TSTP Solution File: SWV401+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWV401+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:47:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.65s 2.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   39 (  13 unt;  10 nHn;  27 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   75 (  15 equ;  36 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   75 (  11 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(insert_slb(esk1_0,pair(esk5_0,esk6_0)),esk4_0),esk2_0,esk3_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6hi98i5m/input.p',i_0_20) ).

cnf(i_0_17,plain,
    ( update_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X3)),X4) = insert_slb(update_slb(X1,X4),pair(X2,X4))
    | ~ strictly_less_than(X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6hi98i5m/input.p',i_0_17) ).

cnf(i_0_18,plain,
    ( insert_slb(update_slb(X1,X2),pair(X3,X4)) = update_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X3,X4)),X2)
    | ~ less_than(X2,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6hi98i5m/input.p',i_0_18) ).

cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    ( pair_in_list(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X3)),X4,X5)
    | ~ pair_in_list(X1,X4,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6hi98i5m/input.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(i_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( pair_in_list(update_slb(esk1_0,X1),X2,X3)
    | ~ less_than(X1,X3)
    | ~ pair_in_list(esk1_0,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6hi98i5m/input.p',i_0_23) ).

cnf(i_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    less_than(esk4_0,esk3_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6hi98i5m/input.p',i_0_21) ).

cnf(i_0_25,plain,
    ( strictly_less_than(X1,X2)
    | less_than(X2,X1)
    | ~ less_than(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6hi98i5m/input.p',i_0_25) ).

cnf(i_0_28,plain,
    ( less_than(X1,X2)
    | less_than(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6hi98i5m/input.p',i_0_28) ).

cnf(i_0_10,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | pair_in_list(X3,X4,X2)
    | ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(X3,pair(X5,X1)),X4,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6hi98i5m/input.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    pair_in_list(insert_slb(esk1_0,pair(esk5_0,esk6_0)),esk2_0,esk3_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6hi98i5m/input.p',i_0_22) ).

cnf(i_0_11,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | pair_in_list(X3,X2,X4)
    | ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(X3,pair(X1,X5)),X2,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6hi98i5m/input.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(i_0_8,plain,
    ( pair_in_list(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X3)),X4,X5)
    | X3 != X5
    | X2 != X4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6hi98i5m/input.p',i_0_8) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(insert_slb(esk1_0,pair(esk5_0,esk6_0)),esk4_0),esk2_0,esk3_0),
    i_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( update_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X3)),X4) = insert_slb(update_slb(X1,X4),pair(X2,X4))
    | ~ strictly_less_than(X3,X4) ),
    i_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( insert_slb(update_slb(X1,X2),pair(X3,X4)) = update_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X3,X4)),X2)
    | ~ less_than(X2,X4) ),
    i_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ strictly_less_than(esk6_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(update_slb(esk1_0,esk4_0),pair(esk5_0,esk4_0)),esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( pair_in_list(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X3)),X4,X5)
    | ~ pair_in_list(X1,X4,X5) ),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(update_slb(esk1_0,esk4_0),pair(esk5_0,esk6_0)),esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ less_than(esk4_0,esk6_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( ~ strictly_less_than(esk6_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(esk1_0,esk4_0),esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ( pair_in_list(update_slb(esk1_0,X1),X2,X3)
    | ~ less_than(X1,X3)
    | ~ pair_in_list(esk1_0,X2,X3) ),
    i_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    less_than(esk4_0,esk3_0),
    i_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( strictly_less_than(X1,X2)
    | less_than(X2,X1)
    | ~ less_than(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    ( less_than(X1,X2)
    | less_than(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_28 ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( ~ pair_in_list(update_slb(esk1_0,esk4_0),esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ less_than(esk4_0,esk6_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | pair_in_list(X3,X4,X2)
    | ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(X3,pair(X5,X1)),X4,X2) ),
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    pair_in_list(insert_slb(esk1_0,pair(esk5_0,esk6_0)),esk2_0,esk3_0),
    i_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ strictly_less_than(esk6_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ pair_in_list(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_49])]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( strictly_less_than(X1,X2)
    | less_than(X2,X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ pair_in_list(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ less_than(esk4_0,esk6_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_48]),c_0_49])]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk6_0 = esk3_0
    | pair_in_list(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    ~ pair_in_list(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]),c_0_57]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    esk6_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | pair_in_list(X3,X2,X4)
    | ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(X3,pair(X1,X5)),X2,X4) ),
    i_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    pair_in_list(insert_slb(esk1_0,pair(esk5_0,esk3_0)),esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    ( pair_in_list(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X3)),X4,X5)
    | X3 != X5
    | X2 != X4 ),
    i_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pair_in_list(insert_slb(update_slb(esk1_0,esk4_0),pair(esk5_0,esk3_0)),esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_60]),c_0_60]),c_0_49])]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    esk2_0 = esk5_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]),c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    pair_in_list(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X3)),X2,X3),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_63])]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]),c_0_66])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWV401+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 17:44:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.65/2.41  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 8.65/2.41  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.65/2.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.020 s
% 8.65/2.41  
% 8.65/2.41  # Proof found!
% 8.65/2.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.65/2.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.65/2.41  # Proof object total steps             : 39
% 8.65/2.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 27
% 8.65/2.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 12
% 8.65/2.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 17
% 8.65/2.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 13
% 8.65/2.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 4
% 8.65/2.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 12
% 8.65/2.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 12
% 8.65/2.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 9
% 8.65/2.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 18
% 8.65/2.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.65/2.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 29
% 8.65/2.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 8.65/2.41  # Initial clauses                      : 29
% 8.65/2.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 8.65/2.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 29
% 8.65/2.41  # Processed clauses                    : 58
% 8.65/2.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 8.65/2.41  # ...subsumed                          : 9
% 8.65/2.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 49
% 8.65/2.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 8.65/2.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 8.65/2.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 8.65/2.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 13
% 8.65/2.41  # Generated clauses                    : 65
% 8.65/2.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 58
% 8.65/2.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 8.65/2.41  # Paramodulations                      : 60
% 8.65/2.41  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 8.65/2.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 8.65/2.41  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 8.65/2.41  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 8.65/2.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 33
% 8.65/2.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 11
% 8.65/2.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.65/2.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 8.65/2.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 19
% 8.65/2.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 28
% 8.65/2.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 79
% 8.65/2.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 8.65/2.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 14
% 8.65/2.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 82
% 8.65/2.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 76
% 8.65/2.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
% 8.65/2.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 46
% 8.65/2.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 8.65/2.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 11
% 8.65/2.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 8.65/2.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 8.65/2.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 8.65/2.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1154
% 8.65/2.41  
% 8.65/2.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.65/2.41  # User time                : 0.015 s
% 8.65/2.41  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 8.65/2.41  # Total time               : 0.023 s
% 8.65/2.41  # ...preprocessing         : 0.020 s
% 8.65/2.41  # ...main loop             : 0.003 s
% 8.65/2.41  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.65/2.41  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------