_448_1_1572) = all_448_0_1571
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						| From (305) and (1842) follows:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						| (1845) host(all_0_17_17) = all_448_3_1574
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (10) with all_448_3_1574, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_448_3_1574, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						| (1846) all_448_3_1574 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_448_3_1574, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_448_3_1574, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						| (1847) all_448_3_1574 = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						| Combining equations (1847,1846) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						| (309) $false
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				| (1863)  ~ (all_448_3_1574 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_448_3_1574
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (1863) yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					| (1864)  ~ (all_448_3_1574 = all_0_15_15)
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					| (1842) host(all_0_7_7) = all_448_3_1574
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					| From (305) and (1842) follows:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					| (1845) host(all_0_17_17) = all_448_3_1574
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					| Instantiating formula (10) with all_448_3_1574, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_448_3_1574, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					| (1846) all_448_3_1574 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_448_3_1574, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_448_3_1574, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					| (1847) all_448_3_1574 = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					| Combining equations (1847,1846) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					| (309) $false
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| (1872) host(all_0_7_7) = all_448_2_1573 & ( ~ (all_448_2_1573 = all_0_4_4) | (all_448_3_1574 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (1872) yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				| (1873) host(all_0_7_7) = all_448_2_1573
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				| (1874)  ~ (all_448_2_1573 = all_0_4_4) | (all_448_3_1574 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				| From (305) and (1873) follows:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				| (1875) host(all_0_17_17) = all_448_2_1573
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_448_2_1573, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_448_2_1573, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				| (1876) all_448_2_1573 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_448_2_1573, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_448_2_1573, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				| (1877) all_448_2_1573 = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				| Combining equations (1877,1876) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				| (309) $false
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																		| (1881)  ~ (all_98_0_232 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_98_2_234 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_98_3_235 & queue(all_98_3_235) = all_98_1_233 & elem(all_98_2_234, all_98_1_233) = all_98_0_232
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																		|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (1881) yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| (1882) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_98_2_234
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| (1883)  ~ (all_98_0_232 = 0)
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| (1884) queue(all_98_3_235) = all_98_1_233
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| (1885) elem(all_98_2_234, all_98_1_233) = all_98_0_232
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| (1886) host(all_0_7_7) = all_98_3_235
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| From (305) and (1886) follows:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| (1887) host(all_0_17_17) = all_98_3_235
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (10) with all_98_3_235, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_98_3_235, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| (1888) all_98_3_235 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_502_1_1784, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_502_1_1784, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| (1889) all_502_1_1784 = all_0_14_14
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14, all_270_0_874, all_398_1_1375 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_398_1_1375, elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_270_0_874, yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| (1890) all_398_1_1375 = all_270_0_874
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| From (1888) and (1887) follows:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| (71) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| From (1888) and (1884) follows:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| (1892) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_98_1_233
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| From (1889) and (1827) follows:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| (155) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| From (1890) and (1763) follows:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| (1829) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_270_0_874
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (280), into two cases.
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			| (1895) (all_212_3_658 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_212_0_655 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_212_2_657 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_212_3_658 & queue(all_212_3_658) = all_212_1_656 & elem(all_212_2_657, all_212_1_656) = all_212_0_655) | ( ~ (all_212_1_656 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_212_3_658 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_212_2_657 & elem(all_212_3_658, all_212_2_657) = all_212_1_656) | ( ~ (all_212_3_658 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_212_3_658)
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																			|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1895), into two cases.
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				| (1896) (all_212_3_658 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_212_0_655 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_212_2_657 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_212_3_658 & queue(all_212_3_658) = all_212_1_656 & elem(all_212_2_657, all_212_1_656) = all_212_0_655) | ( ~ (all_212_1_656 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_212_3_658 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_212_2_657 & elem(all_212_3_658, all_212_2_657) = all_212_1_656)
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																				|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1896), into two cases.
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					| (1897) (all_212_3_658 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_212_0_655 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_212_2_657 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_212_3_658 & queue(all_212_3_658) = all_212_1_656 & elem(all_212_2_657, all_212_1_656) = all_212_0_655)
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																					|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1897), into two cases.
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						| (1898) all_212_3_658 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																						|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (1898) yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																							| (1899) all_212_3_658 = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																							| (570) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																							|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (282), into two cases.
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																							| (1901) ( ~ (all_249_0_803 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_249_2_805 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_249_3_806 & queue(all_249_3_806) = all_249_1_804 & elem(all_249_2_805, all_249_1_804) = all_249_0_803) | ( ~ (all_249_0_803 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_249_2_805 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_249_3_806 & queue(all_249_3_806) = all_249_1_804 & elem(all_249_2_805, all_249_1_804) = all_249_0_803) | ( ~ (all_249_3_806 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_249_3_806)
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																							|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1901), into two cases.
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																								| (1902) ( ~ (all_249_0_803 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_249_2_805 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_249_3_806 & queue(all_249_3_806) = all_249_1_804 & elem(all_249_2_805, all_249_1_804) = all_249_0_803) | ( ~ (all_249_0_803 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_249_2_805 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_249_3_806 & queue(all_249_3_806) = all_249_1_804 & elem(all_249_2_805, all_249_1_804) = all_249_0_803)
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																								|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1902), into two cases.
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																									| (1903)  ~ (all_249_0_803 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_249_2_805 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_249_3_806 & queue(all_249_3_806) = all_249_1_804 & elem(all_249_2_805, all_249_1_804) = all_249_0_803
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																									|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (1903) yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (1904) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_249_2_805
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (1905)  ~ (all_249_0_803 = 0)
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (1906) elem(all_249_2_805, all_249_1_804) = all_249_0_803
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (1907) queue(all_249_3_806) = all_249_1_804
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (1908) host(all_0_7_7) = all_249_3_806
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| From (305) and (1908) follows:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (1909) host(all_0_17_17) = all_249_3_806
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (10) with all_249_3_806, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_249_3_806, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (1910) all_249_3_806 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_249_3_806, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_249_3_806, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (1911) all_249_3_806 = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| Combining equations (1910,1911) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (309) $false
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																									| (1914)  ~ (all_249_0_803 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_249_2_805 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_249_3_806 & queue(all_249_3_806) = all_249_1_804 & elem(all_249_2_805, all_249_1_804) = all_249_0_803
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																									|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (1914) yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (1905)  ~ (all_249_0_803 = 0)
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (1916) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_249_2_805
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (1906) elem(all_249_2_805, all_249_1_804) = all_249_0_803
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (1907) queue(all_249_3_806) = all_249_1_804
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (1909) host(all_0_17_17) = all_249_3_806
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (10) with all_249_3_806, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_249_3_806, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (1910) all_249_3_806 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_249_3_806, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_249_3_806, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (1911) all_249_3_806 = all_0_4_4
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| Combining equations (1910,1911) yields a new equation:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										| (309) $false
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										|
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 126.77/84.00  																																																																																								| (1924)  ~ (all_249_3_806 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_249_3_806
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																								|
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (1924) yields:
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									| (1925)  ~ (all_249_3_806 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									| (1908) host(all_0_7_7) = all_249_3_806
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									| From (305) and (1908) follows:
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									| (1909) host(all_0_17_17) = all_249_3_806
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (10) with all_249_3_806, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_249_3_806, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									| (1910) all_249_3_806 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_249_3_806, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_249_3_806, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									| (1911) all_249_3_806 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									| Combining equations (1911,1910) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.00  																																																																																							| (1933) host(all_0_17_17) = all_249_2_805 & ( ~ (all_249_2_805 = all_0_4_4) | (all_249_3_806 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (1933) yields:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								| (1934) host(all_0_17_17) = all_249_2_805
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								| (1935)  ~ (all_249_2_805 = all_0_4_4) | (all_249_3_806 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								| Instantiating formula (10) with all_249_2_805, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_249_2_805, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								| (1936) all_249_2_805 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_249_2_805, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_249_2_805, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								| (1937) all_249_2_805 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								| Combining equations (1937,1936) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																						| (1941)  ~ (all_212_0_655 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_212_2_657 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_212_3_658 & queue(all_212_3_658) = all_212_1_656 & elem(all_212_2_657, all_212_1_656) = all_212_0_655
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (1941) yields:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| (1942) elem(all_212_2_657, all_212_1_656) = all_212_0_655
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| (1943) queue(all_212_3_658) = all_212_1_656
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| (1944)  ~ (all_212_0_655 = 0)
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| (1945) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_212_2_657
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| (1946) host(all_0_17_17) = all_212_3_658
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (47) with all_212_2_657, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_212_2_657, m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| (1947) all_212_2_657 = all_0_0_0
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (10) with all_212_3_658, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_212_3_658, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| (1948) all_212_3_658 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_98_1_233, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_98_1_233, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| (1949) all_98_1_233 = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| From (1947) and (1945) follows:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| (15) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| From (1948) and (1946) follows:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| (71) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| From (1948) and (1943) follows:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| (1952) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_212_1_656
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| From (1949) and (1892) follows:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| (155) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| From (1947) and (1942) follows:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| (1954) elem(all_0_0_0, all_212_1_656) = all_212_0_655
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (294), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							| (1955) ( ~ (all_483_0_1707 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_483_2_1709 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_483_3_1710 & queue(all_483_3_1710) = all_483_1_1708 & elem(all_483_2_1709, all_483_1_1708) = all_483_0_1707) | ( ~ (all_483_0_1707 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_483_2_1709 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_483_3_1710 & queue(all_483_3_1710) = all_483_1_1708 & elem(all_483_2_1709, all_483_1_1708) = all_483_0_1707) | ( ~ (all_483_3_1710 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_483_3_1710)
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1955), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								| (1956) ( ~ (all_483_0_1707 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_483_2_1709 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_483_3_1710 & queue(all_483_3_1710) = all_483_1_1708 & elem(all_483_2_1709, all_483_1_1708) = all_483_0_1707) | ( ~ (all_483_0_1707 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_483_2_1709 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_483_3_1710 & queue(all_483_3_1710) = all_483_1_1708 & elem(all_483_2_1709, all_483_1_1708) = all_483_0_1707)
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																								|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1956), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																									| (1957)  ~ (all_483_0_1707 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_483_2_1709 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_483_3_1710 & queue(all_483_3_1710) = all_483_1_1708 & elem(all_483_2_1709, all_483_1_1708) = all_483_0_1707
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (1957) yields:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| (1958) host(all_0_17_17) = all_483_3_1710
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| (1959) elem(all_483_2_1709, all_483_1_1708) = all_483_0_1707
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| (1960) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_483_2_1709
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| (1961)  ~ (all_483_0_1707 = 0)
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| (1962) queue(all_483_3_1710) = all_483_1_1708
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (10) with all_483_3_1710, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_483_3_1710, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| (1963) all_483_3_1710 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_212_1_656, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_212_1_656, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| (1964) all_212_1_656 = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| From (1963) and (1958) follows:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| (71) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| From (1963) and (1962) follows:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| (1966) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_483_1_1708
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| From (1964) and (1952) follows:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| (155) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| From (1964) and (1954) follows:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| (1968) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_212_0_655
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (300), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										| (1969) ( ~ (all_543_0_1944 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_543_2_1946 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_543_3_1947 & queue(all_543_3_1947) = all_543_1_1945 & elem(all_543_2_1946, all_543_1_1945) = all_543_0_1944) | ( ~ (all_543_0_1944 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_543_2_1946 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_543_3_1947 & queue(all_543_3_1947) = all_543_1_1945 & elem(all_543_2_1946, all_543_1_1945) = all_543_0_1944) | ( ~ (all_543_3_1947 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_543_3_1947)
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1969), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																											| (1970) ( ~ (all_543_0_1944 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_543_2_1946 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_543_3_1947 & queue(all_543_3_1947) = all_543_1_1945 & elem(all_543_2_1946, all_543_1_1945) = all_543_0_1944) | ( ~ (all_543_0_1944 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_543_2_1946 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_543_3_1947 & queue(all_543_3_1947) = all_543_1_1945 & elem(all_543_2_1946, all_543_1_1945) = all_543_0_1944)
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																											|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1970), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																												| (1971)  ~ (all_543_0_1944 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_543_2_1946 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_543_3_1947 & queue(all_543_3_1947) = all_543_1_1945 & elem(all_543_2_1946, all_543_1_1945) = all_543_0_1944
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (1971) yields:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| (1972) host(all_0_7_7) = all_543_3_1947
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| (1973) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_543_2_1946
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| (1974) queue(all_543_3_1947) = all_543_1_1945
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| (1975)  ~ (all_543_0_1944 = 0)
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| (1976) elem(all_543_2_1946, all_543_1_1945) = all_543_0_1944
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| From (305) and (1972) follows:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| (1977) host(all_0_17_17) = all_543_3_1947
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (10) with all_543_3_1947, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_543_3_1947, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| (1978) all_543_3_1947 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_483_1_1708, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_483_1_1708, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| (1979) all_483_1_1708 = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14, all_212_0_655, all_270_0_874 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_270_0_874, elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_212_0_655, yields:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| (1980) all_270_0_874 = all_212_0_655
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| From (1978) and (1977) follows:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| (71) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| From (1978) and (1974) follows:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| (1982) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_543_1_1945
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| From (1979) and (1966) follows:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| (155) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| From (1980) and (1829) follows:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| (1968) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_212_0_655
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (293), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													| (1985) (all_471_3_1662 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_471_0_1659 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_471_2_1661 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_471_3_1662 & queue(all_471_3_1662) = all_471_1_1660 & elem(all_471_2_1661, all_471_1_1660) = all_471_0_1659) | ( ~ (all_471_1_1660 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_471_3_1662 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_471_2_1661 & elem(all_471_3_1662, all_471_2_1661) = all_471_1_1660) | ( ~ (all_471_3_1662 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_471_3_1662)
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1985), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																														| (1986) (all_471_3_1662 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_471_0_1659 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_471_2_1661 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_471_3_1662 & queue(all_471_3_1662) = all_471_1_1660 & elem(all_471_2_1661, all_471_1_1660) = all_471_0_1659) | ( ~ (all_471_1_1660 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_471_3_1662 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_471_2_1661 & elem(all_471_3_1662, all_471_2_1661) = all_471_1_1660)
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1986), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																															| (1987) (all_471_3_1662 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_471_0_1659 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_471_2_1661 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_471_3_1662 & queue(all_471_3_1662) = all_471_1_1660 & elem(all_471_2_1661, all_471_1_1660) = all_471_0_1659)
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1987), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																																| (1988) all_471_3_1662 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (1988) yields:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																																	| (1989) all_471_3_1662 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																																	| (570) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (278), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																																	| (1991) ( ~ (all_157_0_453 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_157_2_455 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456 & queue(all_157_3_456) = all_157_1_454 & elem(all_157_2_455, all_157_1_454) = all_157_0_453) | ( ~ (all_157_0_453 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = all_157_2_455 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456 & queue(all_157_3_456) = all_157_1_454 & elem(all_157_2_455, all_157_1_454) = all_157_0_453) | ( ~ (all_157_3_456 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456)
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1991), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.01  																																																																																																		| (1992) ( ~ (all_157_0_453 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_157_2_455 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456 & queue(all_157_3_456) = all_157_1_454 & elem(all_157_2_455, all_157_1_454) = all_157_0_453) | ( ~ (all_157_0_453 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = all_157_2_455 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456 & queue(all_157_3_456) = all_157_1_454 & elem(all_157_2_455, all_157_1_454) = all_157_0_453)
