TSTP Solution File: SWV405+1 by PyRes---1.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.3
% Problem : SWV405+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:17:06 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.57s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV405+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 12:00:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.57/0.74 # Version: 1.3
% 0.57/0.74 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.57/0.74 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.57/0.74 fof(ax22,axiom,(![U]:(![V]:(~pair_in_list(create_slb,U,V)))),input).
% 0.57/0.74 fof(c150,axiom,(![U]:(![V]:~pair_in_list(create_slb,U,V))),inference(fof_simplification,status(thm),[ax22])).
% 0.57/0.74 fof(c151,axiom,(![X111]:(![X112]:~pair_in_list(create_slb,X111,X112))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c150])).
% 0.57/0.74 cnf(c152,axiom,~pair_in_list(create_slb,X144,X145),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c151])).
% 0.57/0.74 fof(ax36,axiom,(![U]:(![V]:check_cpq(triple(U,create_slb,V)))),input).
% 0.57/0.74 fof(c99,axiom,(![X65]:(![X66]:check_cpq(triple(X65,create_slb,X66)))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[ax36])).
% 0.57/0.74 cnf(c100,axiom,check_cpq(triple(X153,create_slb,X152)),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c99])).
% 0.57/0.74 fof(l41_co,conjecture,(![U]:(![V]:(check_cpq(triple(U,create_slb,V))<=>(![W]:(![X]:(pair_in_list(create_slb,W,X)=>less_than(X,W))))))),input).
% 0.57/0.74 fof(c24,negated_conjecture,(~(![U]:(![V]:(check_cpq(triple(U,create_slb,V))<=>(![W]:(![X]:(pair_in_list(create_slb,W,X)=>less_than(X,W)))))))),inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[l41_co])).
% 0.57/0.74 fof(c25,negated_conjecture,(?[U]:(?[V]:((~check_cpq(triple(U,create_slb,V))|(?[W]:(?[X]:(pair_in_list(create_slb,W,X)&~less_than(X,W)))))&(check_cpq(triple(U,create_slb,V))|(![W]:(![X]:(~pair_in_list(create_slb,W,X)|less_than(X,W)))))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c24])).
% 0.57/0.74 fof(c26,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:(?[X3]:((~check_cpq(triple(X2,create_slb,X3))|(?[X4]:(?[X5]:(pair_in_list(create_slb,X4,X5)&~less_than(X5,X4)))))&(check_cpq(triple(X2,create_slb,X3))|(![X6]:(![X7]:(~pair_in_list(create_slb,X6,X7)|less_than(X7,X6)))))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c25])).
% 0.57/0.74 fof(c28,negated_conjecture,(![X6]:(![X7]:((~check_cpq(triple(skolem0001,create_slb,skolem0002))|(pair_in_list(create_slb,skolem0003,skolem0004)&~less_than(skolem0004,skolem0003)))&(check_cpq(triple(skolem0001,create_slb,skolem0002))|(~pair_in_list(create_slb,X6,X7)|less_than(X7,X6)))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c27,negated_conjecture,((~check_cpq(triple(skolem0001,create_slb,skolem0002))|(pair_in_list(create_slb,skolem0003,skolem0004)&~less_than(skolem0004,skolem0003)))&(check_cpq(triple(skolem0001,create_slb,skolem0002))|(![X6]:(![X7]:(~pair_in_list(create_slb,X6,X7)|less_than(X7,X6)))))),inference(skolemize,status(esa),[c26])).])).
% 0.57/0.74 fof(c29,negated_conjecture,(![X6]:(![X7]:(((~check_cpq(triple(skolem0001,create_slb,skolem0002))|pair_in_list(create_slb,skolem0003,skolem0004))&(~check_cpq(triple(skolem0001,create_slb,skolem0002))|~less_than(skolem0004,skolem0003)))&(check_cpq(triple(skolem0001,create_slb,skolem0002))|(~pair_in_list(create_slb,X6,X7)|less_than(X7,X6)))))),inference(distribute,status(thm),[c28])).
% 0.57/0.74 cnf(c30,negated_conjecture,~check_cpq(triple(skolem0001,create_slb,skolem0002))|pair_in_list(create_slb,skolem0003,skolem0004),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c29])).
% 0.57/0.74 cnf(c616,plain,pair_in_list(create_slb,skolem0003,skolem0004),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c30, c100])).
% 0.57/0.74 cnf(c617,plain,$false,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c616, c152])).
% 0.57/0.74 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.57/0.74
% 0.57/0.74 # Initial clauses : 80
% 0.57/0.74 # Processed clauses : 121
% 0.57/0.74 # Factors computed : 1
% 0.57/0.74 # Resolvents computed: 432
% 0.57/0.74 # Tautologies deleted: 6
% 0.57/0.74 # Forward subsumed : 19
% 0.57/0.74 # Backward subsumed : 2
% 0.57/0.74 # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.57/0.74 # User time : 0.387 s
% 0.57/0.74 # System time : 0.018 s
% 0.57/0.74 # Total time : 0.405 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------