TSTP Solution File: SWV394+1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SWV394+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:20:50 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV394+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.09/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.09/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 10:56:08 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 0.09/0.36 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.09/0.36 #
% 0.09/0.36 # Number of axioms: 56 Number of unprocessed: 56
% 0.09/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.09/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.09/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.13/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.13/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.13/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.13/0.36 # 56 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.13/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 4 conjectures.
% 0.13/0.36 # There are 4 start rule candidates:
% 0.13/0.36 # Found 19 unit axioms.
% 0.13/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.13/0.36 # 4 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.13/0.36 # 37 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.13/0.36 # 19 unit axiom clauses
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.13/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 4
% 0.13/0.36 # Returning from population with 10 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.13/0.36 # We now have 10 tableaux to operate on
% 0.13/0.39 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.13/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.13/0.39 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.13/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.13/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.13/0.39 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.13/0.39 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 # End clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (~isnonempty_slb(create_slb))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (update_slb(create_slb,X1)=create_slb)).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (less_than(bottom,X1))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (less_than(X1,X1))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (succ_cpq(X1,X1))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_55, negated_conjecture, (~less_than(esk7_0,esk6_0))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (~contains_slb(create_slb,X1))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (less_than(X2,X1)|less_than(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (less_than(X1,X2)|~strictly_less_than(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (succ_cpq(X1,findmin_cpq_eff(X2))|~succ_cpq(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (~less_than(X1,X2)|~strictly_less_than(X2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (pair_in_list(esk4_0,esk6_0,esk7_0))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (less_than(X2,X1)|strictly_less_than(X1,X2)|~less_than(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (less_than(X1,X3)|~less_than(X2,X3)|~less_than(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (succ_cpq(X1,insert_cpq(X2,X3))|~succ_cpq(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (succ_cpq(X1,remove_cpq(X2,X3))|~succ_cpq(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (isnonempty_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X3))))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (~pair_in_list(create_slb,X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (succ_cpq(X1,remove_cpq(findmin_cpq_eff(X2),findmin_cpq_res(X2)))|~succ_cpq(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (remove_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X3)),X2)=X1)).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (lookup_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X3)),X2)=X3)).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (contains_slb(insert_slb(X3,pair(X1,X4)),X2)|X1!=X2)).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (findmin_cpq_res(triple(X1,create_slb,X2))=bottom)).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (check_cpq(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (X3=bad|ok(triple(X1,X2,X3)))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (contains_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X3,X4)),X2)|~contains_slb(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (X1=create_slb|findmin_cpq_res(triple(X2,X1,X3))=findmin_pqp_res(X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (X1=X2|lookup_slb(insert_slb(X3,pair(X1,X4)),X2)=lookup_slb(X3,X2)|~contains_slb(X3,X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (pair_in_list(insert_slb(X5,pair(X1,X3)),X2,X4)|X3!=X4|X1!=X2)).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (contains_cpq(triple(X3,X1,X4),X2)|~contains_slb(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,create_slb,X2))=triple(X1,create_slb,bad))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (X2=X4|contains_slb(X1,X4)|~contains_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X3)),X4))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (~ok(triple(X1,X2,bad)))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (update_slb(insert_slb(X3,pair(X4,X2)),X1)=insert_slb(update_slb(X3,X1),pair(X4,X2))|~less_than(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (update_slb(insert_slb(X3,pair(X4,X1)),X2)=insert_slb(update_slb(X3,X2),pair(X4,X2))|~strictly_less_than(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (X1=X2|remove_slb(insert_slb(X3,pair(X1,X4)),X2)=insert_slb(remove_slb(X3,X2),pair(X1,X4))|~contains_slb(X3,X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (remove_cpq(triple(X3,X1,X4),X2)=triple(X3,X1,bad)|contains_slb(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (contains_slb(X2,X4)|~contains_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_51, lemma, (check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))|~less_than(esk2_2(X1,X2),esk1_2(X1,X2)))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_52, lemma, (check_cpq(triple(X2,X1,X3))|pair_in_list(X1,esk1_2(X2,X1),esk2_2(X2,X1)))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (pair_in_list(insert_slb(X1,pair(X4,X5)),X2,X3)|~pair_in_list(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_58, negated_conjecture, (check_cpq(remove_cpq(triple(esk3_0,esk4_0,esk5_0),esk6_0)))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_57, negated_conjecture, (ok(remove_cpq(triple(esk3_0,esk4_0,esk5_0),esk6_0)))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (X1=create_slb|findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X2,X1,X3))=triple(X2,update_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2)),bad)|contains_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2)))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (X1=X2|pair_in_list(X3,X4,X2)|~pair_in_list(insert_slb(X3,pair(X5,X1)),X4,X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (X1=X2|pair_in_list(X3,X2,X4)|~pair_in_list(insert_slb(X3,pair(X1,X5)),X2,X4))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (triple(insert_pqp(X1,X4),insert_slb(X2,pair(X4,bottom)),X3)=insert_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_53, lemma, (less_than(X5,X4)|~pair_in_list(X2,X4,X5)|~check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3)))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (remove_cpq(triple(X3,X1,X4),X2)=triple(remove_pqp(X3,X2),remove_slb(X1,X2),bad)|~contains_slb(X1,X2)|~strictly_less_than(X2,lookup_slb(X1,X2)))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (triple(remove_pqp(X3,X2),remove_slb(X1,X2),X4)=remove_cpq(triple(X3,X1,X4),X2)|~contains_slb(X1,X2)|~less_than(lookup_slb(X1,X2),X2))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (X1=create_slb|findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X2,X1,X3))=triple(X2,update_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2)),bad)|~contains_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2))|~strictly_less_than(findmin_pqp_res(X2),lookup_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2))))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (X1=create_slb|triple(X2,update_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2)),X3)=findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X2,X1,X3))|~contains_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2))|~less_than(lookup_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2)),findmin_pqp_res(X2)))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (~strictly_less_than(X1,X2)|~check_cpq(triple(X3,insert_slb(X4,pair(X1,X2)),X5)))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (check_cpq(triple(X1,insert_slb(X2,pair(X4,X5)),X3))|~less_than(X5,X4)|~check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3)))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X5))|~less_than(X4,X3)|~check_cpq(triple(X1,insert_slb(X2,pair(X3,X4)),X5)))).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_54, lemma, (pair_in_list(remove_slb(X1,X2),X2,X3)|~strictly_less_than(X2,X3)|~pair_in_list(X1,X2,X3)|~ok(remove_cpq(triple(X4,X1,X5),X2)))).
% 0.13/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.13/0.39 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.13/0.39 # Found 6 steps
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (pair_in_list(esk4_0,esk6_0,esk7_0)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_61, plain, (pair_in_list(esk4_0,esk6_0,esk7_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_54])).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_344, plain, (~ok(remove_cpq(triple(esk3_0,esk4_0,esk5_0),esk6_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_57])).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_341, plain, (pair_in_list(remove_slb(esk4_0,esk6_0),esk6_0,esk7_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_342, plain, (~strictly_less_than(esk6_0,esk7_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_342, ...])).
% 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_493, plain, (pair_in_list(insert_slb(remove_slb(esk4_0,esk6_0),pair(X9,X10)),esk6_0,esk7_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_493, ...])).
% 0.13/0.39 # End printing tableau
% 0.13/0.39 # SZS output end
% 0.13/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.13/0.39 # Child (16847) has found a proof.
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 # Proof search is over...
% 0.13/0.39 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------