TSTP Solution File: SWV420-1.010 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SWV420-1.010 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 07:15:25 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP22430/SWV/SWV420-1.010+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 246] [nf = 0] [nu = 81] [ut = 86]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2092] [nf = 1] [nu = 216] [ut = 89]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7477] [nf = 41] [nu = 417] [ut = 92]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 32176] [nf = 299] [nu = 851] [ut = 92]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 134537] [nf = 1340] [nu = 2505] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 600975] [nf = 6621] [nu = 8271] [ut = 98]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 24 secs [nr = 2671824] [nf = 31604] [nu = 32557] [ut = 102]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 106 secs [nr = 11719048] [nf = 155465] [nu = 127607] [ut = 102]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 12767950] [nf = 171420] [nu = 159006] [ut = 109]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 12771517] [nf = 171421] [nu = 159179] [ut = 109]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 12785696] [nf = 171560] [nu = 159447] [ut = 109]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 12887048] [nf = 174560] [nu = 161272] [ut = 132]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 129 secs [nr = 13662669] [nf = 190876] [nu = 187445] [ut = 136]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 175 secs [nr = 20227470] [nf = 372255] [nu = 412119] [ut = 136]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 38623283
% resolvents: 37946874 factors: 676409
% Number of unit clauses generated: 997152
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 2.58
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 21 [1] = 72 [2] = 3 [3] = 3
% [4] = 23 [5] = 8 [6] = 2 [7] = 7
% Total = 139
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 997152 [2] = 14561967 [3] = 14613436 [4] = 7237697 [5] = 1136378 [6] = 72397
% [7] = 4187 [8] = 69
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] loop (+)0 (-)0
% [1] last_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [2] m_main_v_REPLY_h_OWNED_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [3] m_main_v_REPLY_h_STALL_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] m_main_v_REPLY_h_WAITING_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [5] node10_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] node11_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] node12_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] node13_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] node14_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] node15_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] node16_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] node17_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] node1_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [14] node2_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [15] node3_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [16] node4_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [17] node5_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [18] node67_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [19] node6_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [20] node7_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] node8_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] node9_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] until2p70_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] until68_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [25] xuntil2p71_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [26] xuntil69_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [27] m_main_v_CMD_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] m_memory_v_REPLY_h_OWNED_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [29] m_memory_v_REPLY_h_STALL_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] m_memory_v_REPLY_h_WAITING_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [31] m_memory_v_abort_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] m_memory_v_busy_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [33] m_memory_v_master_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] m_memory_v_reply_h_owned_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [35] m_memory_v_reply_h_stall_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] m_memory_v_reply_h_waiting_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [37] m_processor_v_REPLY_h_OWNED_2 (+)0 (-)3
% [38] m_processor_v_REPLY_h_STALL_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [39] m_processor_v_REPLY_h_WAITING_2 (+)0 (-)3
% [40] m_processor_v_abort_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [41] m_processor_v_master_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [42] m_processor_v_readable_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [43] m_processor_v_reply_h_owned_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [44] m_processor_v_reply_h_stall_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [45] m_processor_v_reply_h_waiting_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [46] m_processor_v_waiting_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [47] m_processor_v_writable_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [48] node19_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [49] node20_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [50] node21_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [51] node24_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [52] node25_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [53] node26_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [54] node27_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [55] node28_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [56] node29_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [57] node30_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [58] node31_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [59] node35_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [60] node36_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [61] node40_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [62] node41_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [63] node42_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [64] node43_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [65] node47_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [66] node48_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [67] node49_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [68] node50_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [69] node51_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [70] node54_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [71] node55_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [72] node56_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [73] node57_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [74] node58_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [75] node59_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [76] node60_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [77] node61_2 (+)0 (-)3
% [78] node62_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [79] node63_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [80] node64_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [81] node65_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [82] node66_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [83] succ_2 (+)9 (-)0
% [84] trans_2 (+)9 (-)0
% [85] m_memory_v_CMD_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [86] m_memory_v_cmd_3 (+)1 (-)8
% [87] m_processor_v_CMD_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [88] m_processor_v_cmd_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [89] m_processor_v_snoop_3 (+)1 (-)2
% [90] m_processor_v_state_3 (+)1 (-)2
% [91] node18_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [92] node22_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [93] node23_3 (+)9 (-)0
% [94] node32_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [95] node33_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [96] node34_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [97] node37_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [98] node38_3 (+)9 (-)0
% [99] node39_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [100] node44_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [101] node45_3 (+)9 (-)0
% [102] node46_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [103] node52_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [104] node53_3 (+)9 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)68 (-)71
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 139
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 395931582
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 446672507
% Number of successful unifications: 38623283
% Number of unification failures: 9587816
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 12
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 351832108
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3682233134
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 20
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 847686
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 183
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 315
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.58
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 165
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 48211099
% ConstructUnitClause() = 847804
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.83 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 128744
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------