TSTP Solution File: SWV419-1.005 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SWV419-1.005 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 07:12:21 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP15159/SWV/SWV419-1.005+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 356] [nf = 0] [nu = 175] [ut = 115]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2162] [nf = 0] [nu = 743] [ut = 143]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10503] [nf = 30] [nu = 2688] [ut = 161]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 48506] [nf = 379] [nu = 10265] [ut = 164]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 223228] [nf = 3185] [nu = 38770] [ut = 164]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 1058212] [nf = 17727] [nu = 167460] [ut = 218]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 5599854] [nf = 117070] [nu = 738038] [ut = 316]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 21213740] [nf = 433623] [nu = 2886535] [ut = 345]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 21216341] [nf = 433623] [nu = 2887654] [ut = 345]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 21228209] [nf = 433727] [nu = 2891142] [ut = 345]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 21302241] [nf = 435039] [nu = 2904008] [ut = 351]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 126 secs [nr = 21768955] [nf = 451087] [nu = 2953475] [ut = 354]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 144 secs [nr = 24863023] [nf = 538582] [nu = 3180677] [ut = 354]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 288 secs [nr = 48114200] [nf = 1484773] [nu = 4334184] [ut = 405]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 52113687
% resolvents: 50594075 factors: 1519612
% Number of unit clauses generated: 4801337
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 9.21
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 20 [1] = 97 [2] = 28 [3] = 18
% [4] = 9 [5] = 3 [6] = 54 [7] = 149
% [8] = 27
% Total = 405
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 4801337 [2] = 24494109 [3] = 17907173 [4] = 4363108 [5] = 547960
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] loop (+)0 (-)0
% [1] last_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [2] node23_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [3] node24_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [4] node25_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [5] node26_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [6] until27_1 (+)4 (-)0
% [7] until2p29_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] xuntil28_1 (+)3 (-)0
% [9] xuntil2p30_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [10] m_cell_v_ack_2 (+)0 (-)7
% [11] m_cell_v_left_2 (+)3 (-)0
% [12] m_cell_v_req_2 (+)0 (-)15
% [13] m_cell_v_right_2 (+)3 (-)0
% [14] m_cell_v_token_2 (+)2 (-)4
% [15] succ_2 (+)4 (-)0
% [16] trans_2 (+)4 (-)0
% [17] m_and_h_gate_h_init_v_in1_3 (+)2 (-)0
% [18] m_and_h_gate_h_init_v_in2_3 (+)6 (-)3
% [19] m_and_h_gate_h_init_v_init_h_out_3 (+)6 (-)6
% [20] m_and_h_gate_h_init_v_out_3 (+)6 (-)6
% [21] m_and_h_gate_v_in1_3 (+)0 (-)23
% [22] m_and_h_gate_v_in2_3 (+)24 (-)12
% [23] m_and_h_gate_v_out_3 (+)0 (-)60
% [24] m_c_h_element_v_in1_3 (+)0 (-)16
% [25] m_c_h_element_v_in2_3 (+)0 (-)8
% [26] m_c_h_element_v_out_3 (+)0 (-)12
% [27] m_mutex_h_half_v_inp_3 (+)0 (-)13
% [28] m_mutex_h_half_v_other_h_out_3 (+)0 (-)12
% [29] m_mutex_h_half_v_out_3 (+)0 (-)13
% [30] m_or_h_gate_v_in1_3 (+)0 (-)10
% [31] m_or_h_gate_v_in2_3 (+)0 (-)18
% [32] m_or_h_gate_v_out_3 (+)0 (-)15
% [33] m_user_v_ack_3 (+)0 (-)6
% [34] m_user_v_req_3 (+)0 (-)2
% [35] node16_3 (+)0 (-)8
% [36] node17_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [37] node1_3 (+)3 (-)0
% [38] node20_3 (+)0 (-)33
% [39] node2_3 (+)3 (-)0
% [40] node3_3 (+)3 (-)0
% [41] node4_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [42] node9_3 (+)0 (-)3
% [43] node10_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [44] node11_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [45] node12_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [46] node13_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [47] node14_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [48] node15_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [49] node18_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [50] node19_4 (+)4 (-)0
% [51] node21_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [52] node22_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [53] node5_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [54] node6_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [55] node7_4 (+)0 (-)6
% [56] node8_4 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)81 (-)324
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 405
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 524217980
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 3561666
% Number of successful unifications: 52113687
% Number of unification failures: 72168014
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 386
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 579136765
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2847784914
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 279496
% Max entries in substitution set: 23
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 3738069
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 4
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 354
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 1141
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.31
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 117
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 124281701
% ConstructUnitClause() = 3738454
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 3.89 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 173712
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------