TSTP Solution File: SWV390+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV390+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:38:18 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 4.00s 4.19s
% Output : Refutation 4.00s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13 % Problem : SWV390+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 21:51:36 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.37 The process was started by sandbox2 on n014.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.37 Tue Jun 14 21:51:36 2022
% 0.14/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 31580.
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 formula_list(usable).
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.37 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.37 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.37 clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 66 during input processing: 0 [copy,66,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 52 during input processing: 0 [copy,67,flip.1] {-} insert_cpq(triple(A,B,C),D)=triple(insert_pqp(A,D),insert_slb(B,pair(D,bottom)),C).
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.22/0.51 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.22/0.51 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.22/0.51 number of clauses in intial UL: 35
% 0.22/0.51 number of clauses initially in problem: 65
% 0.22/0.51 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 53
% 0.22/0.51 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 82
% 0.22/0.51 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.22/0.51 absolute distinct symbol count: 34
% 0.22/0.51 distinct predicate count: 10
% 0.22/0.51 distinct function count: 17
% 0.22/0.51 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.16/1.38
% 1.16/1.38
% 1.16/1.38 Changing weight limit from 60 to 48.
% 1.16/1.38
% 1.16/1.38 Resetting weight limit to 48 after 135 givens.
% 1.16/1.38
% 1.37/1.55
% 1.37/1.55
% 1.37/1.55 Changing weight limit from 48 to 45.
% 1.37/1.55
% 1.37/1.55 Resetting weight limit to 45 after 140 givens.
% 1.37/1.55
% 1.46/1.69
% 1.46/1.69
% 1.46/1.69 Changing weight limit from 45 to 41.
% 1.46/1.69
% 1.46/1.69 Resetting weight limit to 41 after 145 givens.
% 1.46/1.69
% 1.63/1.80
% 1.63/1.80
% 1.63/1.80 Changing weight limit from 41 to 39.
% 1.63/1.80
% 1.63/1.80 Resetting weight limit to 39 after 150 givens.
% 1.63/1.80
% 1.75/1.91
% 1.75/1.91
% 1.75/1.91 Changing weight limit from 39 to 38.
% 1.75/1.91
% 1.75/1.91 Resetting weight limit to 38 after 155 givens.
% 1.75/1.91
% 1.83/1.99
% 1.83/1.99
% 1.83/1.99 Changing weight limit from 38 to 37.
% 1.83/1.99
% 1.83/1.99 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 160 givens.
% 1.83/1.99
% 1.93/2.10
% 1.93/2.10
% 1.93/2.10 Changing weight limit from 37 to 35.
% 1.93/2.10
% 1.93/2.10 Resetting weight limit to 35 after 165 givens.
% 1.93/2.10
% 1.96/2.20
% 1.96/2.20
% 1.96/2.20 Changing weight limit from 35 to 34.
% 1.96/2.20
% 1.96/2.20 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 170 givens.
% 1.96/2.20
% 2.06/2.29
% 2.06/2.29
% 2.06/2.29 Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 2.06/2.29
% 2.06/2.29 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 175 givens.
% 2.06/2.29
% 2.14/2.39
% 2.14/2.39
% 2.14/2.39 Changing weight limit from 33 to 32.
% 2.14/2.39
% 2.14/2.39 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 180 givens.
% 2.14/2.39
% 2.24/2.46
% 2.24/2.46
% 2.24/2.46 Changing weight limit from 32 to 31.
% 2.24/2.46
% 2.24/2.46 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 185 givens.
% 2.24/2.46
% 2.66/2.84
% 2.66/2.84
% 2.66/2.84 Changing weight limit from 31 to 28.
% 2.66/2.84
% 2.66/2.84 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 190 givens.
% 2.66/2.84
% 2.76/2.98
% 2.76/2.98
% 2.76/2.98 Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 2.76/2.98
% 2.76/2.98 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 195 givens.
% 2.76/2.98
% 2.92/3.07
% 2.92/3.07
% 2.92/3.07 Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 2.92/3.07
% 2.92/3.07 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 200 givens.
