TSTP Solution File: SWV401+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV401+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:42:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.59s 0.77s
% Output   : Refutation 0.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWV401+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 17:56:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.59/0.77  
% 0.59/0.77  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.59/0.77  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.59/0.77  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.59/0.77  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.59/0.77  SPASS derived 1924 clauses, backtracked 62 clauses, performed 8 splits and kept 715 clauses.
% 0.59/0.77  SPASS allocated 87476 KBytes.
% 0.59/0.77  SPASS spent	0:00:00.41 on the problem.
% 0.59/0.77  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.59/0.77  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.59/0.77  		0:00:00.05 for inferences.
% 0.59/0.77  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.59/0.77  		0:00:00.27 for the reduction.
% 0.59/0.77  
% 0.59/0.77  
% 0.59/0.77  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 48 :
% 0.59/0.77  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.59/0.77  1[0:Inp] ||  -> less_than(skc8,skc7)*l.
% 0.59/0.77  8[0:Inp] ||  -> less_than(u,v)* less_than(v,u)*.
% 0.59/0.77  11[0:Inp] ||  -> pair_in_list(insert_slb(skc6,pair(skc10,skc9)),skc11,skc7)*.
% 0.59/0.77  15[0:Inp] || less_than(u,v) -> less_than(v,u) strictly_less_than(u,v)*.
% 0.59/0.77  16[0:Inp] || pair_in_list(update_slb(insert_slb(skc6,pair(skc10,skc9)),skc8),skc11,skc7)* -> .
% 0.59/0.77  20[0:Inp] || pair_in_list(u,v,w) -> pair_in_list(insert_slb(u,pair(x,y)),v,w)*.
% 0.59/0.77  22[0:Inp] || less_than(u,v) pair_in_list(skc6,w,v) -> pair_in_list(update_slb(skc6,u),w,v)*.
% 0.59/0.77  23[0:Inp] || pair_in_list(insert_slb(u,pair(v,w)),x,y)* -> equal(v,x) pair_in_list(u,x,y).
% 0.59/0.77  24[0:Inp] || pair_in_list(insert_slb(u,pair(v,w)),x,y)* -> equal(w,y) pair_in_list(u,x,y).
% 0.59/0.77  25[0:Inp] || equal(u,v) equal(w,x) -> pair_in_list(insert_slb(y,pair(w,u)),x,v)*.
% 0.59/0.77  27[0:Inp] || strictly_less_than(u,v) -> equal(update_slb(insert_slb(w,pair(x,u)),v),insert_slb(update_slb(w,v),pair(x,v)))*.
% 0.59/0.77  28[0:Inp] || less_than(u,v) -> equal(insert_slb(update_slb(w,u),pair(x,v)),update_slb(insert_slb(w,pair(x,v)),u))**.
% 0.59/0.77  30[0:MRR:15.0,8.0] ||  -> strictly_less_than(u,v)* less_than(v,u).
% 0.59/0.77  32[0:Res:11.0,23.0] ||  -> equal(skc11,skc10) pair_in_list(skc6,skc11,skc7)*.
% 0.59/0.77  33[0:Res:11.0,24.0] ||  -> equal(skc9,skc7) pair_in_list(skc6,skc11,skc7)*.
% 0.59/0.77  34[0:Res:1.0,28.0] ||  -> equal(insert_slb(update_slb(u,skc8),pair(v,skc7)),update_slb(insert_slb(u,pair(v,skc7)),skc8))**.
% 0.59/0.77  36[0:Res:1.0,22.1] || pair_in_list(skc6,u,skc7) -> pair_in_list(update_slb(skc6,skc8),u,skc7)*.
% 0.59/0.77  44[1:Spt:32.0] ||  -> equal(skc11,skc10)**.
% 0.59/0.77  45[1:Rew:44.0,33.1] ||  -> equal(skc9,skc7) pair_in_list(skc6,skc10,skc7)*.
% 0.59/0.77  47[1:Rew:44.0,16.0] || pair_in_list(update_slb(insert_slb(skc6,pair(skc10,skc9)),skc8),skc10,skc7)* -> .
% 0.59/0.77  50[2:Spt:45.0] ||  -> equal(skc9,skc7)**.