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1992), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			| (1993)  ~ (all_157_0_453 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_157_2_455 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456 & queue(all_157_3_456) = all_157_1_454 & elem(all_157_2_455, all_157_1_454) = all_157_0_453
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (1993) yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (1994) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_157_2_455
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (1995)  ~ (all_157_0_453 = 0)
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (1996) host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (1997) elem(all_157_2_455, all_157_1_454) = all_157_0_453
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (1998) queue(all_157_3_456) = all_157_1_454
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_157_3_456, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (1999) all_157_3_456 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_157_3_456, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (2000) all_157_3_456 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| Combining equations (1999,2000) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			| (2003)  ~ (all_157_0_453 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = all_157_2_455 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456 & queue(all_157_3_456) = all_157_1_454 & elem(all_157_2_455, all_157_1_454) = all_157_0_453
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (2003) yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (1995)  ~ (all_157_0_453 = 0)
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (1996) host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (1997) elem(all_157_2_455, all_157_1_454) = all_157_0_453
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (2007) m_Down(all_0_17_17) = all_157_2_455
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (1998) queue(all_157_3_456) = all_157_1_454
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_157_3_456, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (1999) all_157_3_456 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_157_3_456, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (2000) all_157_3_456 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| Combining equations (2000,1999) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		| (2014)  ~ (all_157_3_456 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (2014) yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			| (2015)  ~ (all_157_3_456 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			| (1996) host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (10) with all_157_3_456, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			| (1999) all_157_3_456 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_157_3_456, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_3_456, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			| (2000) all_157_3_456 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			| Combining equations (2000,1999) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	| (2022) host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_2_455 & ( ~ (all_157_2_455 = all_0_4_4) | (all_157_3_456 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4))
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (2022) yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		| (2023) host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_2_455
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		| (2024)  ~ (all_157_2_455 = all_0_4_4) | (all_157_3_456 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4)
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		| Instantiating formula (10) with all_157_2_455, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_2_455, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		| (2025) all_157_2_455 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_157_2_455, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_157_2_455, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		| (2026) all_157_2_455 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		| Combining equations (2026,2025) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																| (2030)  ~ (all_471_0_1659 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_471_2_1661 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_471_3_1662 & queue(all_471_3_1662) = all_471_1_1660 & elem(all_471_2_1661, all_471_1_1660) = all_471_0_1659
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (2030) yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	| (2031) elem(all_471_2_1661, all_471_1_1660) = all_471_0_1659
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	| (2032) queue(all_471_3_1662) = all_471_1_1660
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	| (2033) host(all_0_17_17) = all_471_3_1662
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	| (2034) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_471_2_1661
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	| (2035)  ~ (all_471_0_1659 = 0)
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_471_3_1662, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_471_3_1662, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	| (2036) all_471_3_1662 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_543_1_1945, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_543_1_1945, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	| (2037) all_543_1_1945 = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	| From (2036) and (2033) follows:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	| (71) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	| From (2036) and (2032) follows:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	| (2039) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_471_1_1660
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	| From (2037) and (1982) follows:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	| (155) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (297), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	| (2041) (all_505_3_1798 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_505_0_1795 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_505_2_1797 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_505_3_1798 & queue(all_505_3_1798) = all_505_1_1796 & elem(all_505_2_1797, all_505_1_1796) = all_505_0_1795) | ( ~ (all_505_2_1797 = all_505_3_1798) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_505_2_1797 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_505_3_1798)
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2041), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		| (2042) (all_505_3_1798 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_505_0_1795 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_505_2_1797 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_505_3_1798 & queue(all_505_3_1798) = all_505_1_1796 & elem(all_505_2_1797, all_505_1_1796) = all_505_0_1795)
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																		|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2042), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			| (2043) all_505_3_1798 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (2043) yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (2044) all_505_3_1798 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (570) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (286), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				| (2046) ( ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310) | ( ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310) | ( ~ (all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313)
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2046), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																					| (2047) ( ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310) | ( ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310)
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2047), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																						| (2048)  ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (2048) yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (2049) host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (2050) elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (2051) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_382_2_1312
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (2052)  ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0)
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (2053) queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| From (305) and (2049) follows:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (2054) host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (10) with all_382_3_1313, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (2055) all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_382_3_1313, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (2056) all_382_3_1313 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| Combining equations (2056,2055) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																						| (2060)  ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (2060) yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (2049) host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (2062) m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (2050) elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (2052)  ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0)
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (2053) queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| From (305) and (2049) follows:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (2054) host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (10) with all_382_3_1313, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (2055) all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_382_3_1313, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (2056) all_382_3_1313 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| Combining equations (2056,2055) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																					| (2072)  ~ (all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (2072) yields:
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																						| (2073)  ~ (all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																						| (2049) host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.02  																																																																																																						| From (305) and (2049) follows:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						| (2054) host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (10) with all_382_3_1313, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						| (2055) all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_382_3_1313, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						| (2056) all_382_3_1313 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						| Combining equations (2056,2055) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| (2081) host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312 & ( ~ (all_382_2_1312 = all_0_4_4) | (all_382_3_1313 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (2081) yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					| (2082) host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					| (2083)  ~ (all_382_2_1312 = all_0_4_4) | (all_382_3_1313 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					| From (305) and (2082) follows:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					| (2084) host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_2_1312
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					| Instantiating formula (10) with all_382_2_1312, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_2_1312, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					| (2085) all_382_2_1312 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_382_2_1312, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_2_1312, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					| (2086) all_382_2_1312 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					| Combining equations (2086,2085) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																			| (2090)  ~ (all_505_0_1795 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_505_2_1797 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_505_3_1798 & queue(all_505_3_1798) = all_505_1_1796 & elem(all_505_2_1797, all_505_1_1796) = all_505_0_1795
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (2090) yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| (2091) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_505_2_1797
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| (2092) queue(all_505_3_1798) = all_505_1_1796
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| (2093) elem(all_505_2_1797, all_505_1_1796) = all_505_0_1795
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| (2094) host(all_0_17_17) = all_505_3_1798
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| (2095)  ~ (all_505_0_1795 = 0)
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (47) with all_505_2_1797, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_505_2_1797, m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| (2096) all_505_2_1797 = all_0_0_0
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_505_3_1798, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_505_3_1798, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| (2097) all_505_3_1798 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_471_1_1660, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_471_1_1660, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| (2098) all_471_1_1660 = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| From (2096) and (2091) follows:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| (15) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| From (2097) and (2094) follows:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| (71) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| From (2097) and (2092) follows:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| (2101) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_505_1_1796
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| From (2098) and (2039) follows:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| (155) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| From (2096) and (2093) follows:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| (2103) elem(all_0_0_0, all_505_1_1796) = all_505_0_1795
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (292), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				| (2104) ( ~ (all_466_0_1639 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_466_2_1641 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_466_3_1642 & queue(all_466_3_1642) = all_466_1_1640 & elem(all_466_2_1641, all_466_1_1640) = all_466_0_1639) | ( ~ (all_466_0_1639 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_466_2_1641 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_466_3_1642 & queue(all_466_3_1642) = all_466_1_1640 & elem(all_466_2_1641, all_466_1_1640) = all_466_0_1639) | ( ~ (all_466_3_1642 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_466_3_1642)
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2104), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					| (2105) ( ~ (all_466_0_1639 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_466_2_1641 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_466_3_1642 & queue(all_466_3_1642) = all_466_1_1640 & elem(all_466_2_1641, all_466_1_1640) = all_466_0_1639) | ( ~ (all_466_0_1639 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_466_2_1641 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_466_3_1642 & queue(all_466_3_1642) = all_466_1_1640 & elem(all_466_2_1641, all_466_1_1640) = all_466_0_1639)
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2105), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						| (2106)  ~ (all_466_0_1639 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_466_2_1641 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_466_3_1642 & queue(all_466_3_1642) = all_466_1_1640 & elem(all_466_2_1641, all_466_1_1640) = all_466_0_1639
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (2106) yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| (2107) elem(all_466_2_1641, all_466_1_1640) = all_466_0_1639
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| (2108) host(all_0_17_17) = all_466_3_1642
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| (2109) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_466_2_1641
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| (2110) queue(all_466_3_1642) = all_466_1_1640
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| (2111)  ~ (all_466_0_1639 = 0)
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (47) with all_466_2_1641, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_466_2_1641, m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| (2112) all_466_2_1641 = all_0_0_0
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (10) with all_466_3_1642, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_466_3_1642, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| (2113) all_466_3_1642 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_505_1_1796, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_505_1_1796, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| (2114) all_505_1_1796 = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| From (2112) and (2109) follows:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| (15) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| From (2113) and (2108) follows:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| (71) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| From (2113) and (2110) follows:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| (2117) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_466_1_1640
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| From (2114) and (2101) follows:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| (155) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| From (2112) and (2107) follows:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| (2119) elem(all_0_0_0, all_466_1_1640) = all_466_0_1639
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| From (2114) and (2103) follows:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| (2120) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_505_0_1795
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (275), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							| (2121) (all_65_3_103 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_65_0_100 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_65_2_102 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_65_3_103 & queue(all_65_3_103) = all_65_1_101 & elem(all_65_2_102, all_65_1_101) = all_65_0_100) | ( ~ (all_65_2_102 = all_65_3_103) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_65_2_102 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_65_3_103)
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2121), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																								| (2122) (all_65_3_103 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_65_0_100 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_65_2_102 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_65_3_103 & queue(all_65_3_103) = all_65_1_101 & elem(all_65_2_102, all_65_1_101) = all_65_0_100)
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																								|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2122), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																									| (2123) all_65_3_103 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (2123) yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																										| (2124) all_65_3_103 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																										| (569) host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																										| From (305) and (569) follows:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																										| (570) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (281), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																										| (2127) ( ~ (all_248_0_799 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_248_2_801 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802 & queue(all_248_3_802) = all_248_1_800 & elem(all_248_2_801, all_248_1_800) = all_248_0_799) | ( ~ (all_248_0_799 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_248_2_801 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802 & queue(all_248_3_802) = all_248_1_800 & elem(all_248_2_801, all_248_1_800) = all_248_0_799) | ( ~ (all_248_3_802 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802)
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2127), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																											| (2128) ( ~ (all_248_0_799 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_248_2_801 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802 & queue(all_248_3_802) = all_248_1_800 & elem(all_248_2_801, all_248_1_800) = all_248_0_799) | ( ~ (all_248_0_799 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_248_2_801 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802 & queue(all_248_3_802) = all_248_1_800 & elem(all_248_2_801, all_248_1_800) = all_248_0_799)
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																											|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2128), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																												| (2129)  ~ (all_248_0_799 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_248_2_801 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802 & queue(all_248_3_802) = all_248_1_800 & elem(all_248_2_801, all_248_1_800) = all_248_0_799
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (2129) yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (2130)  ~ (all_248_0_799 = 0)
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (2131) host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (2132) elem(all_248_2_801, all_248_1_800) = all_248_0_799
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (2133) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_248_2_801
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (2134) queue(all_248_3_802) = all_248_1_800
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (10) with all_248_3_802, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (2135) all_248_3_802 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_248_3_802, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (2136) all_248_3_802 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| Combining equations (2136,2135) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																												| (2140)  ~ (all_248_0_799 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_248_2_801 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802 & queue(all_248_3_802) = all_248_1_800 & elem(all_248_2_801, all_248_1_800) = all_248_0_799
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (2140) yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (2130)  ~ (all_248_0_799 = 0)
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (2131) host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (2132) elem(all_248_2_801, all_248_1_800) = all_248_0_799
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (2144) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_248_2_801
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (2134) queue(all_248_3_802) = all_248_1_800
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (10) with all_248_3_802, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (2135) all_248_3_802 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_248_3_802, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (2136) all_248_3_802 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| Combining equations (2136,2135) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																											| (2151)  ~ (all_248_3_802 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																											|
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (2151) yields:
% 127.23/84.03  																																																																																																												| (2152)  ~ (all_248_3_802 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												| (2131) host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												| Instantiating formula (10) with all_248_3_802, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												| (2135) all_248_3_802 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_248_3_802, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_3_802, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												| (2136) all_248_3_802 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												| Combining equations (2135,2136) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (2158) host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_2_801 & ( ~ (all_248_2_801 = all_0_4_4) | (all_248_3_802 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4))
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (2158) yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											| (2159) host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_2_801
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											| (2160)  ~ (all_248_2_801 = all_0_4_4) | (all_248_3_802 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4)
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_248_2_801, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_2_801, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											| (2161) all_248_2_801 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_248_2_801, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_248_2_801, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											| (2162) all_248_2_801 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											| Combining equations (2161,2162) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																									| (2165)  ~ (all_65_0_100 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_65_2_102 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_65_3_103 & queue(all_65_3_103) = all_65_1_101 & elem(all_65_2_102, all_65_1_101) = all_65_0_100
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (2165) yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (2166) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_65_2_102
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (2167) host(all_0_7_7) = all_65_3_103
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (2168) queue(all_65_3_103) = all_65_1_101
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (2169)  ~ (all_65_0_100 = 0)
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (2170) elem(all_65_2_102, all_65_1_101) = all_65_0_100
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| From (305) and (2167) follows:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (2171) host(all_0_17_17) = all_65_3_103
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (47) with all_65_2_102, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_65_2_102, m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (2172) all_65_2_102 = all_0_0_0
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (10) with all_65_3_103, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_65_3_103, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (2173) all_65_3_103 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_466_1_1640, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_466_1_1640, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (2174) all_466_1_1640 = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14, all_505_0_1795, all_212_0_655 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_505_0_1795, elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_212_0_655, yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (2175) all_505_0_1795 = all_212_0_655
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| From (2172) and (2166) follows:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (15) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| From (2173) and (2171) follows:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (71) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| From (2173) and (2168) follows:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (2178) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_65_1_101
