TSTP Solution File: SWV405+1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SWV405+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 22:32:53 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.94s 1.16s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   68 (  27   ~;  22   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (   6 sgn;  30   !;  18   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ pair_in_list(create_slb,X0,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax22) ).

fof(f24,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : check_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax36) ).

fof(f42,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( check_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1))
    <=> ! [X2,X3] :
          ( pair_in_list(create_slb,X2,X3)
         => less_than(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l41_co) ).

fof(f43,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( check_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1))
      <=> ! [X2,X3] :
            ( pair_in_list(create_slb,X2,X3)
           => less_than(X3,X2) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( check_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1))
    <~> ! [X2,X3] :
          ( less_than(X3,X2)
          | ~ pair_in_list(create_slb,X2,X3) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f89,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ? [X2,X3] :
            ( ~ less_than(X3,X2)
            & pair_in_list(create_slb,X2,X3) )
        | ~ check_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)) )
      & ( ! [X2,X3] :
            ( less_than(X3,X2)
            | ~ pair_in_list(create_slb,X2,X3) )
        | check_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f82]) ).

fof(f90,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ? [X2,X3] :
            ( ~ less_than(X3,X2)
            & pair_in_list(create_slb,X2,X3) )
        | ~ check_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)) )
      & ( ! [X4,X5] :
            ( less_than(X5,X4)
            | ~ pair_in_list(create_slb,X4,X5) )
        | check_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f89]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
        ( ( ? [X2,X3] :
              ( ~ less_than(X3,X2)
              & pair_in_list(create_slb,X2,X3) )
          | ~ check_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)) )
        & ( ! [X4,X5] :
              ( less_than(X5,X4)
              | ~ pair_in_list(create_slb,X4,X5) )
          | check_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)) ) )
   => ( ( ? [X2,X3] :
            ( ~ less_than(X3,X2)
            & pair_in_list(create_slb,X2,X3) )
        | ~ check_cpq(triple(sK0,create_slb,sK1)) )
      & ( ! [X4,X5] :
            ( less_than(X5,X4)
            | ~ pair_in_list(create_slb,X4,X5) )
        | check_cpq(triple(sK0,create_slb,sK1)) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ( ? [X2,X3] :
        ( ~ less_than(X3,X2)
        & pair_in_list(create_slb,X2,X3) )
   => ( ~ less_than(sK3,sK2)
      & pair_in_list(create_slb,sK2,sK3) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ less_than(sK3,sK2)
        & pair_in_list(create_slb,sK2,sK3) )
      | ~ check_cpq(triple(sK0,create_slb,sK1)) )
    & ( ! [X4,X5] :
          ( less_than(X5,X4)
          | ~ pair_in_list(create_slb,X4,X5) )
      | check_cpq(triple(sK0,create_slb,sK1)) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f90,f92,f91]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ pair_in_list(create_slb,X0,X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : check_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f142,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( less_than(X5,X4)
      | ~ pair_in_list(create_slb,X4,X5)
      | check_cpq(triple(sK0,create_slb,sK1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f93]) ).

fof(f143,plain,
    ( pair_in_list(create_slb,sK2,sK3)
    | ~ check_cpq(triple(sK0,create_slb,sK1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f93]) ).

cnf(c_60,plain,
    ~ pair_in_list(create_slb,X0,X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f105]) ).

cnf(c_77,plain,
    check_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

cnf(c_96,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ check_cpq(triple(sK0,create_slb,sK1))
    | pair_in_list(create_slb,sK2,sK3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f143]) ).

cnf(c_97,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ pair_in_list(create_slb,X0,X1)
    | check_cpq(triple(sK0,create_slb,sK1))
    | less_than(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f142]) ).

cnf(c_133,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pair_in_list(create_slb,X0,X1),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_60]) ).

cnf(c_151,plain,
    pair_in_list(create_slb,sK2,sK3),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_77]) ).

cnf(c_155,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_151,c_133]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWV405+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 07:17:35 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.94/1.16  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.94/1.16  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.94/1.16  
% 0.94/1.16  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 0.94/1.16  
% 0.94/1.16  ------  iProver source info
% 0.94/1.16  
% 0.94/1.16  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 0.94/1.16  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 0.94/1.16  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.94/1.16  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 0.94/1.16  
% 0.94/1.16  ------ Parsing...
% 0.94/1.16  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.94/1.16  
% 0.94/1.16  ------ Preprocessing...
% 0.94/1.16  
% 0.94/1.16  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.94/1.16  
% 0.94/1.16  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.94/1.16  
% 0.94/1.16  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------