% 0.59/0.77  52[2:Rew:50.0,47.0] || pair_in_list(update_slb(insert_slb(skc6,pair(skc10,skc7)),skc8),skc10,skc7)* -> .
% 0.59/0.77  104[0:SpR:34.0,25.2] || equal(skc7,u) equal(v,w) -> pair_in_list(update_slb(insert_slb(x,pair(v,skc7)),skc8),w,u)*.
% 0.59/0.77  227[0:SpR:27.1,20.1] || strictly_less_than(u,v) pair_in_list(update_slb(w,v),x,y) -> pair_in_list(update_slb(insert_slb(w,pair(z,u)),v),x,y)*.
% 0.59/0.77  368[0:SpR:28.1,20.1] || less_than(u,v) pair_in_list(update_slb(w,u),x,y) -> pair_in_list(update_slb(insert_slb(w,pair(z,v)),u),x,y)*.
% 0.59/0.77  544[2:Res:104.2,52.0] || equal(skc7,skc7) equal(skc10,skc10)* -> .
% 0.59/0.77  545[2:Obv:544.1] ||  -> .
% 0.59/0.77  546[2:Spt:545.0,45.0,50.0] || equal(skc9,skc7)** -> .
% 0.59/0.77  547[2:Spt:545.0,45.1] ||  -> pair_in_list(skc6,skc10,skc7)*.
% 0.59/0.77  817[1:Res:227.2,47.0] || strictly_less_than(skc9,skc8) pair_in_list(update_slb(skc6,skc8),skc10,skc7)* -> .
% 0.59/0.77  823[1:Res:36.1,817.1] || pair_in_list(skc6,skc10,skc7)* strictly_less_than(skc9,skc8) -> .
% 0.59/0.77  824[2:MRR:823.0,547.0] || strictly_less_than(skc9,skc8)* -> .
% 0.59/0.77  825[2:Res:30.0,824.0] ||  -> less_than(skc8,skc9)*r.
% 0.59/0.77  2188[1:Res:368.2,47.0] || less_than(skc8,skc9) pair_in_list(update_slb(skc6,skc8),skc10,skc7)* -> .
% 0.59/0.77  2202[2:MRR:2188.0,825.0] || pair_in_list(update_slb(skc6,skc8),skc10,skc7)* -> .
% 0.59/0.77  2212[2:Res:22.2,2202.0] || less_than(skc8,skc7) pair_in_list(skc6,skc10,skc7)* -> .
% 0.59/0.77  2215[2:MRR:2212.1,547.0] || less_than(skc8,skc7)*l -> .
% 0.59/0.77  2216[2:MRR:2215.0,1.0] ||  -> .
% 0.59/0.77  2217[1:Spt:2216.0,32.0,44.0] || equal(skc11,skc10)** -> .
% 0.59/0.77  2218[1:Spt:2216.0,32.1] ||  -> pair_in_list(skc6,skc11,skc7)*.
% 0.59/0.77  2241[0:Res:227.2,16.0] || strictly_less_than(skc9,skc8) pair_in_list(update_slb(skc6,skc8),skc11,skc7)* -> .
% 0.59/0.77  2243[0:Res:368.2,16.0] || less_than(skc8,skc9) pair_in_list(update_slb(skc6,skc8),skc11,skc7)* -> .
% 0.59/0.77  2245[0:Res:36.1,2241.1] || pair_in_list(skc6,skc11,skc7)* strictly_less_than(skc9,skc8) -> .
% 0.59/0.77  2246[1:MRR:2245.0,2218.0] || strictly_less_than(skc9,skc8)* -> .
% 0.59/0.77  2247[1:Res:30.0,2246.0] ||  -> less_than(skc8,skc9)*r.
% 0.59/0.77  2248[1:MRR:2243.0,2247.0] || pair_in_list(update_slb(skc6,skc8),skc11,skc7)* -> .
% 0.59/0.77  2249[1:Res:22.2,2248.0] || less_than(skc8,skc7) pair_in_list(skc6,skc11,skc7)* -> .
% 0.59/0.77  2252[1:MRR:2249.0,2249.1,1.0,2218.0] ||  -> .
% 0.59/0.77  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.59/0.77  Formulae used in the proof : l37_co totality stricly_smaller_definition ax23 ax29 ax30
% 0.59/0.77  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------