TSTP Solution File: SWV410+1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : SWV410+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:04:02 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.13s 1.86s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 15
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 4 unt; 13 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 6 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 4 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 20 ( 10 >; 10 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 (; 3 !; 1 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ pair_in_list > strictly_less_than > less_than > contains_slb > isnonempty_slb > update_slb > remove_slb > pair > lookup_slb > insert_slb > #nlpp > create_slb > bottom > #skF_1
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(contains_slb,type,
contains_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(lookup_slb,type,
lookup_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(pair_in_list,type,
pair_in_list: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(less_than,type,
less_than: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff('#skF_1',type,
'#skF_1': $i ).
tff(strictly_less_than,type,
strictly_less_than: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(pair,type,
pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(bottom,type,
bottom: $i ).
tff(isnonempty_slb,type,
isnonempty_slb: $i > $o ).
tff(remove_slb,type,
remove_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(create_slb,type,
create_slb: $i ).
tff(insert_slb,type,
insert_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(update_slb,type,
update_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(f_104,axiom,
! [U] : ~ contains_slb(create_slb,U),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+2.ax',ax20) ).
tff(f_160,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [U] :
( contains_slb(create_slb,U)
=> ? [V] : pair_in_list(create_slb,U,V) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l46_co) ).
tff(c_20,plain,
! [U_13] : ~ contains_slb(create_slb,U_13),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_104]) ).
tff(c_54,plain,
contains_slb(create_slb,'#skF_1'),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_160]) ).
tff(c_55,plain,
$false,
inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_54]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SWV410+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.17/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 22:36:06 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 3.13/1.86 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.13/1.86
% 3.13/1.86 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.13/1.88
% 3.13/1.88 Inference rules
% 3.13/1.88 ----------------------
% 3.13/1.88 #Ref : 0
% 3.13/1.88 #Sup : 0
% 3.13/1.88 #Fact : 0
% 3.13/1.88 #Define : 0
% 3.13/1.88 #Split : 0
% 3.13/1.88 #Chain : 0
% 3.13/1.88 #Close : 0
% 3.13/1.88
% 3.13/1.88 Ordering : KBO
% 3.13/1.88
% 3.13/1.88 Simplification rules
% 3.13/1.88 ----------------------
% 3.13/1.88 #Subsume : 26
% 3.13/1.88 #Demod : 0
% 3.13/1.88 #Tautology : 0
% 3.13/1.88 #SimpNegUnit : 1
% 3.13/1.88 #BackRed : 0
% 3.13/1.88
% 3.13/1.88 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.13/1.88 #Strategies tried : 1
% 3.13/1.88
% 3.13/1.88 Timing (in seconds)
% 3.13/1.88 ----------------------
% 3.13/1.89 Preprocessing : 0.56
% 3.13/1.89 Parsing : 0.29
% 3.13/1.89 CNF conversion : 0.03
% 3.13/1.89 Main loop : 0.08
% 3.13/1.89 Inferencing : 0.00
% 3.13/1.89 Reduction : 0.04
% 3.13/1.89 Demodulation : 0.03
% 3.13/1.89 BG Simplification : 0.02
% 3.13/1.89 Subsumption : 0.03
% 3.13/1.89 Abstraction : 0.01
% 3.13/1.89 MUC search : 0.00
% 3.13/1.89 Cooper : 0.00
% 3.13/1.89 Total : 0.69
% 3.13/1.89 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 3.13/1.89 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 3.13/1.89 Index Matching : 0.00
% 3.13/1.89 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------