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| From (2174) and (2117) follows:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (155) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| From (2172) and (2170) follows:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (2180) elem(all_0_0_0, all_65_1_101) = all_65_0_100
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| From (2174) and (2119) follows:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (2181) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_466_0_1639
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| From (2175) and (2120) follows:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (1968) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_212_0_655
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (303), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										| (2183) (all_579_3_2090 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_579_0_2087 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_579_2_2089 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_579_3_2090 & queue(all_579_3_2090) = all_579_1_2088 & elem(all_579_2_2089, all_579_1_2088) = all_579_0_2087) | ( ~ (all_579_1_2088 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_579_3_2090 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_579_2_2089 & elem(all_579_3_2090, all_579_2_2089) = all_579_1_2088) | ( ~ (all_579_3_2090 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_579_3_2090)
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2183), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											| (2184) (all_579_3_2090 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_579_0_2087 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_579_2_2089 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_579_3_2090 & queue(all_579_3_2090) = all_579_1_2088 & elem(all_579_2_2089, all_579_1_2088) = all_579_0_2087) | ( ~ (all_579_1_2088 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_579_3_2090 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_579_2_2089 & elem(all_579_3_2090, all_579_2_2089) = all_579_1_2088)
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																											|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2184), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												| (2185) (all_579_3_2090 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4) | ( ~ (all_579_0_2087 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_579_2_2089 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_579_3_2090 & queue(all_579_3_2090) = all_579_1_2088 & elem(all_579_2_2089, all_579_1_2088) = all_579_0_2087)
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2185), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																													| (2186) all_579_3_2090 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (2186) yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																														| (2187) all_579_3_2090 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																														| (569) host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																														| From (305) and (569) follows:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																														| (570) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (286), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																														| (2046) ( ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310) | ( ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310) | ( ~ (all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313)
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2046), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																															| (2047) ( ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310) | ( ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310)
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2047), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																| (2048)  ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (2048) yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (2049) host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (2050) elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (2051) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_382_2_1312
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (2052)  ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0)
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (2053) queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| From (305) and (2049) follows:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (2054) host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_382_3_1313, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (2055) all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_382_3_1313, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (2056) all_382_3_1313 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| Combining equations (2056,2055) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																| (2060)  ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (2060) yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (2049) host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (2062) m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (2050) elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (2052)  ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0)
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (2053) queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| From (305) and (2049) follows:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (2054) host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_382_3_1313, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (2055) all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_382_3_1313, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (2056) all_382_3_1313 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| Combining equations (2056,2055) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																															| (2072)  ~ (all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (2072) yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																| (2073)  ~ (all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																| (2049) host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																| From (305) and (2049) follows:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																| (2054) host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (10) with all_382_3_1313, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																| (2055) all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_382_3_1313, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																| (2056) all_382_3_1313 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																| Combining equations (2056,2055) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																														| (2081) host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312 & ( ~ (all_382_2_1312 = all_0_4_4) | (all_382_3_1313 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (2081) yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																															| (2082) host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																															| (2083)  ~ (all_382_2_1312 = all_0_4_4) | (all_382_3_1313 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																															| From (305) and (2082) follows:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																															| (2084) host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_2_1312
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (10) with all_382_2_1312, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_2_1312, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																															| (2085) all_382_2_1312 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.04  																																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_382_2_1312, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_2_1312, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																															| (2086) all_382_2_1312 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																															| Combining equations (2086,2085) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																															| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																															| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																															| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																													| (2234)  ~ (all_579_0_2087 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_579_2_2089 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_579_3_2090 & queue(all_579_3_2090) = all_579_1_2088 & elem(all_579_2_2089, all_579_1_2088) = all_579_0_2087
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (2234) yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| (2235) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_579_2_2089
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| (2236) elem(all_579_2_2089, all_579_1_2088) = all_579_0_2087
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| (2237)  ~ (all_579_0_2087 = 0)
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| (2238) queue(all_579_3_2090) = all_579_1_2088
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| (2239) host(all_0_7_7) = all_579_3_2090
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| From (305) and (2239) follows:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| (2240) host(all_0_17_17) = all_579_3_2090
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| Instantiating formula (10) with all_579_3_2090, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_579_3_2090, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| (2241) all_579_3_2090 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_65_1_101, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_65_1_101, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| (2242) all_65_1_101 = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14, all_466_0_1639, all_212_0_655 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_466_0_1639, elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_212_0_655, yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| (2243) all_466_0_1639 = all_212_0_655
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| From (2241) and (2240) follows:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| (71) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| From (2241) and (2238) follows:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| (2245) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_579_1_2088
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| From (2242) and (2178) follows:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| (155) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| From (2242) and (2180) follows:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| (2247) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_65_0_100
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| From (2243) and (2181) follows:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| (1968) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_212_0_655
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (284), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														| (2249) ( ~ (all_314_0_1050 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_314_2_1052 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_314_3_1053 & queue(all_314_3_1053) = all_314_1_1051 & elem(all_314_2_1052, all_314_1_1051) = all_314_0_1050) | ( ~ (all_314_0_1050 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_314_2_1052 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_314_3_1053 & queue(all_314_3_1053) = all_314_1_1051 & elem(all_314_2_1052, all_314_1_1051) = all_314_0_1050) | ( ~ (all_314_3_1053 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_314_3_1053)
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2249), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																															| (2250) ( ~ (all_314_0_1050 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_314_2_1052 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_314_3_1053 & queue(all_314_3_1053) = all_314_1_1051 & elem(all_314_2_1052, all_314_1_1051) = all_314_0_1050) | ( ~ (all_314_0_1050 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_314_2_1052 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_314_3_1053 & queue(all_314_3_1053) = all_314_1_1051 & elem(all_314_2_1052, all_314_1_1051) = all_314_0_1050)
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2250), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																| (2251)  ~ (all_314_0_1050 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_314_2_1052 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_314_3_1053 & queue(all_314_3_1053) = all_314_1_1051 & elem(all_314_2_1052, all_314_1_1051) = all_314_0_1050
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (2251) yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| (2252)  ~ (all_314_0_1050 = 0)
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| (2253) queue(all_314_3_1053) = all_314_1_1051
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| (2254) elem(all_314_2_1052, all_314_1_1051) = all_314_0_1050
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| (2255) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_314_2_1052
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| (2256) host(all_0_7_7) = all_314_3_1053
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| From (305) and (2256) follows:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| (2257) host(all_0_17_17) = all_314_3_1053
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (47) with all_314_2_1052, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_314_2_1052, m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| (2258) all_314_2_1052 = all_0_0_0
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_314_3_1053, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_314_3_1053, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| (2259) all_314_3_1053 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_579_1_2088, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_579_1_2088, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| (2260) all_579_1_2088 = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14, all_65_0_100, all_212_0_655 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_212_0_655, elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_65_0_100, yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| (2261) all_212_0_655 = all_65_0_100
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| From (2258) and (2255) follows:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| (15) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| From (2259) and (2257) follows:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| (71) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| From (2259) and (2253) follows:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| (2264) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_314_1_1051
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| From (2260) and (2245) follows:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| (155) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| From (2258) and (2254) follows:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| (2266) elem(all_0_0_0, all_314_1_1051) = all_314_0_1050
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| From (2261) and (1968) follows:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| (2247) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_65_0_100
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (298), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	| (2268) ( ~ (all_518_0_1847 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_518_2_1849 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_518_3_1850 & queue(all_518_3_1850) = all_518_1_1848 & elem(all_518_2_1849, all_518_1_1848) = all_518_0_1847) | ( ~ (all_518_0_1847 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_518_2_1849 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_518_3_1850 & queue(all_518_3_1850) = all_518_1_1848 & elem(all_518_2_1849, all_518_1_1848) = all_518_0_1847) | ( ~ (all_518_3_1850 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_518_3_1850)
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2268), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																		| (2269) ( ~ (all_518_0_1847 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_518_2_1849 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_518_3_1850 & queue(all_518_3_1850) = all_518_1_1848 & elem(all_518_2_1849, all_518_1_1848) = all_518_0_1847) | ( ~ (all_518_0_1847 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_518_2_1849 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_518_3_1850 & queue(all_518_3_1850) = all_518_1_1848 & elem(all_518_2_1849, all_518_1_1848) = all_518_0_1847)
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																		|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2269), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																			| (2270)  ~ (all_518_0_1847 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_518_2_1849 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_518_3_1850 & queue(all_518_3_1850) = all_518_1_1848 & elem(all_518_2_1849, all_518_1_1848) = all_518_0_1847
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (2270) yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| (2271) queue(all_518_3_1850) = all_518_1_1848
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| (2272) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_518_2_1849
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| (2273) elem(all_518_2_1849, all_518_1_1848) = all_518_0_1847
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| (2274) host(all_0_17_17) = all_518_3_1850
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| (2275)  ~ (all_518_0_1847 = 0)
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_518_3_1850, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_518_3_1850, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| (2276) all_518_3_1850 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_314_1_1051, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_314_1_1051, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| (2277) all_314_1_1051 = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| From (2276) and (2274) follows:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| (71) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| From (2276) and (2271) follows:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| (2279) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_518_1_1848
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| From (2277) and (2264) follows:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| (155) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| From (2277) and (2266) follows:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| (2281) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_314_0_1050
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (295), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				| (2282) ( ~ (all_488_0_1727 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_488_2_1729 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_488_3_1730 & queue(all_488_3_1730) = all_488_1_1728 & elem(all_488_2_1729, all_488_1_1728) = all_488_0_1727) | ( ~ (all_488_0_1727 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_488_2_1729 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_488_3_1730 & queue(all_488_3_1730) = all_488_1_1728 & elem(all_488_2_1729, all_488_1_1728) = all_488_0_1727) | ( ~ (all_488_3_1730 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_488_3_1730)
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2282), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																					| (2283) ( ~ (all_488_0_1727 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_488_2_1729 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_488_3_1730 & queue(all_488_3_1730) = all_488_1_1728 & elem(all_488_2_1729, all_488_1_1728) = all_488_0_1727) | ( ~ (all_488_0_1727 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_488_2_1729 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_488_3_1730 & queue(all_488_3_1730) = all_488_1_1728 & elem(all_488_2_1729, all_488_1_1728) = all_488_0_1727)
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2283), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																						| (2284)  ~ (all_488_0_1727 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_488_2_1729 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_488_3_1730 & queue(all_488_3_1730) = all_488_1_1728 & elem(all_488_2_1729, all_488_1_1728) = all_488_0_1727
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (2284) yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																							| (2285) host(all_0_17_17) = all_488_3_1730
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																							| (2286) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_488_2_1729
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																							| (2287) queue(all_488_3_1730) = all_488_1_1728
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																							| (2288)  ~ (all_488_0_1727 = 0)
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																							| (2289) elem(all_488_2_1729, all_488_1_1728) = all_488_0_1727
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (47) with all_488_2_1729, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_488_2_1729, m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																							| (2290) all_488_2_1729 = all_0_0_0
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (10) with all_488_3_1730, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_488_3_1730, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																							| (2291) all_488_3_1730 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_518_1_1848, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_518_1_1848, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																							| (2292) all_518_1_1848 = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14, all_314_0_1050, all_65_0_100 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_314_0_1050, elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_65_0_100, yields:
% 127.23/84.05  																																																																																																																							| (2293) all_314_0_1050 = all_65_0_100
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							| From (2290) and (2286) follows:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							| (15) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							| From (2291) and (2285) follows:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							| (71) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							| From (2291) and (2287) follows:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							| (2296) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_488_1_1728
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							| From (2292) and (2279) follows:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							| (155) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							| From (2290) and (2289) follows:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							| (2298) elem(all_0_0_0, all_488_1_1728) = all_488_0_1727
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							| From (2293) and (2281) follows:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							| (2247) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_65_0_100
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (285), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							| (2300) ( ~ (all_377_0_1290 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_377_2_1292 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_377_3_1293 & queue(all_377_3_1293) = all_377_1_1291 & elem(all_377_2_1292, all_377_1_1291) = all_377_0_1290) | ( ~ (all_377_0_1290 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_377_2_1292 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_377_3_1293 & queue(all_377_3_1293) = all_377_1_1291 & elem(all_377_2_1292, all_377_1_1291) = all_377_0_1290) | ( ~ (all_377_3_1293 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_377_3_1293)
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2300), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																								| (2301) ( ~ (all_377_0_1290 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_377_2_1292 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_377_3_1293 & queue(all_377_3_1293) = all_377_1_1291 & elem(all_377_2_1292, all_377_1_1291) = all_377_0_1290) | ( ~ (all_377_0_1290 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_377_2_1292 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_377_3_1293 & queue(all_377_3_1293) = all_377_1_1291 & elem(all_377_2_1292, all_377_1_1291) = all_377_0_1290)
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																								|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2301), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																									| (2302)  ~ (all_377_0_1290 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_377_2_1292 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_377_3_1293 & queue(all_377_3_1293) = all_377_1_1291 & elem(all_377_2_1292, all_377_1_1291) = all_377_0_1290
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (2302) yields:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| (2303) elem(all_377_2_1292, all_377_1_1291) = all_377_0_1290
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| (2304)  ~ (all_377_0_1290 = 0)
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| (2305) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_377_2_1292
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| (2306) queue(all_377_3_1293) = all_377_1_1291
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| (2307) host(all_0_7_7) = all_377_3_1293
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| From (305) and (2307) follows:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| (2308) host(all_0_17_17) = all_377_3_1293
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (10) with all_377_3_1293, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_377_3_1293, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| (2309) all_377_3_1293 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_488_1_1728, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_488_1_1728, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| (2310) all_488_1_1728 = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| From (2309) and (2308) follows:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| (71) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| From (2309) and (2306) follows:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| (2312) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_377_1_1291
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| From (2310) and (2296) follows:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| (155) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| From (2310) and (2298) follows:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| (2314) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_488_0_1727
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (302), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										| (2315) ( ~ (all_556_0_1996 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_556_2_1998 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_556_3_1999 & queue(all_556_3_1999) = all_556_1_1997 & elem(all_556_2_1998, all_556_1_1997) = all_556_0_1996) | ( ~ (all_556_0_1996 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_556_2_1998 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_556_3_1999 & queue(all_556_3_1999) = all_556_1_1997 & elem(all_556_2_1998, all_556_1_1997) = all_556_0_1996) | ( ~ (all_556_3_1999 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_556_3_1999)
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2315), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																											| (2316) ( ~ (all_556_0_1996 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_556_2_1998 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_556_3_1999 & queue(all_556_3_1999) = all_556_1_1997 & elem(all_556_2_1998, all_556_1_1997) = all_556_0_1996) | ( ~ (all_556_0_1996 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_556_2_1998 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_556_3_1999 & queue(all_556_3_1999) = all_556_1_1997 & elem(all_556_2_1998, all_556_1_1997) = all_556_0_1996)
