TSTP Solution File: SWV400+1 by Z3---4.8.9.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem : SWV400+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 15:11:38 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.40s
% Output : Proof 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWV400+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Sep 4 03:01:09 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.14/0.35 Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.14/0.35 -h, -? prints this message.
% 0.14/0.35 -smt2 print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.14/0.35 -m, -model generate model.
% 0.14/0.35 -p, -proof generate proof.
% 0.14/0.35 -c, -core generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.14/0.35 -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.14/0.35 -t:timeout set timeout (in second).
% 0.14/0.35 -smt2status display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.14/0.35 -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.14/0.35 -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.14/0.35 -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.14/0.40 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.40 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.14/0.40 tff(pair_in_list_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.40 pair_in_list: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(tptp_fun_W_1_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.40 tptp_fun_W_1: $i)).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(tptp_fun_V_2_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.40 tptp_fun_V_2: $i)).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(create_slb_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.40 create_slb: $i)).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(less_than_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.40 less_than: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(tptp_fun_X_0_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.40 tptp_fun_X_0: $i)).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(update_slb_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.40 update_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $i)).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(1,plain,
% 0.14/0.40 ((~![V: $i, W: $i, X: $i] : ((~(pair_in_list(create_slb, V, W) & less_than(X, W))) | pair_in_list(update_slb(create_slb, X), V, W))) <=> (~![V: $i, W: $i, X: $i] : ((~(pair_in_list(create_slb, V, W) & less_than(X, W))) | pair_in_list(update_slb(create_slb, X), V, W)))),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(2,plain,
% 0.14/0.40 ((~![U: $i, V: $i, W: $i, X: $i] : ((pair_in_list(create_slb, V, W) & less_than(X, W)) => pair_in_list(update_slb(create_slb, X), V, W))) <=> (~![V: $i, W: $i, X: $i] : ((~(pair_in_list(create_slb, V, W) & less_than(X, W))) | pair_in_list(update_slb(create_slb, X), V, W)))),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(3,axiom,(~![U: $i, V: $i, W: $i, X: $i] : ((pair_in_list(create_slb, V, W) & less_than(X, W)) => pair_in_list(update_slb(create_slb, X), V, W))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','l36_co')).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(4,plain,
% 0.14/0.40 (~![V: $i, W: $i, X: $i] : ((~(pair_in_list(create_slb, V, W) & less_than(X, W))) | pair_in_list(update_slb(create_slb, X), V, W))),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[3, 2])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(5,plain,
% 0.14/0.40 (~![V: $i, W: $i, X: $i] : ((~(pair_in_list(create_slb, V, W) & less_than(X, W))) | pair_in_list(update_slb(create_slb, X), V, W))),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[4, 1])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(6,plain,
% 0.14/0.40 (~![V: $i, W: $i, X: $i] : ((~(pair_in_list(create_slb, V, W) & less_than(X, W))) | pair_in_list(update_slb(create_slb, X), V, W))),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[5, 1])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(7,plain,
% 0.14/0.40 (~![V: $i, W: $i, X: $i] : ((~(pair_in_list(create_slb, V, W) & less_than(X, W))) | pair_in_list(update_slb(create_slb, X), V, W))),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[6, 1])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(8,plain,
% 0.14/0.40 (~![V: $i, W: $i, X: $i] : ((~(pair_in_list(create_slb, V, W) & less_than(X, W))) | pair_in_list(update_slb(create_slb, X), V, W))),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[7, 1])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(9,plain,
% 0.14/0.40 (~![V: $i, W: $i, X: $i] : ((~(pair_in_list(create_slb, V, W) & less_than(X, W))) | pair_in_list(update_slb(create_slb, X), V, W))),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[8, 1])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(10,plain,
% 0.14/0.40 (~![V: $i, W: $i, X: $i] : ((~(pair_in_list(create_slb, V, W) & less_than(X, W))) | pair_in_list(update_slb(create_slb, X), V, W))),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9, 1])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(11,plain,(
% 0.14/0.40 ~((~(pair_in_list(create_slb, V!2, W!1) & less_than(X!0, W!1))) | pair_in_list(update_slb(create_slb, X!0), V!2, W!1))),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[10])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(12,plain,
% 0.14/0.40 (pair_in_list(create_slb, V!2, W!1) & less_than(X!0, W!1)),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[11])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(13,plain,
% 0.14/0.40 (pair_in_list(create_slb, V!2, W!1)),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(and_elim,[status(thm)],[12])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(14,plain,
% 0.14/0.40 (^[U: $i, V: $i] : refl((~pair_in_list(create_slb, U, V)) <=> (~pair_in_list(create_slb, U, V)))),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(15,plain,
% 0.14/0.40 (![U: $i, V: $i] : (~pair_in_list(create_slb, U, V)) <=> ![U: $i, V: $i] : (~pair_in_list(create_slb, U, V))),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[14])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(16,plain,
% 0.14/0.40 (![U: $i, V: $i] : (~pair_in_list(create_slb, U, V)) <=> ![U: $i, V: $i] : (~pair_in_list(create_slb, U, V))),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(17,axiom,(![U: $i, V: $i] : (~pair_in_list(create_slb, U, V))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+2.ax','ax22')).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(18,plain,
% 0.14/0.40 (![U: $i, V: $i] : (~pair_in_list(create_slb, U, V))),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[17, 16])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(19,plain,(
% 0.14/0.40 ![U: $i, V: $i] : (~pair_in_list(create_slb, U, V))),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[18])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(20,plain,
% 0.14/0.40 (![U: $i, V: $i] : (~pair_in_list(create_slb, U, V))),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[19, 15])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(21,plain,
% 0.14/0.40 ((~![U: $i, V: $i] : (~pair_in_list(create_slb, U, V))) | (~pair_in_list(create_slb, V!2, W!1))),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.14/0.40 tff(22,plain,
% 0.14/0.40 ($false),
% 0.14/0.40 inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[21, 20, 13])).
% 0.14/0.40 % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------