TSTP Solution File: SWV420-1.020 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SWV420-1.020 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 07:17:44 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.06s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP19423/SWV/SWV420-1.020+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 306] [nf = 0] [nu = 141] [ut = 146]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2312] [nf = 1] [nu = 376] [ut = 149]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8037] [nf = 41] [nu = 677] [ut = 152]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 34026] [nf = 299] [nu = 1211] [ut = 152]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 144637] [nf = 1340] [nu = 2965] [ut = 156]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 651975] [nf = 6621] [nu = 8831] [ut = 158]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 27 secs [nr = 2950894] [nf = 31604] [nu = 33217] [ut = 162]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 12899689] [nf = 153433] [nu = 128424] [ut = 169]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 12903416] [nf = 153434] [nu = 128697] [ut = 169]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 12917935] [nf = 153573] [nu = 129065] [ut = 169]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 13021697] [nf = 156573] [nu = 130990] [ut = 192]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 130 secs [nr = 13825508] [nf = 172939] [nu = 157263] [ut = 196]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 178 secs [nr = 20729479] [nf = 355358] [nu = 382037] [ut = 196]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 38748776
% resolvents: 38130142 factors: 618634
% Number of unit clauses generated: 949248
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 2.45
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 31 [1] = 122 [2] = 3 [3] = 3
% [4] = 23 [5] = 8 [6] = 2 [7] = 7
% Total = 199
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 949248 [2] = 14328054 [3] = 14690884 [4] = 7461367 [5] = 1232405 [6] = 83192
% [7] = 3574 [8] = 50 [9] = 2
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] loop (+)0 (-)0
% [1] last_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [2] m_main_v_REPLY_h_OWNED_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [3] m_main_v_REPLY_h_STALL_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] m_main_v_REPLY_h_WAITING_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [5] node10_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] node11_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] node12_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] node13_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] node14_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] node15_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] node16_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] node17_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] node1_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [14] node2_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [15] node3_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [16] node4_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [17] node5_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [18] node67_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [19] node6_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [20] node7_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] node8_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] node9_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] until2p70_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] until68_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [25] xuntil2p71_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [26] xuntil69_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [27] m_main_v_CMD_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] m_memory_v_REPLY_h_OWNED_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [29] m_memory_v_REPLY_h_STALL_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] m_memory_v_REPLY_h_WAITING_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [31] m_memory_v_abort_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] m_memory_v_busy_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [33] m_memory_v_master_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] m_memory_v_reply_h_owned_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [35] m_memory_v_reply_h_stall_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] m_memory_v_reply_h_waiting_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [37] m_processor_v_REPLY_h_OWNED_2 (+)0 (-)3
% [38] m_processor_v_REPLY_h_STALL_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [39] m_processor_v_REPLY_h_WAITING_2 (+)0 (-)3
% [40] m_processor_v_abort_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [41] m_processor_v_master_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [42] m_processor_v_readable_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [43] m_processor_v_reply_h_owned_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [44] m_processor_v_reply_h_stall_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [45] m_processor_v_reply_h_waiting_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [46] m_processor_v_waiting_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [47] m_processor_v_writable_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [48] node19_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [49] node20_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [50] node21_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [51] node24_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [52] node25_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [53] node26_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [54] node27_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [55] node28_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [56] node29_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [57] node30_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [58] node31_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [59] node35_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [60] node36_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [61] node40_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [62] node41_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [63] node42_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [64] node43_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [65] node47_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [66] node48_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [67] node49_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [68] node50_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [69] node51_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [70] node54_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [71] node55_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [72] node56_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [73] node57_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [74] node58_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [75] node59_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [76] node60_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [77] node61_2 (+)0 (-)3
% [78] node62_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [79] node63_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [80] node64_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [81] node65_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [82] node66_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [83] succ_2 (+)19 (-)0
% [84] trans_2 (+)19 (-)0
% [85] m_memory_v_CMD_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [86] m_memory_v_cmd_3 (+)1 (-)8
% [87] m_processor_v_CMD_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [88] m_processor_v_cmd_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [89] m_processor_v_snoop_3 (+)1 (-)2
% [90] m_processor_v_state_3 (+)1 (-)2
% [91] node18_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [92] node22_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [93] node23_3 (+)19 (-)0
% [94] node32_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [95] node33_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [96] node34_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [97] node37_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [98] node38_3 (+)19 (-)0
% [99] node39_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [100] node44_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [101] node45_3 (+)19 (-)0
% [102] node46_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [103] node52_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [104] node53_3 (+)19 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)128 (-)71
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 199
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 396225795
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 440041262
% Number of successful unifications: 38748776
% Number of unification failures: 10178231
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 12
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 325665484
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3614204503
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 18
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 809699
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 243
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 475
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.51
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 175
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 48927007
% ConstructUnitClause() = 809867
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.79 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 129163
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------