TSTP Solution File: SWV420-1.045 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SWV420-1.045 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 07:18:15 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP22015/SWV/SWV420-1.045+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 456] [nf = 0] [nu = 291] [ut = 296]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 2862] [nf = 1] [nu = 776] [ut = 299]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 9437] [nf = 41] [nu = 1327] [ut = 302]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 38651] [nf = 299] [nu = 2111] [ut = 302]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 169887] [nf = 1340] [nu = 4115] [ut = 306]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 779475] [nf = 6621] [nu = 10231] [ut = 308]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 44 secs [nr = 3648569] [nf = 31604] [nu = 34867] [ut = 312]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 11029188] [nf = 109667] [nu = 108009] [ut = 319]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 11033315] [nf = 109668] [nu = 108532] [ut = 319]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 11048684] [nf = 109807] [nu = 109150] [ut = 319]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 11158471] [nf = 112807] [nu = 111325] [ut = 342]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 132 secs [nr = 12032757] [nf = 129298] [nu = 137848] [ut = 346]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 205 secs [nr = 19784653] [nf = 314317] [nu = 362872] [ut = 346]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 30273705
% resolvents: 29812923 factors: 460782
% Number of unit clauses generated: 375219
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 1.24
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 56 [1] = 247 [2] = 3 [3] = 3
% [4] = 23 [5] = 8 [6] = 2 [7] = 7
% Total = 349
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 375219 [2] = 9280263 [3] = 13331762 [4] = 6197554 [5] = 1008968 [6] = 77881
% [7] = 2041 [8] = 17
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] loop (+)0 (-)0
% [1] last_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [2] m_main_v_REPLY_h_OWNED_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [3] m_main_v_REPLY_h_STALL_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] m_main_v_REPLY_h_WAITING_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [5] node10_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] node11_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] node12_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] node13_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] node14_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] node15_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] node16_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] node17_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] node1_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [14] node2_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [15] node3_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [16] node4_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [17] node5_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [18] node67_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [19] node6_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [20] node7_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] node8_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] node9_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] until2p70_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] until68_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [25] xuntil2p71_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [26] xuntil69_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [27] m_main_v_CMD_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] m_memory_v_REPLY_h_OWNED_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [29] m_memory_v_REPLY_h_STALL_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] m_memory_v_REPLY_h_WAITING_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [31] m_memory_v_abort_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] m_memory_v_busy_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [33] m_memory_v_master_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] m_memory_v_reply_h_owned_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [35] m_memory_v_reply_h_stall_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] m_memory_v_reply_h_waiting_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [37] m_processor_v_REPLY_h_OWNED_2 (+)0 (-)3
% [38] m_processor_v_REPLY_h_STALL_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [39] m_processor_v_REPLY_h_WAITING_2 (+)0 (-)3
% [40] m_processor_v_abort_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [41] m_processor_v_master_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [42] m_processor_v_readable_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [43] m_processor_v_reply_h_owned_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [44] m_processor_v_reply_h_stall_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [45] m_processor_v_reply_h_waiting_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [46] m_processor_v_waiting_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [47] m_processor_v_writable_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [48] node19_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [49] node20_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [50] node21_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [51] node24_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [52] node25_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [53] node26_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [54] node27_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [55] node28_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [56] node29_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [57] node30_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [58] node31_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [59] node35_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [60] node36_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [61] node40_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [62] node41_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [63] node42_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [64] node43_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [65] node47_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [66] node48_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [67] node49_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [68] node50_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [69] node51_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [70] node54_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [71] node55_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [72] node56_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [73] node57_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [74] node58_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [75] node59_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [76] node60_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [77] node61_2 (+)0 (-)3
% [78] node62_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [79] node63_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [80] node64_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [81] node65_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [82] node66_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [83] succ_2 (+)44 (-)0
% [84] trans_2 (+)44 (-)0
% [85] m_memory_v_CMD_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [86] m_memory_v_cmd_3 (+)1 (-)8
% [87] m_processor_v_CMD_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [88] m_processor_v_cmd_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [89] m_processor_v_snoop_3 (+)1 (-)2
% [90] m_processor_v_state_3 (+)1 (-)2
% [91] node18_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [92] node22_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [93] node23_3 (+)44 (-)0
% [94] node32_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [95] node33_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [96] node34_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [97] node37_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [98] node38_3 (+)44 (-)0
% [99] node39_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [100] node44_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [101] node45_3 (+)44 (-)0
% [102] node46_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [103] node52_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [104] node53_3 (+)44 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)278 (-)71
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 349
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 321597965
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 397329301
% Number of successful unifications: 30273705
% Number of unification failures: 12542218
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 12
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 256375490
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2894519856
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 18
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 310563
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 393
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 875
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.45
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 200
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 42815923
% ConstructUnitClause() = 310856
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.39 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 100912
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 305 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------