TSTP Solution File: SWV400+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : SWV400+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:33:27 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem    : SWV400+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 06:44:32 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.58  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.63  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.22/0.63  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.63  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.22/0.63  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.22/0.63  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.22/0.63  
% 0.22/0.63  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.22/0.63  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.22/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.64  % File     : SWV400+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.22/0.64  % Domain   : Software Verification
% 0.22/0.64  % Problem  : Priority queue checker: tmp_not_check_03_2 base
% 0.22/0.64  % Version  : [dNP05] axioms.
% 0.22/0.64  % English  :
% 0.22/0.64  
% 0.22/0.64  % Refs     : [Pis06] Piskac (2006), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.22/0.64  %          : [dNP05] de Nivelle & Piskac (2005), Verification of an Off-Lin
% 0.22/0.64  % Source   : [Pis06]
% 0.22/0.64  % Names    : cpq_l036 [Pis06]
% 0.22/0.64  
% 0.22/0.64  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.22/0.64  % Rating   : 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.04 v6.2.0, 0.12 v6.1.0, 0.07 v6.0.0, 0.04 v5.5.0, 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.07 v5.2.0, 0.05 v5.0.0, 0.00 v3.4.0, 0.05 v3.3.0
% 0.22/0.64  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   9 unt;   0 def)
% 0.22/0.64  %            Number of atoms       :   37 (  12 equ)
% 0.22/0.64  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
% 0.22/0.64  %            Number of connectives :   24 (   6   ~;   3   |;   6   &)
% 0.22/0.64  %                                         (   3 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.22/0.64  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
% 0.22/0.64  %            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
% 0.22/0.64  %            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.22/0.64  %            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.22/0.64  %            Number of variables   :   51 (  51   !;   0   ?)
% 0.22/0.64  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.22/0.64  
% 0.22/0.64  % Comments :
% 0.22/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.64  %----Include the axioms about priority queues and checked priority queues
% 0.22/0.64  include('Axioms/SWV007+0.ax').
% 0.22/0.64  include('Axioms/SWV007+2.ax').
% 0.22/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.64  %----goal: fof(l35_li3637, lemma, (! [U,V,W,X] : ((pair_in_list(U,V,W) &
% 0.22/0.64  %----        less_than(X,W)) => pair_in_list(update_slb(U,X),V,W)))).
% 0.22/0.64  
% 0.22/0.64  %----tmp_not_check_03_2::base (conjecture)
% 0.22/0.64  fof(l36_co,conjecture,
% 0.22/0.64      ! [U,V,W,X] :
% 0.22/0.64        ( ( pair_in_list(create_slb,V,W)
% 0.22/0.64          & less_than(X,W) )
% 0.22/0.64       => pair_in_list(update_slb(create_slb,X),V,W) ) ).
% 0.22/0.64  
% 0.22/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.64  % Proof found
% 0.22/0.64  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.64  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.22/0.64  %ClaNum:51(EqnAxiom:23)
% 0.22/0.64  %VarNum:143(SingletonVarNum:74)
% 0.22/0.64  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.22/0.64  %MaxfuncDepth:3
% 0.22/0.64  %SharedTerms:10
