TSTP Solution File: SWV383+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SWV383+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:03:58 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 5.70s 2.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   35
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (   6 unt;  33 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   22 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   26 (  14   ~;   8   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   42 (  24   >;  18   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   9 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   24 (  24 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (;  18   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ pair_in_list > succ_cpq > strictly_less_than > less_than > contains_slb > contains_cpq > ok > isnonempty_slb > check_cpq > triple > update_slb > remove_slb > remove_pqp > remove_cpq > pair > lookup_slb > insert_slb > insert_pqp > insert_cpq > #nlpp > removemin_cpq_res > removemin_cpq_eff > findmin_pqp_res > findmin_cpq_res > findmin_cpq_eff > create_slb > bottom > bad > #skF_5 > #skF_6 > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(bad,type,
    bad: $i ).

tff(insert_cpq,type,
    insert_cpq: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(succ_cpq,type,
    succ_cpq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(remove_cpq,type,
    remove_cpq: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(contains_slb,type,
    contains_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(lookup_slb,type,
    lookup_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(pair_in_list,type,
    pair_in_list: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff(less_than,type,
    less_than: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(contains_cpq,type,
    contains_cpq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(strictly_less_than,type,
    strictly_less_than: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(pair,type,
    pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(ok,type,
    ok: $i > $o ).

tff(insert_pqp,type,
    insert_pqp: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(findmin_pqp_res,type,
    findmin_pqp_res: $i > $i ).

tff(remove_pqp,type,
    remove_pqp: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(bottom,type,
    bottom: $i ).

tff(triple,type,
    triple: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(removemin_cpq_res,type,
    removemin_cpq_res: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff(isnonempty_slb,type,
    isnonempty_slb: $i > $o ).

tff(check_cpq,type,
    check_cpq: $i > $o ).

tff(remove_slb,type,
    remove_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(findmin_cpq_eff,type,
    findmin_cpq_eff: $i > $i ).

tff(removemin_cpq_eff,type,
    removemin_cpq_eff: $i > $i ).

tff(create_slb,type,
    create_slb: $i ).

tff(findmin_cpq_res,type,
    findmin_cpq_res: $i > $i ).

tff(insert_slb,type,
    insert_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(update_slb,type,
    update_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_312,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U,V,W] :
        ( ~ check_cpq(triple(U,V,W))
       => ! [X,Y,Z] :
            ( succ_cpq(triple(U,V,W),triple(X,Y,Z))
           => ( ~ ok(triple(X,Y,Z))
              | ~ check_cpq(triple(X,Y,Z)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l19_co) ).

tff(f_298,lemma,
    ! [U,V,W] :
      ( ( ~ check_cpq(triple(U,V,W))
        | ~ ok(triple(U,V,W)) )
     => ! [X,Y,Z] :
          ( succ_cpq(triple(U,V,W),triple(X,Y,Z))
         => ( ~ ok(triple(X,Y,Z))
            | ~ check_cpq(triple(X,Y,Z)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l19_l20) ).

tff(c_112,plain,
    ~ check_cpq(triple('#skF_1','#skF_2','#skF_3')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_312]) ).

tff(c_108,plain,
    ok(triple('#skF_4','#skF_5','#skF_6')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_312]) ).

tff(c_106,plain,
    check_cpq(triple('#skF_4','#skF_5','#skF_6')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_312]) ).

tff(c_110,plain,
    succ_cpq(triple('#skF_1','#skF_2','#skF_3'),triple('#skF_4','#skF_5','#skF_6')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_312]) ).

tff(c_1706,plain,
    ! [X_446,W_447,V_444,U_445,Y_449,Z_448] :
      ( check_cpq(triple(U_445,V_444,W_447))
      | ~ check_cpq(triple(X_446,Y_449,Z_448))
      | ~ ok(triple(X_446,Y_449,Z_448))
      | ~ succ_cpq(triple(U_445,V_444,W_447),triple(X_446,Y_449,Z_448)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_298]) ).

tff(c_1742,plain,
    ( check_cpq(triple('#skF_1','#skF_2','#skF_3'))
    | ~ check_cpq(triple('#skF_4','#skF_5','#skF_6'))
    | ~ ok(triple('#skF_4','#skF_5','#skF_6')) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_1706]) ).

tff(c_1757,plain,
    check_cpq(triple('#skF_1','#skF_2','#skF_3')),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_108,c_106,c_1742]) ).

tff(c_1759,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_112,c_1757]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SWV383+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 23:24:01 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.70/2.53  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.70/2.54  
% 5.70/2.54  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.10/2.56  
% 6.10/2.56  Inference rules
% 6.10/2.56  ----------------------
% 6.10/2.56  #Ref     : 0
% 6.10/2.56  #Sup     : 391
% 6.10/2.56  #Fact    : 20
% 6.10/2.56  #Define  : 0
% 6.10/2.56  #Split   : 1
% 6.10/2.56  #Chain   : 0
% 6.10/2.56  #Close   : 0
% 6.10/2.56  
% 6.10/2.56  Ordering : KBO
% 6.10/2.56  
% 6.10/2.56  Simplification rules
% 6.10/2.56  ----------------------
% 6.10/2.56  #Subsume      : 79
% 6.10/2.56  #Demod        : 98
% 6.10/2.56  #Tautology    : 129
% 6.10/2.56  #SimpNegUnit  : 15
% 6.10/2.56  #BackRed      : 1
% 6.10/2.56  
% 6.10/2.56  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 6.10/2.56  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 6.10/2.56  
% 6.10/2.56  Timing (in seconds)
% 6.10/2.56  ----------------------
% 6.10/2.56  Preprocessing        : 0.72
% 6.10/2.56  Parsing              : 0.37
% 6.10/2.56  CNF conversion       : 0.05
% 6.10/2.56  Main loop            : 0.69
% 6.10/2.56  Inferencing          : 0.26
% 6.10/2.56  Reduction            : 0.22
% 6.10/2.56  Demodulation         : 0.14
% 6.10/2.56  BG Simplification    : 0.04
% 6.10/2.56  Subsumption          : 0.14
% 6.10/2.56  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 6.10/2.57  MUC search           : 0.00
% 6.10/2.57  Cooper               : 0.00
% 6.10/2.57  Total                : 1.45
% 6.10/2.57  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 6.10/2.57  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 6.10/2.57  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 6.10/2.57  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------