TSTP Solution File: SWV376+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV376+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:42:34 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.47s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (  11 unt;   4 nHn;  19 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   35 (   0 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;  16 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(6,axiom,
    ok(triple(skc15,skc16,skc17)),
    file('SWV376+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ~ ok(triple(skc12,skc13,skc14)),
    file('SWV376+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    ~ ok(triple(u,v,bad)),
    file('SWV376+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(20,axiom,
    ( ok(triple(u,v,w))
    | equal(w,bad) ),
    file('SWV376+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(22,axiom,
    succ_cpq(triple(skc12,skc13,skc14),triple(skc15,skc16,skc17)),
    file('SWV376+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(36,axiom,
    ( ~ ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(u,v,w)))
    | ok(triple(u,v,w)) ),
    file('SWV376+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(54,axiom,
    ( ~ ok(triple(skc18,skc19,skc20))
    | ~ succ_cpq(triple(u,v,w),triple(x,y,z))
    | ~ ok(triple(x,y,z))
    | ok(triple(u,v,w)) ),
    file('SWV376+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(55,axiom,
    ( ~ succ_cpq(triple(u,v,w),triple(x,y,z))
    | ~ ok(triple(x,y,z))
    | ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(skc18,skc19,skc20)))
    | ok(triple(u,v,w)) ),
    file('SWV376+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(68,plain,
    equal(skc14,bad),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[20,11]),
    [iquote('0:Res:20.0,11.0')] ).

cnf(73,plain,
    ( ~ ok(triple(skc15,skc16,skc17))
    | ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(skc18,skc19,skc20)))
    | ok(triple(skc12,skc13,skc14)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[22,55]),
    [iquote('0:Res:22.0,55.0')] ).

cnf(74,plain,
    ( ~ ok(triple(skc18,skc19,skc20))
    | ~ ok(triple(skc15,skc16,skc17))
    | ok(triple(skc12,skc13,skc14)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[22,54]),
    [iquote('0:Res:22.0,54.1')] ).

cnf(78,plain,
    ( ~ ok(triple(skc15,skc16,skc17))
    | ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(skc18,skc19,skc20)))
    | ok(triple(skc12,skc13,bad)) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[68,73]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:68.0,73.2')] ).

cnf(79,plain,
    ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(skc18,skc19,skc20))),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[78,6,14]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:78.0,78.2,6.0,14.0')] ).

cnf(80,plain,
    ( ~ ok(triple(skc18,skc19,skc20))
    | ~ ok(triple(skc15,skc16,skc17))
    | ok(triple(skc12,skc13,bad)) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[68,74]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:68.0,74.2')] ).

cnf(81,plain,
    ~ ok(triple(skc18,skc19,skc20)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[80,6,14]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:80.1,80.2,6.0,14.0')] ).

cnf(90,plain,
    equal(skc20,bad),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[20,81]),
    [iquote('0:Res:20.0,81.0')] ).

cnf(91,plain,
    ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(skc18,skc19,bad))),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[90,79]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:90.0,79.0')] ).

cnf(125,plain,
    ok(triple(skc18,skc19,bad)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[91,36]),
    [iquote('0:Res:91.0,36.0')] ).

cnf(126,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[125,14]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:125.0,14.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SWV376+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 20:44:35 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.47  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.47  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.47  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.47  SPASS derived 49 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 73 clauses.
% 0.20/0.47  SPASS allocated 85372 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.47  SPASS spent	0:00:00.11 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.47  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.20/0.47  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.47  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.47  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.47  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 19 :
% 0.20/0.47  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.47  Formulae used in the proof : l12_co ax40 ax41 l12_l13 l12_induction ax31
% 0.20/0.47  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------