TSTP Solution File: SWV404+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV404+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:38:20 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 79.13s 79.32s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV404+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 14:19:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n012.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Wed Jun 15 14:19:24 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 3243.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.35 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.35 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 68 during input processing: 0 [copy,68,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 52 during input processing: 0 [copy,69,flip.1] {-} insert_cpq(triple(A,B,C),D)=triple(insert_pqp(A,D),insert_slb(B,pair(D,bottom)),C).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.47 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.47 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.47 number of clauses in intial UL: 35
% 0.18/0.47 number of clauses initially in problem: 65
% 0.18/0.47 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 53
% 0.18/0.47 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 83
% 0.18/0.47 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.47 absolute distinct symbol count: 31
% 0.18/0.47 distinct predicate count: 10
% 0.18/0.47 distinct function count: 15
% 0.18/0.47 distinct constant count: 6
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 Changing weight limit from 60 to 47.
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 Resetting weight limit to 47 after 135 givens.
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.36/1.55
% 1.36/1.55
% 1.36/1.55 Changing weight limit from 47 to 43.
% 1.36/1.55
% 1.36/1.55 Resetting weight limit to 43 after 140 givens.
% 1.36/1.55
% 1.44/1.68
% 1.44/1.68
% 1.44/1.68 Changing weight limit from 43 to 40.
% 1.44/1.68
% 1.44/1.68 Resetting weight limit to 40 after 145 givens.
% 1.44/1.68
% 1.50/1.76
% 1.50/1.76
% 1.50/1.76 Changing weight limit from 40 to 39.
% 1.50/1.76
% 1.50/1.76 Resetting weight limit to 39 after 150 givens.
% 1.50/1.76
% 1.64/1.87
% 1.64/1.87
% 1.64/1.87 Changing weight limit from 39 to 37.
% 1.64/1.87
% 1.64/1.87 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 155 givens.
% 1.64/1.87
% 1.73/1.93
% 1.73/1.93
% 1.73/1.93 Changing weight limit from 37 to 36.
% 1.73/1.93
% 1.73/1.93 Resetting weight limit to 36 after 160 givens.
% 1.73/1.93
% 1.80/2.04
% 1.80/2.04
% 1.80/2.04 Changing weight limit from 36 to 34.
% 1.80/2.04
% 1.80/2.04 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 165 givens.
% 1.80/2.04
% 1.90/2.11
% 1.90/2.11
% 1.90/2.11 Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 1.90/2.11
% 1.90/2.11 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 170 givens.
% 1.90/2.11
% 1.96/2.19
% 1.96/2.19
% 1.96/2.19 Changing weight limit from 33 to 32.
% 1.96/2.19
% 1.96/2.19 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 175 givens.
% 1.96/2.19
% 2.04/2.27
% 2.04/2.27
% 2.04/2.27 Changing weight limit from 32 to 31.
% 2.04/2.27
% 2.04/2.27 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 180 givens.
% 2.04/2.27
% 2.24/2.48
% 2.24/2.48
% 2.24/2.48 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 2.24/2.48
% 2.24/2.48 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 190 givens.
% 2.24/2.48
% 2.71/2.92
% 2.71/2.92
% 2.71/2.92 Changing weight limit from 30 to 26.
% 2.71/2.92
% 2.71/2.92 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 200 givens.
% 2.71/2.92
% 2.81/3.00
% 2.81/3.00
% 2.81/3.00 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 2.81/3.00
% 2.81/3.00 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 205 givens.
% 2.81/3.00
% 2.86/3.08
% 2.86/3.08
% 2.86/3.08 Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 2.86/3.08
% 2.86/3.08 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 210 givens.
% 2.86/3.08
% 3.01/3.23
% 3.01/3.23
% 3.01/3.23 Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 3.01/3.23
% 3.01/3.23 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 220 givens.
% 3.01/3.23
% 3.17/3.43
% 3.17/3.43
% 3.17/3.43 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 3.17/3.43
% 3.17/3.43 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 235 givens.
% 3.17/3.43
% 3.67/3.86
% 3.67/3.86
% 3.67/3.86 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 3.67/3.86
% 3.67/3.86 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 275 givens.
% 3.67/3.86
% 4.30/4.49
% 4.30/4.49
% 4.30/4.49 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 4.30/4.49
% 4.30/4.49 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 4.30/4.49
% 4.30/4.49
% 4.30/4.49 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 335 givens.
% 4.30/4.49
% 4.74/4.93
% 4.74/4.93
% 4.74/4.93 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 4.74/4.93
% 4.74/4.93 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 380 givens.
% 4.74/4.93
% 5.03/5.26
% 5.03/5.26
% 5.03/5.26 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 5.03/5.26
% 5.03/5.26 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 455 givens.