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																											|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2316), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																												| (2317)  ~ (all_556_0_1996 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_556_2_1998 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_556_3_1999 & queue(all_556_3_1999) = all_556_1_1997 & elem(all_556_2_1998, all_556_1_1997) = all_556_0_1996
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (2317) yields:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2318) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_556_2_1998
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2319) queue(all_556_3_1999) = all_556_1_1997
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2320) host(all_0_7_7) = all_556_3_1999
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2321) elem(all_556_2_1998, all_556_1_1997) = all_556_0_1996
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2322)  ~ (all_556_0_1996 = 0)
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| From (305) and (2320) follows:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2323) host(all_0_17_17) = all_556_3_1999
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (47) with all_556_2_1998, all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_556_2_1998, m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2324) all_556_2_1998 = all_0_0_0
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (10) with all_556_3_1999, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_556_3_1999, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2325) all_556_3_1999 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_377_1_1291, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_377_1_1291, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2326) all_377_1_1291 = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14, all_488_0_1727, all_65_0_100 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_488_0_1727, elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_65_0_100, yields:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2327) all_488_0_1727 = all_65_0_100
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| From (2325) and (2319) follows:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2328) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_556_1_1997
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| From (2326) and (2312) follows:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (155) queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| From (2324) and (2321) follows:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2330) elem(all_0_0_0, all_556_1_1997) = all_556_0_1996
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| From (2327) and (2314) follows:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2247) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_65_0_100
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_15_15, all_556_1_1997, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_15_15) = all_556_1_1997, queue(all_0_15_15) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2332) all_556_1_1997 = all_0_14_14
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| From (2332) and (2330) follows:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2333) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_556_0_1996
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14, all_556_0_1996, all_65_0_100 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_556_0_1996, elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_65_0_100, yields:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2334) all_556_0_1996 = all_65_0_100
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| Equations (2334) can reduce 2322 to:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2169)  ~ (all_65_0_100 = 0)
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| From (2334) and (2333) follows:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2247) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_65_0_100
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (62) with all_65_0_100, all_0_14_14, all_0_18_18, all_0_13_13, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms cons(all_0_13_13, all_0_18_18) = all_0_14_14, elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_14_14) = all_65_0_100, yields:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2337) all_65_0_100 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_18_18) = v0)
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2337), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2338) all_65_0_100 = 0
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																														| Equations (2338) can reduce 2169 to:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																														| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2169)  ~ (all_65_0_100 = 0)
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2341)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_18_18) = v0)
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																														| Instantiating (2341) with all_1094_0_4508 yields:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																														| (2342)  ~ (all_1094_0_4508 = 0) & elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_18_18) = all_1094_0_4508
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (2342) yields:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																														| (2343)  ~ (all_1094_0_4508 = 0)
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																														| (2344) elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_18_18) = all_1094_0_4508
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																														| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_0_0, all_0_18_18, all_1094_0_4508, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_18_18) = all_1094_0_4508, elem(all_0_0_0, all_0_18_18) = 0, yields:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																														| (2345) all_1094_0_4508 = 0
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																														| Equations (2345) can reduce 2343 to:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																														| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																												| (2347)  ~ (all_556_0_1996 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_556_2_1998 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_556_3_1999 & queue(all_556_3_1999) = all_556_1_1997 & elem(all_556_2_1998, all_556_1_1997) = all_556_0_1996
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (2347) yields:
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2319) queue(all_556_3_1999) = all_556_1_1997
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2321) elem(all_556_2_1998, all_556_1_1997) = all_556_0_1996
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2350) host(all_0_5_5) = all_556_3_1999
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2322)  ~ (all_556_0_1996 = 0)
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| (2352) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_556_2_1998
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.06  																																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (47) with all_556_2_1998, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_556_2_1998, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| (2353) all_556_2_1998 = all_0_3_3
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (10) with all_556_3_1999, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_556_3_1999, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| (2354) all_556_3_1999 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| From (2354) and (2319) follows:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| (2355) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_556_1_1997
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| From (2353) and (2321) follows:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| (2356) elem(all_0_3_3, all_556_1_1997) = all_556_0_1996
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_556_1_1997, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_556_1_1997, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| (2357) all_556_1_1997 = all_0_2_2
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| From (2357) and (2356) follows:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| (2358) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_556_0_1996
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_556_0_1996, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_556_0_1996, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| (2359) all_556_0_1996 = 0
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| Equations (2359) can reduce 2322 to:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																											| (2361)  ~ (all_556_3_1999 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_556_3_1999
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																											|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (2361) yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| (2362)  ~ (all_556_3_1999 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| (2320) host(all_0_7_7) = all_556_3_1999
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| From (305) and (2320) follows:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| (2323) host(all_0_17_17) = all_556_3_1999
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| Instantiating formula (10) with all_556_3_1999, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_556_3_1999, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| (2325) all_556_3_1999 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| Equations (2325) can reduce 2362 to:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																										| (2367) host(all_0_5_5) = all_556_2_1998 & ( ~ (all_556_2_1998 = all_0_4_4) | (all_556_3_1999 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (2367) yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																											| (2368) host(all_0_5_5) = all_556_2_1998
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																											| (2369)  ~ (all_556_2_1998 = all_0_4_4) | (all_556_3_1999 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																											|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2369), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																											| (2370)  ~ (all_556_2_1998 = all_0_4_4)
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																											|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| Instantiating formula (10) with all_556_2_1998, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_556_2_1998, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| (2371) all_556_2_1998 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| Equations (2371) can reduce 2370 to:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																											| (2371) all_556_2_1998 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																											| (2374) all_556_3_1999 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																											|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (2374) yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| (2354) all_556_3_1999 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| (569) host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| From (305) and (569) follows:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| (570) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (286), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| (2046) ( ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310) | ( ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310) | ( ~ (all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313)
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2046), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| (2047) ( ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310) | ( ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310)
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2047), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														| (2048)  ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (2048) yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (2049) host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (2050) elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (2051) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_382_2_1312
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (2052)  ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0)
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (2053) queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| From (305) and (2049) follows:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (2054) host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (10) with all_382_3_1313, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (2055) all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_382_3_1313, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (2056) all_382_3_1313 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| Combining equations (2056,2055) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														| (2060)  ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313 & queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311 & elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (2060) yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (2049) host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (2062) m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (2050) elem(all_382_2_1312, all_382_1_1311) = all_382_0_1310
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (2052)  ~ (all_382_0_1310 = 0)
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (2053) queue(all_382_3_1313) = all_382_1_1311
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| From (305) and (2049) follows:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (2054) host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (10) with all_382_3_1313, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (2055) all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_382_3_1313, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (2056) all_382_3_1313 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| Combining equations (2056,2055) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| (2072)  ~ (all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (2072) yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														| (2073)  ~ (all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														| (2049) host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														| From (305) and (2049) follows:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														| (2054) host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														| Instantiating formula (10) with all_382_3_1313, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														| (2055) all_382_3_1313 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_382_3_1313, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_3_1313, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														| (2056) all_382_3_1313 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														| Combining equations (2056,2055) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												| (2081) host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312 & ( ~ (all_382_2_1312 = all_0_4_4) | (all_382_3_1313 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																												|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (2081) yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| (2082) host(all_0_7_7) = all_382_2_1312
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| (2083)  ~ (all_382_2_1312 = all_0_4_4) | (all_382_3_1313 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| From (305) and (2082) follows:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| (2084) host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_2_1312
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (10) with all_382_2_1312, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_2_1312, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| (2085) all_382_2_1312 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_382_2_1312, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_382_2_1312, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| (2086) all_382_2_1312 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| Combining equations (2086,2085) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																									| (2422)  ~ (all_377_0_1290 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_377_2_1292 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_377_3_1293 & queue(all_377_3_1293) = all_377_1_1291 & elem(all_377_2_1292, all_377_1_1291) = all_377_0_1290
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (2422) yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																										| (2303) elem(all_377_2_1292, all_377_1_1291) = all_377_0_1290
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																										| (2424) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_377_2_1292
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																										| (2304)  ~ (all_377_0_1290 = 0)
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																										| (2306) queue(all_377_3_1293) = all_377_1_1291
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																										| (2427) host(all_0_5_5) = all_377_3_1293
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (47) with all_377_2_1292, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_377_2_1292, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																										| (2428) all_377_2_1292 = all_0_3_3
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (10) with all_377_3_1293, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_377_3_1293, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																										| (2429) all_377_3_1293 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																										| From (2429) and (2306) follows:
% 127.23/84.07  																																																																																																																										| (2430) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_377_1_1291
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																										| From (2428) and (2303) follows:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																										| (2431) elem(all_0_3_3, all_377_1_1291) = all_377_0_1290
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_377_1_1291, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_377_1_1291, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																										| (2432) all_377_1_1291 = all_0_2_2
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																										| From (2432) and (2431) follows:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																										| (2433) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_377_0_1290
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_377_0_1290, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_377_0_1290, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																										| (2434) all_377_0_1290 = 0
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																										| Equations (2434) can reduce 2304 to:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																										| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																										|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																								| (2436)  ~ (all_377_3_1293 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_377_3_1293
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																								|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (2436) yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									| (2437)  ~ (all_377_3_1293 = all_0_4_4)
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									| (2427) host(all_0_5_5) = all_377_3_1293
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (10) with all_377_3_1293, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_377_3_1293, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									| (2429) all_377_3_1293 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									| Equations (2429) can reduce 2437 to:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| (2441) host(all_0_7_7) = all_377_2_1292 & ( ~ (all_377_2_1292 = all_0_15_15) | (all_377_3_1293 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15))
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (2441) yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																								| (2442) host(all_0_7_7) = all_377_2_1292
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																								| (2443)  ~ (all_377_2_1292 = all_0_15_15) | (all_377_3_1293 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15)
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																								|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																								| From (305) and (2442) follows:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																								| (2444) host(all_0_17_17) = all_377_2_1292
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																								|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2443), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																								| (2445)  ~ (all_377_2_1292 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																								|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (10) with all_377_2_1292, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_377_2_1292, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									| (2446) all_377_2_1292 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									| Equations (2446) can reduce 2445 to:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																								| (2446) all_377_2_1292 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																								| (2449) all_377_3_1293 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																								|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (2449) yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									| (2309) all_377_3_1293 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									| (318) host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| (2454)  ~ (all_488_0_1727 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_488_2_1729 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_488_3_1730 & queue(all_488_3_1730) = all_488_1_1728 & elem(all_488_2_1729, all_488_1_1728) = all_488_0_1727
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (2454) yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| (2287) queue(all_488_3_1730) = all_488_1_1728
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| (2456) host(all_0_5_5) = all_488_3_1730
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| (2288)  ~ (all_488_0_1727 = 0)
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| (2289) elem(all_488_2_1729, all_488_1_1728) = all_488_0_1727
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| (2459) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_488_2_1729
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (47) with all_488_2_1729, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_488_2_1729, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| (2460) all_488_2_1729 = all_0_3_3
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (10) with all_488_3_1730, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_488_3_1730, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| (2461) all_488_3_1730 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| From (2461) and (2287) follows:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| (2462) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_488_1_1728
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| From (2460) and (2289) follows:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| (2463) elem(all_0_3_3, all_488_1_1728) = all_488_0_1727
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_488_1_1728, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_488_1_1728, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| (2464) all_488_1_1728 = all_0_2_2
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| From (2464) and (2463) follows:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| (2465) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_488_0_1727
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_488_0_1727, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_488_0_1727, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| (2466) all_488_0_1727 = 0
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| Equations (2466) can reduce 2288 to:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																					| (2468)  ~ (all_488_3_1730 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_488_3_1730
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (2468) yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| (2469)  ~ (all_488_3_1730 = all_0_4_4)
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| (2456) host(all_0_5_5) = all_488_3_1730
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (10) with all_488_3_1730, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_488_3_1730, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| (2461) all_488_3_1730 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| Equations (2461) can reduce 2469 to:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| (2473) host(all_0_17_17) = all_488_2_1729 & ( ~ (all_488_2_1729 = all_0_15_15) | (all_488_3_1730 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15))
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (2473) yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																					| (2474) host(all_0_17_17) = all_488_2_1729
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																					| (2475)  ~ (all_488_2_1729 = all_0_15_15) | (all_488_3_1730 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15)
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2475), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																					| (2476)  ~ (all_488_2_1729 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (10) with all_488_2_1729, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_488_2_1729, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| (2477) all_488_2_1729 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| Equations (2477) can reduce 2476 to:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																					| (2477) all_488_2_1729 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																					| (2480) all_488_3_1730 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (2480) yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| (2291) all_488_3_1730 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| (318) host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																			| (2485)  ~ (all_518_0_1847 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_518_2_1849 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_518_3_1850 & queue(all_518_3_1850) = all_518_1_1848 & elem(all_518_2_1849, all_518_1_1848) = all_518_0_1847
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (2485) yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| (2271) queue(all_518_3_1850) = all_518_1_1848
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| (2273) elem(all_518_2_1849, all_518_1_1848) = all_518_0_1847
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| (2275)  ~ (all_518_0_1847 = 0)
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| (2489) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_518_2_1849
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| (2490) host(all_0_5_5) = all_518_3_1850
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (47) with all_518_2_1849, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_518_2_1849, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| (2491) all_518_2_1849 = all_0_3_3
