TSTP Solution File: SWV419-1.010 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SWV419-1.010 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 07:12:23 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP11501/SWV/SWV419-1.010+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ......................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 371] [nf = 0] [nu = 190] [ut = 130]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2237] [nf = 0] [nu = 778] [ut = 158]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10758] [nf = 30] [nu = 2743] [ut = 176]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 49576] [nf = 379] [nu = 10340] [ut = 179]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 229038] [nf = 3185] [nu = 38865] [ut = 179]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 1087277] [nf = 17740] [nu = 167604] [ut = 233]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 33 secs [nr = 5725314] [nf = 117078] [nu = 737696] [ut = 331]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 21152586] [nf = 426498] [nu = 2878421] [ut = 360]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 21155241] [nf = 426498] [nu = 2879553] [ut = 360]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 21167272] [nf = 426602] [nu = 2883045] [ut = 360]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 21244232] [nf = 427913] [nu = 2895898] [ut = 366]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 126 secs [nr = 21743822] [nf = 444054] [nu = 2945326] [ut = 369]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 146 secs [nr = 25178450] [nf = 533082] [nu = 3172265] [ut = 369]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 52289993
% resolvents: 50805832 factors: 1484161
% Number of unit clauses generated: 4180095
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 7.99
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 25 [1] = 107 [2] = 28 [3] = 18
% [4] = 9 [5] = 3 [6] = 54 [7] = 143
% [8] = 27
% Total = 414
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 4180095 [2] = 23247804 [3] = 19124820 [4] = 5126024 [5] = 595057 [6] = 16189
% [7] = 4
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] loop (+)0 (-)0
% [1] last_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [2] node23_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [3] node24_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [4] node25_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [5] node26_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [6] until27_1 (+)4 (-)0
% [7] until2p29_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] xuntil28_1 (+)3 (-)0
% [9] xuntil2p30_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [10] m_cell_v_ack_2 (+)0 (-)7
% [11] m_cell_v_left_2 (+)3 (-)0
% [12] m_cell_v_req_2 (+)0 (-)12
% [13] m_cell_v_right_2 (+)3 (-)0
% [14] m_cell_v_token_2 (+)2 (-)4
% [15] succ_2 (+)9 (-)0
% [16] trans_2 (+)9 (-)0
% [17] m_and_h_gate_h_init_v_in1_3 (+)2 (-)0
% [18] m_and_h_gate_h_init_v_in2_3 (+)6 (-)3
% [19] m_and_h_gate_h_init_v_init_h_out_3 (+)6 (-)6
% [20] m_and_h_gate_h_init_v_out_3 (+)6 (-)6
% [21] m_and_h_gate_v_in1_3 (+)0 (-)23
% [22] m_and_h_gate_v_in2_3 (+)24 (-)12
% [23] m_and_h_gate_v_out_3 (+)0 (-)60
% [24] m_c_h_element_v_in1_3 (+)0 (-)16
% [25] m_c_h_element_v_in2_3 (+)0 (-)8
% [26] m_c_h_element_v_out_3 (+)0 (-)12
% [27] m_mutex_h_half_v_inp_3 (+)0 (-)10
% [28] m_mutex_h_half_v_other_h_out_3 (+)0 (-)12
% [29] m_mutex_h_half_v_out_3 (+)0 (-)13
% [30] m_or_h_gate_v_in1_3 (+)0 (-)10
% [31] m_or_h_gate_v_in2_3 (+)0 (-)18
% [32] m_or_h_gate_v_out_3 (+)0 (-)15
% [33] m_user_v_ack_3 (+)0 (-)6
% [34] m_user_v_req_3 (+)0 (-)2
% [35] node16_3 (+)0 (-)8
% [36] node17_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [37] node1_3 (+)3 (-)0
% [38] node20_3 (+)0 (-)33
% [39] node2_3 (+)3 (-)0
% [40] node3_3 (+)3 (-)0
% [41] node4_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [42] node9_3 (+)0 (-)3
% [43] node10_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [44] node11_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [45] node12_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [46] node13_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [47] node14_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [48] node15_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [49] node18_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [50] node19_4 (+)9 (-)0
% [51] node21_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [52] node22_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [53] node5_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [54] node6_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [55] node7_4 (+)0 (-)6
% [56] node8_4 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)96 (-)318
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 414
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 532346570
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 3622901
% Number of successful unifications: 52289993
% Number of unification failures: 76825631
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 386
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 586153103
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2885771776
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 353055
% Max entries in substitution set: 23
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 3208284
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 4
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 369
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 1166
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.32
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 122
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 129115624
% ConstructUnitClause() = 3208673
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 3.53 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 174300
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------