TSTP Solution File: SWV414+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SWV414+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:44:35 EDT 2023

% Result   : Timeout 408.17s 300.19s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    8 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   2 sgn;   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] : i(triple(create_pqp,create_slb,X1)) = create_pq,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ncKUcVYOqj/E---3.1_20894.p',co1) ).

fof(ax54,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : i(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)) = create_pq,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ncKUcVYOqj/E---3.1_20894.p',ax54) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] : i(triple(create_pqp,create_slb,X1)) = create_pq,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    i(triple(create_pqp,create_slb,esk1_0)) != create_pq,
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X8,X9] : i(triple(X8,create_slb,X9)) = create_pq,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax54]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    i(triple(create_pqp,create_slb,esk1_0)) != create_pq,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    i(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)) = create_pq,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SWV414+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 04:48:22 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ncKUcVYOqj/E---3.1_20894.p
% 408.17/300.19  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 408.17/300.19  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.17/300.19  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.17/300.19  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.17/300.19  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.17/300.19  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.17/300.19  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 408.17/300.19  # new_bool_1 with pid 20975 completed with status 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 408.17/300.19  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.17/300.19  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.17/300.19  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.17/300.19  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.17/300.19  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.17/300.19  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 408.17/300.19  # Search class: FGUSS-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 408.17/300.19  # partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 408.17/300.19  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 408.17/300.19  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 100s (1) cores
% 408.17/300.19  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 20977 completed with status 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 408.17/300.19  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.17/300.19  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.17/300.19  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.17/300.19  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.17/300.19  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.17/300.19  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 408.17/300.19  # Search class: FGUSS-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 408.17/300.19  # partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 408.17/300.19  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 408.17/300.19  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 100s (1) cores
% 408.17/300.19  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 408.17/300.19  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 408.17/300.19  
% 408.17/300.19  # Proof found!
% 408.17/300.19  # SZS status Theorem
% 408.17/300.19  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 408.17/300.19  # Parsed axioms                        : 63
% 408.17/300.19  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 55
% 408.17/300.19  # Initial clauses                      : 12
% 408.17/300.19  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 12
% 408.17/300.19  # Processed clauses                    : 4
% 408.17/300.19  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # ...remaining for further processing  : 4
% 408.17/300.19  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 408.17/300.19  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # NegExts                              : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 408.17/300.19  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 408.17/300.19  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 408.17/300.19  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 408.17/300.19  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 408.17/300.19  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 408.17/300.19  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 408.17/300.19  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 408.17/300.19  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 408.17/300.19  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 408.17/300.19  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 408.17/300.19  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 408.17/300.19  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 408.17/300.19  # Current number of processed clauses  : 3
% 408.17/300.19  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 408.17/300.19  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 408.17/300.19  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 408.17/300.19  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8
% 408.17/300.19  # ...number of literals in the above   : 16
% 408.17/300.19  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 408.17/300.19  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 408.17/300.19  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 408.17/300.19  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 408.17/300.19  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1046
% 408.17/300.19  
% 408.17/300.19  # -------------------------------------------------
% 408.17/300.19  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 408.17/300.19  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 408.17/300.19  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 408.17/300.19  # Maximum resident set size: 1900 pages
% 408.17/300.19  
% 408.17/300.19  # -------------------------------------------------
% 408.17/300.19  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 408.17/300.19  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 408.17/300.19  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 408.17/300.19  # Maximum resident set size: 1748 pages
% 408.17/300.19  % E---3.1 exiting
% 408.17/300.19  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------