TSTP Solution File: SWV402+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWV402+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:33:28 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.16s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11 % Problem : SWV402+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.09/0.11 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 09:47:01 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.50 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.54 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.54 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.16/0.54 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.54 % Transform :cnf
% 0.16/0.54 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.16/0.54 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.16/0.54
% 0.16/0.54 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.16/0.54 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.16/0.54 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.55 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.55 % File : SWV402+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.16/0.55 % Domain : Software Verification
% 0.16/0.55 % Problem : Priority queue checker: tmp_not_check_03_3 base
% 0.16/0.55 % Version : [dNP05] axioms.
% 0.16/0.55 % English :
% 0.16/0.55
% 0.16/0.55 % Refs : [Pis06] Piskac (2006), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.16/0.55 % : [dNP05] de Nivelle & Piskac (2005), Verification of an Off-Lin
% 0.16/0.55 % Source : [Pis06]
% 0.16/0.55 % Names : cpq_l038 [Pis06]
% 0.16/0.55
% 0.16/0.55 % Status : Theorem
% 0.16/0.55 % Rating : 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.04 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.16 v6.1.0, 0.10 v6.0.0, 0.09 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.11 v5.2.0, 0.05 v5.0.0, 0.08 v4.1.0, 0.09 v4.0.0, 0.08 v3.7.0, 0.10 v3.5.0, 0.11 v3.4.0, 0.05 v3.3.0
% 0.16/0.55 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% 0.16/0.55 % Number of atoms : 37 ( 12 equ)
% 0.16/0.55 % Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% 0.16/0.55 % Number of connectives : 24 ( 6 ~; 3 |; 6 &)
% 0.16/0.55 % ( 3 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.16/0.55 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% 0.16/0.55 % Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% 0.16/0.55 % Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.16/0.55 % Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.16/0.55 % Number of variables : 51 ( 51 !; 0 ?)
% 0.16/0.55 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.16/0.55
% 0.16/0.55 % Comments :
% 0.16/0.55 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.55 %----Include the axioms about priority queues and checked priority queues
% 0.16/0.55 include('Axioms/SWV007+0.ax').
% 0.16/0.55 include('Axioms/SWV007+2.ax').
% 0.16/0.55 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.55 %----goal: fof(l35_li3839, lemma, (! [U,V,W,X] : ((pair_in_list(U,V,W) &
% 0.16/0.55 %---- strictly_less_than(W,X)) => pair_in_list(update_slb(U,X),V,X)))).
% 0.16/0.55
% 0.16/0.55 %----tmp_not_check_03_3::base (conjecture)
% 0.16/0.55 fof(l38_co,conjecture,
% 0.16/0.55 ! [U,V,W,X] :
% 0.16/0.55 ( ( pair_in_list(create_slb,V,W)
% 0.16/0.55 & strictly_less_than(W,X) )
% 0.16/0.55 => pair_in_list(update_slb(create_slb,X),V,X) ) ).
% 0.16/0.55
% 0.16/0.55 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.55 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.55 % Proof found
% 0.16/0.55 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.55 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.16/0.55 %ClaNum:51(EqnAxiom:23)
% 0.16/0.55 %VarNum:143(SingletonVarNum:74)