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_518_3_1850, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_518_3_1850, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| (2492) all_518_3_1850 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| From (2492) and (2271) follows:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| (2493) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_518_1_1848
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| From (2491) and (2273) follows:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| (2494) elem(all_0_3_3, all_518_1_1848) = all_518_0_1847
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_518_1_1848, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_518_1_1848, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| (2495) all_518_1_1848 = all_0_2_2
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| From (2495) and (2494) follows:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| (2496) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_518_0_1847
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_518_0_1847, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_518_0_1847, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| (2497) all_518_0_1847 = 0
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| Equations (2497) can reduce 2275 to:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																		| (2499)  ~ (all_518_3_1850 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_518_3_1850
% 127.23/84.08  																																																																																																																		|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (2499) yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			| (2500)  ~ (all_518_3_1850 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			| (2274) host(all_0_17_17) = all_518_3_1850
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (10) with all_518_3_1850, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_518_3_1850, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			| (2276) all_518_3_1850 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			| Equations (2276) can reduce 2500 to:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| (2504) host(all_0_5_5) = all_518_2_1849 & ( ~ (all_518_2_1849 = all_0_4_4) | (all_518_3_1850 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4))
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (2504) yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																		| (2505) host(all_0_5_5) = all_518_2_1849
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																		| (2506)  ~ (all_518_2_1849 = all_0_4_4) | (all_518_3_1850 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4)
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																		|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2506), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																		| (2507)  ~ (all_518_2_1849 = all_0_4_4)
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																		|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (10) with all_518_2_1849, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_518_2_1849, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			| (2508) all_518_2_1849 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			| Equations (2508) can reduce 2507 to:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																		| (2508) all_518_2_1849 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																		| (2511) all_518_3_1850 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																		|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (2511) yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			| (2492) all_518_3_1850 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			| (570) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (279), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			| (2514) ( ~ (all_188_0_566 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_188_2_568 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_188_3_569 & queue(all_188_3_569) = all_188_1_567 & elem(all_188_2_568, all_188_1_567) = all_188_0_566) | ( ~ (all_188_0_566 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = all_188_2_568 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_188_3_569 & queue(all_188_3_569) = all_188_1_567 & elem(all_188_2_568, all_188_1_567) = all_188_0_566) | ( ~ (all_188_3_569 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_188_3_569)
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2514), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				| (2515) ( ~ (all_188_0_566 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_188_2_568 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_188_3_569 & queue(all_188_3_569) = all_188_1_567 & elem(all_188_2_568, all_188_1_567) = all_188_0_566) | ( ~ (all_188_0_566 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = all_188_2_568 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_188_3_569 & queue(all_188_3_569) = all_188_1_567 & elem(all_188_2_568, all_188_1_567) = all_188_0_566)
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2515), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					| (2516)  ~ (all_188_0_566 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_188_2_568 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_188_3_569 & queue(all_188_3_569) = all_188_1_567 & elem(all_188_2_568, all_188_1_567) = all_188_0_566
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (2516) yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (2517) host(all_0_7_7) = all_188_3_569
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (2518) queue(all_188_3_569) = all_188_1_567
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (2519)  ~ (all_188_0_566 = 0)
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (2520) elem(all_188_2_568, all_188_1_567) = all_188_0_566
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (2521) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_188_2_568
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| From (305) and (2517) follows:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (2522) host(all_0_17_17) = all_188_3_569
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (10) with all_188_3_569, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_188_3_569, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (2523) all_188_3_569 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_188_3_569, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_188_3_569, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (2524) all_188_3_569 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| Combining equations (2524,2523) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					| (2528)  ~ (all_188_0_566 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_17_17) = all_188_2_568 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_188_3_569 & queue(all_188_3_569) = all_188_1_567 & elem(all_188_2_568, all_188_1_567) = all_188_0_566
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (2528) yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (2518) queue(all_188_3_569) = all_188_1_567
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (2519)  ~ (all_188_0_566 = 0)
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (2522) host(all_0_17_17) = all_188_3_569
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (2532) m_Down(all_0_17_17) = all_188_2_568
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (2520) elem(all_188_2_568, all_188_1_567) = all_188_0_566
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (10) with all_188_3_569, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_188_3_569, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (2523) all_188_3_569 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_188_3_569, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_188_3_569, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (2524) all_188_3_569 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| Combining equations (2523,2524) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				| (2538)  ~ (all_188_3_569 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_188_3_569
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (2538) yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					| (2539)  ~ (all_188_3_569 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					| (2517) host(all_0_7_7) = all_188_3_569
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					| From (305) and (2517) follows:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					| (2522) host(all_0_17_17) = all_188_3_569
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					| Instantiating formula (10) with all_188_3_569, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_188_3_569, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					| (2523) all_188_3_569 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_188_3_569, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_188_3_569, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					| (2524) all_188_3_569 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					| Combining equations (2523,2524) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			| (2546) host(all_0_17_17) = all_188_2_568 & ( ~ (all_188_2_568 = all_0_4_4) | (all_188_3_569 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																			|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (2546) yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				| (2547) host(all_0_17_17) = all_188_2_568
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				| (2548)  ~ (all_188_2_568 = all_0_4_4) | (all_188_3_569 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_188_2_568, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_188_2_568, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				| (2549) all_188_2_568 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_188_2_568, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_188_2_568, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				| (2550) all_188_2_568 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				| Combining equations (2549,2550) yields a new equation:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																| (2553)  ~ (all_314_0_1050 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_314_2_1052 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_314_3_1053 & queue(all_314_3_1053) = all_314_1_1051 & elem(all_314_2_1052, all_314_1_1051) = all_314_0_1050
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (2553) yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| (2252)  ~ (all_314_0_1050 = 0)
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| (2253) queue(all_314_3_1053) = all_314_1_1051
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| (2556) host(all_0_5_5) = all_314_3_1053
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| (2557) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_314_2_1052
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| (2254) elem(all_314_2_1052, all_314_1_1051) = all_314_0_1050
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (47) with all_314_2_1052, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_314_2_1052, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| (2559) all_314_2_1052 = all_0_3_3
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_314_3_1053, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_314_3_1053, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| (2560) all_314_3_1053 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| From (2560) and (2253) follows:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| (2561) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_314_1_1051
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| From (2559) and (2254) follows:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| (2562) elem(all_0_3_3, all_314_1_1051) = all_314_0_1050
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_314_1_1051, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_314_1_1051, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| (2563) all_314_1_1051 = all_0_2_2
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| From (2563) and (2562) follows:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| (2564) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_314_0_1050
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_314_0_1050, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_314_0_1050, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| (2565) all_314_0_1050 = 0
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| Equations (2565) can reduce 2252 to:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																															| (2567)  ~ (all_314_3_1053 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_314_3_1053
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (2567) yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																| (2568)  ~ (all_314_3_1053 = all_0_4_4)
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																| (2556) host(all_0_5_5) = all_314_3_1053
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (10) with all_314_3_1053, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_314_3_1053, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																| (2560) all_314_3_1053 = all_0_4_4
% 127.23/84.09  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																| Equations (2560) can reduce 2568 to:
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																														| (2572) host(all_0_7_7) = all_314_2_1052 & ( ~ (all_314_2_1052 = all_0_15_15) | (all_314_3_1053 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15))
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																														|
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (2572) yields:
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																															| (2573) host(all_0_7_7) = all_314_2_1052
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																															| (2574)  ~ (all_314_2_1052 = all_0_15_15) | (all_314_3_1053 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15)
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																															| From (305) and (2573) follows:
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																															| (2575) host(all_0_17_17) = all_314_2_1052
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2574), into two cases.
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																															| (2576)  ~ (all_314_2_1052 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (10) with all_314_2_1052, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_314_2_1052, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																| (2577) all_314_2_1052 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																| Equations (2577) can reduce 2576 to:
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																															| (2577) all_314_2_1052 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																															| (2580) all_314_3_1053 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																															|
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (2580) yields:
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																| (2259) all_314_3_1053 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																| (318) host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																| (309) $false
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																|
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																												| (2585)  ~ (all_579_1_2088 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_579_3_2090 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_579_2_2089 & elem(all_579_3_2090, all_579_2_2089) = all_579_1_2088
% 127.23/84.10  																																																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (2585) yields:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													| (2586)  ~ (all_579_1_2088 = 0)
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													| (2587) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_579_3_2090
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													| (2588) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_579_2_2089
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													| (2589) elem(all_579_3_2090, all_579_2_2089) = all_579_1_2088
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (47) with all_579_3_2090, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_579_3_2090, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													| (2590) all_579_3_2090 = all_0_3_3
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_579_2_2089, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_579_2_2089, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													| (2591) all_579_2_2089 = all_0_2_2
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													| From (2590)(2591) and (2589) follows:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													| (2592) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_579_1_2088
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_579_1_2088, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_579_1_2088, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													| (2593) all_579_1_2088 = 0
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													| Equations (2593) can reduce 2586 to:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																											| (2595)  ~ (all_579_3_2090 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_579_3_2090
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																											|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (2595) yields:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																												| (2596)  ~ (all_579_3_2090 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																												| (2239) host(all_0_7_7) = all_579_3_2090
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																												| From (305) and (2239) follows:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																												| (2240) host(all_0_17_17) = all_579_3_2090
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																												| Instantiating formula (10) with all_579_3_2090, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_579_3_2090, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																												| (2241) all_579_3_2090 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																												| Equations (2241) can reduce 2596 to:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																												| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																										| (2601)  ~ (all_579_3_2090 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_579_3_2090
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																										|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (2601) yields:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																											| (2602)  ~ (all_579_3_2090 = 0)
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																											| (2603) setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_579_3_2090
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																											|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																											| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_5_5, alive, all_579_3_2090, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_579_3_2090, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																											| (2604) all_579_3_2090 = 0
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																											|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																											| Equations (2604) can reduce 2602 to:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																											| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																											|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																								| (2606)  ~ (all_65_2_102 = all_65_3_103) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_65_2_102 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_65_3_103
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																								|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (2606) yields:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																									| (2607)  ~ (all_65_2_102 = all_65_3_103)
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																									| (2608) host(all_0_6_6) = all_65_2_102
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																									| (2167) host(all_0_7_7) = all_65_3_103
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																									| From (305) and (2167) follows:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																									| (2171) host(all_0_17_17) = all_65_3_103
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (10) with all_65_2_102, all_0_15_15, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms host(all_0_6_6) = all_65_2_102, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																									| (2611) all_65_2_102 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (10) with all_65_3_103, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_65_3_103, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																									| (2173) all_65_3_103 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																									| Equations (2611,2173) can reduce 2607 to:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																									| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| (2614)  ~ (all_65_3_103 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_65_3_103
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (2614) yields:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																								| (2615)  ~ (all_65_3_103 = 0)
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																								| (2616) setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_65_3_103
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																								|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																								| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_5_5, alive, all_65_3_103, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_65_3_103, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																								| (2617) all_65_3_103 = 0
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																								|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																								| Equations (2617) can reduce 2615 to:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																								| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																								|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																						| (2619)  ~ (all_466_0_1639 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_466_2_1641 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_466_3_1642 & queue(all_466_3_1642) = all_466_1_1640 & elem(all_466_2_1641, all_466_1_1640) = all_466_0_1639
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																						|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (2619) yields:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| (2107) elem(all_466_2_1641, all_466_1_1640) = all_466_0_1639
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| (2621) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_466_2_1641
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| (2622) host(all_0_5_5) = all_466_3_1642
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| (2110) queue(all_466_3_1642) = all_466_1_1640
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| (2111)  ~ (all_466_0_1639 = 0)
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (47) with all_466_2_1641, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_466_2_1641, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| (2625) all_466_2_1641 = all_0_3_3
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (10) with all_466_3_1642, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_466_3_1642, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| (2626) all_466_3_1642 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| From (2626) and (2110) follows:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| (2627) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_466_1_1640
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| From (2625) and (2107) follows:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| (2628) elem(all_0_3_3, all_466_1_1640) = all_466_0_1639
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_466_1_1640, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_466_1_1640, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| (2629) all_466_1_1640 = all_0_2_2
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| From (2629) and (2628) follows:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| (2630) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_466_0_1639
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_466_0_1639, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_466_0_1639, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| (2631) all_466_0_1639 = 0
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| Equations (2631) can reduce 2111 to:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																					| (2633)  ~ (all_466_3_1642 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_466_3_1642
% 127.61/84.10  																																																																																																					|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (2633) yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						| (2634)  ~ (all_466_3_1642 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						| (2108) host(all_0_17_17) = all_466_3_1642
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (10) with all_466_3_1642, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_466_3_1642, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						| (2113) all_466_3_1642 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						| Equations (2113) can reduce 2634 to:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																				| (2638) host(all_0_5_5) = all_466_2_1641 & ( ~ (all_466_2_1641 = all_0_4_4) | (all_466_3_1642 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4))
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																				|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (2638) yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																					| (2639) host(all_0_5_5) = all_466_2_1641
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																					| (2640)  ~ (all_466_2_1641 = all_0_4_4) | (all_466_3_1642 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4)
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																					|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2640), into two cases.
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																					| (2641)  ~ (all_466_2_1641 = all_0_4_4)
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																					|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (10) with all_466_2_1641, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_466_2_1641, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						| (2642) all_466_2_1641 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						| Equations (2642) can reduce 2641 to:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																					| (2642) all_466_2_1641 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																					| (2645) all_466_3_1642 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																					|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (2645) yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						| (2626) all_466_3_1642 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						| (570) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (299), into two cases.
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						| (2648) ( ~ (all_519_0_1851 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_519_2_1853 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854 & queue(all_519_3_1854) = all_519_1_1852 & elem(all_519_2_1853, all_519_1_1852) = all_519_0_1851) | ( ~ (all_519_0_1851 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_519_2_1853 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854 & queue(all_519_3_1854) = all_519_1_1852 & elem(all_519_2_1853, all_519_1_1852) = all_519_0_1851) | ( ~ (all_519_3_1854 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854)
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2648), into two cases.
