TSTP Solution File: SWV397+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWV397+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:47:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.25s 2.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   7 unt;   2 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   11 (   2 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ok(remove_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk4_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-krya8r8o/input.p',i_0_46) ).

cnf(i_0_33,plain,
    ( remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4) = triple(X1,X2,bad)
    | contains_slb(X2,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-krya8r8o/input.p',i_0_33) ).

cnf(i_0_30,plain,
    ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,bad)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-krya8r8o/input.p',i_0_30) ).

cnf(i_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ contains_slb(esk2_0,esk4_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-krya8r8o/input.p',i_0_45) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ok(remove_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk4_0)),
    i_0_46 ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4) = triple(X1,X2,bad)
    | contains_slb(X2,X4) ),
    i_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,bad)),
    i_0_30 ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ contains_slb(esk2_0,esk4_0),
    i_0_45 ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),c_0_53]),c_0_54]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWV397+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 18:48:50 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.25/2.28  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 7.25/2.28  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.25/2.28  # Preprocessing time       : 0.019 s
% 7.25/2.28  
% 7.25/2.28  # Proof found!
% 7.25/2.28  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.25/2.28  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.25/2.28  # Proof object total steps             : 9
% 7.25/2.28  # Proof object clause steps            : 5
% 7.25/2.28  # Proof object formula steps           : 4
% 7.25/2.28  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 7.25/2.28  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 7.25/2.28  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 2
% 7.25/2.28  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 7.25/2.28  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 7.25/2.28  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 7.25/2.28  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 7.25/2.28  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.25/2.28  # Parsed axioms                        : 50
% 7.25/2.28  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 7.25/2.28  # Initial clauses                      : 50
% 7.25/2.28  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 7.25/2.28  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 50
% 7.25/2.28  # Processed clauses                    : 33
% 7.25/2.28  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 7.25/2.28  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 7.25/2.28  # ...remaining for further processing  : 33
% 7.25/2.28  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 7.25/2.28  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 7.25/2.28  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 7.25/2.28  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 7.25/2.28  # Generated clauses                    : 16
% 7.25/2.28  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 9
% 7.25/2.28  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 7.25/2.28  # Paramodulations                      : 13
% 7.25/2.28  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 7.25/2.28  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 7.25/2.28  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 7.25/2.28  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 7.25/2.28  # Current number of processed clauses  : 32
% 7.25/2.28  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 10
% 7.25/2.28  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.25/2.28  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 7.25/2.28  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 17
% 7.25/2.28  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 25
% 7.25/2.28  # ...number of literals in the above   : 62
% 7.25/2.28  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 7.25/2.28  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 7.25/2.28  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 21
% 7.25/2.28  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 7.25/2.28  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 7.25/2.28  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 7.25/2.28  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 7.25/2.28  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 7.25/2.28  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 7.25/2.28  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 7.25/2.28  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 7.25/2.28  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1053
% 7.25/2.28  
% 7.25/2.28  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.25/2.28  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 7.25/2.28  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 7.25/2.28  # Total time               : 0.021 s
% 7.25/2.28  # ...preprocessing         : 0.019 s
% 7.25/2.28  # ...main loop             : 0.001 s
% 7.25/2.28  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.25/2.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------