TSTP Solution File: SWV454+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV454+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:38:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.04s 300.21s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWV454+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 14:17:24 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.37 The process was started by sandbox2 on n005.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.37 Wed Jun 15 14:17:24 2022
% 0.13/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 348.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.37 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.37 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.37 clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 79 during input processing: 0 [] {-} leq(A,s(B))|A!=s(B).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 87 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -elem(m_Down(A),queue(host(B)))| -setIn(A,alive).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 16 during input processing: 0 [copy,105,flip.1] {-} m_Ack(A,B)!=m_Halt(C).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 17 during input processing: 0 [copy,106,flip.1] {-} m_Ack(A,B)!=m_Down(C).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [copy,107,flip.1] {-} m_Ack(A,B)!=m_NotNorm(C).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 19 during input processing: 0 [copy,108,flip.1] {-} m_Ack(A,B)!=m_Ldr(C).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [copy,109,flip.1] {-} m_Ack(A,B)!=m_NormQ(C).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [copy,110,flip.1] {-} m_NotNorm(A)!=m_Halt(B).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 22 during input processing: 0 [copy,111,flip.1] {-} m_Down(A)!=m_Halt(B).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [copy,112,flip.1] {-} m_Down(A)!=m_Ldr(B).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [copy,113,flip.1] {-} m_Down(A)!=m_NotNorm(B).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 25 during input processing: 0 [copy,114,flip.1] {-} m_Down(A)!=m_NormQ(B).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 26 during input processing: 0 [copy,115,flip.1] {-} m_NormQ(A)!=m_Halt(B).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 27 during input processing: 0 [copy,116,flip.1] {-} m_Ldr(A)!=m_Halt(B).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 28 during input processing: 0 [copy,117,flip.1] {-} m_Ldr(A)!=m_NormQ(B).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 29 during input processing: 0 [copy,118,flip.1] {-} m_Ldr(A)!=m_NotNorm(B).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 30 during input processing: 0 [copy,119,flip.1] {-} m_NormQ(A)!=m_NotNorm(B).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 149 during input processing: 0 [demod,141] {-} ordered(cons(A,q_nil)).
% 0.13/0.37 150 back subsumes 121.
% 0.13/0.37 150 back subsumes 120.
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 170 during input processing: 0 [copy,170,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.37 170 back subsumes 123.
% 0.13/0.37 170 back subsumes 122.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.46 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.46 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.46 number of clauses in intial UL: 99
% 0.20/0.46 number of clauses initially in problem: 146
% 0.20/0.46 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 67
% 0.20/0.46 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 65
% 0.20/0.46 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.20/0.46 absolute distinct symbol count: 46
% 0.20/0.46 distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.20/0.46 distinct function count: 20
% 0.20/0.46 distinct constant count: 20
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.82/1.01
% 0.82/1.01
% 0.82/1.01 Changing weight limit from 60 to 29.
% 0.82/1.01
% 0.82/1.01 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 115 givens.
% 0.82/1.01
% 0.90/1.12
% 0.90/1.12
% 0.90/1.12 Changing weight limit from 29 to 23.
% 0.90/1.12
% 0.90/1.12 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 120 givens.
% 0.90/1.12
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 125 givens.
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.21
% 0.99/1.21
% 0.99/1.21 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 0.99/1.21
% 0.99/1.21 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 130 givens.
% 0.99/1.21
% 1.06/1.24
% 1.06/1.24
% 1.06/1.24 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 1.06/1.24
% 1.06/1.24 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 135 givens.
% 1.06/1.24
% 1.06/1.26
% 1.06/1.26
% 1.06/1.26 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 1.06/1.26
% 1.06/1.26 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 140 givens.
% 1.06/1.26
% 1.16/1.35
% 1.16/1.35
% 1.16/1.35 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 1.16/1.35
% 1.16/1.35 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 150 givens.
% 1.16/1.35
% 1.19/1.39
% 1.19/1.39
% 1.19/1.39 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 1.19/1.39
% 1.19/1.39 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 155 givens.
% 1.19/1.39
% 1.26/1.45
% 1.26/1.45
% 1.26/1.45 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 1.26/1.45
% 1.26/1.45 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 160 givens.
% 1.26/1.45
% 1.36/1.55
% 1.36/1.55
% 1.36/1.55 Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 1.36/1.55
% 1.36/1.55 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 170 givens.
% 1.36/1.55
% 1.39/1.65
% 1.39/1.65
% 1.39/1.65 Changing weight limit from 15 to 14.
% 1.39/1.65
% 1.39/1.65 Resetting weight limit to 14 after 175 givens.
% 1.39/1.65
% 1.59/1.79
% 1.59/1.79
% 1.59/1.79 Changing weight limit from 14 to 13.
% 1.59/1.79
% 1.59/1.79 Resetting weight limit to 13 after 190 givens.
% 1.59/1.79
% 1.88/2.07
% 1.88/2.07
% 1.88/2.07 Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 1.88/2.07
% 1.88/2.07 Resetting weight limit to 12 after 235 givens.
% 1.88/2.07
% 2.75/2.96
% 2.75/2.96
% 2.75/2.96 Changing weight limit from 12 to 11.
% 2.75/2.96
% 2.75/2.96 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 2.75/2.96
% 2.75/2.96
% 2.75/2.96 Resetting weight limit to 11 after 415 givens.
% 2.75/2.96
% 3.54/3.73
% 3.54/3.73
% 3.54/3.73 Changing weight limit from 11 to 10.
% 3.54/3.73
% 3.54/3.73 Resetting weight limit to 10 after 630 givens.
% 3.54/3.73
% 55.61/55.83
% 55.61/55.83
% 55.61/55.83 Changing weight limit from 10 to 11.
% 55.61/55.83
% 55.61/55.83 Resetting weight limit to 11 after 5360 givens.
% 55.61/55.83
% 300.04/300.21 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------