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							| (2649) ( ~ (all_519_0_1851 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_519_2_1853 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854 & queue(all_519_3_1854) = all_519_1_1852 & elem(all_519_2_1853, all_519_1_1852) = all_519_0_1851) | ( ~ (all_519_0_1851 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_519_2_1853 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854 & queue(all_519_3_1854) = all_519_1_1852 & elem(all_519_2_1853, all_519_1_1852) = all_519_0_1851)
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2649), into two cases.
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								| (2650)  ~ (all_519_0_1851 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_519_2_1853 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854 & queue(all_519_3_1854) = all_519_1_1852 & elem(all_519_2_1853, all_519_1_1852) = all_519_0_1851
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (2650) yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| (2651) elem(all_519_2_1853, all_519_1_1852) = all_519_0_1851
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| (2652) queue(all_519_3_1854) = all_519_1_1852
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| (2653) host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| (2654)  ~ (all_519_0_1851 = 0)
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| (2655) m_Down(all_0_1_1) = all_519_2_1853
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (10) with all_519_3_1854, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| (2656) all_519_3_1854 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_519_3_1854, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| (2657) all_519_3_1854 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| Combining equations (2656,2657) yields a new equation:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								| (2660)  ~ (all_519_0_1851 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_519_2_1853 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854 & queue(all_519_3_1854) = all_519_1_1852 & elem(all_519_2_1853, all_519_1_1852) = all_519_0_1851
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (2660) yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| (2651) elem(all_519_2_1853, all_519_1_1852) = all_519_0_1851
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| (2652) queue(all_519_3_1854) = all_519_1_1852
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| (2653) host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| (2654)  ~ (all_519_0_1851 = 0)
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| (2665) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_519_2_1853
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (10) with all_519_3_1854, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| (2656) all_519_3_1854 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_519_3_1854, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| (2657) all_519_3_1854 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| Combining equations (2656,2657) yields a new equation:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							| (2670)  ~ (all_519_3_1854 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (2670) yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								| (2671)  ~ (all_519_3_1854 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								| (2653) host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								| Instantiating formula (10) with all_519_3_1854, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								| (2656) all_519_3_1854 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_519_3_1854, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_3_1854, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								| (2657) all_519_3_1854 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								| Combining equations (2657,2656) yields a new equation:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						| (2678) host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_2_1853 & ( ~ (all_519_2_1853 = all_0_4_4) | (all_519_3_1854 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4))
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																						|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (2678) yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							| (2679) host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_2_1853
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							| (2680)  ~ (all_519_2_1853 = all_0_4_4) | (all_519_3_1854 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4)
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (10) with all_519_2_1853, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_2_1853, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							| (2681) all_519_2_1853 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_519_2_1853, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_519_2_1853, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							| (2682) all_519_2_1853 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							| Combining equations (2682,2681) yields a new equation:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							| (718) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																		| (2686)  ~ (all_505_2_1797 = all_505_3_1798) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_505_2_1797 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_505_3_1798
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																		|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (2686) yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																			| (2687)  ~ (all_505_2_1797 = all_505_3_1798)
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																			| (2688) host(all_0_6_6) = all_505_2_1797
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																			| (2094) host(all_0_17_17) = all_505_3_1798
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																			|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (10) with all_505_2_1797, all_0_15_15, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms host(all_0_6_6) = all_505_2_1797, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																			| (2690) all_505_2_1797 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																			|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (10) with all_505_3_1798, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_505_3_1798, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																			| (2097) all_505_3_1798 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																			|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																			| Equations (2690,2097) can reduce 2687 to:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																			| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																			|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																	| (2693)  ~ (all_505_3_1798 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_505_3_1798
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																	|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (2693) yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																		| (2694)  ~ (all_505_3_1798 = 0)
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																		| (2695) setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_505_3_1798
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																		|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																		| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_5_5, alive, all_505_3_1798, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_505_3_1798, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																		| (2696) all_505_3_1798 = 0
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																		|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																		| Equations (2696) can reduce 2694 to:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																		| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																		|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																															| (2698)  ~ (all_471_1_1660 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_471_3_1662 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_471_2_1661 & elem(all_471_3_1662, all_471_2_1661) = all_471_1_1660
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																															|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (2698) yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																| (2699)  ~ (all_471_1_1660 = 0)
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																| (2700) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_471_3_1662
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																| (2701) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_471_2_1661
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																| (2702) elem(all_471_3_1662, all_471_2_1661) = all_471_1_1660
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (47) with all_471_3_1662, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_471_3_1662, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																| (2703) all_471_3_1662 = all_0_3_3
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																|
% 127.61/84.11  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_471_2_1661, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_471_2_1661, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																																| (2704) all_471_2_1661 = all_0_2_2
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																																|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																																| From (2703)(2704) and (2702) follows:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																																| (2705) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_471_1_1660
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																																|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_471_1_1660, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_471_1_1660, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																																| (2706) all_471_1_1660 = 0
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																																|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																																| Equations (2706) can reduce 2699 to:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																																| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																																|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														| (2708)  ~ (all_471_3_1662 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_471_3_1662
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (2708) yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (2709)  ~ (all_471_3_1662 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (2033) host(all_0_17_17) = all_471_3_1662
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (10) with all_471_3_1662, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_471_3_1662, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (2036) all_471_3_1662 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| Equations (2036) can reduce 2709 to:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| (2713)  ~ (all_471_3_1662 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_471_3_1662
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (2713) yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														| (2714)  ~ (all_471_3_1662 = 0)
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														| (2715) setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_471_3_1662
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_5_5, alive, all_471_3_1662, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_471_3_1662, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														| (2716) all_471_3_1662 = 0
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														| Equations (2716) can reduce 2714 to:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| (2718)  ~ (all_543_0_1944 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_543_2_1946 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_543_3_1947 & queue(all_543_3_1947) = all_543_1_1945 & elem(all_543_2_1946, all_543_1_1945) = all_543_0_1944
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (2718) yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| (1974) queue(all_543_3_1947) = all_543_1_1945
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| (2720) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_543_2_1946
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| (1975)  ~ (all_543_0_1944 = 0)
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| (2722) host(all_0_5_5) = all_543_3_1947
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| (1976) elem(all_543_2_1946, all_543_1_1945) = all_543_0_1944
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (47) with all_543_2_1946, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_543_2_1946, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| (2724) all_543_2_1946 = all_0_3_3
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (10) with all_543_3_1947, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_543_3_1947, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| (2725) all_543_3_1947 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| From (2725) and (1974) follows:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| (2726) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_543_1_1945
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| From (2724) and (1976) follows:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| (2727) elem(all_0_3_3, all_543_1_1945) = all_543_0_1944
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_543_1_1945, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_543_1_1945, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| (2728) all_543_1_1945 = all_0_2_2
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| From (2728) and (2727) follows:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| (2729) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_543_0_1944
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_543_0_1944, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_543_0_1944, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| (2730) all_543_0_1944 = 0
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| Equations (2730) can reduce 1975 to:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																											| (2732)  ~ (all_543_3_1947 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_543_3_1947
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																											|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (2732) yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| (2733)  ~ (all_543_3_1947 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| (1972) host(all_0_7_7) = all_543_3_1947
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| From (305) and (1972) follows:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| (1977) host(all_0_17_17) = all_543_3_1947
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| Instantiating formula (10) with all_543_3_1947, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_543_3_1947, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| (1978) all_543_3_1947 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| Equations (1978) can reduce 2733 to:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																										| (2738) host(all_0_5_5) = all_543_2_1946 & ( ~ (all_543_2_1946 = all_0_4_4) | (all_543_3_1947 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																										|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (2738) yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																											| (2739) host(all_0_5_5) = all_543_2_1946
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																											| (2740)  ~ (all_543_2_1946 = all_0_4_4) | (all_543_3_1947 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																											|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2740), into two cases.
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																											| (2741)  ~ (all_543_2_1946 = all_0_4_4)
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																											|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| Instantiating formula (10) with all_543_2_1946, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_543_2_1946, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| (2742) all_543_2_1946 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| Equations (2742) can reduce 2741 to:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																											| (2742) all_543_2_1946 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																											| (2745) all_543_3_1947 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																											|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (2745) yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| (2725) all_543_3_1947 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| (569) host(all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| From (305) and (569) follows:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| (570) host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (304), into two cases.
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												| (2749) ( ~ (all_590_0_2129 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_590_2_2131 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132 & queue(all_590_3_2132) = all_590_1_2130 & elem(all_590_2_2131, all_590_1_2130) = all_590_0_2129) | ( ~ (all_590_0_2129 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_590_2_2131 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132 & queue(all_590_3_2132) = all_590_1_2130 & elem(all_590_2_2131, all_590_1_2130) = all_590_0_2129) | ( ~ (all_590_3_2132 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132)
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2749), into two cases.
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| (2750) ( ~ (all_590_0_2129 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_590_2_2131 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132 & queue(all_590_3_2132) = all_590_1_2130 & elem(all_590_2_2131, all_590_1_2130) = all_590_0_2129) | ( ~ (all_590_0_2129 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_590_2_2131 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132 & queue(all_590_3_2132) = all_590_1_2130 & elem(all_590_2_2131, all_590_1_2130) = all_590_0_2129)
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2750), into two cases.
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														| (2751)  ~ (all_590_0_2129 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_590_2_2131 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132 & queue(all_590_3_2132) = all_590_1_2130 & elem(all_590_2_2131, all_590_1_2130) = all_590_0_2129
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (2751) yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (2752) m_Down(all_0_5_5) = all_590_2_2131
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (2753) host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (2754)  ~ (all_590_0_2129 = 0)
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (2755) queue(all_590_3_2132) = all_590_1_2130
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (2756) elem(all_590_2_2131, all_590_1_2130) = all_590_0_2129
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (10) with all_590_3_2132, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (2757) all_590_3_2132 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_590_3_2132, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (2758) all_590_3_2132 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| Combining equations (2757,2758) yields a new equation:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														| (2761)  ~ (all_590_0_2129 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_590_2_2131 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132 & queue(all_590_3_2132) = all_590_1_2130 & elem(all_590_2_2131, all_590_1_2130) = all_590_0_2129
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																														|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (2761) yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (2753) host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (2754)  ~ (all_590_0_2129 = 0)
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (2755) queue(all_590_3_2132) = all_590_1_2130
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (2765) m_Down(all_0_7_7) = all_590_2_2131
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (2756) elem(all_590_2_2131, all_590_1_2130) = all_590_0_2129
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (10) with all_590_3_2132, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (2757) all_590_3_2132 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_590_3_2132, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (2758) all_590_3_2132 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| Combining equations (2757,2758) yields a new equation:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															|
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													| (2771)  ~ (all_590_3_2132 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132
% 127.61/84.12  																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (2771) yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																														| (2772)  ~ (all_590_3_2132 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																														| (2753) host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																														|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																														| Instantiating formula (10) with all_590_3_2132, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																														| (2757) all_590_3_2132 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																														|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																														| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_590_3_2132, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_3_2132, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																														| (2758) all_590_3_2132 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																														|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																														| Combining equations (2757,2758) yields a new equation:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																														| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																														|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																														| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																														| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																														|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																												| (2778) host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_2_2131 & ( ~ (all_590_2_2131 = all_0_4_4) | (all_590_3_2132 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4))
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (2778) yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																													| (2779) host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_2_2131
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																													| (2780)  ~ (all_590_2_2131 = all_0_4_4) | (all_590_3_2132 = all_0_4_4 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4)
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (10) with all_590_2_2131, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_2_2131, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																													| (2781) all_590_2_2131 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_590_2_2131, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_590_2_2131, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																													| (2782) all_590_2_2131 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																													| Combining equations (2781,2782) yields a new equation:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																													| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																													| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																													| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| (2785)  ~ (all_483_0_1707 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_483_2_1709 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_483_3_1710 & queue(all_483_3_1710) = all_483_1_1708 & elem(all_483_2_1709, all_483_1_1708) = all_483_0_1707
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (2785) yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| (1959) elem(all_483_2_1709, all_483_1_1708) = all_483_0_1707
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| (2787) host(all_0_5_5) = all_483_3_1710
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| (1961)  ~ (all_483_0_1707 = 0)
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| (1962) queue(all_483_3_1710) = all_483_1_1708
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| (2790) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_483_2_1709
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (47) with all_483_2_1709, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_483_2_1709, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| (2791) all_483_2_1709 = all_0_3_3
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (10) with all_483_3_1710, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_483_3_1710, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| (2792) all_483_3_1710 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| From (2792) and (1962) follows:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| (2793) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_483_1_1708
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| From (2791) and (1959) follows:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| (2794) elem(all_0_3_3, all_483_1_1708) = all_483_0_1707
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_483_1_1708, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_483_1_1708, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| (2795) all_483_1_1708 = all_0_2_2
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| From (2795) and (2794) follows:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| (2796) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_483_0_1707
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_483_0_1707, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_483_0_1707, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| (2797) all_483_0_1707 = 0
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| Equations (2797) can reduce 1961 to:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																								| (2799)  ~ (all_483_3_1710 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_483_3_1710
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																								|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (2799) yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| (2800)  ~ (all_483_3_1710 = all_0_4_4)
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| (2787) host(all_0_5_5) = all_483_3_1710
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (10) with all_483_3_1710, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_483_3_1710, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| (2792) all_483_3_1710 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| Equations (2792) can reduce 2800 to:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																							| (2804) host(all_0_17_17) = all_483_2_1709 & ( ~ (all_483_2_1709 = all_0_15_15) | (all_483_3_1710 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15))
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																							|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (2804) yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																								| (2805) host(all_0_17_17) = all_483_2_1709
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																								| (2806)  ~ (all_483_2_1709 = all_0_15_15) | (all_483_3_1710 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15)
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																								|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2806), into two cases.
