TSTP Solution File: SWV378+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV378+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:42:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 3.65s 3.88s
% Output   : Refutation 3.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWV378+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 18:31:26 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.65/3.88  
% 3.65/3.88  SPASS V 3.9 
% 3.65/3.88  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 3.65/3.88  % SZS status Theorem
% 3.65/3.88  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 3.65/3.88  SPASS derived 3323 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 2156 clauses.
% 3.65/3.88  SPASS allocated 91312 KBytes.
% 3.65/3.88  SPASS spent	0:00:03.49 on the problem.
% 3.65/3.88  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 3.65/3.88  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 3.65/3.88  		0:00:00.09 for inferences.
% 3.65/3.88  		0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 3.65/3.88  		0:00:03.30 for the reduction.
% 3.65/3.88  
% 3.65/3.88  
% 3.65/3.88  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 21 :
% 3.65/3.88  % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.65/3.88  10[0:Inp] || ok(triple(skc4,skc5,skc6))* -> .
% 3.65/3.88  11[0:Inp] ||  -> less_than(u,v)* less_than(v,u)*.
% 3.65/3.88  13[0:Inp] || ok(triple(u,v,bad))* -> .
% 3.65/3.88  14[0:Inp] ||  -> ok(remove_cpq(triple(skc4,skc5,skc6),skc7))*.
% 3.65/3.88  20[0:Inp] ||  -> ok(triple(u,v,w))* equal(w,bad).
% 3.65/3.88  26[0:Inp] || less_than(u,v) -> less_than(v,u) strictly_less_than(u,v)*.
% 3.65/3.88  37[0:Inp] ||  -> contains_slb(u,v) equal(remove_cpq(triple(w,u,x),v),triple(w,u,bad))**.
% 3.65/3.88  49[0:Inp] || contains_slb(u,v) strictly_less_than(v,lookup_slb(u,v)) -> equal(remove_cpq(triple(w,u,x),v),triple(remove_pqp(w,v),remove_slb(u,v),bad))*.
% 3.65/3.88  50[0:Inp] || contains_slb(u,v) less_than(lookup_slb(u,v),v) -> equal(triple(remove_pqp(w,v),remove_slb(u,v),x),remove_cpq(triple(w,u,x),v))**.
% 3.65/3.88  56[0:MRR:26.0,11.0] ||  -> strictly_less_than(u,v)* less_than(v,u).
% 3.65/3.88  58[0:Res:20.0,10.0] ||  -> equal(skc6,bad)**.
% 3.65/3.88  60[0:Rew:58.0,14.0] ||  -> ok(remove_cpq(triple(skc4,skc5,bad),skc7))*.
% 3.65/3.88  108[0:SpR:37.1,60.0] ||  -> contains_slb(skc5,skc7) ok(triple(skc4,skc5,bad))*.
% 3.65/3.88  113[0:MRR:108.1,13.0] ||  -> contains_slb(skc5,skc7)*.
% 3.65/3.88  543[0:SpL:49.2,13.0] || contains_slb(u,v) strictly_less_than(v,lookup_slb(u,v))* ok(remove_cpq(triple(w,u,x),v))*+ -> .
% 3.65/3.88  590[0:Res:60.0,543.2] || contains_slb(skc5,skc7) strictly_less_than(skc7,lookup_slb(skc5,skc7))* -> .
% 3.65/3.88  591[0:MRR:590.0,113.0] || strictly_less_than(skc7,lookup_slb(skc5,skc7))* -> .
% 3.65/3.88  593[0:Res:56.0,591.0] ||  -> less_than(lookup_slb(skc5,skc7),skc7)*l.
% 3.65/3.88  623[0:SpL:50.2,13.0] || contains_slb(u,v) less_than(lookup_slb(u,v),v) ok(remove_cpq(triple(w,u,bad),v))* -> .
% 3.65/3.88  3896[0:Res:60.0,623.2] || contains_slb(skc5,skc7) less_than(lookup_slb(skc5,skc7),skc7)*l -> .
% 3.65/3.88  3897[0:MRR:3896.0,3896.1,113.0,593.0] ||  -> .
% 3.65/3.88  % SZS output end Refutation
% 3.65/3.88  Formulae used in the proof : l14_co totality ax40 ax41 stricly_smaller_definition ax43 ax45 ax44
% 3.65/3.88  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------