TSTP Solution File: SWV403+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV403+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:38:20 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.57s 8.79s
% Output : Refutation 8.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SWV403+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 20:40:39 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.38 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.38 The process was started by sandbox on n004.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.38 Tue Jun 14 20:40:39 2022
% 0.14/0.38 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 20946.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.38 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.38 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 formula_list(usable).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.38 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.38 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.38 clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 34 during input processing: 0 [copy,34,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.45 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.45 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.45 number of clauses in intial UL: 21
% 0.21/0.45 number of clauses initially in problem: 34
% 0.21/0.45 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 61
% 0.21/0.45 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 89
% 0.21/0.45 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.45 absolute distinct symbol count: 19
% 0.21/0.45 distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.21/0.45 distinct function count: 5
% 0.21/0.45 distinct constant count: 8
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 =========== start of search ===========
% 4.78/4.95
% 4.78/4.95
% 4.78/4.95 Changing weight limit from 60 to 32.
% 4.78/4.95
% 4.78/4.95 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 150 givens.
% 4.78/4.95
% 6.43/6.64
% 6.43/6.64
% 6.43/6.64 Changing weight limit from 32 to 28.
% 6.43/6.64
% 6.43/6.64 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 155 givens.
% 6.43/6.64
% 7.34/7.58
% 7.34/7.58
% 7.34/7.58 Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 7.34/7.58
% 7.34/7.58 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 170 givens.
% 7.34/7.58
% 8.57/8.79
% 8.57/8.79 -------- PROOF --------
% 8.57/8.79 % SZS status Theorem
% 8.57/8.79 % SZS output start Refutation
% 8.57/8.79
% 8.57/8.79 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 8.38 sec ----> 9842 [binary,9841.1,2968.1] {-} $F.
% 8.57/8.79
% 8.57/8.79 Length of proof is 14. Level of proof is 9.
% 8.57/8.79
% 8.57/8.79 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 8.57/8.79 % SZS status Theorem
% 8.57/8.79 % SZS output start Refutation
% 8.57/8.79
% 8.57/8.79 4 [] {+} strictly_less_than(A,B)| -less_than(A,B)|less_than(B,A).
% 8.57/8.79 11 [] {+} -pair_in_list(insert_slb(A,pair(B,C)),D,E)|pair_in_list(A,D,E)|B=D.
% 8.57/8.79 12 [] {+} -pair_in_list(insert_slb(A,pair(B,C)),D,E)|pair_in_list(A,D,E)|C=E.
% 8.57/8.79 13 [] {+} pair_in_list(insert_slb(A,pair(B,C)),D,E)| -pair_in_list(A,D,E).
% 8.57/8.79 14 [] {+} pair_in_list(insert_slb(A,pair(B,C)),D,E)|B!=D|C!=E.
% 8.57/8.79 17 [] {+} -strictly_less_than(A,B)|update_slb(insert_slb(C,pair(D,A)),B)=insert_slb(update_slb(C,B),pair(D,B)).
% 8.57/8.79 18 [] {+} -less_than(A,B)|update_slb(insert_slb(C,pair(D,B)),A)=insert_slb(update_slb(C,A),pair(D,B)).
% 8.57/8.79 19 [] {+} -pair_in_list($c6,A,B)| -strictly_less_than(B,C)|pair_in_list(update_slb($c6,C),A,C).
% 8.57/8.79 20 [] {+} -pair_in_list(update_slb(insert_slb($c6,pair($c2,$c1)),$c3),$c5,$c3).
% 8.57/8.79 22 [] {-} less_than(A,B)|less_than(B,A).
% 8.57/8.79 32 [] {-} pair_in_list(insert_slb($c6,pair($c2,$c1)),$c5,$c4).
% 8.57/8.79 33 [] {-} strictly_less_than($c4,$c3).
% 8.57/8.79 34 [] {-} A=A.
% 8.57/8.79 36 [hyper,22,4,factor_simp] {-} less_than(A,B)|strictly_less_than(B,A).
% 8.57/8.79 61 [hyper,34,14,34] {-} pair_in_list(insert_slb(A,pair(B,C)),B,C).
% 8.57/8.79 96 [hyper,36,17] {-} less_than(A,B)|update_slb(insert_slb(C,pair(D,B)),A)=insert_slb(update_slb(C,A),pair(D,A)).
% 8.57/8.79 141 [hyper,32,12,flip.2] {-} pair_in_list($c6,$c5,$c4)|$c4=$c1.
% 8.57/8.79 142 [hyper,32,11,flip.2] {-} pair_in_list($c6,$c5,$c4)|$c5=$c2.
% 8.57/8.79 225 [para_from,141.2.1,33.1.1] {-} strictly_less_than($c1,$c3)|pair_in_list($c6,$c5,$c4).
% 8.57/8.79 261 [para_from,142.2.1,20.1.2] {-} -pair_in_list(update_slb(insert_slb($c6,pair($c2,$c1)),$c3),$c2,$c3)|pair_in_list($c6,$c5,$c4).
% 8.57/8.79 2844 [para_into,261.1.1,17.2.1,unit_del,61] {-} pair_in_list($c6,$c5,$c4)| -strictly_less_than($c1,$c3).
% 8.57/8.79 2940 [hyper,2844,225,factor_simp] {-} pair_in_list($c6,$c5,$c4).
% 8.57/8.79 2942 [hyper,2940,19,33] {-} pair_in_list(update_slb($c6,$c3),$c5,$c3).
% 8.57/8.79 2968 [hyper,2942,13] {-} pair_in_list(insert_slb(update_slb($c6,$c3),pair(A,B)),$c5,$c3).
% 8.57/8.79 9806 [para_from,96.2.1,20.1.1,unit_del,2968] {-} less_than($c3,$c1).
% 8.57/8.79 9808,9807 [hyper,9806,18] {-} update_slb(insert_slb(A,pair(B,$c1)),$c3)=insert_slb(update_slb(A,$c3),pair(B,$c1)).
% 8.57/8.79 9841 [back_demod,20,demod,9808] {-} -pair_in_list(insert_slb(update_slb($c6,$c3),pair($c2,$c1)),$c5,$c3).
% 8.57/8.79 9842 [binary,9841.1,2968.1] {-} $F.
% 8.57/8.79
% 8.57/8.79 % SZS output end Refutation
% 8.57/8.79 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 8.57/8.79
% 8.57/8.79
% 8.57/8.79 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 8.57/8.79
% 8.57/8.79
% 8.57/8.79 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 8.57/8.79
% 8.57/8.79 ============ end of search ============
% 8.57/8.79
% 8.57/8.79 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 8.57/8.79
% 8.57/8.79 Process 20946 finished Tue Jun 14 20:40:47 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------