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																								| (2807)  ~ (all_483_2_1709 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																								|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (10) with all_483_2_1709, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_483_2_1709, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| (2808) all_483_2_1709 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| Equations (2808) can reduce 2807 to:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																								| (2808) all_483_2_1709 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																								| (2811) all_483_3_1710 = all_0_15_15 & host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																								|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (2811) yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| (1963) all_483_3_1710 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| (318) host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_15_15, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| (308) all_0_4_4 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| Equations (308) can reduce 129 to:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																					| (2816)  ~ (all_212_1_656 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_212_3_658 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_212_2_657 & elem(all_212_3_658, all_212_2_657) = all_212_1_656
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																					|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (2816) yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						| (2817)  ~ (all_212_1_656 = 0)
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						| (2818) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_212_3_658
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						| (2819) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_212_2_657
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						| (2820) elem(all_212_3_658, all_212_2_657) = all_212_1_656
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (47) with all_212_3_658, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_212_3_658, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						| (2821) all_212_3_658 = all_0_3_3
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_212_2_657, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_212_2_657, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						| (2822) all_212_2_657 = all_0_2_2
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						| From (2821)(2822) and (2820) follows:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						| (2823) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_212_1_656
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_212_1_656, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_212_1_656, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						| (2824) all_212_1_656 = 0
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						| Equations (2824) can reduce 2817 to:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																				| (2826)  ~ (all_212_3_658 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_212_3_658
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																				|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (2826) yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																					| (2827)  ~ (all_212_3_658 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																					| (1946) host(all_0_17_17) = all_212_3_658
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																					|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																					| Instantiating formula (10) with all_212_3_658, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_212_3_658, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																					| (1948) all_212_3_658 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																					|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																					| Equations (1948) can reduce 2827 to:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																					| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																					|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																			| (2831)  ~ (all_212_3_658 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_212_3_658
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																			|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (2831) yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																				| (2832)  ~ (all_212_3_658 = 0)
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																				| (2833) setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_212_3_658
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																				|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_5_5, alive, all_212_3_658, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_212_3_658, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																				| (2834) all_212_3_658 = 0
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																				|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																				| Equations (2834) can reduce 2832 to:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																				| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																				|
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.13  																																																																																	| (2836)  ~ (all_98_2_234 = all_98_3_235) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_98_2_234 & host(all_0_7_7) = all_98_3_235
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																	|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (2836) yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																		| (2837)  ~ (all_98_2_234 = all_98_3_235)
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																		| (2838) host(all_0_6_6) = all_98_2_234
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																		| (1886) host(all_0_7_7) = all_98_3_235
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																		|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																		| From (305) and (1886) follows:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																		| (1887) host(all_0_17_17) = all_98_3_235
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																		|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																		| Instantiating formula (10) with all_98_2_234, all_0_15_15, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms host(all_0_6_6) = all_98_2_234, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																		| (2841) all_98_2_234 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																		|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																		| Instantiating formula (10) with all_98_3_235, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_98_3_235, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																		| (1888) all_98_3_235 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																		|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																		| Equations (2841,1888) can reduce 2837 to:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																		| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																		|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																| (2844)  ~ (all_98_3_235 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_98_3_235
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (2844) yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																	| (2845)  ~ (all_98_3_235 = 0)
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																	| (2846) setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_98_3_235
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																	|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_5_5, alive, all_98_3_235, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_98_3_235, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																	| (2847) all_98_3_235 = 0
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																	|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																	| Equations (2847) can reduce 2845 to:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																	| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																	|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																														| (2849)  ~ (all_502_2_1785 = all_502_3_1786) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_502_2_1785 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_502_3_1786
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																														|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (2849) yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																															| (2850)  ~ (all_502_2_1785 = all_502_3_1786)
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																															| (2851) host(all_0_6_6) = all_502_2_1785
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																															| (1815) host(all_0_17_17) = all_502_3_1786
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																															|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (10) with all_502_2_1785, all_0_15_15, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms host(all_0_6_6) = all_502_2_1785, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																															| (2853) all_502_2_1785 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																															|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (10) with all_502_3_1786, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_502_3_1786, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																															| (1818) all_502_3_1786 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																															|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																															| Equations (2853,1818) can reduce 2850 to:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																															| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																															|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													| (2856)  ~ (all_502_3_1786 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_502_3_1786
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (2856) yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																														| (2857)  ~ (all_502_3_1786 = 0)
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																														| (2858) setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_502_3_1786
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																														|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																														| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_5_5, alive, all_502_3_1786, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_502_3_1786, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																														| (2859) all_502_3_1786 = 0
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																														|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																														| Equations (2859) can reduce 2857 to:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																														| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																														|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																												| (2861)  ~ (all_830_0_4423 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_830_2_4425 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_830_1_4424 & elem(all_830_2_4425, all_830_1_4424) = all_830_0_4423
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (2861) yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													| (1705)  ~ (all_830_0_4423 = 0)
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													| (2863) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_830_2_4425
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													| (2864) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_830_1_4424
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													| (1708) elem(all_830_2_4425, all_830_1_4424) = all_830_0_4423
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (47) with all_830_2_4425, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_830_2_4425, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													| (2866) all_830_2_4425 = all_0_3_3
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_830_1_4424, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_830_1_4424, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													| (2867) all_830_1_4424 = all_0_2_2
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													| From (2866)(2867) and (1708) follows:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													| (2868) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_830_0_4423
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_830_0_4423, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_830_0_4423, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													| (2869) all_830_0_4423 = 0
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													| Equations (2869) can reduce 1705 to:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																											| (2871)  ~ (all_830_2_4425 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_830_2_4425
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																											|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (2871) yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																												| (2872)  ~ (all_830_2_4425 = 0)
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																												| (2873) setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_830_2_4425
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																												| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_5_5, alive, all_830_2_4425, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_830_2_4425, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																												| (2874) all_830_2_4425 = 0
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																												| Equations (2874) can reduce 2872 to:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																												| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																												|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																										| (2876)  ~ (all_830_2_4425 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = all_830_2_4425
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																										|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (2876) yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																											| (2872)  ~ (all_830_2_4425 = 0)
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																											| (2878) setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = all_830_2_4425
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																											|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																											| From (305) and (2878) follows:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																											| (2879) setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_830_2_4425
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																											|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																											| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_17_17, alive, all_830_2_4425, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_830_2_4425, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																											| (2874) all_830_2_4425 = 0
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																											|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																											| Equations (2874) can reduce 2872 to:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																											| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																											|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.14  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																											| (2882)  ~ (all_398_3_1377 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_398_3_1377
% 127.61/84.14  																																																											|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (2882) yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																												| (2883)  ~ (all_398_3_1377 = all_0_4_4)
% 127.61/84.14  																																																												| (1635) host(all_0_5_5) = all_398_3_1377
% 127.61/84.14  																																																												|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																												| Instantiating formula (10) with all_398_3_1377, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_398_3_1377, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																												| (1637) all_398_3_1377 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.14  																																																												|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																												| Equations (1637) can reduce 2883 to:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																												| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.14  																																																												|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										| (2887)  ~ (all_398_3_1377 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = all_398_3_1377
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (2887) yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																											| (2888)  ~ (all_398_3_1377 = 0)
% 127.61/84.14  																																																											| (2889) setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = all_398_3_1377
% 127.61/84.14  																																																											|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																											| From (305) and (2889) follows:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																											| (2890) setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_398_3_1377
% 127.61/84.14  																																																											|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																											| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_17_17, alive, all_398_3_1377, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_398_3_1377, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																											| (2891) all_398_3_1377 = 0
% 127.61/84.14  																																																											|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																											| Equations (2891) can reduce 2888 to:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																											| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.14  																																																											|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.14  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																									| (2893)  ~ (all_754_0_4287 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_754_2_4289 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_754_1_4288 & elem(all_754_2_4289, all_754_1_4288) = all_754_0_4287
% 127.61/84.14  																																																									|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (2893) yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										| (1566)  ~ (all_754_0_4287 = 0)
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										| (2895) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_754_2_4289
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										| (2896) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_754_1_4288
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										| (1569) elem(all_754_2_4289, all_754_1_4288) = all_754_0_4287
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										| Instantiating formula (47) with all_754_2_4289, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_754_2_4289, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										| (2898) all_754_2_4289 = all_0_3_3
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_754_1_4288, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_754_1_4288, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										| (2899) all_754_1_4288 = all_0_2_2
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										| From (2898)(2899) and (1569) follows:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										| (2900) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_754_0_4287
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										|
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_754_0_4287, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_754_0_4287, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.14  																																																										| (2901) all_754_0_4287 = 0
% 127.61/84.15  																																																										|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																										| Equations (2901) can reduce 1566 to:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																										| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.15  																																																										|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.15  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																								| (2903)  ~ (all_754_2_4289 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_754_2_4289
% 127.61/84.15  																																																								|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (2903) yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																									| (2904)  ~ (all_754_2_4289 = 0)
% 127.61/84.15  																																																									| (2905) setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_754_2_4289
% 127.61/84.15  																																																									|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																									| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_5_5, alive, all_754_2_4289, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_754_2_4289, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																									| (2906) all_754_2_4289 = 0
% 127.61/84.15  																																																									|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																									| Equations (2906) can reduce 2904 to:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																									| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.15  																																																									|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.15  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																							| (2908)  ~ (all_754_2_4289 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_754_2_4289
% 127.61/84.15  																																																							|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (2908) yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																								| (2904)  ~ (all_754_2_4289 = 0)
% 127.61/84.15  																																																								| (2910) setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_754_2_4289
% 127.61/84.15  																																																								|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																								| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_17_17, alive, all_754_2_4289, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_754_2_4289, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																								| (2906) all_754_2_4289 = 0
% 127.61/84.15  																																																								|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																								| Equations (2906) can reduce 2904 to:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																								| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.15  																																																								|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.15  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																						| (2913)  ~ (all_774_2_4304 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_774_2_4304
% 127.61/84.15  																																																						|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (2913) yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																							| (2914)  ~ (all_774_2_4304 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.61/84.15  																																																							| (2915) host(all_0_6_6) = all_774_2_4304
% 127.61/84.15  																																																							|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																							| Instantiating formula (10) with all_774_2_4304, all_0_15_15, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms host(all_0_6_6) = all_774_2_4304, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																							| (2916) all_774_2_4304 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.15  																																																							|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																							| Equations (2916) can reduce 2914 to:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																							| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.15  																																																							|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.15  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																					| (2918)  ~ (all_774_2_4304 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_774_2_4304
% 127.61/84.15  																																																					|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (2918) yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																						| (2919)  ~ (all_774_2_4304 = 0)