% 0.16/0.55 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.16/0.55 %MaxfuncDepth:3
% 0.16/0.55 %SharedTerms:10
% 0.16/0.55 %goalClause: 24 28 35
% 0.16/0.55 %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.16/0.55 [24]P1(a1,a5)
% 0.16/0.55 [28]P5(a2,a4,a1)
% 0.16/0.55 [32]~P3(a2)
% 0.16/0.55 [35]~P5(f6(a2,a5),a4,a5)
% 0.16/0.55 [26]P2(a3,x261)
% 0.16/0.55 [27]P2(x271,x271)
% 0.16/0.55 [33]~P4(a2,x331)
% 0.16/0.55 [25]E(f6(a2,x251),a2)
% 0.16/0.55 [34]~P5(a2,x341,x342)
% 0.16/0.55 [29]P3(f8(x291,f7(x292,x293)))
% 0.16/0.55 [30]E(f10(f8(x301,f7(x302,x303)),x302),x301)
% 0.16/0.55 [31]E(f9(f8(x311,f7(x312,x313)),x312),x313)
% 0.16/0.55 [36]P2(x362,x361)+P2(x361,x362)
% 0.16/0.55 [37]~P1(x371,x372)+P2(x371,x372)
% 0.16/0.55 [38]~P1(x382,x381)+~P2(x381,x382)
% 0.16/0.55 [41]~E(x412,x414)+P4(f8(x411,f7(x412,x413)),x414)
% 0.16/0.55 [42]~P4(x421,x424)+P4(f8(x421,f7(x422,x423)),x424)
% 0.16/0.55 [46]~P2(x462,x464)+E(f8(f6(x461,x462),f7(x463,x464)),f6(f8(x461,f7(x463,x464)),x462))
% 0.16/0.55 [47]~P1(x473,x474)+E(f6(f8(x471,f7(x472,x473)),x474),f8(f6(x471,x474),f7(x472,x474)))
% 0.16/0.55 [49]~P5(x491,x494,x495)+P5(f8(x491,f7(x492,x493)),x494,x495)
% 0.16/0.55 [39]P1(x392,x391)+~P2(x392,x391)+P2(x391,x392)
% 0.16/0.55 [40]~P2(x401,x403)+P2(x401,x402)+~P2(x403,x402)
% 0.16/0.55 [45]E(x451,x452)+P4(x453,x452)+~P4(f8(x453,f7(x451,x454)),x452)
% 0.16/0.55 [43]~P4(x433,x432)+E(x431,x432)+E(f9(f8(x433,f7(x431,x434)),x432),f9(x433,x432))
% 0.16/0.55 [48]~P4(x483,x482)+E(x481,x482)+E(f10(f8(x483,f7(x481,x484)),x482),f8(f10(x483,x482),f7(x481,x484)))
% 0.16/0.55 [44]~E(x443,x445)+~E(x442,x444)+P5(f8(x441,f7(x442,x443)),x444,x445)
% 0.16/0.55 [50]E(x501,x502)+P5(x503,x504,x502)+~P5(f8(x503,f7(x505,x501)),x504,x502)
% 0.16/0.55 [51]E(x511,x512)+P5(x513,x512,x514)+~P5(f8(x513,f7(x511,x515)),x512,x514)
% 0.16/0.55 %EqnAxiom
% 0.16/0.55 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.16/0.55 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.16/0.55 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.16/0.55 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f6(x41,x43),f6(x42,x43))
% 0.16/0.55 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f6(x53,x51),f6(x53,x52))
% 0.16/0.55 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f7(x61,x63),f7(x62,x63))
% 0.16/0.55 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f7(x73,x71),f7(x73,x72))
% 0.16/0.55 [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f8(x81,x83),f8(x82,x83))
% 0.16/0.55 [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f8(x93,x91),f8(x93,x92))
% 0.16/0.55 [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f9(x101,x103),f9(x102,x103))
% 0.16/0.55 [11]~E(x111,x112)+E(f9(x113,x111),f9(x113,x112))
% 0.16/0.55 [12]~E(x121,x122)+E(f10(x121,x123),f10(x122,x123))
% 0.16/0.55 [13]~E(x131,x132)+E(f10(x133,x131),f10(x133,x132))
% 0.16/0.55 [14]P1(x142,x143)+~E(x141,x142)+~P1(x141,x143)
% 0.16/0.55 [15]P1(x153,x152)+~E(x151,x152)+~P1(x153,x151)
% 0.16/0.55 [16]P2(x162,x163)+~E(x161,x162)+~P2(x161,x163)
% 0.16/0.55 [17]P2(x173,x172)+~E(x171,x172)+~P2(x173,x171)
% 0.16/0.55 [18]P5(x182,x183,x184)+~E(x181,x182)+~P5(x181,x183,x184)
% 0.16/0.55 [19]P5(x193,x192,x194)+~E(x191,x192)+~P5(x193,x191,x194)
% 0.16/0.55 [20]P5(x203,x204,x202)+~E(x201,x202)+~P5(x203,x204,x201)
% 0.16/0.55 [21]P4(x212,x213)+~E(x211,x212)+~P4(x211,x213)
% 0.16/0.55 [22]P4(x223,x222)+~E(x221,x222)+~P4(x223,x221)
% 0.16/0.55 [23]~P3(x231)+P3(x232)+~E(x231,x232)
% 0.16/0.55
% 0.16/0.55 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.55 cnf(52,plain,
% 0.16/0.55 ($false),
% 0.16/0.55 inference(scs_inference,[],[34,28]),
% 0.16/0.55 ['proof']).
% 0.16/0.55 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.16/0.55 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------