% 5.03/5.26
% 6.17/6.35
% 6.17/6.35
% 6.17/6.35 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 6.17/6.35
% 6.17/6.35 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 680 givens.
% 6.17/6.35
% 9.17/9.39
% 9.17/9.39
% 9.17/9.39 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 9.17/9.39
% 9.17/9.39 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 2045 givens.
% 9.17/9.39
% 45.72/45.90
% 45.72/45.90
% 45.72/45.90 Changing weight limit from 16 to 17.
% 45.72/45.90
% 45.72/45.90 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 8870 givens.
% 45.72/45.90
% 45.72/45.91
% 45.72/45.91
% 45.72/45.91 Changing weight limit from 17 to 18.
% 45.72/45.91
% 45.72/45.91 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 8875 givens.
% 45.72/45.91
% 79.13/79.32 lookup_slb(insert_slb(insert_slb(A,pair(create_slb,B)),pair(insert_slb(C,pair(findmin_pqp_res(D),E)),F)),create_slb)=B.
% 79.13/79.32
% 79.13/79.32 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 79.13/79.32 768 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 24525.0 K.
% 79.13/79.32 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 79.13/79.32 sym_ent ( 304) 145 0 145 0 43.0 K
% 79.13/79.32 term ( 32) 134262983 134225478 37505 105 1175.3 K
% 79.13/79.32 rel ( 40) 120438501 120376441 62060 98 2428.0 K
% 79.13/79.32 term_ptr ( 16) 1636740 985417 651323 0 10176.9 K
% 79.13/79.32 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 79.13/79.32 fpa_head ( 24) 100128 31105 69023 0 1617.7 K
% 79.13/79.32 fpa_tree ( 56) 902716 902716 0 32179 1759.8 K
% 79.13/79.32 context (1288) 13598064 13598064 0 5 6.3 K
% 79.13/79.32 trail ( 24) 20797265 20797265 0 15 0.4 K
% 79.13/79.32 imd_tree ( 32) 63 5 58 5 2.0 K
% 79.13/79.32 imd_pos (4024) 4206600 4206600 0 6 23.6 K
% 79.13/79.32 is_tree ( 24) 142977 67114 75863 6 1778.2 K
% 79.13/79.32 is_pos (2424) 118543109 118543109 0 19 45.0 K
% 79.13/79.32 fsub_pos ( 16) 13206670 13206670 0 1 0.0 K
% 79.13/79.32 literal ( 32) 13986297 13966119 20178 9 630.8 K
% 79.13/79.32 clause ( 88) 4540983 4525824 15159 2 1302.9 K
% 79.13/79.32 list ( 272) 55 48 7 2 2.4 K
% 79.13/79.32 clash_nd ( 80) 5598 5598 0 2 0.2 K
% 79.13/79.32 clause_ptr ( 16) 32014 16907 15107 4 236.1 K
% 79.13/79.32 int_ptr ( 16) 49424989 49350447 74542 18 1165.0 K
% 79.13/79.32 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 79.13/79.32 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 79.13/79.32 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 79.13/79.32 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 79.13/79.32 formula( 40) 394 394 0 282 11.0 K
% 79.13/79.32 formula_ptr( 16) 45 45 0 45 0.7 K
% 79.13/79.32 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 79.13/79.32
% 79.13/79.32 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 79.13/79.32 00
% 79.13/79.32 post_process time 0.00
% 79.13/79.32 back demod time 0.00
% 79.13/79.32 back subsume 0.00
% 79.13/79.32 factor time 0.00
% 79.13/79.32 FINDER time 0.00
% 79.13/79.32 unindex time 0.00
% 79.13/79.32
% 79.13/79.32 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 79.13/79.32 1:0 2:2 3:12 4:0 5:79 6:79 7:7 8:0 9:0 10:49
% 79.13/79.32 11:5 12:5 13:0 14:0 15:4 16:5 17:0 18:0 19:1 20:2
% 79.13/79.32 21:1 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:1 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:33
% 79.13/79.32 31:0 32:0 33:6 34:6 35:0 36:0 37:4 38:0 39:21 40:41
% 79.13/79.32 41:114 42:28 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:98 50:197
% 79.13/79.32 51:335 52:1 53:1 54:0 55:0 56:8 57:0 58:0 59:65 60:0
% 79.13/79.32 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:0 68:6794 69:0 70:0
% 79.13/79.32 71:6 72:1 73:26 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:14 79:14 80:2
% 79.13/79.32 81:2 82:2 83:2 84:3 85:72 86:46 87:48 88:0 89:591 90:2226
% 79.13/79.32 91:8 92:8 93:6 94:2 95:4 96:4 97:6 98:10 99:10
% 79.13/79.32 All others: 39944.
% 79.13/79.32
% 79.13/79.32 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 79.13/79.32
% 79.13/79.32 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------