TSTP Solution File: SWV383+1 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SWV383+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:20:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWV383+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 23:29:05 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 0.20/0.37  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.20/0.37  #
% 0.20/0.37  # Number of axioms: 54 Number of unprocessed: 54
% 0.20/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.20/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.20/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.20/0.37  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.20/0.37  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.20/0.37  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.20/0.37  # 54 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.20/0.37  # Creating start rules for all 4 conjectures.
% 0.20/0.37  # There are 4 start rule candidates:
% 0.20/0.37  # Found 19 unit axioms.
% 0.20/0.37  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.20/0.37  # 4 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.20/0.37  # 35 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.20/0.37  # 19 unit axiom clauses
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.20/0.37  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 4
% 0.20/0.37  # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 0 folds and 3 closures done.
% 0.20/0.37  # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.37  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.20/0.37  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.37  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.20/0.37  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.20/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.20/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.20/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.20/0.37  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.37  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.37  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  # End clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.37  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (~isnonempty_slb(create_slb))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (update_slb(create_slb,X1)=create_slb)).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (less_than(bottom,X1))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (less_than(X1,X1))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (succ_cpq(X1,X1))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (~contains_slb(create_slb,X1))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (less_than(X2,X1)|less_than(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (less_than(X1,X2)|~strictly_less_than(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (succ_cpq(X1,findmin_cpq_eff(X2))|~succ_cpq(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (~less_than(X1,X2)|~strictly_less_than(X2,X1))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (less_than(X2,X1)|strictly_less_than(X1,X2)|~less_than(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (less_than(X1,X3)|~less_than(X2,X3)|~less_than(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (succ_cpq(X1,insert_cpq(X2,X3))|~succ_cpq(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (succ_cpq(X1,remove_cpq(X2,X3))|~succ_cpq(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (isnonempty_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X3))))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (~pair_in_list(create_slb,X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (succ_cpq(X1,remove_cpq(findmin_cpq_eff(X2),findmin_cpq_res(X2)))|~succ_cpq(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (remove_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X3)),X2)=X1)).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (lookup_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X3)),X2)=X3)).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (contains_slb(insert_slb(X3,pair(X1,X4)),X2)|X1!=X2)).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_53, negated_conjecture, (check_cpq(triple(esk4_0,esk5_0,esk6_0)))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_54, negated_conjecture, (ok(triple(esk4_0,esk5_0,esk6_0)))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (findmin_cpq_res(triple(X1,create_slb,X2))=bottom)).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (check_cpq(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (X3=bad|ok(triple(X1,X2,X3)))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (contains_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X3,X4)),X2)|~contains_slb(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_48, plain, (X1=create_slb|findmin_cpq_res(triple(X2,X1,X3))=findmin_pqp_res(X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (X1=X2|lookup_slb(insert_slb(X3,pair(X1,X4)),X2)=lookup_slb(X3,X2)|~contains_slb(X3,X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (pair_in_list(insert_slb(X5,pair(X1,X3)),X2,X4)|X3!=X4|X1!=X2)).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (contains_cpq(triple(X3,X1,X4),X2)|~contains_slb(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,create_slb,X2))=triple(X1,create_slb,bad))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (~check_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (X2=X4|contains_slb(X1,X4)|~contains_slb(insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X3)),X4))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (~ok(triple(X1,X2,bad)))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (update_slb(insert_slb(X3,pair(X4,X2)),X1)=insert_slb(update_slb(X3,X1),pair(X4,X2))|~less_than(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (update_slb(insert_slb(X3,pair(X4,X1)),X2)=insert_slb(update_slb(X3,X2),pair(X4,X2))|~strictly_less_than(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (X1=X2|remove_slb(insert_slb(X3,pair(X1,X4)),X2)=insert_slb(remove_slb(X3,X2),pair(X1,X4))|~contains_slb(X3,X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (remove_cpq(triple(X3,X1,X4),X2)=triple(X3,X1,bad)|contains_slb(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (contains_slb(X2,X4)|~contains_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_55, negated_conjecture, (succ_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),triple(esk4_0,esk5_0,esk6_0)))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (pair_in_list(insert_slb(X1,pair(X4,X5)),X2,X3)|~pair_in_list(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (X1=create_slb|findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X2,X1,X3))=triple(X2,update_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2)),bad)|contains_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2)))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (X1=X2|pair_in_list(X3,X4,X2)|~pair_in_list(insert_slb(X3,pair(X5,X1)),X4,X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (X1=X2|pair_in_list(X3,X2,X4)|~pair_in_list(insert_slb(X3,pair(X1,X5)),X2,X4))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (triple(insert_pqp(X1,X4),insert_slb(X2,pair(X4,bottom)),X3)=insert_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (remove_cpq(triple(X3,X1,X4),X2)=triple(remove_pqp(X3,X2),remove_slb(X1,X2),bad)|~contains_slb(X1,X2)|~strictly_less_than(X2,lookup_slb(X1,X2)))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (triple(remove_pqp(X3,X2),remove_slb(X1,X2),X4)=remove_cpq(triple(X3,X1,X4),X2)|~contains_slb(X1,X2)|~less_than(lookup_slb(X1,X2),X2))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (X1=create_slb|findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X2,X1,X3))=triple(X2,update_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2)),bad)|~contains_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2))|~strictly_less_than(findmin_pqp_res(X2),lookup_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2))))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (X1=create_slb|triple(X2,update_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2)),X3)=findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X2,X1,X3))|~contains_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2))|~less_than(lookup_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2)),findmin_pqp_res(X2)))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (~strictly_less_than(X1,X2)|~check_cpq(triple(X3,insert_slb(X4,pair(X1,X2)),X5)))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (check_cpq(triple(X1,insert_slb(X2,pair(X4,X5)),X3))|~less_than(X5,X4)|~check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3)))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X5))|~less_than(X4,X3)|~check_cpq(triple(X1,insert_slb(X2,pair(X3,X4)),X5)))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_52, lemma, (check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))|~check_cpq(triple(X4,X5,X6))|~ok(triple(X4,X5,X6))|~succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),triple(X4,X5,X6)))).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_51, lemma, (ok(triple(X1,X2,X3))|~check_cpq(triple(X4,X5,X6))|~ok(triple(X4,X5,X6))|~succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),triple(X4,X5,X6)))).
% 0.20/0.37  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.20/0.37  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.20/0.37  # Found 5 steps
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_55, negated_conjecture, (succ_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),triple(esk4_0,esk5_0,esk6_0))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_57, plain, (succ_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),triple(esk4_0,esk5_0,esk6_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_52])).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_144, plain, (check_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_56])).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_145, plain, (~check_cpq(triple(esk4_0,esk5_0,esk6_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_53])).
% 0.20/0.37  cnf(i_0_146, plain, (~ok(triple(esk4_0,esk5_0,esk6_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_54])).
% 0.20/0.37  # End printing tableau
% 0.20/0.37  # SZS output end
% 0.20/0.37  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.20/0.37  # Returning from population with 8 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.20/0.37  # We now have 8 tableaux to operate on
% 0.20/0.37  # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.20/0.37  # Proof search is over...
% 0.20/0.37  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------