% 2.92/3.07
% 2.96/3.15
% 2.96/3.15
% 2.96/3.15 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 2.96/3.15
% 2.96/3.15 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 205 givens.
% 2.96/3.15
% 3.06/3.24
% 3.06/3.24
% 3.06/3.24 Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 3.06/3.24
% 3.06/3.24 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 210 givens.
% 3.06/3.24
% 3.22/3.39
% 3.22/3.39
% 3.22/3.39 Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 3.22/3.39
% 3.22/3.39 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 220 givens.
% 3.22/3.39
% 3.42/3.61
% 3.42/3.61
% 3.42/3.61 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 3.42/3.61
% 3.42/3.61 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 235 givens.
% 3.42/3.61
% 3.88/4.06
% 3.88/4.06
% 3.88/4.06 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 3.88/4.06
% 3.88/4.06 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 275 givens.
% 3.88/4.06
% 4.00/4.19
% 4.00/4.19 -------- PROOF --------
% 4.00/4.19 % SZS status Theorem
% 4.00/4.19 % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.00/4.19
% 4.00/4.19 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 3.79 sec ----> 11056 [binary,11055.1,37.1] {-} $F.
% 4.00/4.19
% 4.00/4.19 Length of proof is 5. Level of proof is 4.
% 4.00/4.19
% 4.00/4.19 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 4.00/4.19 % SZS status Theorem
% 4.00/4.19 % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.00/4.19
% 4.00/4.19 23 [] {+} -less_than(A,B)| -check_cpq(triple(C,insert_slb(D,pair(B,A)),E))|check_cpq(triple(C,D,E)).
% 4.00/4.19 35 [] {+} -check_cpq(triple(A,B,C))| -pair_in_list(B,D,E)|less_than(E,D).
% 4.00/4.19 36 [] {+} check_cpq(triple(A,B,C))| -less_than($f1(A,B,C),$f2(A,B,C)).
% 4.00/4.19 37 [] {+} -check_cpq(triple($c4,$c3,$c2)).
% 4.00/4.19 41 [] {-} less_than(bottom,A).
% 4.00/4.19 52 [] {-} insert_cpq(triple(A,B,C),D)=triple(insert_pqp(A,D),insert_slb(B,pair(D,bottom)),C).
% 4.00/4.19 64 [] {-} check_cpq(triple(A,B,C))|pair_in_list(B,$f2(A,B,C),$f1(A,B,C)).
% 4.00/4.19 65 [] {-} check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple($c4,$c3,$c2),$c1)).
% 4.00/4.19 542 [para_from,52.1.1,65.1.1] {-} check_cpq(triple(insert_pqp($c4,$c1),insert_slb($c3,pair($c1,bottom)),$c2)).
% 4.00/4.19 1513 [hyper,64,37] {-} pair_in_list($c3,$f2($c4,$c3,$c2),$f1($c4,$c3,$c2)).
% 4.00/4.19 10969 [hyper,542,23,41] {-} check_cpq(triple(insert_pqp($c4,$c1),$c3,$c2)).
% 4.00/4.19 11008 [hyper,10969,35,1513] {-} less_than($f1($c4,$c3,$c2),$f2($c4,$c3,$c2)).
% 4.00/4.19 11055 [hyper,11008,36] {-} check_cpq(triple($c4,$c3,$c2)).
% 4.00/4.19 11056 [binary,11055.1,37.1] {-} $F.
% 4.00/4.19
% 4.00/4.19 % SZS output end Refutation
% 4.00/4.19 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 4.00/4.19
% 4.00/4.19
% 4.00/4.19 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.00/4.19
% 4.00/4.19
% 4.00/4.19 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.00/4.19
% 4.00/4.19 ============ end of search ============
% 4.00/4.19
% 4.00/4.19 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 4.00/4.19
% 4.00/4.19 Process 31580 finished Tue Jun 14 21:51:40 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------