TSTP Solution File: SWV414+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SWV414+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:56:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (  12 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   14 (  13 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    8 (   7   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    4 (   0 usr;   3 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   3   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (  12   !;   2   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_21,type,
    sQ3_eqProxy: ( $int * $int ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_22,type,
    sQ4_eqProxy: ( $rat * $rat ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_23,type,
    sQ5_eqProxy: ( $real * $real ) > $o ).

fof(f435,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f317,f285]) ).

fof(f285,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : create_pq = i(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),
    inference(literal_reordering,[],[f222]) ).

fof(f222,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : create_pq = i(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f166]) ).

fof(f166,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : create_pq = i(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),
    inference(rectify,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ! [X1,X0] : create_pq = i(triple(X1,create_slb,X0)),
    inference(rectify,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f54,axiom,
    ! [X1,X0] : create_pq = i(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax54) ).

fof(f317,plain,
    create_pq != i(triple(create_pqp,create_slb,sK0)),
    inference(literal_reordering,[],[f261]) ).

fof(f261,plain,
    create_pq != i(triple(create_pqp,create_slb,sK0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f197]) ).

fof(f197,plain,
    create_pq != i(triple(create_pqp,create_slb,sK0)),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f114,f196]) ).

fof(f196,plain,
    ( ? [X0] : create_pq != i(triple(create_pqp,create_slb,X0))
   => create_pq != i(triple(create_pqp,create_slb,sK0)) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f114,plain,
    ? [X0] : create_pq != i(triple(create_pqp,create_slb,X0)),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f64]) ).

fof(f64,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] : create_pq = i(triple(create_pqp,create_slb,X0)),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f63]) ).

fof(f63,conjecture,
    ! [X0] : create_pq = i(triple(create_pqp,create_slb,X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11  % Problem    : SWV414+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.09/0.12  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 19:27:10 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.48  % (28806)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.17/0.48  % (28823)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 0.17/0.49  % (28821)ott+3_1:1_gsp=on:lcm=predicate:i=138:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/138Mi)
% 0.17/0.49  % (28814)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.17/0.49  % (28811)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.17/0.49  TRYING [1]
% 0.17/0.50  % (28819)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:rp=on:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.17/0.50  % (28802)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.17/0.50  % (28814)First to succeed.
% 0.17/0.50  TRYING [2]
% 0.17/0.51  % (28814)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.17/0.51  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.51  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.51  % (28814)------------------------------
% 0.17/0.51  % (28814)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.17/0.51  % (28814)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.17/0.51  % (28814)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.17/0.51  
% 0.17/0.51  % (28814)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.17/0.51  % (28814)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.17/0.51  % (28814)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.17/0.51  % (28814)------------------------------
% 0.17/0.51  % (28814)------------------------------
% 0.17/0.51  % (28799)Success in time 0.175 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------