% 127.61/84.15  																																																						| (2920) setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_774_2_4304
% 127.61/84.15  																																																						|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																						| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_5_5, alive, all_774_2_4304, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_774_2_4304, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																						| (2921) all_774_2_4304 = 0
% 127.61/84.15  																																																						|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																						| Equations (2921) can reduce 2919 to:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																						| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.15  																																																						|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.15  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																				| (2923)  ~ (all_774_2_4304 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_774_2_4304
% 127.61/84.15  																																																				|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (2923) yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																					| (2919)  ~ (all_774_2_4304 = 0)
% 127.61/84.15  																																																					| (2925) setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_774_2_4304
% 127.61/84.15  																																																					|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																					| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_17_17, alive, all_774_2_4304, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_774_2_4304, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																					| (2921) all_774_2_4304 = 0
% 127.61/84.15  																																																					|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																					| Equations (2921) can reduce 2919 to:
% 127.61/84.15  																																																					| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.15  																																																					|
% 127.61/84.15  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.15  																																	|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.15  																																	| (2928)  ~ (all_400_3_1385 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_400_3_1385
% 127.61/84.15  																																	|
% 127.61/84.15  																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (2928) yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																																		| (2929)  ~ (all_400_3_1385 = all_0_4_4)
% 127.61/84.15  																																		| (1470) host(all_0_5_5) = all_400_3_1385
% 127.61/84.15  																																		|
% 127.61/84.15  																																		| Instantiating formula (10) with all_400_3_1385, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_400_3_1385, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																																		| (1474) all_400_3_1385 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.15  																																		|
% 127.61/84.15  																																		| Equations (1474) can reduce 2929 to:
% 127.61/84.15  																																		| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.15  																																		|
% 127.61/84.15  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.15  																																|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.15  																																| (2933)  ~ (all_400_3_1385 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_400_3_1385
% 127.61/84.15  																																|
% 127.61/84.15  																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (2933) yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																																	| (2934)  ~ (all_400_3_1385 = 0)
% 127.61/84.15  																																	| (2935) setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_400_3_1385
% 127.61/84.15  																																	|
% 127.61/84.15  																																	| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_17_17, alive, all_400_3_1385, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_400_3_1385, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																																	| (2936) all_400_3_1385 = 0
% 127.61/84.15  																																	|
% 127.61/84.15  																																	| Equations (2936) can reduce 2934 to:
% 127.61/84.15  																																	| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.15  																																	|
% 127.61/84.15  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.15  																											|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.15  																											| (2938)  ~ (all_411_3_1429 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_411_3_1429
% 127.61/84.15  																											|
% 127.61/84.15  																												| Applying alpha-rule on (2938) yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																												| (2939)  ~ (all_411_3_1429 = all_0_4_4)
% 127.61/84.15  																												| (1309) host(all_0_5_5) = all_411_3_1429
% 127.61/84.15  																												|
% 127.61/84.15  																												| Instantiating formula (10) with all_411_3_1429, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_411_3_1429, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																												| (1315) all_411_3_1429 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.15  																												|
% 127.61/84.15  																												| Equations (1315) can reduce 2939 to:
% 127.61/84.15  																												| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.15  																												|
% 127.61/84.15  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.15  																										|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.15  																										| (2943)  ~ (all_411_3_1429 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = all_411_3_1429
% 127.61/84.15  																										|
% 127.61/84.15  																											| Applying alpha-rule on (2943) yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																											| (2944)  ~ (all_411_3_1429 = 0)
% 127.61/84.15  																											| (2945) setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = all_411_3_1429
% 127.61/84.15  																											|
% 127.61/84.15  																											| From (305) and (2945) follows:
% 127.61/84.15  																											| (2946) setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_411_3_1429
% 127.61/84.15  																											|
% 127.61/84.15  																											| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_17_17, alive, all_411_3_1429, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_411_3_1429, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																											| (2947) all_411_3_1429 = 0
% 127.61/84.15  																											|
% 127.61/84.15  																											| Equations (2947) can reduce 2944 to:
% 127.61/84.15  																											| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.15  																											|
% 127.61/84.15  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.15  																									|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.15  																									| (2949)  ~ (all_612_2_2191 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_6_6) = all_612_2_2191
% 127.61/84.15  																									|
% 127.61/84.15  																										| Applying alpha-rule on (2949) yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																										| (2950)  ~ (all_612_2_2191 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.61/84.15  																										| (2951) host(all_0_6_6) = all_612_2_2191
% 127.61/84.15  																										|
% 127.61/84.15  																										| Instantiating formula (10) with all_612_2_2191, all_0_15_15, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms host(all_0_6_6) = all_612_2_2191, host(all_0_6_6) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																										| (2952) all_612_2_2191 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.15  																										|
% 127.61/84.15  																										| Equations (2952) can reduce 2950 to:
% 127.61/84.15  																										| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.15  																										|
% 127.61/84.15  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.15  																								|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.15  																								| (2954)  ~ (all_612_2_2191 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_612_2_2191
% 127.61/84.15  																								|
% 127.61/84.15  																									| Applying alpha-rule on (2954) yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																									| (2955)  ~ (all_612_2_2191 = 0)
% 127.61/84.15  																									| (2956) setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_612_2_2191
% 127.61/84.15  																									|
% 127.61/84.15  																									| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_5_5, alive, all_612_2_2191, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_612_2_2191, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																									| (2957) all_612_2_2191 = 0
% 127.61/84.15  																									|
% 127.61/84.15  																									| Equations (2957) can reduce 2955 to:
% 127.61/84.15  																									| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.15  																									|
% 127.61/84.15  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.15  																							|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.15  																							| (2959)  ~ (all_612_2_2191 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = all_612_2_2191
% 127.61/84.15  																							|
% 127.61/84.15  																								| Applying alpha-rule on (2959) yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																								| (2955)  ~ (all_612_2_2191 = 0)
% 127.61/84.15  																								| (2961) setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = all_612_2_2191
% 127.61/84.15  																								|
% 127.61/84.15  																								| From (305) and (2961) follows:
% 127.61/84.15  																								| (2962) setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_612_2_2191
% 127.61/84.15  																								|
% 127.61/84.15  																								| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_17_17, alive, all_612_2_2191, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_612_2_2191, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.15  																								| (2957) all_612_2_2191 = 0
% 127.61/84.15  																								|
% 127.61/84.15  																								| Equations (2957) can reduce 2955 to:
% 127.61/84.15  																								| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.15  																								|
% 127.61/84.15  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.15  																				|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.16  																				| (2965)  ~ (all_270_1_875 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_270_3_877 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_270_2_876 & elem(all_270_3_877, all_270_2_876) = all_270_1_875
% 127.61/84.16  																				|
% 127.61/84.16  																					| Applying alpha-rule on (2965) yields:
% 127.61/84.16  																					| (2966)  ~ (all_270_1_875 = 0)
% 127.61/84.16  																					| (2967) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_270_3_877
% 127.61/84.16  																					| (2968) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_270_2_876
% 127.61/84.16  																					| (2969) elem(all_270_3_877, all_270_2_876) = all_270_1_875
% 127.61/84.16  																					|
% 127.61/84.16  																					| Instantiating formula (47) with all_270_3_877, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_270_3_877, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 127.61/84.16  																					| (2970) all_270_3_877 = all_0_3_3
% 127.61/84.16  																					|
% 127.61/84.16  																					| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_270_2_876, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_270_2_876, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 127.61/84.16  																					| (2971) all_270_2_876 = all_0_2_2
% 127.61/84.16  																					|
% 127.61/84.16  																					| From (2970)(2971) and (2969) follows:
% 127.61/84.16  																					| (2972) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_270_1_875
% 127.61/84.16  																					|
% 127.61/84.16  																					| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_270_1_875, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_270_1_875, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.16  																					| (2973) all_270_1_875 = 0
% 127.61/84.16  																					|
% 127.61/84.16  																					| Equations (2973) can reduce 2966 to:
% 127.61/84.16  																					| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.16  																					|
% 127.61/84.16  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.16  																			|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.16  																			| (2975)  ~ (all_270_3_877 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_270_3_877
% 127.61/84.16  																			|
% 127.61/84.16  																				| Applying alpha-rule on (2975) yields:
% 127.61/84.16  																				| (2976)  ~ (all_270_3_877 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.61/84.16  																				| (1152) host(all_0_7_7) = all_270_3_877
% 127.61/84.16  																				|
% 127.61/84.16  																				| From (305) and (1152) follows:
% 127.61/84.16  																				| (1156) host(all_0_17_17) = all_270_3_877
% 127.61/84.16  																				|
% 127.61/84.16  																				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_270_3_877, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_270_3_877, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.16  																				| (1714) all_270_3_877 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.16  																				|
% 127.61/84.16  																				| Equations (1714) can reduce 2976 to:
% 127.61/84.16  																				| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.16  																				|
% 127.61/84.16  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.16  																		|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.16  																		| (2981)  ~ (all_270_3_877 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_270_3_877
% 127.61/84.16  																		|
% 127.61/84.16  																			| Applying alpha-rule on (2981) yields:
% 127.61/84.16  																			| (2982)  ~ (all_270_3_877 = 0)
% 127.61/84.16  																			| (2983) setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_270_3_877
% 127.61/84.16  																			|
% 127.61/84.16  																			| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_5_5, alive, all_270_3_877, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_270_3_877, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.16  																			| (2984) all_270_3_877 = 0
% 127.61/84.16  																			|
% 127.61/84.16  																			| Equations (2984) can reduce 2982 to:
% 127.61/84.16  																			| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.16  																			|
% 127.61/84.16  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.16  																	|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.16  																	| (2986)  ~ (all_652_0_3369 = 0) & m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_652_2_3371 & queue(all_0_4_4) = all_652_1_3370 & elem(all_652_2_3371, all_652_1_3370) = all_652_0_3369
% 127.61/84.16  																	|
% 127.61/84.16  																		| Applying alpha-rule on (2986) yields:
% 127.61/84.16  																		| (560)  ~ (all_652_0_3369 = 0)
% 127.61/84.16  																		| (2988) m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_652_2_3371
% 127.61/84.16  																		| (2989) queue(all_0_4_4) = all_652_1_3370
% 127.61/84.16  																		| (563) elem(all_652_2_3371, all_652_1_3370) = all_652_0_3369
% 127.61/84.16  																		|
% 127.61/84.16  																		| Instantiating formula (47) with all_652_2_3371, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_652_2_3371, m_Down(all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 127.61/84.16  																		| (2991) all_652_2_3371 = all_0_3_3
% 127.61/84.16  																		|
% 127.61/84.16  																		| Instantiating formula (172) with all_0_4_4, all_652_1_3370, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms queue(all_0_4_4) = all_652_1_3370, queue(all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 127.61/84.16  																		| (2992) all_652_1_3370 = all_0_2_2
% 127.61/84.16  																		|
% 127.61/84.16  																		| From (2991)(2992) and (563) follows:
% 127.61/84.16  																		| (2993) elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_652_0_3369
% 127.61/84.16  																		|
% 127.61/84.16  																		| Instantiating formula (189) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_652_0_3369, 0 and discharging atoms elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_652_0_3369, elem(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.16  																		| (2994) all_652_0_3369 = 0
% 127.61/84.16  																		|
% 127.61/84.16  																		| Equations (2994) can reduce 560 to:
% 127.61/84.16  																		| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.16  																		|
% 127.61/84.16  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.16  																|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.16  																| (2996)  ~ (all_652_2_3371 = 0) & setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_652_2_3371
% 127.61/84.16  																|
% 127.61/84.16  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (2996) yields:
% 127.61/84.16  																	| (2997)  ~ (all_652_2_3371 = 0)
% 127.61/84.16  																	| (2998) setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_652_2_3371
% 127.61/84.16  																	|
% 127.61/84.16  																	| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_5_5, alive, all_652_2_3371, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = all_652_2_3371, setIn(all_0_5_5, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.16  																	| (2999) all_652_2_3371 = 0
% 127.61/84.16  																	|
% 127.61/84.16  																	| Equations (2999) can reduce 2997 to:
% 127.61/84.16  																	| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.16  																	|
% 127.61/84.16  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.16  															|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.16  															| (3001)  ~ (all_652_2_3371 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_652_2_3371
% 127.61/84.16  															|
% 127.61/84.16  																| Applying alpha-rule on (3001) yields:
% 127.61/84.16  																| (2997)  ~ (all_652_2_3371 = 0)
% 127.61/84.16  																| (3003) setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_652_2_3371
% 127.61/84.16  																|
% 127.61/84.16  																| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_17_17, alive, all_652_2_3371, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_652_2_3371, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.16  																| (2999) all_652_2_3371 = 0
% 127.61/84.16  																|
% 127.61/84.16  																| Equations (2999) can reduce 2997 to:
% 127.61/84.16  																| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.16  																|
% 127.61/84.16  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.16  			|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.16  			| (3006)  ~ (all_402_3_1393 = all_0_4_4) & host(all_0_5_5) = all_402_3_1393
% 127.61/84.16  			|
% 127.61/84.16  				| Applying alpha-rule on (3006) yields:
% 127.61/84.16  				| (3007)  ~ (all_402_3_1393 = all_0_4_4)
% 127.61/84.16  				| (502) host(all_0_5_5) = all_402_3_1393
% 127.61/84.16  				|
% 127.61/84.16  				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_402_3_1393, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms host(all_0_5_5) = all_402_3_1393, host(all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 127.61/84.16  				| (504) all_402_3_1393 = all_0_4_4
% 127.61/84.16  				|
% 127.61/84.16  				| Equations (504) can reduce 3007 to:
% 127.61/84.16  				| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.16  				|
% 127.61/84.16  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.16  		|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.16  		| (3011)  ~ (all_402_3_1393 = 0) & setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_402_3_1393
% 127.61/84.16  		|
% 127.61/84.16  			| Applying alpha-rule on (3011) yields:
% 127.61/84.16  			| (3012)  ~ (all_402_3_1393 = 0)
% 127.61/84.16  			| (3013) setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_402_3_1393
% 127.61/84.16  			|
% 127.61/84.16  			| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_17_17, alive, all_402_3_1393, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = all_402_3_1393, setIn(all_0_17_17, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.16  			| (3014) all_402_3_1393 = 0
% 127.61/84.16  			|
% 127.61/84.16  			| Equations (3014) can reduce 3012 to:
% 127.61/84.16  			| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.16  			|
% 127.61/84.16  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.16  |-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.16  | (3016)  ~ (all_0_7_7 = all_0_17_17)
% 127.61/84.16  | (3017)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = v0))
% 127.61/84.16  |
% 127.61/84.16  	| Instantiating (3017) with all_609_0_9726 yields:
% 127.61/84.16  	| (3018) ( ~ (all_609_0_9726 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_609_0_9726) | ( ~ (all_609_0_9726 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = all_609_0_9726)
% 127.61/84.16  	|
% 127.61/84.16  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (274), into two cases.
% 127.61/84.16  	|-Branch one:
% 127.61/84.16  	| (305) all_0_7_7 = all_0_17_17
% 127.61/84.16  	|
% 127.61/84.16  		| Equations (305) can reduce 3016 to:
% 127.61/84.16  		| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.16  		|
% 127.61/84.16  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.16  	|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.16  	| (3016)  ~ (all_0_7_7 = all_0_17_17)
% 127.61/84.16  	| (3022)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & host(all_0_7_7) = v0 & host(all_0_17_17) = v1)
% 127.61/84.16  	|
% 127.61/84.16  		| Instantiating (3022) with all_662_0_11188, all_662_1_11189 yields:
% 127.61/84.16  		| (3023)  ~ (all_662_0_11188 = all_662_1_11189) & host(all_0_7_7) = all_662_1_11189 & host(all_0_17_17) = all_662_0_11188
% 127.61/84.16  		|
% 127.61/84.16  		| Applying alpha-rule on (3023) yields:
% 127.61/84.16  		| (3024)  ~ (all_662_0_11188 = all_662_1_11189)
% 127.61/84.16  		| (3025) host(all_0_7_7) = all_662_1_11189
% 127.61/84.16  		| (3026) host(all_0_17_17) = all_662_0_11188
% 127.61/84.16  		|
% 127.61/84.16  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3018), into two cases.
% 127.61/84.16  		|-Branch one:
% 127.61/84.16  		| (3027)  ~ (all_609_0_9726 = all_0_15_15) & host(all_0_17_17) = all_609_0_9726
% 127.61/84.16  		|
% 127.61/84.16  			| Applying alpha-rule on (3027) yields:
% 127.61/84.16  			| (3028)  ~ (all_609_0_9726 = all_0_15_15)
% 127.61/84.16  			| (3029) host(all_0_17_17) = all_609_0_9726
% 127.61/84.16  			|
% 127.61/84.16  			| Instantiating formula (10) with all_662_0_11188, all_0_15_15, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_662_0_11188, host(all_0_17_17) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 127.61/84.16  			| (3030) all_662_0_11188 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.16  			|
% 127.61/84.16  			| Instantiating formula (10) with all_609_0_9726, all_662_0_11188, all_0_17_17 and discharging atoms host(all_0_17_17) = all_662_0_11188, host(all_0_17_17) = all_609_0_9726, yields:
% 127.61/84.17  			| (3031) all_662_0_11188 = all_609_0_9726
% 127.61/84.17  			|
% 127.61/84.17  			| Combining equations (3030,3031) yields a new equation:
% 127.61/84.17  			| (3032) all_609_0_9726 = all_0_15_15
% 127.61/84.17  			|
% 127.61/84.17  			| Equations (3032) can reduce 3028 to:
% 127.61/84.17  			| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.17  			|
% 127.61/84.17  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.17  		|-Branch two:
% 127.61/84.17  		| (3034)  ~ (all_609_0_9726 = 0) & setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = all_609_0_9726
% 127.61/84.17  		|
% 127.61/84.17  			| Applying alpha-rule on (3034) yields:
% 127.61/84.17  			| (3035)  ~ (all_609_0_9726 = 0)
% 127.61/84.17  			| (3036) setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = all_609_0_9726
% 127.61/84.17  			|
% 127.61/84.17  			| Instantiating formula (90) with all_0_7_7, alive, all_609_0_9726, 0 and discharging atoms setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = all_609_0_9726, setIn(all_0_7_7, alive) = 0, yields:
% 127.61/84.17  			| (3037) all_609_0_9726 = 0
% 127.61/84.17  			|
% 127.61/84.17  			| Equations (3037) can reduce 3035 to:
% 127.61/84.17  			| (309) $false
% 127.61/84.17  			|
% 127.61/84.17  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 127.61/84.17  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 127.61/84.17  
% 127.61/84.17  83580ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------