TSTP Solution File: SWV387+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWV387+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:47:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.00s 2.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   13 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_48,lemma,
    ( check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
    | ~ check_cpq(remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))
    | ~ ok(remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m53tkazm/input.p',i_0_48) ).

cnf(i_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ok(remove_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk4_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m53tkazm/input.p',i_0_45) ).

cnf(i_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    check_cpq(remove_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk4_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m53tkazm/input.p',i_0_46) ).

cnf(i_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ~ check_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m53tkazm/input.p',i_0_47) ).

cnf(c_0_53,lemma,
    ( check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
    | ~ check_cpq(remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))
    | ~ ok(remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)) ),
    i_0_48 ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    ok(remove_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk4_0)),
    i_0_45 ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    check_cpq(remove_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk4_0)),
    i_0_46 ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    ~ check_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)),
    i_0_47 ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]),c_0_55])]),c_0_56]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWV387+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 16:01:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.00/2.26  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 7.00/2.26  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.00/2.26  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 7.00/2.26  
% 7.00/2.26  # Proof found!
% 7.00/2.26  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.00/2.26  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.00/2.26  # Proof object total steps             : 9
% 7.00/2.26  # Proof object clause steps            : 5
% 7.00/2.26  # Proof object formula steps           : 4
% 7.00/2.26  # Proof object conjectures             : 7
% 7.00/2.26  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 4
% 7.00/2.26  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 7.00/2.26  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 7.00/2.26  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 7.00/2.26  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 7.00/2.26  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 7.00/2.26  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.00/2.26  # Parsed axioms                        : 52
% 7.00/2.26  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Initial clauses                      : 52
% 7.00/2.26  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 52
% 7.00/2.26  # Processed clauses                    : 13
% 7.00/2.26  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # ...remaining for further processing  : 13
% 7.00/2.26  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Generated clauses                    : 3
% 7.00/2.26  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Paramodulations                      : 1
% 7.00/2.26  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 7.00/2.26  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Current number of processed clauses  : 13
% 7.00/2.26  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 7.00/2.26  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.00/2.26  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 7.00/2.26  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 7.00/2.26  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 39
% 7.00/2.26  # ...number of literals in the above   : 88
% 7.00/2.26  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 7.00/2.26  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 7.00/2.26  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 837
% 7.00/2.26  
% 7.00/2.26  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.00/2.26  # User time                : 0.009 s
% 7.00/2.26  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 7.00/2.26  # Total time               : 0.012 s
% 7.00/2.26  # ...preprocessing         : 0.012 s
% 7.00/2.26  # ...main loop             : 0.000 s
% 7.00/2.26  # Maximum resident set size: 7136 pages
% 7.00/2.26  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------