TSTP Solution File: SWV372+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV372+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:42:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.48s 0.69s
% Output   : Refutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (  13 unt;   6 nHn;  23 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   37 (   0 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(13,axiom,
    equal(findmin_cpq_res(u),removemin_cpq_res(u)),
    file('SWV372+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    phi(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(skc3,skc4,skc5))),
    file('SWV372+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    ~ ok(triple(u,v,bad)),
    file('SWV372+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(51,axiom,
    ( ~ contains_slb(u,v)
    | contains_cpq(triple(w,u,x),v) ),
    file('SWV372+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(52,axiom,
    equal(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(u,create_slb,v)),triple(u,create_slb,bad)),
    file('SWV372+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(53,axiom,
    ( ~ phi(triple(u,v,w))
    | ok(triple(u,v,w)) ),
    file('SWV372+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(59,axiom,
    ( equal(findmin_cpq_res(triple(u,v,w)),findmin_pqp_res(u))
    | equal(v,create_slb) ),
    file('SWV372+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(62,axiom,
    ~ contains_pq(i(triple(skc3,skc4,skc5)),findmin_cpq_res(triple(skc3,skc4,skc5))),
    file('SWV372+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(69,axiom,
    ( ~ contains_cpq(triple(u,v,w),x)
    | contains_pq(i(triple(u,v,w)),x) ),
    file('SWV372+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(87,axiom,
    ( equal(u,create_slb)
    | contains_slb(u,findmin_pqp_res(v))
    | equal(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(v,u,w)),triple(v,update_slb(u,findmin_pqp_res(v)),bad)) ),
    file('SWV372+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(95,plain,
    ( equal(u,create_slb)
    | equal(removemin_cpq_res(triple(v,u,w)),findmin_pqp_res(v)) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[13,59]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:13.0,59.0')] ).

cnf(96,plain,
    ~ contains_pq(i(triple(skc3,skc4,skc5)),removemin_cpq_res(triple(skc3,skc4,skc5))),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[13,62]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:13.0,62.0')] ).

cnf(106,plain,
    ~ contains_cpq(triple(skc3,skc4,skc5),removemin_cpq_res(triple(skc3,skc4,skc5))),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[69,96]),
    [iquote('0:Res:69.1,96.0')] ).

cnf(167,plain,
    ~ contains_slb(skc4,removemin_cpq_res(triple(skc3,skc4,skc5))),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[51,106]),
    [iquote('0:Res:51.1,106.0')] ).

cnf(172,plain,
    ( ~ contains_slb(skc4,findmin_pqp_res(skc3))
    | equal(skc4,create_slb) ),
    inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[95,167]),
    [iquote('0:SpL:95.1,167.0')] ).

cnf(1025,plain,
    ( ~ phi(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(u,v,w)))
    | equal(v,create_slb)
    | contains_slb(v,findmin_pqp_res(u))
    | ok(triple(u,update_slb(v,findmin_pqp_res(u)),bad)) ),
    inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[87,53]),
    [iquote('0:SpL:87.2,53.0')] ).

cnf(1037,plain,
    ( ~ phi(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(u,v,w)))
    | equal(v,create_slb)
    | contains_slb(v,findmin_pqp_res(u)) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[1025,17]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:1025.3,17.0')] ).

cnf(1046,plain,
    ( equal(skc4,create_slb)
    | contains_slb(skc4,findmin_pqp_res(skc3)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[14,1037]),
    [iquote('0:Res:14.0,1037.0')] ).

cnf(1048,plain,
    equal(skc4,create_slb),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[1046,172]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:1046.1,172.0')] ).

cnf(1049,plain,
    phi(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(skc3,create_slb,skc5))),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1048,14]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:1048.0,14.0')] ).

cnf(1058,plain,
    phi(triple(skc3,create_slb,bad)),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[52,1049]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:52.0,1049.0')] ).

cnf(1067,plain,
    ok(triple(skc3,create_slb,bad)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1058,53]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1058.0,53.0')] ).

cnf(1068,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[1067,17]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:1067.0,17.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13  % Problem  : SWV372+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 15:24:16 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.48/0.69  
% 0.48/0.69  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.48/0.69  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.48/0.69  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.48/0.69  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.48/0.69  SPASS derived 869 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 436 clauses.
% 0.48/0.69  SPASS allocated 98707 KBytes.
% 0.48/0.69  SPASS spent	0:00:00.31 on the problem.
% 0.48/0.69  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.48/0.69  		0:00:00.05 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.48/0.69  		0:00:00.02 for inferences.
% 0.48/0.69  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.48/0.69  		0:00:00.17 for the reduction.
% 0.48/0.69  
% 0.48/0.69  
% 0.48/0.69  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 23 :
% 0.48/0.69  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.48/0.69  Formulae used in the proof : ax53 l8_co ax40 ax39 ax46 l8_lX ax51 l8_li56 ax47
% 0.48/0.69  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------