TSTP Solution File: SWV397+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV397+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:44:32 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 17 ( 9 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 32 ( 3 sgn; 26 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l33_co,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( ok(remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))
=> contains_slb(X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AzUEe9T4xS/E---3.1_12256.p',l33_co) ).
fof(ax43,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( ~ contains_slb(X2,X4)
=> remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4) = triple(X1,X2,bad) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AzUEe9T4xS/E---3.1_12256.p',ax43) ).
fof(ax40,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ok(triple(X1,X2,bad))
<=> ~ $true ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AzUEe9T4xS/E---3.1_12256.p',ax40) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( ok(remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))
=> contains_slb(X2,X4) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l33_co]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( ~ contains_slb(X2,X4)
=> remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4) = triple(X1,X2,bad) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax43]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X1,X2] : ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,bad)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax40]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ok(remove_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk4_0))
& ~ contains_slb(esk2_0,esk4_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X23,X24,X25,X26] :
( contains_slb(X24,X26)
| remove_cpq(triple(X23,X24,X25),X26) = triple(X23,X24,bad) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X15,X16] : ~ ok(triple(X15,X16,bad)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
ok(remove_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk4_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( contains_slb(X1,X2)
| remove_cpq(triple(X3,X1,X4),X2) = triple(X3,X1,bad) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
~ ok(triple(X1,X2,bad)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ contains_slb(esk2_0,esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SWV397+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:28:59 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AzUEe9T4xS/E---3.1_12256.p
% 0.21/0.50 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # new_bool_3 with pid 12336 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FGUSS-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # partial match(1): FGUSF-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 12339 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FGUSS-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # partial match(1): FGUSF-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 42
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 29
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses : 16
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 16
% 0.21/0.50 # Processed clauses : 30
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 30
% 0.21/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Generated clauses : 5
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Paramodulations : 4
% 0.21/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 13
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.21/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 12
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 16
% 0.21/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1510
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1884 pages
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------