% 0.22/0.64  %goalClause: 24 28 35
% 0.22/0.64  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.22/0.64  [24]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.22/0.64  [28]P4(a3,a5,a2)
% 0.22/0.64  [32]~P2(a3)
% 0.22/0.64  [35]~P4(f6(a3,a1),a5,a2)
% 0.22/0.64  [26]P1(a4,x261)
% 0.22/0.64  [27]P1(x271,x271)
% 0.22/0.64  [33]~P3(a3,x331)
% 0.22/0.64  [25]E(f6(a3,x251),a3)
% 0.22/0.64  [34]~P4(a3,x341,x342)
% 0.22/0.64  [29]P2(f8(x291,f7(x292,x293)))
% 0.22/0.64  [30]E(f10(f8(x301,f7(x302,x303)),x302),x301)
% 0.22/0.64  [31]E(f9(f8(x311,f7(x312,x313)),x312),x313)
% 0.22/0.64  [36]P1(x362,x361)+P1(x361,x362)
% 0.22/0.64  [37]~P5(x371,x372)+P1(x371,x372)
% 0.22/0.64  [38]~P5(x382,x381)+~P1(x381,x382)
% 0.22/0.64  [41]~E(x412,x414)+P3(f8(x411,f7(x412,x413)),x414)
% 0.22/0.64  [42]~P3(x421,x424)+P3(f8(x421,f7(x422,x423)),x424)
% 0.22/0.64  [46]~P1(x462,x464)+E(f8(f6(x461,x462),f7(x463,x464)),f6(f8(x461,f7(x463,x464)),x462))
% 0.22/0.64  [47]~P5(x473,x474)+E(f6(f8(x471,f7(x472,x473)),x474),f8(f6(x471,x474),f7(x472,x474)))
% 0.22/0.64  [49]~P4(x491,x494,x495)+P4(f8(x491,f7(x492,x493)),x494,x495)
% 0.22/0.64  [39]P5(x392,x391)+~P1(x392,x391)+P1(x391,x392)
% 0.22/0.64  [40]~P1(x401,x403)+P1(x401,x402)+~P1(x403,x402)
% 0.22/0.64  [45]E(x451,x452)+P3(x453,x452)+~P3(f8(x453,f7(x451,x454)),x452)
% 0.22/0.64  [43]~P3(x433,x432)+E(x431,x432)+E(f9(f8(x433,f7(x431,x434)),x432),f9(x433,x432))
% 0.22/0.64  [48]~P3(x483,x482)+E(x481,x482)+E(f10(f8(x483,f7(x481,x484)),x482),f8(f10(x483,x482),f7(x481,x484)))
% 0.22/0.64  [44]~E(x443,x445)+~E(x442,x444)+P4(f8(x441,f7(x442,x443)),x444,x445)
% 0.22/0.64  [50]E(x501,x502)+P4(x503,x504,x502)+~P4(f8(x503,f7(x505,x501)),x504,x502)
% 0.22/0.64  [51]E(x511,x512)+P4(x513,x512,x514)+~P4(f8(x513,f7(x511,x515)),x512,x514)
% 0.22/0.64  %EqnAxiom
% 0.22/0.64  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.22/0.64  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.22/0.64  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.22/0.64  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f6(x41,x43),f6(x42,x43))
% 0.22/0.64  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f6(x53,x51),f6(x53,x52))
% 0.22/0.64  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f7(x61,x63),f7(x62,x63))
% 0.22/0.64  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f7(x73,x71),f7(x73,x72))
% 0.22/0.64  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f8(x81,x83),f8(x82,x83))
% 0.22/0.64  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f8(x93,x91),f8(x93,x92))
% 0.22/0.64  [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f9(x101,x103),f9(x102,x103))
% 0.22/0.64  [11]~E(x111,x112)+E(f9(x113,x111),f9(x113,x112))
% 0.22/0.64  [12]~E(x121,x122)+E(f10(x121,x123),f10(x122,x123))
% 0.22/0.64  [13]~E(x131,x132)+E(f10(x133,x131),f10(x133,x132))
% 0.22/0.64  [14]P1(x142,x143)+~E(x141,x142)+~P1(x141,x143)
% 0.22/0.64  [15]P1(x153,x152)+~E(x151,x152)+~P1(x153,x151)
% 0.22/0.64  [16]P4(x162,x163,x164)+~E(x161,x162)+~P4(x161,x163,x164)
% 0.22/0.64  [17]P4(x173,x172,x174)+~E(x171,x172)+~P4(x173,x171,x174)
% 0.22/0.64  [18]P4(x183,x184,x182)+~E(x181,x182)+~P4(x183,x184,x181)
% 0.22/0.64  [19]P3(x192,x193)+~E(x191,x192)+~P3(x191,x193)
% 0.22/0.64  [20]P3(x203,x202)+~E(x201,x202)+~P3(x203,x201)
% 0.22/0.64  [21]P5(x212,x213)+~E(x211,x212)+~P5(x211,x213)
% 0.22/0.64  [22]P5(x223,x222)+~E(x221,x222)+~P5(x223,x221)
% 0.22/0.64  [23]~P2(x231)+P2(x232)+~E(x231,x232)
% 0.22/0.64  
% 0.22/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.64  cnf(52,plain,
% 0.22/0.64     ($false),
% 0.22/0.64     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,28]),
% 0.22/0.64     ['proof']).
% 0.22/0.64  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.22/0.64  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------